Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by patlike 1411d ago | rumor

Xbox 720 detailed: Blu-ray inside, always-on netcon required

Xbox 720 has been fully detailed to some third-parties, VG247 has learned, and has been slotted in for a Christmas 2013 released. And yes: of course it’ll have a Blu-ray drive. (Microsoft, Next-Gen, Tag Invalid, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 279
« 1 2 3 »
LX-General-Kaos  +   1411d ago
If this is real.. Having to be connected to the internet at all times will make for some interesting conversation on this site. The rumored specs with the AMD 7000 series is amazing news as well if true. With specs like the ones mentioned, the XBOX 720 would surpass my 6850 sporting Cyberpower PC. Which can already max out most games, so this is great news for people planning on purchasing the XBOX 720.. If these rumors are true.

The inclusion of bluray is nice as well. Hopefully that will eliminate disc swapping for larger games.

I guess its safe to say that XBOX fans should start saving the loose change now. This has a fair chance at being an expensive machine.

Anyway I hope this system is made as strong and as complete as possible so I can prepare for the future of HALO. And for the love of god hopefully a Halowars 2. May we all bow our heads and pray for the return of these monsterous games. With specs like mentioned above, this machine will also do wonders for the #1 pro racing sim franchise in the world. The Forza franchise.

Rated E For Everyone
#1 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(39) | Disagree(76) | Report | Reply
Aggesan  +   1410d ago
People need to chill a bit about the amd 7000. It might be in the low end part of the series just as well as the high end. Your 6850 is way more powerfull than a low end 7000 card.
SleazyChimp  +   1410d ago
Yeah but this is a dual gpu set up. Thats what is exciting. Dual 7000s optimized to the hilt is gonna be a beast. It'll be able to keep pace with pc for the next 5-6yrs just like the 360 did. I also would think this would have to make the new box more than 6x more powerful than the 360 as was reported earlier.
JsonHenry  +   1410d ago
Yeah, you get a lot of bang for your buck out a dual GPU set-up even at the lower end of the Tahiti line-up.
#1.1.2 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(10) | Report
MAJ0R  +   1410d ago
Actually dual GPU's can have more disadvantages than advantages. For one, optimization could be a hard thing for 3rd party games. Even some PC games have a hard time being optimized for two GPU's. Remember, dual GPU's = more heat, more heat = slower clock speeds than a single GPU.

If that's the case and some games can't utilize both GPU's, a game could be running off of an under clocked GPU. It could end up being a similar situation for the next Xbox as the Cell architecture was for the PS3.
Dante112  +   1410d ago
Online all the time? MS think they're slick since you know they're gonna charge for Live again. And what if you have an outage with your internet, can't play single player games? Sucks, guess I won't be buying the next Microsoft console.
dirthurts  +   1410d ago
Dual video cards...eww.
I hope not. Too much heat, scaling issues, compatibility problems, why would MS go through that?
I'm calling BS.
Always on internet? That would be a very poor decision. I know a lot of gamers who don't have their xbox's online.
Halochampian  +   1410d ago

Sony is rumored to be doing the same thing. I really don't like the idea.

Hopefully it's not true for either console
cas85  +   1410d ago
Perhaps it's gonna be a single high performance card for games and a single low performance chip for less demanding tasks such as video playback and applications. It would greatly reduce power consumption, heat, expand the lifespan of the console and reduce energy wastage if the high performance chip could be turned off when not needed. But who knows...
#1.1.7 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report
snipes101  +   1410d ago
The more I hear about the next generation of consoles (anti used games and now always online), rumor or not, the more I am beginning to think that console manufacturers are making a physical effort to make gaming suck. This is garbage and if it's true I might finally say screw it and go PC.
vulcanproject  +   1410d ago
I'll quote myself:

I said for a while Dual GPU would actually be possible, and actually fairly smart to start with and work well in consoles because the developers would be able to code for it.

Why? Well it is a well known fact that two midrange GPUs can edge out a high end, very expensive GPU, while not actually costing any more. One recent example being GTX560 SLI comfortably bests a single GTX580, but actually costs less! This has been going on for some time now and there are prior examples of most generations. 5750 crossfire usually beating or at least matching one GTX285 for considerably less cost.

How is this possible? Simple, midrange or lower mid parts are much much easier and most importantly cheaper to make. They will always have better yields, wider tolerances than big, hot, brand new cutting edge designs.

In short it is far more difficult and often more expensive and ultimately slower to build one big fast chip than it is to just design two smaller slower ones and run them together.

Besides the fact scaling on PC games heavily rely on driver level optimisations to work properly with dual GPUs, console games would have no such hurdles. A developer would design the game to specifically use both GPUs to maximum every time. This is why console hardware is more efficient with its assets anyway, PC does use brute force to beat it.

Designing a good midrange GPU, pairing them together on a hugely fast bandwidth bus and fitting them to a console does actually make more financial and developmental sense than you might imagine.

Saturn had Dual graphics, so it is not a new idea for consoles.

Also, the kind of access developers could have to a pair of GPUs could work very much like Lucid Hydra where you can split scene rendering between the GPUs to get superb scaling rather than brute force dumb alternate frame rendering.
#1.1.9 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(7) | Report
tokugawa  +   1410d ago
how much ram?? has a figure been mentioned??
iggsta3o5  +   1410d ago
Sleazy Chimp graphics cards for computers release twice a year, and processors ounce a year. By the time this console hits the market it would only be 1-2 years before the console becomes obsolete. This timeline is being optimistic at best. The reason consoles will never compare to PC graphics and tech is because they would have to build new consoles every year. It would be to expensive and not in any way profitable.
#1.1.11 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report
Information Minister  +   1410d ago
@ vulcanproject:

True, but don't forget that we're talking about a console here, so you have to factor in power consumption, heat output, PCB complexity, form factor and weight. Having 2 GTX560 in SLI, each with their own individual board, heatsink and fan on a PC is completely different from applying that same combination of GPUs on a console with limited space. Even if the 2 chips themselves were cheaper than a more powerful single GPU, the cost of integrating them on the system would be higher. Failure rates would also be higher, as you would have more components that could malfunction.

Also, one of the main reasons why the Saturn was more expensive than the PS1 was because of how complex the thing was to assemble, with its higher number of individual chips, which in turn made it harder to program for.

Personally, I won't give this rumor much credit.
Rumor  +   1410d ago
I'm really excited for this next gen of consoles. It's my college years also so I'm a bit afraid for my future :-0
vulcanproject  +   1410d ago
@ Info minister.

