PlayStation Universe claims to have some inside knowledge about some of the launch games planned from PS4 as it selects 11 potential titles that may make the cut.
I can see Gran Turismo 6 being a PS4 launch title; with everything Sony has learned this gen about developer involvement in hardware design you can bet Polyphony Digital have a large influence. The delay in getting GT5 out the door this gen actually had a negative effect on how gamers and critics viewed the game itself, which is ridiculous but sadly true.
There's some titles that are a given for day one .. FIFA nfl NHL normal sports games then there's always ridge racer lol As for the List they have well wow lol gt6 I think is the hardest one to get .. They do like to take their time with GT dev .. If they have a line up to rival vitas first 3 months not bad variety is the key .. But hey of they get uncharted Gran turismo FIFA and a good war game il be on it day one and buy thouse 4 games I just said lol
Clever article, what a great way to say "WOW look whats coming"! and be able to make a bunch of crap up to get hits by saying "we must protect our sources by putting in red herrings so YOU decide whats going to be released" Marketing ambiguity at it's worst. That said of course I hope several are true. ;)
There's always a Ridge Racer on day 1 :D
The look on people face when GT6 comes on ps3 will be priceless. All these xbox 720 and ps4 articles are so pointless.I dont know about microsoft but sony made it clear that ps3 has alot of time left.I think im missed the memo where ps4 and xbox 720 was announced to come out in 2013 /s.
Dmarc: The look on your face when the Xbox 720 and PS4 are announced this year will be priceless ;)
this is just a wishlist some throw together to get you to click on their crappy site. I can see NFS and AC those games come out yearly. So you'll probably see CoD and Madden and all the other crappy yearly games. Yearly games are not likely to be all that inpressive as most like they will just be upscaled version of the 360/ps3/wiiu versions. Probably get 1 major exclusive my money be on a KZ game
@Chaostar It better be a launch title, I can't imagine what PD will do with more powerful HW, GT5 has evolved into such an awesome game over the updates, it's not perfect, but I'm sure if it wasn't for the HW restrictions, it really could be
I wont be buying a PS4/Xbox 720 day one anyway. Prices will be off the roof, no doubt about that.
@roadkillers Yes, announced this year to come out in 2013. No 720 or PS4 this year.
BUT I wouldn't be too surprised if it was an early PS4 game. GT5's premium cars are next-gen ready.
I still really like Ridge Racer :(
whoever gets devkits first will spit their games out first, which is Guerilla and Naughty I wouldn't hold my breath on GT6, looking back at GT release history, never on launch and you really need to have "4" in title ;)
Every GT release has been a technological breakthrough, pushing the boundaries of racing simulations and showing how advanced the technology sony is that sony uses. The PS4 will be the pinnacle of gaming, pushing the limits of what is capable, and finally cementing it's position as the worlds premier console and software maker.
@Trey_4_Life If that is your definition of a "Technological Breakthrough" i suggest you spend more time in the real world.
I wonder if we're going to keep the same PSN names and Intergrate our data over to the PS4
God I sure hope so... I'll be quite upset if we have to make new names.
Vita does it. It would be a massive step backwards if PS4 doesn't do it so all I will say is it should be obvious that it will happen, and they would really have to be retarded not to do it this way. I hope for backwards compatibility, and the ability to play my PS3 games online on my PS4, with my friends who are still on their PS3's.
It is a must, so much investment in PSN games and all that, it'd be totally crap to start over again
"The delay in getting GT5 out the door this gen actually had a negative effect on how gamers and critics viewed the game itself" Yeah almost every review spoke of the delay as if they reviewed the delay along with the game.
You know ive been keeping up with gt5 so much prior to its release and after its release and I have yet to see an actual delay announced by PD ( besides the nov. 2 delay ).Just a bunch of sites guessing when it comes out then when it didnt come out claim it got delayed then the actual delay they just slapped a "AGAIN" at the end... Thats the sad part...
That's the problem with this generation. If some random "journalist" wannabe with a website/blog writes something, it suddenly becomes fact among internet fanboys. The FACT is that GT5 was not "delayed" until it missed it's "OFFICIAL" launch date of Nov. 2, 2010. It released on Nov. 24, 2010 which is a whopping 22 day delay.
