Quantcast
140°
Submitted by PaPa-Slam 422d ago | opinion piece

Whiteout Doesn't Work on Software: Why Mass Effect Deserves Not To Be Neutered

Joystick Division: It's finally time for me to weigh in on the Mass Effect 3 debate. To be fair, I need to paint the picture of where I stand with the series. I liked ME1, loved ME2, and I am currently playing ME3. I do NOT know the ending that has caused so much controversy, mainly because I haven't had time to play the game through. Being the completionist that I am, it's going to take me some time before I get to this allegedly horrible finale, but it's safe to say that I am a fan of the Mass Effect universe. But I don't need to know the ending of the game to have an opinion about the controversy, because this isn't all about Mass Effect. (Mass Effect 3, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)

FrightfulActions  +   422d ago | Intelligent
"I am currently playing ME3. I do NOT know the ending that has caused so much controversy"

You should really consider actually getting to know why fans are upset, before you tell them all why they're wrong. If you're really such a fan of Mass Effect and know anything about the lore and been following the story, I get the impression you'll change your tune of when you see the ending.

People who never played it really seem to underestimate just how piss-poor the ending actually was. Fans are not exaggerating with their disdain. The worst bit of is that its actual fans of the series who get hurt the most. Fans who actually care about the story, the characters, fans who have been playing the series for years, who had tons of game hours poured into the first two games.

The only people I can see supporting this ending and having a justified case is those who either didn't play the first two, or didn't /really/ play the first two. Those that just skip cutscenes and do the bare-minimum just to be about to shoot stuff again. If that's how they want to play, that's there business, but its like basing your opinion on a novel by its summery instead of actually reading all the pages.

Even then, that justification doesn't go very far since those who didn't play or follow the story don't really have much right to take part in an argument they don't understand.

You say you liked the first two games, so you played them good. Before you jump to tell all the fans why they're wrong about wanting to change this great "Artistic Vision" that the DaVinchi's at Bioware regurgitated up on a canvas, wait until you yourself have actually finished it. If you still feel that way, well, I don't agree nor understand how you could, but that's your business so whatever. I have a feeling you'd change your tone once you face the disaster all the fans are upset about.

Mass Effect 3's ending is great to newcomers in the series, those with little attachment or knowledge of the previous titles, and its vague enough that it opens up possibilities for future titles without having to take much into account other than "we say a green/red/blue light then Reapers died". The ones who are hurt by the ending are the fans, the ones who should the main target audience. It's quite depressing really to see such a wonderful franchise get so badly mistreated.
krazykombatant  +   422d ago
This franchise was the only reason having a 360 had made since for me all of these years, but with them botching the ending I just look at my xbox and think what could have been if i had perhaps gotten a ps3 or gone pc. I've left bioware and have now joined the ranks of CD Projekt Red.

Get treated a hell of a lot better there.
zekk  +   422d ago
me a lot of my friends have been playing since day 1 for mass effect and we all don't seem to mind the ending. so before you judge WHO should enjoy what is not for you to decide.
zekk  +   422d ago
......so people are disagreeing that i'm not entitled to my own opinion?
mep69  +   422d ago
I agree with you completely
Kyosuke_Sanada  +   422d ago
Bubbles for the intelligent post.
tdogchristy90  +   422d ago
Amen to the author! I couldn't agree more.

@Frightful,

His issue isn't so much an issue with the fans being upset or that they follow such a story to have it so drastically changed. His issues is like he mentioned, from an artistic standpoint. You can't tell Leonardo to change the Mona lisa because you disagree with it. Bioware put a lot of effort into this franchise that it is a little unfair for the community to demand a change when they had no sacrificing to make the game (ie the hours at work/away from families). It is not the communities property, it's biowares. Same goes for any form of art, Harry potter or star wars. Sure you can be upset but it is a form of art to which a group of people own the rights to. To tell someone what to do with their life/time is not fair. His argument is this my way or the high way system that has developed among society. We should all just agree to disagree.
#2 (Edited 422d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
krazykombatant  +   422d ago
Don't feed into the bullshit of the "artistic vision".

That franchise wouldn't be anywhere if it wasn't for the people buying it up way back when ME came out. They promised us entirely different endings, a shepard distinct for every gameplay and person. We didn't get that. They simply just didn't know how to end the game.

The fans then even found a way to help them out since they didn't know how to finish the triology and gave them the Indoc theory.

The author hasn't finished the damn game and he is bitching at the people, who feel that bioware LIED to our faces.

Art becomes expensive and valuable when the artist dies, thats the best career move an artist can make, he can die. Its no lie, just how it is. ME is a mass product. It is sold to make tons of profit.

It would be nice if bioware could just come out and say "we didn't know how to end the game sorry" but they're too proud to do that.

Can gamers do anything about it no, you're right its their game. However, just you watch what will happen when they release another game. I would be surprised if they didn't suffer in terms of sales in the future.
ShinraE5  +   422d ago
Bioware has the right to create. So I do agree with you only when discussing the right to make a work, and to not have to change it based on audience demands.

However, we the audience have the right to evaluate critique an discuss. If they have the right to make a product, we have the right to praise or insult it. Its the creator-audience balance.

So if anyone thought we were entitled to a new ending, they were wrong. However, there is nothing wrong with the "mass"es ripping into the ending, as it really was just horribly done.