I pre empted your thoughts, lower down in the discussion about power consumption, heat, layout etc outlining how it is indeed possible, economically viable in the current situation. Go have a read. They cover virtually everything you raised and explained them in detail. The cost along with power consumption itself is becoming more and more favourable for two smaller chips, as i explained. The fact a better cooling system would cost a few dollars more but a larger chip in the near future economics of the semiconductor industry could costs tens more, for each part.

PC multi GPU is a different proposition from a custom console, but nearly only in positive ways. The fact we have seen dual GPU before in a console was just an example of how this is easily more possible than you and others have made out.

Having seen the way the industry is going, I consider myself in a decent position to explain this to naysayers of such an idea.

Indeed it would be far easier to build a console chipset to accommodate 2 graphics chips and far more compact and controllable in a custom design than any PC. I pointed out about fail rates in the lower post too....

Saturn was a mess because it was not designed carefully enough and the concept was flawed. But then it WAS out long before modern dual GPU technology in PC systems became very commonplace. Since Saturn launched it is obvious that dual GPU technology has matured massively, over the past 8 years.

As i have said in my post right here and the one further below, it is entirely viable at this point in time and indeed if manufacturers have looked into the future as they should even more viable then!
#1.1.14 (Edited 1409d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
ChrisW  +   1410d ago
I was hoping that MS wouldn't have to resort to Blu-Ray. But then again, if they don't do digital download, their choices are slim.
Fishy Fingers  +   1410d ago
Why? Its established, future proof for the life of the next gen. Cheap, flexible, read/write speeds are much improved.

Introducing a new format would be a pointless expense to the manufacturers, to the production companies (middle men) and most importantly, to us, the consumer.
Tonester925  +   1410d ago
yeah what happened to the "We don't need Blu-Ray"
ziggurcat  +   1410d ago
@ tonester925:

i think that went away as soon as X360 owners saw that they were getting stuck with games on 2 - 3 discs.

also, content on a few games (i believe lost planet 2, and FFXIII) had to get cut due to the lack of space.
sak500  +   1410d ago

You know what happened to "We don't need Blu-Ray", it lasted 7 years Dec 2005 ~ Dec 2013 (new xbox). Ordered in Dec 2k5 i got mine in Jan2k6. Glad I didn't have to pay premium for a trial underutilized storage device which was still not needed at the end of the current generation.

Dual / Triple discs don't matter to PC and 360 owners only handful of games even this late require 2 Discs at the most. I surely would be p#$##d also when the promised uber BD games still ended up being 5~6 hours and graphics at par with the DVD based console.

I never bought BD player as well I got all my HD watching on media tanks and xb360. But if the next gen xbox comes with BD it will be teh right time.

WHat i dont like about this rumored idea of always on net requirement. I doubt ms will go that path.
#1.2.4 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(21) | Disagree(46) | Report
insomnium2   1410d ago | Trolling | show
_Aarix_  +   1410d ago
Blu ray is just a higher storage disc. Nothing magical about it like you guys practically say it is. It doesnt sense that microsoft would deal with patents and crap whenever they easily have the resourses to make their own media format.

It wasnt needed as bad as you think anyway. I mean after seeing all the content gears of war and skyrim had and only used one disc. Though next gen dvd will be suicide.
#1.2.6 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(19) | Report
PimpDaddy  +   1410d ago
What made sak500's comment a fanboy comment? He is correct. Blu-Ray wasn't needed this generation as far as for use in videogames.

95% of all Xbox 360 games run on one disc. The games that use multiple discs did not ruin the gameplay experience whatsoever.

I bought my PS3 to have a Blu-Ray player for movies and to also play a few PS3 exclusives. That's it. The value of Blu-Ray this generation was as an HD movie player. The short single player campaigns and mandatory installs for PS3 games just further proves this point.
Christopher  +   1410d ago
***Blu-Ray wasn't needed this generation as far as for use in videogames. ***

If you didn't have BD this generation, you wouldn't have had it going forward. The fact of the matter is that people grow to fully utilize new technology. If the technology is only put out absolutely when it is needed, you prevent rapid progress.

So, without BD last decade, this decade would be playing catch up.
Christopher  +   1410d ago
***Blu ray is just a higher storage disc. Nothing magical about it like you guys practically say it is.***

So is the DVD, but the DVD was an advancement on read rates and storage.

BD allows for a higher average/constant read/write speed (means you can stream data at higher rates at a constant rate rather than the variable rate of DVDs) and is also more durable.

If that's not enough and you downplay it? You're the same person who thinks that 8 cores is just 8x as many cores as we used to have, so that's not much.
Hanif-876  +   1410d ago
@ ChrisW
Please clap for the most retarded comment of the day!
PimpDaddy  +   1410d ago
My statement stands. The Xbox 360 and Wii got by this generation without Blu-Ray. So it wasn't needed. Sony could have used DVD this generation too and been just fine.

Edit: Pixelsword. How many games were "gimped"? If you saying that a few games out of hundreds of games required more than one DVD disc is proof of Blu-Ray being needed then I guess CD-ROM wasn't good enough for the PS1 either since I had games that used multiple CD's. Again my statement stands. Blu-Ray was not needed. It was a luxury and not a necessity.
#1.2.11 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(21) | Report
pixelsword  +   1410d ago

If every game could fit on one DVD I'd agree with ya, but since not only were games intentionally gimped because of DVD, but there are a number of instances were two or more discs were needed; so no, although I won't press the disagree, I don't agree.
sak500  +   1410d ago
Well said pimpdaddy +bubbs.

One can see from agrees and disagrees here that Sony fanboys even hate it when people diss bluray as if its a violation against their beliefs.
Christopher  +   1410d ago
@PimpDaddy: Your choice to ignore the progression of technology is perfectly fine. You go right ahead. That doesn't mean that the technology doesn't grow to fit the medium.

What I'm saying that if we were still using DVD and there was no BD disc, what would we have right now? We would have the start of BD discs, which would be very costly, less likely to be supported globally, and would be in competition like it was last gen. By getting that all out of the way, we now have a format that can meet the demands of the next generation, isn't expensive, and has hardware advances that make it equal in cost to the old format. Transition to it will be pretty much seamless as opposed to if it was still new technology.

So, your definition of 'need' might be a bit myopic in the overall scheme of things.