GT6 will launch in fall 2013 because work has already started on gt6, and this time with engine being there already and PD knows what they have to improve i believe we will see Gt6 in fall 2013 on a side note why didn MS announce another forza title i mean forza 4 just came out, i guess now you see the power of GT as an IP
GT6 new ip from GG God of War new ip from Media Molecule The last of Us 2 New ip from uncharted team New ip from Sony Japan The Getaway Sony Smash Bros 2 I also want backwards compatability with ps1, 2 and 3 if possible at least 1 and 2 though. PLus a slew of third party exclusive games would be great.
Two Naughty Dog games at launch? Yeah.. not happening.
@venom why not? why cant it happen WHO are you to say it CANNOT happen. and so what if this is my PERSONAL list.
I didn't say it can't, just said that it won't. Considering every comment on here said how this was just glorified wish list of an article, I didn't give the site a hit, so I didn't know if this was their list or yours. Either way, with that in mind, two Naughty Dog games at launch would indeed be great, but even with two teams at ND, this would spread them a little thin considering it is a new system. I think we would get a better product if they didn't have to meet a simultaneous deadline for 2 games. Releasing a launch title, and then another 12 to 18 months later would ensure A. we aren't getting too much too soon, and B. We are getting the best quality ND can deliver. I for one am patient enough.
Gran turismo 6 be a Excellent ps4 launch, hope it dont take 6 years to finish.
the NEW need for speed # 8 hope its not like "open world online universe" but more like back to its root
say like ps1 the need for speed, NFS 2,3,4
Exactly. Also, they used so much polygons to model the premium cars where Kaz said that they could reuse them with the next generation of Sony's console. I guess that he was hinting to us back then. I can believe that GT6 will be a PS4 launch title and i still have my G27 ready and waiting.........
Well two things are clear from that list, One, it's clear PS4 is set to be released Nov 2013.. And if that's the case we will probably get an announcement at E3 2012 They also forgot some Games - One of the biggest one's which will indeed be on next-gen consoles is Battlefield 4 (BF4 Oct 2013) DICE has already stated how badly next-gen was needed for BF3 and that the game is a PS4 title on PS3... So no question they will be stepping up their game hard for BF4 on PS4 But this also brings up a more important question - What is PS4 going to cost? -Because with all those games coming out in 2013 that means one thing.. Were all going to be going broke because with the cost of the system ($600 to $800) and most likely 5 must have games @ ($65 a pop) that's a +325 to the cost of the system.. don't even get me started on tax people it's looking like you are going to need $1,125 or more for the end of 2013 just to be safe.. .____........___...____ .____||......||.......____|| ||.........___||.......____||
I am hoping they wait until Frostbite 3.0 engine before they push Battlefield 4(2015) out the door. I am doubtful that engine will exist until at least 2013-2015. Battlefield 3 will last at least 4 years from launch date. Around the 2nd year I expect Bad Company 3 to appear(2013).
So when a game keeps being postponed and worked on, it should not be criticized as such? If a game is 10 years in the making, don't you think it's fair to expect more from it, than a game that has only been in development for 2 years? With the amount of time they had on GT5, they left a lot to be desired. The 2.0 update should have been launch material, and it should have been out a year earlier - at least - then it might have gotten more positive feedback. So much time was spent on it, and so little content was found in the game. Not standard cars, but actual racing content - race events, tracks, premium cars (better selection), etc. Who was the idiot that decided the Veyron didn't need a premium model, but instead needed to handle like a brick?
"So when a game keeps being postponed and worked on, it should not be criticized as such?" This is the problem right here, according to you a delay to improve a game should be viewed as a criticism and not a good thing. I'd prefer games to be judged on their comparative quality in their respective genres and not by the length of time from announcement to release.
I never said that delays are bad in themselves. I said that if a game is delayed, it should be more thoroughly critiqued. This does not by itself mean the game should loose points in the final review, but simply be reviewed more in-depth. If the game is delayed, then surely there is more to look after - after all, they did the delay for a reason, some part of the game must have been worked on more. Honestly, don't you think it's fair to make more in-depth reviews of games that has been long in development, than games with short development times? If not, you'd review XBLA and PSN games by the same standards as hugely publicized games such as COD, GT5, Uncharted, etc. I'm not saying delays are bad (if they make the game better, then great!) but when a game is continually delayed (officially or not) it better make the extra wait worth it. And as far as I'm concerned, GT5 did not deliver. It kept being worked on forever, and when it finally came out, so much was left to be desired. I have never owned an xbox, but seeing how Forza is developed makes me wish PD would learn something from Turn 10. The driving itself in GT5 is where its strength lies. I love it. But as a game, feature wise, so much has been left out. You couldn't even rewind or fast forward replays until 2.0, how basic is that? You say that games should be reviewed on their comparative quality. Longer development, bigger budget - higher expectations, more critique. How is that unfair to the game and its developer?
