MP1st - Recently, David Vonderhaar, Game Design Director at Treyarch, opened up a dialogue with fans revealing what kind of thinking goes into developing a Call of Duty game.
I just want a new engine treyarch and better online.
new graphics engine and some actual work on sound design would win me back in a heartbeat.
That's Battlefield 3 dude.
"Treyarch dev talks innovation"
Honestly, while a new engine would be nice, it's new gameplay that I would be more interested in. Fewer Michael Bay-style explosive set pieces and more stealth and exploration. Give me some actual pacing with real peaks and valleys rather than constant, brain-numbing action scenes. Lose the on-rails vehicle sequences and give me wide-open battlefields with vehicles that can be driven in any direction to take on objectives as I see fit. I could go on, but you get the point. It's the super-linear progression from one cut scene to the next that is killing the series, more so than the engine.
Laugh if you like, but there was more innovation in Black Ops than in MW3, relatively speaking. You're sure not going to see anything great from Infinity Ward, because their main talent is gone (hence why MW3 is a warmed over re-hash). If Treyarch can't bring more innovations, you might as well stick a fork in the CoD series, because no one else will.
They wont. The second the game changes from quake 3 with modern day guns, people will scream. A new engine is the definite end to the COD/MW juggernaut,and the rat maze, circle jerk, musical chairs game play COD has become.
To be honest, I was a big fan of CoD 4 (played it on PS3). So I bought CoD [email protected], to learn that they sold me a full price map pack with a slightly weaker single player campaign. The multi player was not bugged that much as the CoD 4 multi player before the patch that took them 2 weeks to release for the US version and additional 6 weeks for the EU version. CoD [email protected] was my last purchase of that franchise. Now I have BF3 on my PC running an average of 60 fps on ultra settings. What can I say? I'm happy with that. For those who prefer smaller maps and infantry only gameplay I hope that there will be a new engine and some change of direction gameplaywise for the franchise soon.
Cod4 was brilliant. I wish we could go back to its simple and balanced gameplay aswell as the amazing map design. The three kill streak system and the small amount of camoes that served to show off how many headshots you had with a weapon were perfect. Also does anybody remember how awesome it was the first time you picked up the 50. cal sniper?
Actually it's pretty funny to say people don't want a COD 4 remake and are waiting for innovation, when they actually just took Infinity Ward engine to make their games. We ll talk about innovation with Treyarch when they will work on their own new engine. Untill then they are just releasing like extension every year for 70 bucks. Because of their lack of innovation, they are killing all the positive thoughts around the licence. It may sells more but the multiplayer is just getting worse with time.
Yeah I have to say I think Blops is the best Cod since 4. But they have done **** all innovation wise, they just had the engine and did what they wanted with it. Which is still little more than an expansion to Cod4
I thought Nazi Zombies and Gun Customization was pretty innovative. How was BF3 innovative? New Engine? That's not innovation. Destruction? Bad Company 2 had that, and Red Faction did it better. Sound Design? That's always been great? How was Uncharted 3/Gears 3/etc. innovative?
Nazi zombies is horde mode. Gun customization.. .please don't tell me you think Cod invented that? BF is new(nuff said on it). Cod isn't new since 4. Just map packs and perks. Either improving the game or making it worse. Nothing more nothing less.
You wan't a game with crazy customizations try Rainbow6:Las vegas 2 i'm sure there are games more customizable but that was awesome,the controls take getting use too but it's fun.
the words Innovation and COD dont go together
BAHAHAHAHA strike packages... ive played it and all i have to say is support is ppl who cant get kill streaks and its still the same old boring mw2
"Strike packages, anyone?" That's not innovative...that's just re-tweaking what they already had going. That's like saying that Deathstreaks are innovation after Killstreaks were around.
Yeah, I'm a little surprised the universe hasn't folded in on itself for even suggesting the idea. It's like saying there are lawyers that have morals, or will work for free. Things like these NEVER happen.
They do, aslong as you put the words 'no' infront of 'innovation' and 'in' before COD.
I'm not a COD fanboy, but you have to at least recognize what the games Infinity Ward made has done for the genre. Tyarch and innovation don't go together, but Infinity Ward games have always innovated (that is, until the company collapsed after MW2 released). MW3 is the first game from IW that isn't up to par with the rest of em, simply because the talent is no longer at IW, instead at their newly formed studio Respawn. COD 1 invented aiming down sights, almost a decade ago. Other developers only recently started doing this in their games. COD2 invented the regenerative health system that is standard in every shooter today, as well as other things like hitmarkers, onscreen grenade indicators, toss back grenades, etc. COD4, being the most innovative, literally invented the entire online multiplayer framework used by other franchises today. Perks, killstreaks, leveling, challenges, etc. Innovation can be measured by it's influence. I think most rational people would agree that COD4 and MW2 have been quite influential. So for you to say that COD has never innovated, would mean you have not been playing video games for very long, or you're just an obnoxious fanboy that jumped on the "hate on COD" bandwagon ever since MW2 became a huge success. Don't blame Infinity Ward for what Activision did to the series (as well as their studio). Jason West and Vince Zampella hated it just as much as you all do, which is why they had their big fallout. They hated Treyarch with a passion too.