I guess we also don't need alternative power sources until we're sure we've destroyed the planet by your logic.
#1.2.14 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(4) | Report
glennco  +   1410d ago
i don't get the blu-ray comments. if they are going to stay with physical media why wouldn't they go blu-ray... or is this another fanboy BS war rehashing old battles thing. some sort of gloating or something juvenile like that. naturally next gen games will require a lot more storage than any other gen.

putting comments like "yeah what happened to the "We don't need Blu-Ray"" is so n4g. idiotic fanboy comments that offer absolutely zero to the conversation.

so far i have never once had to put in a second disc, never ever.

why am i even bothering debating with children
#1.2.15 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report
sikbeta  +   1409d ago
Blu-Ray is needed, XBX3 will benefit from it, everybody wins, why go against it?
mcstorm  +   1410d ago
I agree with you if this is true then the next xbox will be a monster console. I will be picking up the next xbox no matter what anyway just like I will the WiiU and PS4. Im looking forward to seeing what MS do with Kinect next gen too as it will have the device out of the box which means everything will be made around Kinect and xbox live which to me will show off the best of Kinect for core and none core gaems as well as media ect.

I also think 2013 will be a good year to bring out the next 360 as they would have Turn10 working on a Forza 5 as a release game and maybe even a Gears 4 as well as all the content the 360 has now plus more added to it put the next xbox in a good pension to keep the xbox brand as big as it is now.

I hope we get another 12 months out of the 360 and PS3 as they still have some amazing games to offer but 2013 will be the right year for MS to bring out the next xbox.
asmith2306  +   1410d ago
Kinect will never enchance 'core' games as long as it doesn't involve a controller; and then that defeats the purpose of it in the first place. How can you move around in a game world without a controller and remain feasible? When it comes to gaming, Kinect is limited to rails.
LX-General-Kaos  +   1410d ago
@ asmith2306

Have you heard of the phrase "Better with Kinect"

Believe it or not there are a few games out there that are enhanced by kinect. Even if the enhancements are small, they are still part of the experience.

Mass Effect 3, and Forza 4, and Ghost Recon Future are the examples I can remember as of now.


@ asmith2306
I mentioned in this very same post that there are "a few games" that are enhanced. I never said anything about Kinect having this massive list of games. I already provided proof that there are enhanced games.

I never even said anything about the enhancements being big or even worth anyones time. Just the fact that they exist.

Rated E For Everyone
#1.3.2 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(57) | Report
asmith2306  +   1410d ago
Give me stats on how many people really use these features. My guess is the number would not be high because most gamers who play these kinds of games couldn't care less about these features. Oh and by the way, I meant enhance core gaming as a genre, maybe I should have said advance. I have no problem with the features you put to me but they are nothing more than 'oh wow, look at that' and then forget ten mins later.

so a few games are enhanced, big deal. My whole point was that if Kinect can't do anything to really push core games forward in any way bar a few little features then it is stuck in casual land. Thats cool if your a casual gamer and thats your thing; but for me (who had a 360 on day one and have had three since) the name Xbox was and should be synonymous with core gaming. Microsoft are taking it in the opposite direction. And no, they can't co exist in my opinion. If their direction is casual there will be very little room for innovation and risk when it comes to new core ips.
#1.3.3 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(7) | Report
LX-General-Kaos  +   1410d ago
@ asmith2306

Agreed with your post above

I am not a Kinect owner, I am just stating what I have seen. At 1st you said there we no enhanced core games. Then when I showed you a couple it changed to there are not very many.

My gamer tag is provided in my profile. If you glance at my games played you can tell pretty quickly what type of gamer I am in regards of the xbox 360.

Like I said I never said the enhancements were worth anything. Just the simple fact that they exist. Nice debate though. You seem to know what you are talking about. Bubbles have been depleted.

Have a good day and happy gaming.

Rated E For Everyone
#1.3.4 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(16) | Report
Denethor_II  +   1410d ago
"Kinect next gen too as it will have the device out of the box which means everything will be made around Kinect and xbox live"

Whoaaa, hold it there cheese tits. No, I disagree, everything will not be made around Kinect. Games made from the ground up would most likely have to be XBox exclusive, and as we all know these are few and far between.
I think the case will more likely be an all in one console experience for all gamers.
#1.3.5 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(2) | Report
mcstorm  +   1410d ago
LOL loves the hate for Kinect on here. If you don't like it fine go and play on what ever you like to play on.
asmith2306  +   1410d ago
For me it doesn't matter how powerful the console is. If they continue down the casual road then whats the point? Im all about the content, not the specs. Im far more optimistic for Sony's next console given the first party studios they have. The WiiU looks decent as well but I want to see more. I lost faith in Microsoft around the time Gears 2 was released. Their 'vision' has been downhill since then.
Imalwaysright  +   1410d ago
Im in the same position. I dont care about kinect, i wont buy a console for multiplatforms and i will definitely not be shelling out € 400 to play 2 or 3 games with the only thing to look forward being the eventual sequels of those 3 games. MS really dropped the ball and unless they start acquiring 1st party developers that make what i consider proper games, not that kinect crappola, then they wont be seeing my money.
catguykyou  +   1410d ago
It's funny to me how things change each generation. When the PS1 and PS2 were out, the system was known for the best 3rd party lineup. Now the people who praise the console want to ignore how important 3rd party games are to a console. Even the multiplatform ones are important.
I hope that Sony continues to have great 1st party games, but I hope they don't do anything that causes them to lose 3rd party support. An easier development platform would very much help that and that is what it sounds like they are opting for.
mcstorm  +   1410d ago
Catguykyou well said ive been saying this for a long time. Alot of people saw games like mgs final fantasy crash ect as a playstation exclusive and yes it kind of was because of the sales of the n64 gamecube dreamcast xbox ect but if people look back at games like tomb raider wipeout they were on the Saturn before the psx.

There are only a few exclusive games that are big and only a small number for sony and microsoft. Sony has gt and uc. Microsoft has halo and gears. Nintendo has the most but this is becasue when the n64 was out it was dropped by some big names and it was the same with the gamecube so nintendo got along with just its exclusives and look back through the n64 and gamecube history to see which games sold the most then look through sonys and you will see it was the 3rd party that drove sonys sales but people did not think of them as 3rd party as it was only on the playstation but microsoft changed this last gen and this gen.
Rainstorm81  +   1410d ago
N64? Nintendo have been doing Mario, Zelda, and Metroid since the NES days, they are staples of gaming and have proven that exclusives are key, many third party games were exclusive or at least timed on the ps1 & ps2. Exclusives matter just as much as a great lineup of multplats to define a platform
Cassandra76767781   1410d ago | Spam
DeadlyFire  +   1410d ago
I am expecting 6770x2 GPU then. 1300 Gflopsx2 = 2.6 Tflops. Enough power to run that Samaritan demo at 1080p. I can't imagine the 6900 or 7900 series x2 in a console. As it would set it on fire, but I guess its possible.

