Chris Buffa (Modojo): One of the biggest criticisms of the Nintendo 3DS launch was a noticeable lack of Mario. What nerve Nintendo had bringing its new system to market without a game starring the mustachioed mascot. After all, how could the big N ignore a history of proven success with consoles and handhelds that appeared alongside a Mario title? Super Nintendo and Super Mario World, Nintendo 64 and Super Mario 64, Game Boy Advance and Super Mario Advance, DS and Super Mario 64 DS...all proven winners.
My guess is that price will hold back Vita at first but when COD hits it and the price drops it should do very well for itself indeed.
I agree that LBP and Uncharted are killer apps themselves but talking from a purely sales standpoint they can't compete with COD.
its called a mark up, you make the product look expensive then drop the price to make it look attractive, you guys have been duped is all and most of you dont know basic marketing strategies
The same way that exclusives sway people toward one system or another, high-profile titles get people in the door on new system. Knowing that Uncharted will available at launch makes people more likely to buy a Vita; having a Mario game available at launch would have done wonders for the 3DS' early sales.
Exclusives, which are generally AAA, and big-name multiplats push system sales; naturally, if they're available when the system is first released, people are more likely to buy the system.
Now it's priced right and has some games but it's got into this stronger position too close to the Vitas launch for me and I'd rather have a new Wipeout than a new Mario atm.