40°
Submitted by led1090 861d ago | opinion piece

How Many Sequels Does A Game Really Need To Become Redundant?

Every game these days has a sequel. And every sequel either has a prequel leading up the sequel, or another sequel set hundreds of years in the future, which leaves room for prequels and sequels to the prequel. A sequel might be a major overhaul, or it may add an extra element or two to an already established formula. That’s just fine. If the game is good, people might want more of it, because we obviously cannot possibly have enough of something which is good and addictive, and gaming is a hobby which strives on addiction. But do we really need ten to twelve games supporting this habit? (Dev, Industry)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories

DayZ Standalone Tent Guide And Loot Locations

3m ago - One Angry Gamer "Another DayZ standalone guide here. This time the guide covers the all-important... | PC

“Crest” performs kickstart on indiegogo and steam greenlight

3m ago - Singleplayer god game where you write commandments in order to influence your people. In the game... | PC
20°

Huge Discount On Games Like Crysis Trilogy Pack, Binary Domain, Transistor, Titanfall

7m ago - We just found a number of games that you can get right now at a really amazing price. These games... | PC
10°

CGMPodcast Episode 118: Guardians and Comic-Con

8m ago - On this week’s CGM podcast, Electronic Arts tries something a little different with a PlayStation... | PS3
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
10°

CeX Review: Dynasty Warriors Gundam Reborn

8m ago - Denis Murphy writes- Both the Dynasty Warriors and Gundam series are absolutely massive in Japan.... | PS3