I expect something in the range towards 2.5-3.0 Tflops. Maybe more if we are lucky. Would help future proof console to have more.
B00M  +   1410d ago
I doubt two 6770's would be able to run that samaritan demo let alone at 1080p. Originally it had to be run with THREE 580's! Now I've read they can run it with one 680. Two 6770's just wouldn't be powerful enough, no way near. The two GPU rumour is probably bs. Too much heat and too power hungry for a console. Would create more problems.
SleazyChimp  +   1410d ago
@BOOM Epic stated earlier that the Samaritan would be running on tablets and phones by 2014. Hell the Wii u will probably be able to run it by then! Also in that same article Epic stated that the real beast is Unreal 4 and that it would make the Samaritan look "Feeble".
catguykyou  +   1408d ago
Unreal 4 engine really is leaps and bounds better looking than the Samaritan demo. When it is finally shown to the public, people will truly get an idea of what the next gen has in store.
catguykyou  +   1408d ago
@BOOM Epic has done a lot to optimize the latest build of UE3 that was used to show off the Samaritan video. They plan to eventually have it running in flash.
The power you get out of the graphic cards on a computer is less optimized than what you get out of the same hardware on consoles because there a lot less overhead from the OS and generally more direct and often faster routes of transferring data between memory and cpu.
Anyways, you will get better performance out of 6770 on a console than you ever will out of a computer. I'm still hoping they settle on a more recent version of graphics card.
DeadlyFire  +   1408d ago
Originally it was completely unoptimized as well. They are streamlining their engines to run on everything including flash.

Even one 6770 would be able to run this demo by those standards.

Still I prefer higher power, but heat is an issue certainly. More than likely its possible they use part of the Power7 CPU in the next Xbox as a GPU. Kinda of like what was intended with the Cell and what AMD is doing with its APU line-up of chips.

Samaritan demo is most likely the tech demo of what WiiU will be able to do at say 720p.

As for PS4/XB3. I expect much more. In time with optimization possibly WiiU to run as well, but maybe not at first. I expect UE 4.0 and CryEngine 4.0 to make a big splash when they arrive. Epic made a point of saying years ago that UE4 would be built around next generation consoles. So its very likely built to be optimized on all three upcoming consoles.

Either way optimization is key to any game engine being licensed out to developers. Its why CryEngine 2 was revamped so quickly after its launch and rebranded as CryEngine 3. PS3/X360 couldn't handle it without that optimization.

Its all still a guessing game. E3 will make me happy. As its very likely at least two consoles will have all their details fleshed out to the public. If not all three.
chriski333  +   1410d ago
Sony to xbox your welcome
Hanif-876  +   1410d ago
Microsoft can keep their "always on" Xbox Next. I mean if i can't play if my internet goes down then that is reason enough for me not to ever purchase it. Also, if Sony comes up with some bullcrap like that also.. then its the same scenario.
hotrider12  +   1410d ago
Microsoft is not expected to announce anything pertaining to its next machine until next year 2013.

so, NINTENDO an SONY will reign this E3 then?? im sure we'll see some kind of footage of 720 and release date 2013...............
sound to me MICROSOFT will go Digital content only. i agree, i would'nt endorse that feature either.
#1.9 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
vulcanproject  +   1410d ago
Not sure about the always on. Really wouldn't be pleased with that.
#1.10 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
gaffyh  +   1410d ago
looks like its going to be $499.

But what i am worried about is how loud this things going to be to keep it cool, hopefully it isn't louder than the PS3 Slim or the Xbox 360 S
#1.11 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Young_ART  +   1410d ago
now were going to start hearing from critics and xbots about how amazing blu ray is.........smh.
Septic  +   1410d ago
No. Now we're going to start hearing from Sony fanboys about how they assume we are going to hear from MS fanboys about how amazing Blu Ray is. Smh.
fr0sty  +   1410d ago
Dual GPUs isn't a very good idea in a console for many reasons. First of all, heat. They already had the RROD nightmare, and rumors are already coming out of heat issues with the current build of Durango.

Second, power consumption. Also, since performance doesn't scale perfectly when adding another GPU, they'd be better off just putting in a single GPU that was twice as powerful.

It's possible they could go for the GPGPU route and let the other GPU also help the CPU with things like physics or for rendering 3D without a performance hit, but none the less the idea with these consoles is to pack the most power into the fewest components so you can release a reasonably priced product that lasts a long time and isn't the size of a refrigerator. I just don't see putting 2 GPUs into a console as a good idea.
vulcanproject  +   1410d ago
I will address this now because i have noted others saying the same things.

Heat depends on the TDP of the chips in question. Potentially is is easier to cool two cooler chips, than a single large very hot one which may be prone to hot spot and failures. That is all about the design of the machine and its cooling system. Greater expense on the cooling solution is possible, but generally it would be cheaper to fit a better cooling system than build a very large chip with poor yields.

What is more, right up to date Nvidia and AMD have shown that the benefits of shrinking very large chips to get cost savings which is THE MAIN DRIVER of console cost reduction has nearly collapsed. Moving to a better process is closing in on being useless for saving money on making a big chip because the yields have been so poor and the wafers so expensive.

They believe as soon as 2015 it could be virtually pointless to shrink your massive chip unless something major changes.

Two smaller chips solve this very near future problem. Smaller chips would work because their yields would be vastly superior. They would be more viable for future cost savings from shrinks unlike a large chip.

Power consumption goes with the TDP. Most people don't seem to care about it a great deal. They didn't when they bought an original PS3 or 360. They don't when they buy 50 inch plasmas.

Also it is generally only high in the first model. After a die shrink power consumption reduces rapidly. With the aforementioned point that shrinking smaller chips is much more viable, they are more likely to get a shrink and save power sooner.

As for the claim that it wouldn't scale perfectly then that is incorrect. On PC then they typically can't because they rely on drivers and developers to actually bother creating their game or engine for dual GPUs and there are thousands of potential configurations of chipset and GPU and driver.

When you make a game for a set piece of hardware and use Lucid Hydra style techniques for splitting the render tasks then you can achieve near perfect scaling.

It is blatantly obvious consoles have had the attention from devs and pretty mad to think a dev would build a game for a dual GPU console and not code for both GPUs. Course they would.

Did they not transition to multicore CPUs this generation and not bother wringing out performance from every core? Whats the difference? Devs will use whatever is given them as best they can, especially on console.
#1.13.1 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
TheXgamerLive  +   1410d ago
Fake. These are just rumors and some are MS and sony approved
Both sonyand MX dont want you knowing whats coming until next year so they'll continue to throw some meaty rumors your way,
just dont drink it up liks it real.
Also, doesnt matter if BR is included next gen BR will be like this gen's DVD, bhind the times.
Games will be 10x larger just based on the engines and audio used so BR wont be able to support that.