Ah I see the misunderstanding here, the problem lies not in whether or not you should raise your expectations upon hearing of improvements to a game but in how much you raise those expectations. My point was that people had unrealistic expectations after foolishly believing media reports of 'massive delays' despite a release date never being announced. This showed in almost every review where the development time was used in negative light to elicit a false sense of disappointment. I don't how you came to the conclusion that I meant 'review all games the same', including PSN XBL games. I just think that development time should not be used as a negative review factor. Also, I never questioned the criticisms you keep mentioning, they are a legitimate part of your and/or any reviewers opinion of the actual game.
I doubt GT 6 will be available day one, but I do suspect them to be making a title for PS4. I think they will shorten development time a little. I laugh at the thought of next gen. Need for Speed. The only title in the franchise that does them well is Hot Pursuit. Well from my viewpoint. Yet they keep trying to break away from it by making something new every year. 2-3 year development cycle = solid game. 4-6+ years(unless MMO) = overworked and overdone game. Was probably great at some point, but then changed along the way.
No modern shooter on the list,makes it incomplete.
Maybe if we are lucky Modern Shooters will be out of fashion next gen. IMO they suck the soul from the games industry.
I'd be glad honestly if there were no "modern shooter" so to speak. I'm actually sick of the obsession this gen has brought to the shooter category. I'm not knocking the great ones (cause there have been plenty over the years and the best ones aren't even the most popular), but the generic modern shooter like Call of Duty is sucking the life out of an industry where creativity used to be much more valued and a much more popular option. I'll be buying the first person shooters with dynamic gameplay, variety, creativity and substance in every aspect, such as BioShock Infinite and Far Cry 3. I don't care if it has no multiplayer since I'm above that "requirement". Or they could solve everything and bring back TimeSplitters!
I'd rather the PS2 obsession with Platformers. Or the PS1 obsession with RPGs. When the gaming industry finds a new series they just put out every year, I hope it's not an FPS.
I agree with Meerkat lol And I do AGREE 110% with DigitalRaptor But don't worry from what we know and see tere will be a Modern warfare game lol COD is now a game like EAs sport games I yearly game so we will get a MW game or a black ops ..
Crysis 3 & inFamous 3 would make me jump to PS4 day one.
Infamous yes! Crysis NO!
i want to see less patches next gen only major
Sadly it will actually get worse as the games get more complex with each generation.
I concur most wholeheartedly.
Easyfix. Don't connect your console/s of choice to the network. . . . .
Final Fantasy Versus 13
never heard about it ;)
Uncharted 4 and GT6 as a launch title ? I'm in !
I doubt Uncharted would continue anymore.(except on the Vita) Do you know nothing of Naughty Dog history?
What? 1 game series per generation? They have 2 teams now, one for TLOU and one for a new game...probably UC4. Besides, Uncharted was their hit series, their most sucessful series ever, so it's likely to continue in the PS4...and if ND pushed UC graphics in the PS3, imagine that with a next gen console.
@GraveLord Naught Dog has stated they will keep making Uncharted games as long as fans ask for them, and it looks like a lot of people want more, so I think we will see Uncharted on the PS4. Times change, and companies adapt to those changes.
lol every 'next gen' console game will only look as good as current gen pc games, (and i play console!) your average console gamer will never understand that a ps3/360 is essentially a mini pc with very limited capabilities. and current top rig pcs arent even capped yet in capabilities
Have you seen a next gen game ? no. I know what pc can do and I don't give a shit about pc. I have free online on ps3, I play on big hd tv (not small pc screen), I get great exclusives every year, all my friends are on ps3, I don't need to spend money upgrading my ps3... I have God Of War 3 and Uncharted 2 and Killzone 3 and only an idiot would say that that games look like shit. How are consoles "very limited" if I play amazing games all these years ? LOL I don't need a pc. And it's pretty pathetic that pc fanboys compare a console from 2006-2007 to a current pc. Tell me, what pc exclusives are coming out ? Everyone is saying that EPIC's Samaritan demo is amazing. What if PS4 can run that game ? Will THEN pc gamers say that consoles are shit ?
