So far whatever gameplay video we have seen of Ninja Gaiden III, no matter whether it is from PS3 or Xbox 360, it looked amazing, but the question here is on what platform does it look BEST.
... I sure hope it will have the option for original voices included.
I know that is the purpose of this topic but realistically that would only apply to those who have both platforms. If you only have one then you would get it for that platform. My buying habits when it comes to both are centered around price and convenience and most importantly (to me anyway)...control. Some games I have turned down on one platform and picked up on the other simply because of how it controls and how comfortable my hands are when playing. I will, however, buy a sequel to a game on the same platform just to keep the games together. I generally dont split up a series unless it spans different generation of hardware.
... I also have both consoles and I just decide on a case-by-case basis for which platform I buy a certain game, depending on a variety of reasons.
I would like to get this game, but I have no idea why they had to make it more PG. I mean, no dismemberment? C'mon...
^^^ If it was still a 360 exclusive it would still be of a more mature nature.
@darthv72 The question is if the game is good at all. Most people on Iberians Realm (hardcore Ninja Gaiden fans forum) including me, have a somewhat negative outlook for this game. I try hard to stay open, but all I see is destruction of one of the greatest game(s) of all time in my book.
@gamingdroid I completely agree. They fucked up the gameplay with this one so bad. So it doesn't really matter if it looks slightly better on one platform than the other. It still plays like shit..unfortunately. Which is really sad as Ninja Gaiden is my favorite hack 'n slash series.
I read a youtube comment, and it says 360 is really showing it's age. I don't think that's the case. I think the ps3 is showing it's age, more devs are getting better at making games for it.
Both consoles are showing their age and that's a fact.
Then yes, I agree... But reaching the skill level of Sony's first party, typically naughty dog, Santa Monica and gorilla games, no. Not quite yet.
Its always funny seeing console gamers argue about which dated 5-6yr old tech is better. Usually the differences are very hard to tell. Hahaha, yet when a PC comparison is done they say "oh but we dont care about graphics, its gameplay". Why doesnt the same logic apply in console vs console comparison lol?
Factual Evidence (ever watched Elpresador?).Both consoles are showing their age,but gotta say though the PS3 have a little more life in it than the 360.Xbox came a year earlier,way easier to develop for and the PS3 is in fact a little more powerful overall,but both still got life on them specially if we speak in terms of art.Just as a side note I feel sorry for the Wii U since every tech demo and games they had shown for it until now (with the only exception being Zelda),they look dated already and it the hardware is not even out yet.
PS3 version looks better!
without Itagaki I fully expect this game to be crap. Plus ninja gaiden on Playstation still seems weird to me.
Ninja gaiden was supposed to appear on the PS2 until the announcement of the first Xbox, that's where Itagaki preferred making games for Xbox, & that included Ninja Gaiden 1, & in my opinion I like playing those games more with the Dualshock!!!! If you say Ninja Gaiden on Playstation is weird, then Devil May Cry on Xbox is weird as well!!!! Now looking at the video, they both look about the same, so no biggy, just to see how the game will end up like!!!!
Yea, I agree. At least to me, the 360 is good for shooters but that's pretty much it. For me, the Dualshock just feels better for everything else, especially fighters, action, and adventure games.
360 console itself is WEIDER..
only difference i see is the contrast. The ps side seems to have deeper blacks.
PS3 looks cleaner too, is not just the contrast.
who cares really as long as this game kicks my ass and gives me a challenge.
That why I doubt this comparison. Since both consoles are outputting 720p resolution so either PS3 version should have SSAO, better AA and AF. Which I don't think is the case or both consoles are being run on different settings of monitor/TV. I remember earlier their was GTA 4 comparison It was labeled as 360/ps3 comparison. But ppl said one looked better and other worse, the fact that both footage were of PS3 on different color/contrast settings was revealed at the end of the video.
