SchollA from Console ControllUs writes:
“Before you call for my head, this is not a “Gears doesn’t deserve to be nominated” article. This is merely looking at how easy it could of been for Gears to get nominated and the fact that it didn’t might actually mean there’s light at the end of the tunnel. Let me explain.”
Why should a corporation have to choose the GOTY.
Than skyrim and portal 2 hands down in my opinion as well.... And I also prefer resistance 3 and shadows of the damned better than those 2 games also;) just putting it out there heheh!
OT: I'm okay with Gears 3 not being nominated. It felt like a rehash of every other Gears game and really didn't add much of anything in the way of gameplay and especially story. (Haven't played the MP much so can't really comment on that.) Ultimately, it was a disappointing conclusion to the series.
But most of those same complaints could be leveled at UC3, too.
but anyone who says gears is just a rehash and uncharted isn't needs to take off fanboy goggles.
In fact I think Uncharted 2 > Uncharted 3.
@IcarusOne
Most of the innovation for Gears 3 was toward the Multiplayer (Horde 2.0, Beast, new weapons and balancing, servers, etc.)
The multi is where Gears shines, while the single is where Uncharted shines.
For example I personally got a little bored of UC3 half way to getting the platinum, but I can still see the game objectively and feel it should still be nominated.
That's what these award commitees do. (Or at least I hope they do) Even if they didn't personally like X game they won't let that get in the way of their professional opinion and will try and be as objective as they can.
It seems like sooo many people can't wrap their heads around this simple idea that there's a difference between and personal and professional opinion.
I voted for Portal 2 for every single category it was nominated on.
It's a really good game, so I wouldn't mind it winning GOTY. It's one of my faves this year.
But it would also be funny because it would piss off a lot of fanboys :P lol
Portal 1 was groundbreaking when it came out and 2 just used comedy to mask how little of an improvement it actually made and pull in some big dollars.
Skyrim is very good overall, but it is too flawed and the guild quests are boring (did they playtest it AT ALL?). It could have been 10x the game it is but no doubt they knew it would sell like sweetrolls so didn't bother (shareholders need their dividends).
I won't be buying Gears 3 (refuse to pay for XBL anymore, which means I won't be buying any xbox games with significant multiplayer components either - fix your business model M$, or er... just market to stupid people who like to pay for things twice like you have been doing thus far)
My GOTY would be TW2 because it didn't just follow a guaranteed cash pattern, so the game was actually fantastic and refreshing. Though I've still Dark Souls to get so I might change my mind (I havn't mastered Demon Souls yet).
Also: "GTAs winning left and right"
Yes... because GTAs are excellent - good fun and top production quality. I'm just hoping that 5 is going to have some actual extra content and awesome stuff in it like 1,2,3,VC and SA did, they can keep the main missions serious if they want - but why skimp out on other content? Oh wait, the game will sell anyway...
You can't reward developers who constantly keep putting out buggy/glitchy games.
Errr... no. All the bugs are in isolated logic patterns.
Code isn't duplicated when a game is large...
Most of the bugs in Skyrim involve the AI (which breaks other things if it doesn't work - horrible programming practice that would get people fired in most studios) and untested scripts.
Skyrim isn't all that excellent either. The quests are massively dissapointing compared to Morrowind or even Oblivion. And a lot of the bugs should have been spotted within literally 5 minutes of testing.
The best thing Skyrim has done is massively improve the environment design, masking the tile-based nature of the dungeons (nothing wrong with it being tile based, it would take countless man-hours to manually model all the dungeons and it wouldn't fit on a DVD). The voice acting is also a lot better (but the AI bugs out and says the wrong thing way too often so it's spoiled). I also like the soundtrack and audio space of the game in general. Once I am done with Skyrim I will be playing Morrowind again, because I still havn't explored half of it or played many different "classes" after 500+ hours (100% Oblivion in about 120 hours).
Gears deserves it much more.
EDIT: Now that I think about all the games I've played that came out this year, I think the one that most deserves, at the very least, a GOTY nomination is Deus Ex: Human Revolution.
I also liked the story better with Charlie Cutter being added to the cast. Villains were the same with the main and his/her back-up.
The tech in the environments was also better evidenced by the ship levels and the cargo plane both being so dynamic (as well as the barges) and rotating 90° in the ship itself. Plus the horse riding was a step up from the chase scene in UC2.
I guess to sum up it seemed like UC3 didn't need to depend on constant action to keep things going but used more in total aspects to wow me.
Had UC2 not existed I expect most everyone would be gushing over how awesome UC3 is and declare it the undisputed GOTY. It improved on UC2 in many ways, but given the high bar set by UC2 there is only so much better you can get. There are a few areas where UC2 beats it, but not by much.
It's hard to do but games really need to be judged on their own merit, not relative to previous releases.
You have to look at that from both sides because if we never took familiarity into account then mw3 would be winning goty. This is because if mw2 and 1 were never released and mw3 was original mw then it would win goty all over the place
To be honest, if UC3 and MW3 were both released without any previous games, I think UC3 would be rated the better game for all it offers as a complete package. We'll never know though.
Someone should be fired.
Its why I dont trust the media scores!
Its why I wont watch the show!
Gears 3 definitely should be in the running!