If sony strictly went BR, then they'd be the ones behind the times, behind on the need required. 50 gigs wont be enough space after the first year of development, not even close, much less the standard 25gig.

Dual gpu's, no, however you will see dedicated cores for both built in kinect and the O.S. with additional floating cores that could be either kinect used for specific functions or games based.

The 4 to 6 cores is also "not" true. In 2010 MS was experimenting with variations based on the phenom w/12 to 16 cores. IBM as well has 2 propossed processors for the next X and I'm sure they werent 4 to 6 cores. haha.

It's great to guess and play with the possibilities but it will be later this fall even before Epic and others will know the exact specs on whats to come and that could even be tweaked last minute.

Games are being developed for both systems though and probably have been for a year but they've been on a highend pc with the knowledge that it will go to next gen. kits when they are available.

2013 christmas release? Yes, for both sony and MS. MS likes a fall september release.
#1.14 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Malice-Flare  +   1410d ago
heh, the anti-used game rumors seem to be consistent for both PS4 and nextBox that each has an implementation of not-ideal DRM. time to invest on the Wii-U and an upgraded PC...
#1.15 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
mugoldeneagle03  +   1410d ago
What I don't really understand
Is this whole Kinect-built in thing. I mean, there's no way (I guess maybe there is ) they'll be able to fit a big enough camera into the system, capable of zooming in or capturing movements from a distance

And unless they go pretty different in terms of design of the 360, how else can you really have it built in?

I for one have all of my consoles sitting in an entertainment system next to my DVR, Blu Ray player etc...

Can someone explain how this might work?
Angels3785  +   1410d ago
I agreed with EVERY SINGLE SCENTENCE......until I read the end and realized you were a complete and total fanboy. FORZA??????? Number on franchise in pro racing Sims? Lolololololololol. That game is the farthest thing from real as they come, granted its fun and in my opinion more fun than gt5, but it sells like crap in comparison and in realism. In terms of the look and feel of the car its gt5 all the way. For example I drive a Mazda rx8, and I have personally taken it to its top speed of 155mph, in Forza apparently it can reach 185mph and still corner like pacman. And its not just this car, like the Nissan gtr has a top speed of 195 and in forza it reaches nearly 230.....that's obsurd. Plus forzas tracks are wider than the real ones and the cars handle like they are remote controlled. Its quite good fun, but not in any way realistic. Forza also hails in comparison to how well the gt series displays cars, forza does it magically, but gt.....its almost poetic. Plus gt has assosiations with REAL Car companies and the Dev team even helped design REAL cars that made it to production, like the citrogen gt, and even the Nissan GTR speed interface was made by the gt Dev the x1 concept car which has real world physics applied with real race drivers at red bull technologies putting input and pushing its production. Forza has nothing to show for any of this, its just a super fun addicting racer, but not a better simulator. Unfortunately thats why forza is better as a GAMING racer....its fun. GT is not for every one if you aren't willing to invest a good two hours on a single race that you probably wont win, its not the game for you. Thats one of the reasons it got marked down (aside from no real damage until you completely max out the games leveling system) its too hard and not as fun as a game should be. Sure damage may not make it a realistic, but I'm pretty sure most drivers dont get into accidents every five seconds in real life and drift at the turn of a joystick like in forza. Driving is all about the looks and feel of the Car and That is something that Forza hasn't been able to touch in GT (aside from the standard cars) are some links for proof...... go to 5:29 to hear about how the gt dev helped on this amazing nissan GTR Here is the Citrogen GT made exclusively for GT5 and now a real production car here is Sebastion Vettel playing the game and explaining that it is the most realistic thing he's played. Many drivers use GT as a test simulator.
#1.17 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Outside_ofthe_Box  +   1410d ago
Funny ...

I felt the same way. I agreed with everything LX said until the last two sentences...

GT hands down is the #1 and best racing sim franchise period.
#1.17.1 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
Angels3785  +   1410d ago
LOL thats what Im trying to prove and identify; the difference of a SIMULATOR and a Racing game. That is probably the sole reason he has so many disagrees, it was a stupid ignorant statement. Plus just the way GT portrays itself is a borderline religious effort I mean look at this
The way they do this is astounding and poetic. I never though I could be in more love with cars after that. Hell GT even made me change my major from computer engineering to automotive engineering! The sound track is also very catchy:)
#1.17.2 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report
Septic  +   1410d ago
Paragraphs. Where art thou??!!!
PiperMCFierceson   1410d ago | Spam
Legion  +   1410d ago
"Xbox 720 will require an always-on internet connection as an anti-piracy measure." I call bull on this statement. This immediately alienates those that players that don't play online and thus greatly reduces their sales possibilities. This change alone would ensure that if PS3 allows games to be played without internet connection it will own MS on consoles sold from day one almost. Way too many gamers that don't connect to the internet for this to be viable.
Titanz  +   1410d ago
Ah... mang!
"Always on" is a feature I wouldn't endorse.


Nintendo has an, "always on" feature for the Wii, though it isn't "mandatory" (Its called "Wiiconnect 24" - which allows the player to receive updates, friends message, etc. <just as long as the yellow light in on>).

Maybe it'll workout for Microsoft, so here's hoping for the best.
#2 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
Perjoss  +   1410d ago
its 2012, people have internet now.
thereapersson  +   1410d ago
Maybe some people like to play their consoles, even if they don't have internet? I know a few people who would still keep their consoles, even if they couldn't get internet at their residence (for whatever reason).
Hayabusa 117  +   1410d ago
It's 2012, not everyone has the internet.
ironwolf  +   1410d ago
"It's 2012, not everyone has the internet."

Tough. Can't let life's losers hold back progress.
#2.1.3 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(57) | Report
torchic  +   1410d ago
I'm sorry but that is a very horrible perception.

maybe in America, yes everybody has internet (which I'm not even sure is the case).

believe it or not Microsoft sell a crap load of consoles in developing countries, and in developing countries high-speed home internet (ADSL) is not as highly adopted as it is in America. rather, people in these countries use their mobile phones to connect to their favourite sites. so for a console that requires to be always connected to the internet is a good idea, if your goal is not to sell consoles.

but then again America is Microsoft's biggest consumer base. so go ahead Microsoft.
neoandrew  +   1410d ago
OK, but what if my isp has some problems and i don't have connection now?

What if i have only mobile internet and i don't want to use it for console?

What if i need to resign from my isp?

What if i would like to play with friends on vacation when there are no internet?

What is the answer to all those "what if", is the answer any good for customers, for me, i don't think so...
#2.1.5 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(0) | Report
SilentNegotiator  +   1410d ago
They would be complete morons to do a required connection system.