360 version has a higher contrast, but both versions look pretty good. I wish Capcom would make a damn next-gen Onimusha game already, it would be epic.
omg yes love that series. and xbox looks better, have to even it out a little
nah lol this site is so play-station fanboy heavy that i thought it would be funny ( and i was right, 19 disagrees, i def hurt somebody's feelings ). plus the xbox needed some love. reality is though, brightness is the only real difference as usual.
Nah. Just hurt your own pride. Try not to care about the disagrees so much next time.
Yeah Quark, no one could possibly just disagree with you, so you must have hurt people's feelings. Give me a damn break.
You know whats weird? You complain about Ps3 fanboys yet your name is Captain Qwark 9.... I mean are you a fan of the Rachet franchise? But yeah none of the versions look "better" than the other. I guess the console you love the most will always look better to you (talking about fanboys... not you) The only thing I noticed is the textures are sharper on the PS3, but that is it. On topic with Ninja Gaiden... this game has the most over the top multiplayer I have ever seen
AAAAHHHHH HAAA HAAAAA HAAAAAAAH No
Captain Quark only joined in 2010. Even so that holiday season there were numerous "PS3 is teh Doomed" stories. Not as bad in years past though. Had he been here then he would have been treated to a plethora of stories detailing, wishing for, and prognosticating the demise of the PS3. So often it is when the shoe is on the other foot people suddenly complain about the fit. And yes, the PS3 has a quite noticeable edge.
@bioshocking yeah im a big fan of ratchet and clank, one of my fav series of all time. and finally somebody who is not a sony fanboy lol or maybe you are but your not dillusional at least. and i agree with you as well when you said your fav console will always look better, im pretty sure fanboys just lie to themselves to feel better about their system on that note, i personally dont really see sharper textures myself becuase all i see is a game with its brightness set to the max, regardless of the article claiming its not. and "if" it is set to normal than they should prob go in and adjust them to be more similar as to get a more fair comparison. when im looking to compare a games graphics i want to compare things i cant change for example texture detail, sharpness, looking for jaggies, missing/additional assets, etc.. to me this article looks like nothing more than an attempt to get hits and start a fanboy war, which it seems to have succeeded at well and lastly, yeah the mp looks nuts but im not sold on it lol the sp looks better than ever though so im pumped, i will miss the decaps though :( @biggest lmao man what does my pride have to do with anything? i couldnt care less which system looks "better" becuase i have ps3 & 360, ill get it on whichever i feel like @morganfell i have been coming to this site for years before i joined lol i was just in college when i discovered it and didnt have time to chat up the comments section. i seen all the lame ass "ps3 is doomed" articles, once again just more people blowing smoke to get hits. fanboys are easy targets becuase all you have to do is say one bad thing about any console and what do you know, 100 comments/hits in an hour lol look how many responses i got to this as a good example lol i knew i would. recently i have been commenting a lot and typically their rather intelligent ( or i would like to think ) and as unbiased as i can be and i get maybe one or two responses. i comment with something ridiculous like my very first comment and look at all the responses lol
ps3 looks a tad better but who is really going to care.
i do, because i want the best version.
The blacks look ashy on the 360 version but im sure you wouldnt noticed unless side by side But graphically they are the same
Not a good comparison, but the 360 version looks a bit darker on my screen. You need to look really hard to see it though.
there must be something very wrong with your screen, if the 360 video looks darker
PS3 looks a little better, also looks like PS3 has a little better frame rate. Though not surprising as they are using the sigma engine, which was made for the PS3
PS3 looks sharper and less blurry
It seems to me that some textures are better on 360 but PS3 has a more clearer image (maybe more resolution?) What really matters is the framerate performance, anyway.
They look completely different. Like night and day really.
exactly, the ps3 version looks way better.
there's no graphical difference. Maybe a slight contrast difference is all, other than that this game looks smooth across both platforms.
ps3 looks better
hopefully the game maintains a steady 60fps throughout. if they can do that, then idc which one looks better.
both look the same, both look last gen. need new consoles badly play a game like the witcher 2 maxed out everything else becomes a ps2 game. maybe don't play the witcher 2, it ruins console games.
