New York has gone to shit. Beautiful, beautiful shit. In Crysis 3, the speedily developed sequel to 2011's near-future shooter, Mother Nature shows Lady Liberty how to properly dominate a skyline.
yes hype it hype it even more let's see how it can stand on consoles the likes of uncharted3/the last of us/god of war ascension on pc hell yes it will look better but on consoles going by crysis 2 on consoles just no
WTF? Have you seen The Last of Us or God of War: Ascension running yet? The answer is most clearly no, so what the HELL are you going on about?
What does it matter? God of War 3 and Uncharted 3 are amazing looking games. They already give us an idea of what Acsension and The Last of Us will look like. Crysis 2 on the other hand was a graphical and performing disaster.
Lol, what a joke...
hey, can i see these exclusive videos that only you own. would love to compare all 3 games.
But I only thought PS3 exclusives looked the best? Man, this is going to suck for the PS3 only fanboys, and their quest to continue to talk nothing but graphics.
ps3 is still more capable than the 360 and no multiplat will exceed some of the ps3 exclusives in the graphics department. the reason most third party developers cant utilize the ps3 full capabilities is because the cell is a very different cpu than your average one that you find on your pc, laptop or even the xbox 360 instead of the traditional, now more commonly multi cores on the cpus, the cell have one main POWER PC core which distributes the tasks and send them to the six SPEs that are found on the cell. one spe for physics and one spe for the OS etc. but mind you, SPEs arent true physical cores on their own like your traditional cpu, and they rely on the main POWER PC core. so thats why its so difficult to program for the ps3, which left it with untapped potential that hasnt been reached only but with sonys own first party developers because they are used to the hardware and they are directly supported by sony, not to mention that they only have to worry about one version unlike multplat developers.
way to hype up your console of choice cause you have NOT seen any gameplay video of GOW4 or The last of Us cause those videos do not exist! Crysis and all this graphics talk has made me nauseous cause the game play has become HORRIBLE!!
It doesn't matter how good it looks, just make it better to play than that horrific second title.
...until the next 'best-looking game we've ever seen' These articles are pointless because graphics/tech/COMPUTERS will always get better. It's like says 'Tomorrow will have sun'.
As always, CVG hyping up an overrated title. Meanwhile, looking back on Battlefield on PC pretty much decimated the new Crysis trailer making this title moot. I just wonder, would this game actually PERFORM with stability? They may hit graphics on consoles but the performance are some of the worst I've seen in the game, not even reducing the resolution could fix that. I wonder what else they have in store for us?
Like I haven't heard that every month of this console generation. *fart noise* *peace sign to the air* "Jog on"....That's a Hot Fuzz reference for anyone who gets it.
Crysis 2 was also hyped up in the same way on consoles lol and was meh imo. And definitely didnt look as good as Killzone 2 or 3. I wont even mention Uncharted or GOW bcus that would be a disrespect to these titles that hold the graphical medals for the best looking games on a console. Crysis 3 is lucky if it looks as good as Uncharted 2. We can say all this because Crytek already pulled a scam the first time And that is not only my opinon sites such as "lens of truth" did side to side comparisons between Kz3 and Crysis 2 and KZ was the clear winner. They can keep this bs game if its anything like Crysis 2 with its boring gameplay and framerate issues. So much destruction and mayhem in Kz3 yet you never saw framerate issues then comes Crysis 2 with its limited enemies on screen doing hardly anything and framerate issues all over lol They can keep it!!!!
Killzone looks [pretty good but gameplay is CRAP, control is loose and no real fun. If you look at the sales then you know this to be true.
Can't compare games that don't use the same amount of resource. Uncharted or god of war...all clearly linear with little to no destructibility of environments or physics. In Crysis 2 you scaled all over the place, kicked cars, threw people, threw objects, swam, climbed etc. If Crytek made a game where all the camera angles were FIXED or only had to only worry about controls, graphical presentation to make cutscenes meld with gameplay. Then we could compare. but honestly Crysis 2 with all the crap you can do it holds up quite well and look beautiful. now crysis 3 is said to have an open world feel? Now you tell me what open world "exclusive" can even compete with that?
Linear games are all story-focus based.. something Crysis clearly lacks. It makes up for the so-called sandbox system which really is an open area fighting waves and waves of respawning soldiers/aliens. We constantly see a copy/paste of environments through and through and at the end of the day, it still feels like a linear experience. I still think "Halo" does it better than Crysis even without the "quirks" the Cryengine 3 delivers. Meanwhile, Crysis on consoles are clearly performing terribly with frame-rate issues even with the advantage of being sub-hd (in other wards, it ain't polished). Something the top PS3 exclusives don't suffer with.
Will WiiU see this game?
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.