El33tonline writes: "EA and Danger Close have just released a trailer showcasing in-game footage for the pair's Medal of Honor: Warfighter for the very first time - don't waste any more time and watch below!"
Color me intrigued.
Very much intrigued!
Idk, there was something about the original. I loved the historical and respect aspect tied to it, being more real world and based on fact. But something about it bugged me, the graphics or game mechanics, idk, it just didn't feel like it had enough quality compared to others on offer at the time. It just kind of left me "meh" Or maybe my hopes were just too high. Either way, I'm intrigued by this one, it looks better and I hope it is better this time around. *crosses fingers*
Man I love the Frostbite 2 engine. Hopefully gameplay is fluid because this could be an amazing game.
@tdogchristy90 "there was something about the original. I loved the historical and respect aspect tied to it, being more real world and based on fact". I agree and is one of the reasons I am less excited for this game. MoH suffered technical problems mixed with an average multiplayer but the core single player game felt refreshing a real. I can see why they have gone the other way considering the reception MoH got but it is still as shame. Not many games go the realistic route which is why it was nice to see MoH do it and do it quite well.
I'm a long-time Medal of Honor fan. I look forward to this.
Woot! I love Medal of Honor.
The background music is sort of like what they had in BF3 trailer and even in the BF3 game. As for the gameplay, it looks like the footage of the single player campaign. I'd rather multiplayer footage because DICE just killed BF3 after the patch and it'd be great to move on to something else (I refuse to play any COD games). Until then, I'll be playing some awesome single player games.
nothing like the original, but i'm still hopeful that this will be a good installment. Based off of the MoH website it's based off of real stories written by Tier 1 operators who were on duty so maybe (Despite the Cobra world attack) this will still have a realistic feel.
I want to see pure gameplay footage. The last MoH game had similar well produced marketing trailers, but look how it turned out.
It'll be nothing we haven't played before
Very interesting... But too bad it's published by EA, which means I won't buy it.
thats the pc version. it has to be. which will mean thats what we can expect for the next generation. which makes me happy :) sorry (cough) i mean.... intrigued
Yeah, similar to BF3, we can expect that EA will release mostly PC footage to show off the game. The console versions may look decent, but not on the same level as that video.
console version will look similar to how battlefield 3 looked on consoles.
SWEET finally a game where I can play as the army from my Country (Norway). Global warfare...seems interesting! They are going head to head with Cryteks F2P Warface perhaps?
If there is a WiiU version then it will probably look slightly worse than that but better than PS3/360 with some special tablet stuff.... If not then I'll get the PC version for the new laptop I'm getting over summer... Got any ideas? PM ME.
@ yabhero dafu* did i just read?
It seems to be a nice iteration of the realistic wargames FPS genre, and has pretty graphics. I checked out the trailer hoping it would be something intriguing for me, though, and it just wasn't. Nothing against the game or the genre or its fans, but I'm just sick of this style of realistic, real-world military war FPS. It just bores me. The plots don't interest me, the world and weaponry doesn't interest me. I know this is the most popular genre on the planet right now (or one of them anyway) but I like a little more character depth, some good mystery and a lively, imaginative world I can put myself into. This kind of thing just doesn't satisfy my urges.
Well you need to play Halo with its scifi action. I alway prefer Scifi over real world action, but I still have a place for these military shooters like Battlefield 3 for my PC!!!! And it's much better than Call of Duty.
i feel ya. im only lookin forward to ghost recon this year. will not be picking up another modern war fps any time soon
Apparently no one remembers how awesome the first MoH trailer was vs how generic the game was.
Dude, you must have heard this a million times, but your name made me giggle like a schoolgirl. Huzzah to you, good sir.
The only thing I remember is how generic Bobby Kotex is,other then that I think Danger Close has learned there lesson from the first MOH disaster.SP was great but the MP was not up to par.This MOH has alot of potential thats for sure.Lets hope they can deliever another epic game.
was generic, but the single player was brilliant. So good infact I completed it 3 times :)
People said the same shit about the last MOH, game died and was poor fps shooter. I'll wait intill MOH proves itself before hyping anything, let see if this one lasts.
I think it also looks interesting. but actually, I am quite surprised by this trailer, and not in the best of ways. This is going in a completely different direction from what they told EGM and OXM as to what they wanted to do. It looks a hell alot like "one of those Hollywood blockbuster types" and less like a "personal heartfelt story of the relationship between a family man and the war he fights for those at home" (as quoted from Official Playstation Magazine).
Hey guys, finally a game trailer without dubstep!