I want a new engine too but I know it would bring too much compromise on current-gen consoles.
"I just want a new engine treyarch and better online." Oh, is that all?
And better sound might do. Oh, and a singleplayer that actually has some LENGTH. And guns that were more balanced from the start. And a simplified list of killstreaks. And solid hit detection. And either a legitimate way to use sniper rifles, or none at all. And much weaker auto-aim.
No dude, Battlefield is battlefield and Cod is Cod, now that said its not to mutch to ask that cod get a upgrade many peoploe have been with this franchise and its only fair that they up grade and make a real good looking Cod for the fans.
New engine will happen next gen. It's just how it is. But what's this? " It can be speculated that the reason why fans request such a thing is because for many, CoD4 was their “first” CoD experience. Your first experience in almost anything tends to be the most memorable." CoD4 wasn't my first CoD. 2 was and that was really*** great for the time but CoD4 knocked it out of the park in nearly every way. That's why I want every CoD game to be similar. Because it was great. Instead, we get horrible mw2, decent fun with black ops and a game with 1 shot kills with mw3. Well, whatever. I rented mw3 so I guess I can't complain (woo gamefly!).
I want there to be a break till the new consoles are out. New engine, ideas and a fresh start. Lets get creative people! I realize that is a pipe dream.
You can't get any better than cod4,its a classic.They tried and failed or just got lazy,dedicated servers would be great....be the sad thing is that it's all about shareholders and greed.It's a bloody shame:-(
Treyarch did some great things with Black Ops, things that didn't even make it into MW3. Hearing all this stuff, I'm getting quite excited for their next title, be it Black Ops 2 or whatever, maybe even more excited than I was for MW3.
If all studios behind the CoD franchise can coordinate better, we'd get more polished games.
Call of Duty: Modern Ops!
Call of Duty: Black Warfare
Call of Duty: White Warfare
Call of duty:Brown warfare.
I rather have a WaW2...guess I'm the minority :(
I'm with you. I'd love to see a WaW2.
i myself enjoyed WaW more than the modern rehashes they keep making, having no scopes and getting long shots on ppl was pretty fun when using the rifles. The only thing i didnt like was the tanks the maps where too small for them imo.
True. If they do a WaW2, they either need to balance tanks a lot or just take them out completely. I just absolutely loved WaW though. Every gun felt like it had some type of power to it and just the feel was so great. Thompson was amazing to shoot.
@Mister V Same here. Black Ops was my favorite since COD4, simply because of the freedom of customization, and the instant gratification of being able to purchase any, perk, upgrade, and attatchments you wanted for a gun as soon as you unlocked it. I was never a fan of the "kill X amount of people for unlock this attatchment" that IW does and Treyarch did with WaW. I also thought the maps were better, and I really enjoyed the wager matches and their unique game types. I think the only thing that held Black Ops back was the lag and server issues. I didn't pick up MW3 because, quite frankly, I just need a break from CoD. Picked up BF3 on release day and have'nt looked for another online shooter since.. but if Treyarch stick with Black Ops too I may just check into that.. might be what I need to renew my interest in CoD.
Who the hell wants a CoD4 remake?
Nobody... they want the memories and good times they had on COD4, but those days are long gone.
Exactly, nobody wants a remake, they want a game with the same quality, same ammount of balance, simplicity (NO MORE THAN 3 SET KILLSTREAKS and all that other crap like tactical insertions) and just a good new game. Sadly that probably won't happen if Activision does what they always do, run it into the ground and don't care. I mean everything they added from COD4->MW2 basically broke the game. It really did and it was a shame. Now it's just a sad joke that people still think it's good because of how great COD4 was that set off this monster of a bad game managing to become popular for so long.
@ 3gen Perfecty* said. +bubbles
@ 3gengames I disagree with you. I have been let down on all COD's since COD4, but I actually enjoy MW3. I really enjoy support killstreaks and bigger rewards for playing as a team and going for objectives.
I think one of the main problems for each new iteration is the kill streaks they just keep adding more and more crap like that, when what most COD players want a back to basics COD4 experience. We want it to be about the shooting again and from what i can tell its more about the kill streaks and getting the kills is just the means to an end. Each new COD seems to get further away from the game we all loved.
nobody wants a remake... what we want is a sequel that plays as consistently as cod4 did. Cod4 was not perfect. it had bugs, it had lag issues at time.... BUT, compared to blackops and MW3, it played like a dream. It does not matter what new and great innovations they put into the game if the game is hardly playable. I thought Blackops had some good ideas on paper, but in the end it meant little if every time I empty a clip into someone I would get killed by one shot. Then I would have the pleasure of watching the kill cam which showed me not even lifting my gun. MW3 is even worse. I dont care for all the fancy crap they put in it. if I shoot first and accurately at the guys head I want to be rewarded for the kill. Not die and then watch the kill came of the guy shooting the thin air to the left or right of me and getting a head shot
how can you remake a current gen game for the same gen?