Not everyone PLAYS online, not everyone HAS internet, and not everyone wants to be TIED to the internet.

Lowest common denominator is important to achieve if you want the maximum amount of people to buy. Forced internet connection....that's setting the bar of entry several steps higher.

Hey, publishers! Who would you blame when sales are lower next gen with internet required consoles that you pressured into existence?
arnyftw  +   1410d ago
I have problems all the time with my connection, does that mean I shouldnt be able to game?
iamgoatman  +   1410d ago
I'm in the UK and still can't get broadband, so it's not just lesser developed countries either. There are still a lot of "not spots" in the UK, live in any rural area and your speeds quickly plummet or ADSL isn't available at all. A lot of people also have to rely on mobile internet, and the reliability can be really shoddy.

But I guess we should just up sticks and move somewhere else just to use a games console? I think not. If the next Xbox does require a constant connection, I won't be getting one.
kza  +   1410d ago
Hayabusa 117  +   1410d ago
"It's 2012, not everyone has the internet."

"Tough. Can't let life's losers hold back progress."

Erm, you do realise that over 50% of console owners do not have the internet? That might mean nothing to you, but means a hell of a lot to companies like Microsoft and Sony, because they're going to make more money from casual, non-internet customers. You're greatly out numbered by life's loosers you see, and the only thing a mega corporation bows to is numbers.

It's also NOT progress if you can't play a game because your internet provider has a fault :/
AzaziL  +   1410d ago
For all you supporters, just wait till your internet goes out during a storm and your waiting the whole day for it to come back, have fun with your brick.
Veneno  +   1410d ago
"Always On" would kill the competitive gaming scene as they use thousands of consoles that don't connect online. I'm scared of this. Everything next gen will be waaaay more expensive and we're getting even less than ever before.
baodeus  +   1410d ago

"What if i would like to play with friends on vacation when there are no internet?"

so if you don't have internet now on x360 or ps3, how can you play with friend anyways?

You mean you always bring friend along on vacation?
DEATHSTROKE-cro-   1410d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
Droid Control  +   1410d ago
Hope this is true.
tigertron  +   1410d ago
Sounds accurate. I hope Microsoft adopts Blu-ray because it will be needed for next-gen systems. The PS3 has already benefited from it, as have the customers.

Who'd have thought we had a 3D Blu-ray player back in 2006?

Anyway, both system specs sound very promising and I hope to god they'll unveil them at this year's E3 for a 2013 launch.
Mikhail  +   1410d ago
They will probably show some teaser video. I think MS has a higher probability to show something in E3. Sony has TGS as an another option.
DiRtY  +   1410d ago
It will have a 6 core CPU and dual GPU?!
Sounds too powerful for a mass market product. We would face a $600 pricetag yet again.
1nsomniac  +   1410d ago
The 'always online' statement is all you need to read to know that this is fake!

How can you possibly believe that Microsoft would be willing to instantly cut off a HUGE majority portion of there market!?

** lol at the disagrees how stupid can you be. Do you really believe an always on policy is viable? lol
#7 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(9) | Report | Reply
Fishy Fingers  +   1410d ago
Its unlikely yes, but when companies like Ubisoft are using these exact DRM solutions on PC it's a possibility none the less.
#7.1 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Fez  +   1410d ago
That's probably why tonnes of folk pirate ubisoft games on pc.

It's not too bad for consoles and desktops since they are stationary and most people have internet connections but for laptop gaming, always-on is an awful solution to piracy.
thesummerofgeorge  +   1410d ago
I agree 1nsomniac; while anything's possible, I can't imagine MS so severely limiting their market.
Veneno  +   1410d ago
It's true. Imagine if the Wii had this put in. It would not be nearly as successful because I could almost garauntee that 85% of Wii's are not online.
aquamala  +   1410d ago
Is there really a huge market? You thInk a lot of console gamers never play online, get dlc's or patches?
Persistantthug  +   1410d ago
@aquamala.....Worldwide? Yes, there's alot of people that don't connect there consoles.
You've got to remember....
Microsoft doesn't sell regionally.....they sell WORLDWIDE.

Same with Sony.
Jazz4108  +   1410d ago
I imagine the always online thing will be a option just like on wiu for people who have internet and would like to have their updates done and over with when they game.
#7.4 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Philoctetes  +   1410d ago
Agree. There is no way the next generation requires an internet connection to function. Way too many people either don't have high speed internet or have a poor connection.
TENTONGUN  +   1410d ago
its all rumours, but i kinda believe the one about no preowned game sales so this has me wondering. how would that work? would you need a internet connection to register the software to only your console? no preowned games would ruin lets say gamestop. maybe force them to finally give money to the developers and ms(like theyve been begging for years) for preowned sales. that is if they want to keep their gamestops and shit goin. always online is bad news for gamers though
#7.6 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
KeiserSosay4788  +   1410d ago
I hope Microsoft has an option to install discs to the hdd. I mean what's wrong with keeping DVDs, forcing an install, and having a 1 tb HDD to avoid paying their competition for blu-ray. I dont see the point except for blu ray movies. Never had an issue with my PC not having a blu ray drive.
Fishy Fingers  +   1410d ago
How much does MS have to pay to support BD exactly? I assume you have an idea right, and why would that be any different to using one of the other established formats they didnt invent, CD, DVD, Flash etc?

Do you really think MS still hold a grudge over or care about BD becoming the standard?
WitWolfy  +   1410d ago
No doubt, like we ALL know MS they'll act like they discovered the format next gen.

They always do!
AP  +   1410d ago
They've had the install option on 360, so I'm sure DVD or BR they will keep it. Why remove features? Plus, BR has a slower read rate.
Eu  +   1410d ago
When the PS3 was launched, with 2x drives, yes, BR had low speed rates in comparison with DVDs WHEN the DVD drive was at full 12x. But since that doesnt happens ALL the times, it was a fair trade, for BD drives read ALWAYS at the same, CONSTANT, speed.

Nowadays there are up to 12x BD drives....thats so much more read info speed than DVDs it hurts....
arnyftw  +   1410d ago
Even if the speeds are high, the disc drive produces heat and noise (on xbox), and installing takes all this away. Thats why we need it for next gen, I hope they keep the install option.
PimpDaddy  +   1410d ago
Sony is only "one" of several companies that would benefit from the Blu-Ray royalties. Even as much as I prefer my 360 to my PS3 and don't think that Blu-Ray was needed this generation. I can still see the logic in using Blu-Ray next generation for the increased capacity and for the physical media for games.