Wow this is looking good imo. I cant wait to see more at E3! I hope sp is longer and the multiplayer is a lot better
Going by recent trends, I don't think the SP is going to be longer, but it will be more impactful and more quality than 2010's game. Better MP is a given - they'll need to compete with Call of Duty and EA will need to even compete with itself and Battlefield, so I'm guessing something a little different (no vehicles) and perhaps targeting CoD crowd? A two-pronged attack seems likely.
2010s game had an awesome if albeit short campaign. it was by far the most authentic, respectful and realistic feeling modern war game i have ever played - which was what i was expecting. however it had a multiplayer mode that can be described as a mash up of battlefield and call of duty but having none of eithers strengths...
Hmmm I'm very skeptical about this game. I was really looking forward to the one before this with all the good trailers and stuff they were releasing. It hyped me up and I seriously thought it would be my new favorite FPS because well, Its MOH. So I'll try not to hype myself so much this time around. Also, them releasing MOH means that no BC3 this year :(.
Global warfighters US SEAL AUSTRALIAN SASR NORWEGIAN FSK/HJK CANADIAN JTF-2 BRITISH SAS US OGA POLISH GROM SOUTH KOREAN UDT/SEAL RUSSIAN SPECTSNAZ (ALFA GROUP) GERMAN KSK SWEDISH SOG US SFOD-D PRE-ORDER FOR 40 HOUR TACTICAL HEADSTART 40 Hours very nice Im in where do i sign up.
Now the haters will jump on the hype train. so predictable. Day 1 for me though, I loved the first one.
Haters? The last title was technically a mess and critically received as average at best, I don't think being excited about the sequel because of the improvements they've made, 1 developer, frostbite, less influence from 'other' games etc means I'm a 'hater' getting on the hype train. Get off your soap box.
There were tons of doubt that the game would be any good as soon as it was announced. People even hated thee name and basically shunned it because they thought it had nothing to prove or that it was another generic title. Well, MOH 2010 had a great singleplayer campaign albeit some technical issues. The guns had a great weight to them (The shotgun was amazing!) the tone was very convincing, the music was perfect. The emotion was there in the game, something a vast amount of shooters lacked. You are just looking at the "tech" side; How well did it run, or how intricate was the game design? You need to look at what the game offered, what was presented to you. Look past the rough edges of the first game and you'd find that MOH 2010 gave you something original and bold: They sacrificed the flair and Michael Bay type explosions for an atmospheric and realistic take on REAL WORLD conflicts.
Well this time they got it going on just right. Danger close doing it all and by that i mean all in house development, Using of course frosbite 2.0. I still need to enlist
The single player of the 1st game was terrible, I mean no words could describe how bad it was. The multiplayer however, although quite cramped was pretty addictive.
They hyped the game so much that when the demo was released, it was a total mess. The actual game was soooo bad that it fell to $40 in a matter of 2 months. Now you can get it for $20 boxed right next to HOMEFRONT. This is 100%/100% DICE, so there's no 2 developers working here to rush a product out. Last time they asked DICE to help finish the game since it wasn't going in the direction they intended. DICE was trying to polish a turd. Now they are hands on
the first one was average because: 1. the single player was handled by danger close using that crappy UE3 engine (to me, thats what ruined it) 2. DICE handled the multiplayer, felt similar to playing battlefield using the original frostbite engine, which isnt a bad thing, but still, if i wanted to play BF at the time, i would just play bad company 2. this is different though. I'd give'em a chance and see what danger close is really capable of. and with a better frostbite 2, heck, im down.
I agree i like the 1st game not the best moh game ive played but was a good mix between cod and operation fashpoint. The biggest problem with the 2010 game was the mp and sp were done by different teams so they did not feel the same and i think this is where it had its problems but this game being done by one team should make for a good game.
"Day 1 for me though, I loved the first one." Same here, love the first one and looking forward to this one.
cod killer... oh nevermind
Looks good for what it is, but it's simply another linear, military FPS. I wish they would show just a little more ambition.
Looks pretty generic but it still could be fun.
with further analysis, judging solely from the trailer. It looks like COD. The mission looks like the last level from MW3 and the boat scene reminded me of the New York scene in the beginning of MW3. It looks like it'll be running in 30 FPS It's a fast paced action packed Michael Bay game (Aimed toward COD crowd this time?) And why does Mother look like Cpt. Price!? I hoped that it would take a more realistic approach like the last one did and that this trailer is just for the flair and hype because it really looks like what COD MW3 should have been if Activision wasn't so cheap.
Have you ever played MoH games before? It's basically a slightly more believable CoD. It's ok to have a modern war action shooter, just as long as they do it right.
the first reboot was a piece of sh*t and the first game i have sold back in years, this one looks better though. hopefully its more polished since imo that was the biggest problem with the last one, it did have potential but just wasnt any good in the end
MW3 was so bad captain price switched franchises ...
