"Here, we take a run through the classic Deck level, and show off some of the Warfare mode to see how they fare. The video is small, granted, but you can see the speed difference, and subtle colour changes between the two versions."
Games for Windows beats PS3!
mark 1 u are a snob pc snob. and a bill boy
ps3 just looks as good as the pc
hahahah loser. PS3 beat your defecto console in EVERYTHING. Including getting Unreal Tournament 3 Exclusively.
ps3 version looks almost as good as the PC version
Wow, the low resolution videos make it look like the PS3 and the PC version are almost on par with each other. however, I can say that this is NOT the case. My buddy bought this game for the PS3. Then he played the demo on my PC and was sadly upset at just how much better it looks on my PC than the PS3.
But then again, he only paid $500 for his PS3. You get what you pay for.
if it a comparison video how is it an exclusive?
report as spam and move along. Everyoen knows he is anti sony .
yea it would be dumb buying a $2500 computer to play games. The PS3 is def the best.
If you try running unreal on even a $1000 comp it would look like crap.
PS3 shold take this as a compliment, the fact that it is being compared to a PC. In order to make the game look that good on a pc you'd have to have a top line gaming rig worth probably about £1500, and that sudenly makes even the original PS3 price tage of £500 look cheap. So yes mark1 the pc is better, but then if you spend 3 times as much on it, you'd bloody well expect it to be better. (and it sure as hell isn't much better).
the only thing it illustrates to me is how much farther the engine has come along...
compare the PC and PS3 versions of UT3....and then compare the PC and 360 versions of Gears...Gears on a PC looks like an entirely different game in terms of polish...in fact I would say Gears on the PC looks even more impressive than UT3 on the same machine...I am not saying that is the 360 being weaker or anything, Rein stated that the 360 version of Gears used a much less optimized version of UE3 than UT3 for the PS3 and PC...but it would appear to me at least that the PC gears port used the same updated engine...
but anyone with a strong PC knows how crazy good these games can look...and the fact that the PS3 is keeping up with a serious rig is fine with me, although its the mods that have my attention on this game...not how well it compares to other versions...
Need to wait for Gametrailers HD video comparison.
both versions look the same, nice work epic.
The PS3 gameplay looked a bit slow. Slower then Resistance, IMO. Does anybody have a real impression on that (I mean, someone who has both)? Busy with AC ATM, UT3 has to wait a little...
Wow, CVG comparisons always suck, they always use completely different footage.
the PS3 will never be able to handle what the PC does without framerate issues and other technical issues regardless.
why the comparisons...wait for the 360 comparisons
Just buy what you like and play what you like. That would work best. Comparisons never work out. It would be different if it was a totally impartial company that did them on the exact same display device with the exact same settings. I have yet to see a comparison look the same as it does on my displays at home. Whether they are better or worst they never look like what I see in my own home but then again my set is calibrated properly for each console.
There are no "frame rate issues" or other "technical issues" in the PS3 version compared to the PC version.
many people will have moved on from UT3 to care. Not that 360 people won't care but to wait 6 months to compare products doesn't serve to prove anything. Not bashing 360 or anything just if you're gonna compare vids make sure they're within a reasonable time-line.
working on a Gears of War vs UT3 comparison. I'm sure that would get set on fire at N4G in a matter of minutes. I am dreading it already.
I don't think I can play those Unreal Tournament games anymore. All that spaz movement is going to make me have an aneurism.
running them both at 720p i can definitely say the pc has sharper textures at the same rez. the ps3 version does come off with slightly blurred image in comparison. i wonder if the ps3 one is actually 1280x720. that video though isnt doing justice to the ps3 version. its not that washed out looking. it just doesnt have a overall sharper image than the pc at the same rez. also, i am not sure if you guys or gals have noticed, but the ps3 version also is suffering from some horrible sound sampling issues. they sound like they are sampled at 11khz most of the time. the pc demo doesnt suffer from this. but all that said, its still one hellava game. i miss the unreal intensity online.
@ comment 10.1
i have my pc going to my hdtv via hdmi(dvi to hdmi cable). same as with the ps3 of course :)
what size HDTV are you basing this texture comparison on?...if your PC screen has a HDMI input or something...and you still came to this conclusion...then I believe you...but comparing upscaled textures on even a 42" HDTV compared to a ~20" PC moniter...of course a the PC moniter is going to look less blurry (the textures are closer to there native size, rather than "blown up")...
its pretty likely that both games stream the exact same textures anyway...its just the PC version supports more of them for high end rigs...texture building is extremely tedious and expensive...why would they make two sets of textures for the same game?...I could be wrong about it, I am not sure how they are handling that...but as far as the mod tool goes, the PC and PS3 are built from the exact same texture bank...there are no "PS3 textures" to use instead of the PC version...
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think the console version was intentionally slowed down due to control scheme. Being Mouse and keyboard able to handle a faster game than a joystick.
anyhow, I guess there is a mouse and keyboard for the PS3... Does the game have a speed up option?
I think that´s what you saw, Ju. But I don´t really remember if this info is precise. Can someone confirm?
do any of you guys remember when console versions of games couldn't come *CLOSE to matching the PC counterparts?
hmmm...i thought not.
the fact that the PS3 version of Unreal is even *COMPARABLE to the PC version is impressive enough for me.
also, i didn't have to spend a buttload of money to upgrade my PS3 to play the game properly.
in all honesty, it's a win/win for everyone;
the PC gamers who are fortunate to have high-end systems get to experience the game with jaw-dropping graphics (and make and play mods), while the console gamers that can't afford a $1500-$2000 PC setup can experience the game with jaw-dropping graphics (and play mods made by PC users*). like a said, it's a win/win.
if i hadn't seen the comparison videos, i never would have realized there was a difference, as the game looks stunning running on my 40" 720p LCD Samsung. and even the comparison just shows slightly muted colors (interestingly enough, it doesn't look like that on *MY TV; you know, televisions and games have video settings for a *REASON, guys), and a slower pace. though, honestly, i think Unreal on the PS3 is still pretty damn fast and hectic, just not as fast as the PC version (i played the PC version on my PC, though it looked like utter [email protected]
*once they release the PS3 tools for PC modders, that is.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.