Submitted by led1090 1295d ago | opinion piece

How Many Sequels Does A Game Really Need To Become Redundant?

Every game these days has a sequel. And every sequel either has a prequel leading up the sequel, or another sequel set hundreds of years in the future, which leaves room for prequels and sequels to the prequel. A sequel might be a major overhaul, or it may add an extra element or two to an already established formula. That’s just fine. If the game is good, people might want more of it, because we obviously cannot possibly have enough of something which is good and addictive, and gaming is a hobby which strives on addiction. But do we really need ten to twelve games supporting this habit? (Dev, Industry)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

WWE 2K16 Online, Lobbies Return, Online Tournaments & more we want to see

3m ago - Not much has been revealed or talked about when it comes to the WWE 2K16 Online portion of the ga... | Xbox 360

Razer Unveils BlackWidow Ultimate 2016

16m ago - If you are looking to upgrade your rig this holiday season, software and connected device moguls,... | PC

MoreConsole takes on Destiny: The Taken King

Now - MoreConsole's rag-tag band of guardians finally make it to the Oryx's ship...but can they make it out alive? | Promoted post

Fallout 4 Loot Crate Available For Purchase Again

16m ago - The special Fallout 4 Limited Edition Crate from Loot Crate is once again available for purchase. | PC

Honesty, Emotion and Oppressive Atmospheres in Actual Sunlight

24m ago - The Vita Lounge spoke to Will O'Neill, the developer behind the emotive and thought-provoking Act... | PS Vita

Nintendo Selects Range on 3DS Has a Handsome Price Point in Europe

26m ago - NL: Unlike Nintendo of America, the European subsidiary of the company - for various legal and r... | 3DS