Dude just paste this instead http://images.brighthub.com... There we go, thats why consoles are better in my opinion.
lol your an idiot and a half, especially after claiming i play on big hd tv, LOLZ and then prior claiming i know what pc do, well monkey you know what pc do, then you know pc connect to any tv via cable, whether svideo, component, composite, or hdmi, so monkey thats that, and there are tons of pc/mac exclusives that console doesnt have btw but fuck it, monkeys' brains are very limited =) so wont go into further details
Dont be silly son, current PC games dont even look as good as pc gamers claim it to be, besides as far as game-play goes, which, believe it or not, matters more than graphics, pc exclusives will always, always, always be second best or third best if you count the Wii.
Who is the one being silly here really? You sound like someone that has not seen what PC games look like in the past couple years. Even games that are on the consoles (BF3, NFS, SSFIVAE, Crysis 2, etc) look in another stratosphere when compared to the console counterparts. If you have a top of the line video card you can do 16QX anti aliasing and max settings. Everything is so much more detailed while smoother at the same time. This effect even on a game like SSFIVAE is staggering and that game isn't exactly a graphics juggernaut. Let's not forget the 800lb gorilla in the room that "hopefully" next gen console will be able to do, PHYSX. Even in Batman Arkham City with physx enabled, it looks literally out of this world compared to what the console versions look like without it. Even you haven't seen or know what it is I suggest watching videos on it. You, and most other people can bury your head in the sand until you suffocate. It wont change the simple fact that at best, when the new consoles are released, they "might" be on par with the current crop of PC machines out but not with top of the line vid cards. With in a year of their release they will once again be swallowed up by PC technology. If it even takes that long. It's just the simple reality of technology and cost effectiveness of consoles. You can't expect a $400 - 600 console (probable console release price) to compete with a PC that has 1 video card that cost double that. The new GTX 690 will be hitting retail shortly for $1000 dollars. Do you honestly believe a next gaming console costing half of that will be on par or better? I think we all know the answer to that question. Edit: you can pound disagree until your finger bleeds and you have a mini stroke while doing so. What I said is fact and that is what you are disagreeing with. Disagreeing with facts only makes me smile. I eat disagrees like women do chocolate during their periods.
@sly-famous... Dude I'm a console gamer, and I love the crap out of my PS3 but I have to agree with Brutallyhonest on this one. PC games look superb. I've just recently got myself a rig with a GTX 580 card, and its crazy how good games look on it. @Brutallyhonest... that said, while PC games look a hell of a lot better, you have to admit that when it comes to sheer variety of quality games, the consoles just kill PC. You don't get uncharted, infamous or god of war on PC. That's why I'll have both, PC for multiplats and PS3 for exclusives. Can't wait to see what darksiders 2 looks like on my PC :) or Max Payne 3, Hitman, Tomb Raider, and I'll also be playing Assassins Creed for the first time in true HD!
I ran Amensia maxed out the other day and it looked better than anything on consoles. My friend had the nerve to say a console port would require better graphics. How??? Lol.
Current PC games don't look as amazing as it potentially should with graphic cards going as high as 3GB. If the next gen consoles were released today with similar to or a little less in specs than current high end PCs, initially the console games probably won't look better. However, within a couple of years, console games would surpass PC games with PC specs of today(2012).
My proof comes from history. Show me a PC game from '06 using '06 PC hardware that comes close to games like UC3.
There is one, a year later in 2007, but crysis says hi, with one 8800 gt at 1280x720 on high is enough
First of all, Crysis was a game from 2007, not 2006. In relation to ScytheX3 saying 'next gen' consoles won't be better than curren PC games, that makes the Crysis example irrelevant.
Crysis was a game where PC game developers truly pushed PC hardware. The result was that even high end PCs couldn't run Crysis on max and at a good framerate during that year. Crysis still holds up in terms of graphics today, about 5 years later.
but... who plays games on their pc?
People who like to play games and watch porn. At the same time.
Ps3 launch titles hmmm... been there, done that.
Uncharted 4 here i come..