Lmfao someone give this man the "Funny comment of the year award" Bubs+ xDDD.
With a shift away from WW1/2 setting.. EA LA need to make this stand out..especially multiplayer. MOH SP campaign was great.. I got the game to pass time by till BF3 hit, but the MP left me thinking "meh" .. went back to BFBC2, so EA, make it stand out, like the original WW settings did. I remember watching Saving Private Ryan then playing MOH front line going WOW. so thats what I want here. WOW!
I recently bought Medal of Honor(2010) and it's a bit rubbish, the MP is dead and a BC2 hack job. The single player mostly consists out of "follow this guy until the credits roll". Moral of the story: It made me reinstall Medal of Honor Airborne because it is fun, open world and most importantly had it's own identity. EA, why did you turn Medal of Honor into a COD fest? I know you want to swim in gold coins, but can't we work something out?
It's the current trend, CoD sells, so publishers don't wanna take risks, and make same kind of rubbish, sad really. For example BF3, mp is amazing, but the sp was terrible, as boring and scripted as CoD... BC's had atleast some freedom in theyr campaigns, they weren't great, but way better than BF3's campaign.. It was a joke. It's a terrible trend where main focus is mass-market, games hold your hand, and be sure to not piss anyone off.. Btw, is the avatar from Eve?
I agree. Personally, I wish they would go back to what made Allied Assault and Frontlines so good. It was just you leading the path trying to find your way through enemy lines on a secret mission to board a U-boat or to destroy a train or something. I miss those days. I guess that's why I keep coming back to them. Because I'm always hoping to have as much fun as I did back then...
Looks very good!
Wow! Loved the first one to death. Definatly will be getting this. I just want to see some multiplayer footage! I actually enjoyed the multiplayer on the first one. It wasnt the best but it was fun at times. Im glad dc are doing the multiplayer this time around though, interested to see what they can do. And Australian SASR!? God I hope they have real Australian voice actors.. Dead Island voice acting was terrible, we sound nothing like that!
I just hope it doesn't incorporate the input lag from Battlefield 3 on the PS3. Using the frostbyte 2 engine is concerning me for this. I had to get rid of my copy of Battlefield 3 because I couldn't stand the input lag.
I'm kind of interested to see more on this game. I actually hate Dice, so while I found MOH 2010 to be a fun campaign, the online was utterly worthless. The campaign had a prone feature and you could switch fire rate of the weapons, while the online played just like a crappy Bad Company game. Glad Dice isn't touching this ones online, it might actually be decent now. Looking forward to seeing a lot more from this game, though its obvious MOH, Battlefield are now on a 2 year development cycle just like COD.
Good. Hopefully the frostbite engine on consoles will look a lot better on smaller maps. I just can't stand B3 on consoles on the big maps, it has terrible jaggies. I must admit I quite enjoyed the last MOH.
The FOV for Medal of Honor was locked at 55 for the Single Player. No SERIOUSLY it was, couldn't stand playing for more than 5 minutes, never touched it again.
Woah, Cpt. Price left Infinity Ward too??? WAH!
Meh. Rave on about graphics all you want, its just another fps. I was hoping the next gen would bring better leaps than just graphics, which should be a given anyway.
Hang on, I've seen this game before.
I definitely will check this out but... I think this game will suffer again from identity crisis. Its trying hard to be COD in so many ways... I mean if you don't tell me the name of that game and just played the trailer I would have thought its the next COD game.
mmm.. Two guys started COD, what do you expect?
i hate to be a negative nancy but its hard for me to be excited for this.I feel like i seen this show before with the release of BF3.All that beautiful pc footage just to be dissapointed with only sub-par to good graphics.Gameplay is still more important than graphics imo & BF3 definently brought the gameplay but i highly doubt that MOH will b as good as BF.ill keep an eye out on this but Starhawk is still my most anticipated.
What I little tested previous MoH, it's pretty much CoD, with more tactical/team-work based infantry warfare. I believe it will stay as that, since this is pretty obvious try from EA to take over some CoD market. I agree with your statement, personally I prefer full warfare gameplay, so it's BF3 (PC) for me too. Starhawk looks pretty interesting too, brings many interesting ideas on consoles first time, like basebuilding in mp, and Warhawk was tons of fun back in days.
Looks good but that may be more down to it being a well put together trailer. Being frostbite 3 I would expect the game will look stunning... but on PC, not consoles unfortunately
I'm not that interested in the title, but I have to say FB2 still amazes, visuals look amazing, very, very impressive.