Please don't make 360 owners look bad ever again...
KeiserSosay4788  +   1410d ago
How did I make 360 owners look bad? I don't even own a 360. I'm just saying that the PC platform hasn't even found a justification for blu-ray games, so how have consoles (other than blu-ray movies?)
jukins  +   1410d ago
you do realize that the bluray license holders arent sony alone right? Everyone company thats part of that group has no problem paying license fees for windows and i doubt microsoft doesnt have a problem paying the, relatively, small fees to have bluray.
Mikhail  +   1410d ago
Hmm, two gpu's? I wonder what kind of design it is if this rumor is true. The heat it will generate would be @@. Let us say I don't want a RROD fiasco again.

Edit: The rumors about this and the Orbis are coming from devkits (assuming they are true). Dev kits have different specs and may have restrictions put into place so the final product would be vastly different in terms of what kind of cpu, gpu and amount of ram. The basic functions such as the blu ray and the kinect built-in may be final.
#9 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Captain Tuttle  +   1410d ago
I thought the same thing about dev kits. I think the eraly 360 dev kits had tow gpu's as well as placeholders until the final gpu design was decided upon.
SephirothX21  +   1410d ago
My i7, GTX 580 and 8 gigs of ram still rape this console but if this rumour is true, it is better than I expected. Though let's remember that this is probably releasing in over a year and half which means hardware costs will have been reduced. Though also think about how powerful new Nvidia and AMD graphics cards will be then.
TheGrimReaper  +   1410d ago
Yes, you are sooo right!
And you will be playing all the console exclusive games with higher resolution, additional effects and higher fps. IF these games would ever appear on PC!
I think some PC enthusiasts just don't get it:
We like playing these games! Yes we love it if these games look pretty! But do we care how they would look on a PC? No because they are not released on a PC!
(Written on a gaming rig by a console owner)
andibandit  +   1410d ago

dosnt matter, cause what the consoles lack in power, they receive in graphicEngine optimization.

So in a little less than 2 years, you'll be scratching your head over why games on your GAZILLION GHz, CrossFire,SLI, GPU accompanied by your 8 HypnoHertz 1000 core CPU, only looks "A little better".
FrigidDARKNESS  +   1410d ago
I'm glad they will be using dual AMD 7000 series gfx chip instead of the 6600 series and hope all games will be running in dx11/12. the Blu ray drive will be a lot faster than the first generation drive and won't require installs.
@sephirothx21 the gfx chips in the new consoles will be highly optimized to get the best performance to compete with next gen PC gfx cards.
#11 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
supremacy  +   1410d ago
Umm I dont mean to start a war here, but based on these vs rumors which platform will you guys say is turning out to be more powerful?

Just asking.
#12 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Mikhail  +   1410d ago
Its inconclusive. The two gpus are not in a crossfire setup. (i.e. Two Gpu's work in the same application such as video games) From what I can deduce from the rumors, the two GPU's powers different functions of the console.

The Orbis rumor does not specify which Southern Island GPU they are going with. It could be the 7970(high end), 7870 or the 7770 (low end). The same goes for Durango.

In the end there two scenarios MS console would cost more because of the Kinect 2.0. Sony can counter this by either having a higher GPU at the same price point or the same GPU at a lower price point. Logically speaking of course.

However, they are basing rumors mostly out of dev kits which only emulates the final product. MS and Sony might add same RAM or Vram or upgrade the CPU/GPU during manufacturing process. Proof of this is how games such as Gears and Uncharted look better as time goes by.

Also, don't believe in rumors, we can speculate but don't believe entirely on it.
Dlacy13g  +   1410d ago
It's really hard to say at this point especially given its all rumor and speculation. Plus once we do get the final hardware a big peice is the support tools for the devs. You can easily say the PS3 is the more powerful machine over the 360 but the excellent & easy to use tool sets for the 360 have helped keep the 360 on a level playing field with the PS3 for most of this generation. We really will need the full picture before anyone can definitively say one is better than the other...and even may not be able to get a clear answer.
#12.2 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Tai_Kaliso  +   1410d ago
Well again this is all just rumor, Microsoft knows that not everyone has their current Xbox 360's hooked up to the internet and a lot of the casual crowd that they've captured with Kinect don't go online as all either, so I am calling that part of this bogus.

The Blu Ray I expected, I mean Microsoft put the DVD drive in the Xbox and the Xbox 360 and Sony owns patents on those. Blu Ray is cheap enough now to not drive up the cost. I just hope they go with a faster drive so we don't get mandatory installs or anything like that. Honestly, this generation I've hated the mandatory installs more than swapping disks.

You can usually weed out some of the truth from the non truth, maybe the mandatory online thing is with the Xbox Lite, which is rumored to be a disk drive-less Xbox 360 that plays arcade and digital games? That would make sense to have to be online all the time.

Rumors can be fun, but I think some of us overreact a bit.
PimpDaddy  +   1410d ago

Sony does not own a patent on Blu-Ray. They are one of several companies that get royalties but they do not won Blu-Ray outright.

If Sony did own Blu-Ray outright then Blu-Ray would have failed. No way all the other Blu-Ray manufacturers would let one company control it.
ipe  +   1410d ago
2x gpus, 6 core cpu, 4GB ram, blu ray, kinect out of box??

600$ without doubt+ live.
Maybe 500 depending how big loses ll ey take.
Dlacy13g  +   1410d ago
One thing we do know...MS likes the $399 price point so you need to factor that into this. Maybe they do two skus one at $499 and one at $399 but I am 99% sure we will see a launch day sku priced at $399.
dcbronco  +   1410d ago
The AMD APUs for this will be less than $200 for two by the time the next Xbox releases. RAM is cheap and there will be no Blu-ray player. Kinect was $60 at launch and the cost to MS has dropped since then. Kinect 2.0 will still be less than $100 to produce.

There is no reason for the new machine to cost more than the last one. Instead of two GPUs and two CPUs making four chips at 90nm, it's two GPUs and two CPU on two dies at 28nm. So it's really the same number of parts as the 360 at launch, but made much cheaper because you get a lot more chips per wafer at 28nm.
Clarence  +   1410d ago
Hilarious. Sony leads the way. M$ still playing catch up. No more switching disc, or scratches.
MoFo1111  +   1410d ago
Sony leading the way from last place
World domination
OMEGAZONE  +   1410d ago
April Fools is over. Enough with this shit.
MoFo1111  +   1410d ago
Its not an April fools
Just a rumour
arnyftw  +   1410d ago
If this was a April Fools joke it would be like this.
"Next gen xbox to have 2-Gtx 590's, 8 core gpu, 32 Gb RAM, and 2 TB HDD at $399"
BattleTorn  +   1410d ago
I don't care about next-gen pricing. Let it be $700+ for all I care.