ME1 & ME2 & 95% of ME3 were all brilliantly executed, with clear and concise dialogue. The last 5 minutes felt like they handed off writing duties to some developer's kid and his pals so they could have a week off. The nose dive in quality is legendary.

If you dont agree with the endings lack of quality, that is your right to your opinion. But we, the fans who didnt enjoy the ending by any means, are allowed to think otherwise - and to vocalize those thoughts
tdogchristy90  +   422d ago
Amen! To diagree is one thing. Entitlement is something different.
HunterRose  +   422d ago
I'm so glad that there are people out there that understand the truth of this situation like you. I'm all for voicing opinions on the ending, whether someone hated it, liked it, or just shrugged and moved on. If this doesn't happen, how would developers know what people liked?

But demanding or expecting a change in the product is just counter-productive.
CAPSLOCKFURY  +   422d ago
Bioware reps flat out lied while marketing the product. The ending was exactly what they said it would NOT be. If this had been any other medium, they would be getting hit with false advertising right now. Had Bioware not specifically stated, multiple times, that the game would not end exactly as it did, people wouldn't have the ammo they do.

The "artistic integrity" argument is a strawman built by gaming journalists that has no bearing on the actual issues with the end product that we received. Say you pay a painter for a portrait of a dog and get a painting of a banana. I highly doubt you're just going to eat your money quietly and quote his artistic integrity.

@tddog :

Yes, if you commission a painting. I'm just talking about walking up to an artist's shop and buying something they already have completed. In the real world, you can see the painting before buying it. So just assume that it's covered up and he promises that it's a dog.

The lack of a contract does not nullify the act of consciously misrepresenting what you're releasing either. A lot of the statements were made after the game went gold, so they knew they were being less than honest about it. We paid for something that was not as advertised. On the upside, we did get Marauder Shields.
#2.3 (Edited 422d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
tdogchristy90  +   422d ago
Though if you were to commission a painting you would have had some sort of contract written up. We do not sign contracts with writers and producers on how a movie or book is made.
varsek  +   422d ago
how could you disagree with a painting ? that it's ending is bullsh*t ? that would be really something amusing to experience.
and to the "changing" part, do you expect leonardo's zombie ass to crawl from the great beyond and repaint it ?
i don't understand people who compare a god damned painting(which is painted and that's it, it is done and it doesn't continue or evolve any further) to a videogame which art is contained within hours and hours of storytelling, action, drama and your own decisions which shape your further development in many different ways.
I personally think that the endings were "problematic".
stragomccloud  +   421d ago
Actually often you could. Because back then artists often painted for their patrons. Whoever their patrons were at the time, and if a work wasn't to the patrons liking, it would be altered.
You can alter works while maintaining artistic integrity. Keeps the soul, change the details. Artists deal with that all the time.
varsek  +   421d ago
AMEN to that !!!
Megaton  +   422d ago
Nothing is being removed, only built upon. Your rant is invalid.
EmperorDalek  +   422d ago
*SPOILERS*
The ending made no sence AT ALL. I literally can't believe that was the end. The creation of the Reapers was to kill organics... so organics don't create different synthetics to turn against them... The biggest problem is WTF was Joker doing? Why and how did my entire team just go back to the Normandy and leave the battle?

I don't see any of the sqaud members doing that, escpecially Javik, even if it was possible.

It all felt like a hallucination. I hope new DLC adds the REAL ending soon. And if it was real... Then they just screwed up the whole series. That is not an exaggeration.
*/SPOILERS*

I was thinking that everyone was exaggerating, thinking "how can the last
15 minutes ruin the series?". Then I beat it, and I liked it at first, but I realised how bad it was after 1-2 days. The indoctrination theory still gives me some hope that the ending wasn't the ending.

ME is the best series i've played, but if that REALLY WAS the ending... then it's painful even thinking of playing any of them again. That's how bad the ending is.
#4 (Edited 422d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
stragomccloud  +   421d ago
You have to understand. Bioware made this whole series to slap it's fans in the face. Probably started as a joke a few years ago, then it became an actual game. They want to be the author of their own destruction, so they did this to lose as many fans as possible. /sarcasm/
varsek  +   421d ago
actually, what you wrote would make more sense than the ending :D
stragomccloud  +   420d ago
I realized that after I wrote it. I thought to myself... am I being sarcastic? It kind of makes sense. Heck I might try to do something like that if I had the power. :P
It's like a big joke. Just for yourself.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

The Future Of PlayStation Plus Worries Me

9m ago - Gamers-Association editor Ridge Dermody isn't optimistic about the future of PlayStation Plus. | PS3
10°

STN: Saint's Row IV Preview

17m ago - STN @ E3: I’ll just get this out of the way up front, Saint’s Row The Third is one of my fav... | PC
40°

TOP 5 Worst Moments Of E3 2013

38m ago - The Tyuno Project: "E3 2013 is official over. This year was a amazing year for the video gaming i... | PS4
40°

Elder Scrolls Online – My Final Hope For An MMORPG

1h ago - Blaine of Camelot Post Writes: I’ve been playing MMO games for a little over 15 years now and... | PC
Ad

LEGO Batman 2: DC Super Heroes (Wii U) Review

Now - The Wii U is still getting table scraps. Find out how the latest LEGO Batman game fares on the machine. | Promoted post
40°

The 5 greatest retro cities you wish you could visit

1h ago - Lets take a tour of some of the finest cities from the 16-bit era | Culture
Related content from friends