40°
Submitted by led1090 974d ago | opinion piece

How Many Sequels Does A Game Really Need To Become Redundant?

Every game these days has a sequel. And every sequel either has a prequel leading up the sequel, or another sequel set hundreds of years in the future, which leaves room for prequels and sequels to the prequel. A sequel might be a major overhaul, or it may add an extra element or two to an already established formula. That’s just fine. If the game is good, people might want more of it, because we obviously cannot possibly have enough of something which is good and addictive, and gaming is a hobby which strives on addiction. But do we really need ten to twelve games supporting this habit? (Dev, Industry)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare Review - Duuro Magazine

6m ago - Duuro says:"Call of Duty Advanced Warfare is probably the best Call of Duty ever made. The single... | PC
10°

Global Assault Cheats: The Strategy Guide and Tips

6m ago - Global Assault Cheats Volt Coins: Guide, Tips & Strategy for Android/iPhone Game If there are no... | iPhone
20°

(WGB) Logitech Daedalus Prime Review – Whose Naming These Things? Seriously?

1h ago - Baden of WGB: "I’ve often wondered how you design a mouse around a specific genre. Surely everyon... | Tech
20°

A Bad Month for Game Releases & the Game Industry

1h ago - September thru December is the biggest time of year for gamers because of all the AAA titles that... | Industry
Ad

Looking for a great Pokemon Community?

Now - Look no further. Join us at the BulbaGarden Forums, the best community for everything Pokemon | Promoted post
20°

(WGB) Logitech G910 Orion Spark Review – Don’t Push The Red Button! Or The Yellow One

1h ago - Baden of WGB: "Type the words “gaming keyboard” into Google and you’ll be buried under a tonne of... | Tech