I just spent $1200 on a new PC and I don't even use it!

mainly due to lack of friends (I've got a nice community of friends on XBL)

So I'll even be willing to pay PC-hardware prices.
enfestid  +   1410d ago
This article is full of crap.

An always-on Internet connection? Sorry, but even today (or when it's released) that would eliminate a massive amount of potential customers, and it would also make it difficult to sell in foreign markets like India, for instance.

Having the GPUs separately draw graphics would also be a disadvantage, as it would make games more difficult to port (in either direction). That would remove one of the advantages Microsoft has actually had since the original Xbox -- being easy to program for.

Basically, this is all FUD.
Rageanitus  +   1410d ago
all of a sudden were gonna see the xbox fanboys praising blu-ray
honkyjesus  +   1410d ago
I don't praise Bluray, I praise Bluray rips.
iamamedic   1410d ago | Spam
ziggurcat  +   1410d ago
funny how the anti-used game "feature" has been omitted this time around...
MrBeatdown  +   1410d ago
Well, there's the always-on connection for "piracy". If this was true, there's nothing really stopping them from blocking used game sales too.

But at least things are getting better. The last rumor said the next Xbox was digital download only. Now we got discs. Progress!
cheetorb  +   1410d ago
Kinect built in? I don't like the idea of paying for something I'm not going to use. Hopefully they will offer a "stripped down" model that is Kinect free with the option to buy separately.

The more choices I have, the more inclined I am to purchase. Doesn't matter what console it is.
giovonni  +   1410d ago
How do you know you aren't going to use it? Kinect makes certain features better. for example, I was playing mass effect 3 and in the heat of the battle I didn't have to press the left bumper to switch weapons cast spells or to get my crew to cover me in a fire fight. It is a wonderful addition because it puts you in the heart of battle, and I can't wait to see how they use it in sports with hand gestures to indicate a play or use it in mini games with in a game like defusing a bomb.

To say you aren't going to use it is a little premature because you may find yourself enjoying certain small features in games you love. and besides Kinect has sold so well, you may find other companies jumping on the band wagon. What happens if this becomes the indie standard ?
PopRocks359  +   1410d ago
I'm a big time gamer, and when I got my third 360, I was given a Kinect for free. I haven't touched it since I first synced the thing. The only use it's seen since was when a couple friends asked if they could play Dance Central. That was a year ago.

Kinect has some small features yes. But for any gamer with even a little concern for what they spend their money on, $100 for a Kinect just isn't worth it.
giovonni  +   1409d ago
I understand where you are coming from. and Respect what you are saying because it is true. I've gone a few months not playing the kinect because there was nothing that appealed to me but once I saw features that were added more hands free options to navigate mini options in mass effect and the addition of sports like PGA13 it has been a blast.
Kinect is good for what it is. it's not the be all, but great for parties, netflicks and squad play.
honkyjesus  +   1410d ago
At this point you are seeing different directions you are pointed in every week. Last week it was all about an Xbox light in 2013 and next Xbox in two or three years. This week it is all about a 2013 release?

I expect something at E3 this year, MS is having some pretty shit E3's recently... and consumers have overridden fanboys as far as Halo and Gears, as these games aren't the huge franchises MS likes you to think they are. If you look at this E3 the big thing is Halo 4. And more Kinect bullshit. This is more or less what they have done the past few years, insert whatever underwhelming IP they line up.

I imagine it gets a bit embarrassing. You can tell things are off when they start amping up Steel Battalion recently. Along with a Star Wars/Kinect console and game.
gypsygib  +   1410d ago
I don' like the requirement of being online constantly at all.
Mister_G  +   1410d ago
Yeah, big brother is watching ;)
Mister_G  +   1410d ago
LoL @ all these rumors for the next gen...... it's gonna be like this for months.

X720 will have this, PS4 will have that, X720 will release first, PS4 will release first, etc. etc.

Lol! :D
urwifeminder  +   1410d ago
All rumor on a lighter note it was great to see the CSIRO in australia finally get paid for inventing wifi so many people use it in the world big cash, they also invented plastic money and flu vaccine they are currently using old tv transmitters to send and recieve the internet aussies invent lots of things.
#26 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TABSF  +   1410d ago
I can believe the CPU part but the GPU nah

HD 7770 is 80Watt if two chips 160Watt TDP
AMD Bulldozer 6 Core is 95Watt TDP
You telling me that the Next Xbox will be using over 250Watt

BTW HD 7870/ GTX 570 is quicker than HD 7770 in CFX never mind 7950 or 7970 GTX 580 or GTX 680

HD 7850 is 130Watt if two chips 260Watt TDP
AMD Bulldozer 6 Core is 95Watt TDP
Its just crazy to think its a high end HD 7000

Also you got to look at a late 2013 or early 2014 before Next Xbox is released, the GPUs will have be out for almost 2 years with newer parts already out.
#27 (Edited 1410d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Kidmyst  +   1410d ago
Like 2 PC's taped together? Man the 360 can give off heat, what's this heat on the 720 gonna be like? A bit concerned on the always on part. I have that but not everyone does and that will be interesting if all this is true how it'll play out to the vast consumer base.
ZeroWil  +   1410d ago
I can see it utilizing blu-rays, though I hope the constant Internet connection stays as a rumor. Though I don't necessarily have a problem with that, it's gonna suck when your Internet connection is down because your ISP is always doing maintenance or something.
gypsygib  +   1410d ago
Next MS will make you need a Kinect that is always on
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

PAX South Recap - The Game Bolt Podcast - EP 48

27m ago - In this episode Brett hosts while Grant and Jon share the experience they had at PAX South 2016!... | PC

Looks like Battle Worlds: Kronos is coming to consoles

4h ago - Following an appearance on Amazon, GamesAsylum reports that the Kickstarter funded RTS Battle Wor... | PS4

Guess N4G Game of the Year Winners, win a $300 Amazon Gift Card

Now - Also enter for a chance to win a gift card for writing a user blog, writing a user review, or being a top contributor for the month. | Promoted post

Fable Legends - Heroes of Albion: Meet Celeste

4h ago - Lionhead "Time to take a closer look at Fable Legends' light Priestess and resident stargazer... | PC

The Culling, AKA Hunger Games the Game, Gets a Closed Alpha

4h ago - EB: Xaviant has announced that The Culling, its new Hunger Games-like battle royale title, will b... | PC

XCOM 2 Gamer Stats Revealed: Over 50 Million Aliens Defeated

4h ago - XCOM 2 sold over half a million units, but can you guess how many aliens killed or missions finis... | PC