The Witcher 2 does look amazing, but you are aware that is a DX 9 based game correct? You know the same DX 9 the current gen uses. Which essentially makes the programming used in the Withcer 2 the same as used in current gen. Now what were you saying about new consoles?
Um....just cuz consoles do dx9 does NOT mean they can look that good. Have u not seen the 360 witcher 2? It looks garbage in comparison. Consoles are ancient. Just accept it. Thy are now SHOWING their age.
@h311rais3r I maybe should have stated it better. I was pointing out he was using a game that uses dx 9 which is ancient in technical years compared to dx11. If he was going to point out why new consoles are needed he would have been better off comparing Battlefield 3, because there you have a real world comparison to make, not to mention on PC it's dx 11. I guess I was just saying he was using a poor example. ( I loved Witcher 2 btw)
I love it when people disagree with facts, this country is full of morons.
"everything else becomes a ps2 game." No. It really doesn't.
its hardly worth comparing 2 machines of the same gen: go with the platform you use on a regular basis or preferred controller - i love the first ninja gaiden on my old xbox crystal: completed it on its highest difficulty, after many tantrums. good times. i hope this games is as good!
if anyone considers one better than the other you seriously need to trade your fanboy glasses in. they're identical.
It is actually hard to say, because of the video compression and due to different scenes. For instance, at first glance I noticed the leaves looked all messed up on the Xbox 360 version, but then I never really spotted that part in the PS3 version. There was one scene I noticed the texture was different and better on Xbox 360. That said, is this game going to be good? So far all signs point to no. :(
no fanboy glasses here, the xbox version looks a little faded while PS3 version looks sharper.
the main difference is lighter versus darker, everything else is pretty dam close.
so does he kill the man?
i know right! I hope not. Im always a sucker for the "i got a family" plug; who can kill a family man?
is everyone blind??? the ps3 version has sharper textures, cleaner graphics, deeper colors and blacks and seems to run smoother...
the ps3 version looks better by miles.
PS3 version looks better by the landslide, just look at the freakin video! The colors are more vivid on PS3 version, the xbox version looks like it has some sort of grayish white film over it. PS3 version looks so clear compared to the xbox side, the only time I couldnt tell the difference was during that little security camera part...
the ps3 version looks way better, i know im getting this game for sure.
360 looks just a tad blurry compared to PS3. Probably the resolution is lower. Also, the guy playing on the PS3 is a better NG player, and makes the game look cooler just by showing off his skill.
Well judging by the video comparison it's seems PS3's ninja gaiden 3 has sharp visuals & bright vibrant colors well 360's ninja gaiden 3 has soft visuals & soft pastel colors. Cheers Gamers & Happy Gaming!
The PS3 version looks sharper and less blury. Although will the framerate be better ON THE xBOX
They look pretty much the same thing to me. But okay there is a problem with Ninja Gaiden 3: Where is the Guts chopping from NG2? That is a downer for me. True that NG3 has >>> SARCASM ALERT DANGER DANGER <<< well... a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitle bit of blood spilling D: >>> SARCASM ENDS <<< But I am sure gonna miss chopping the idiot guy's head with the stupid machine gun bazooka launcher thingy.
How come nobody ever comments on screen tearing? A game can look really good but if the image is broken up everywhere while I'm playing then it really makes the graphics useless to me. Screen tearing should be hated by more people. Uncharted 2 and 3 look amazing and also have zero screen tearing.
the thing is that the game runs at native 60frames but youtube videos are capped at 30frames so, if you see any tear there's a high chance that it was caused by the down-conversion of the video player itself and not the game.
Well since the other 2 Ninja Gaiden's tore, I was assuming this was not a glitch caused by converting 60fps to 30fps.
Both look identical with the exception of PS3 version having slightly better lighting. Very minimal that it would hard to tell the difference unless you have 2 screens side by side and up close to your face.