I was thinking the same thing.
Guess after black ops 2 or whatever they end up calling it, we will get a Call of Duty anniversary edition (CoD 1 released in 2003 iirc), just seems to be a trend now xD
as much as I hate COD, those are some true words right there.
honestly from the LAST people I'd ever expect to hear them from seriously...some major irony.
COD and INNOVATION should never be in the same sentence. unless the words "lack of" are also included. COD4 was extremely innovative. However the 4 games following it are not. Not even progressive in the least.
"COD and INNOVATION should never be in the same sentence. COD4 was extremely innovative." Well, that's ironic.
Contradiction is fun.
lulz. it is ironic i posted that. However and i'm sure you know i'm talking about everything after cod4, i guess i shouldve said "should no longer" be in the same sentence
MW2 and Black Ops actually added plenty of new features. Trolls like you however, just like to ignore that fact. WoW was a (basically) carbon copy of CoD4 though. (However, the games are unbalanced and glitchy)
What the hell is this? Who wants a CoD4 remake? What would they remake it with? They still use the same engine, FFS. @AdmiralSnake - Oh please, I currently own 3 CoD games and have owned CoD4 on multiple platforms. I'd bet that I've easily played more CoD4 than you have. This is still an absurd idea. Remakes are typically done across separate generations because of a demand for graphical upgrades and enhancement. Remaking CoD4 on the same engine in the same generation would be utterly pointless. I'm sorry if that bit of realism is lost on you.
And THE SAME, trolls come on every Cod articles complaining, Irony isn't it ? Played more than me ? That is quite irrelevant, I see the same shit, from 90% of you morons on this site complaining and whining. Don't like it, don't buy the damn game. There's no demand for graphical improvement. Barely any game changes their gameplay mechanic, and regardless of whether it have better graphics, will that improve your gameplay experience ? Absolutely NOT! New Engine ? I didn't hear that shit till BF3 came out. COD fans want dedicated severs, a new engine is quite irrelevant right now, plus the new gen is apparently on its way, if next gen comes, and they still use the same engine, you may THEN complain. Lmao I see more people complain about COD engine, than the one Bethesda use for Skyrim.... haha.
You misuse the word irony pal. How is it ironic that the same trolls are in every COD article? Thats more typical than ironic lrn2engrish
@Chnswdchldrn I believe the irony he is going after is the irony of people who say they hate COD and they can't stand, etc, are the ones who post more in the COD articles. It's ironic, meaning the opposite of what should be. Therefore, most of the posts in COD related articles are from people who say they can give a sh*t about COD yet they continuously post in every article. It is also typical for this site, but it is also ironic that the people who say they hate COD and haven't bought a COD since COD4 are the majority of the posters.
Maybe its because the haters on the newer COD games are also the bigger fans of COD4 and every time a new COD comes out with more kill streaks,death streaks and whatever streaks they think of next they feel the COD franchise die a little bit.
Still....remaking a game that used the same game engine it started with is kind of a rip off. Might as well make a HD texture patch for the old game and sell it as DLC.
These guys are saying that a COD4 remake "would be neither an innovation or evolution" yet all other CODs that have come after COD4 were hardly innovative and in no way were they an evolution. Way to contradict yourself there Treyarch come back after you have made a decent COD like COD4 and that's not a hot steaming pile poo like Black Ops.
No evolution? Black Ops added a TON of customization, completely changed the weapon upgrade system, added dolphin dives, new effects, dynamic levels, expanded stat tracking (IN GAME), theater mode, etc. Then MW3 took 90% of that and threw it away, or provided an inferior version of it. If took a gamer who was unfamiliar with the series and put MW3 and Black Ops side-by-side, I guarantee you they'd think Black Ops was the newer game by at least a couple of years.
All of what you just said is nothing new, other games offer the same additions and the weapon upgrade system in BO was terrible so were the maps they are some of the worst in COD history. Also what new effects? Graphics were a downgrade from MW2 lol but i do think MW3 is even worse than BO so i retract my statement about it being a pile of poo and instead give that title to MW3.
Well , i do know i dont want and expect them from you , nor anything
They've already made about four or five cod4 remakes.
Call of Duty: Future Warfare This way they can make everything up and come up with brand new ideas because no one knows the future.
o god... every gun standard equipped with a heartbeat sensor that bleep every .05 seconds showing direction and precise movement, kill streaks being even easier to get kills look in the general direction of the enemy fire megalazor destroy everything except buildings, perks would just be buffed further cuz hell this is the future!! but nah they probably wont do that. theyll just recopy and paste mw2 then change bullets to lazors edit: also each gun has 4 attachtments cuz bf has 3 so MUST HAVE MOAR with no drawbacks of course on any of em
yes and since its the future there will be cloaking and guns that shoot through walls. It will be the best game EVAH!