Gears Of War 3:
1.Great SP:4 player co-op with replay value
2.Horde Mode:5 player co-op
3.Beast Mode:5 player co-op
4.Multiplayer
5.A new Skull feature to change your experience
6.and more!
Hater or not, that is added value everyone can respect from an already feature rich game.
VGA's should be ashamed of themselves!
It def the best shooter of the year for me so whatever f*** the awards, this game was the reward for 360 fans.
Battlefield 3 is gonna win best FPS Shooter of 2011 :-)
Not sure if it won GOTY, but it COD4 was nominated at some point because My copy is the GOTY edition that came with a map pack.
Edit: Derp.. I think that's kinda what you just said! :)
title (perception)which in turn is more deserving of an nomination of an award like "GOTY" than COD...i think gamers know why COD is popular and just take it for what it is...GoW3 on the other hand I think more was expected. Thus being more of a surprise.
The game play, graphics, and multiplayer are great for Gears. But its the story that severely turns me off of the franchise. The first one was the most bareable for me, and ill take that simply because it took me 3.5 hours to complete.
Oh, and commercial success doesnt mean a game is good. It also doesnt mean a game is bad either though. It just could be like CoD where its really easy to pick up, and fun in
bursts... you know, like an arcade game.
Honestly it just comes down to opinion. Do you like Gears or not? Life Doomer doesnt, and neither do i. But there are over 8million people each time it comes out that do. So let them enjoy it, and let those who dont enjoy something else.
The VGA's are relatively biased in my opinion, despite being a fantastic game, Batman Arkham City does not deserve nominating for best graphics, why has it been? Well, I would say it's die to the exclusivity of the first 2 Trailers on the past 2 VGA's.
Gears of War 3 is MY personal Game of the Year...
Just my 2 cents.
Related image(s)
Batman as a game techniqlly is pretty weak
(I think some folks get caught up in this game of the year thing a little more than actually enjoying a game for what it is.)
Anyways if there is any game I think should get the award its Batman:AC. Such a fantastic game, only complaint was the story was way too short...or maybe I just played it way too much.
Portal 2 and Witcher 2 come close, but the fact that Dark Souls isn't even nominated is a slap in the face to gamers. I enjoyed Skyrim, but it was buggy and not very innovative.
Thats the problem with Uncharted 3, innovation was out the window.
Skyrim is the obvious champion and I think it'll clean up with these awards.
Gears of War 3 Metacritic Score: 91 -- http://www.metacritic.com/g...
Uncharted 3 Metacritic Score: 92 -- http://www.metacritic.com/g...
Gears of War 3 GameRankings Score: 91.89% -- http://www.gamerankings.com...
Uncharted 3 GameRankings Score: 92.07% -- http://www.gamerankings.com...
So less than one point in difference between the aggregate scores somehow makes Gears of War 3 a crappy game? It means award ceremonies "get it"? No, sorry. The argument this article makes is that because Gears of War 3 is widely popular among a large amount of people -- and not just hardcore gamers -- that it is somehow not worthy of adoration.
Nope, sorry, not buying it. A game's commercial success does not preclude it from critical success, as the aggregate scores prove. This article is absurd, bluntly. Maybe a large amount of N4G users don't like Gears of War 3. And that's fine. Just like anyone not liking Uncharted 3 is fine. But to say that one or the other doesn't deserve to be nominated? Yeah, sorry, no. I'm not saying either should surely win, but they're both worthy of nomination.
ps3 standards are highers, if uncharted could exist on xbox, it would be a 11/10 metacritic score..
by the way, if you count all the existing reviews, uncharted is more 9.7 than 9.2.
A game could get a 1/10 and still be better than a 10/10. Unlikely but possible.
Review scores are only merited against the game being reviewed that is it.
This is where meta-critic fails, you really think Pacman or Wii Sports is one of the best games ever made?
Don't use metacritic it is useless.
lrn2grammar
Gaming has now turned into a bias industry. I wouldnt be surprised if the only reason uncharted 3 was up there is becasue ps3 owners are more passionate. The whole gears of war franchise deserves ample supplies of awards and regonization because as an overall GAME!!!, Epic games did it right.
If gears not being nominated is a step in the right direction then its going torwards hell.
What do you expect it's from the same people that brought you the MTV awards.
Anyways...
Portal 2 and Batman:City IMO are GOTY worthy.
Skrim is AMAZING game but does not deserve it either because of glitches. If not for the bugs, Skyrim wins hands down GOTY.
I know everyone has there opinions and all but I LOVE the game. I just wana keep playing it. Every day after work me and me mates hop online and team deathmatch to out hearts content :) very addictive and fun. (Kickerz is my gamer name) oh well other then that the only other game that I'm so hooked on is league of legends. Which didn't get nominated either :(
Oh well. Have a good day gamers :)
The fact THAT Gears....etc
Oh well, I only watch the VGAs for the reveal trailers anyway.
That said I realise that looks / engine(s) don't make the game.. but rather the imagination!
On that note.. I'm glad to see Rayman getting good reviews and I think that should have been there but it got kind of swamped which is a great shame.. for such a beautiful game!
How much enjoyment has been reaped from one, over the other, I wonder? Shouldn't that be the measure? I sincerely doubt the playtime of all copies of Gears 3 could match the playtime of all copies of Skyrim, at the same point in its life cycle.
Gears 3 is "fun". Skyrim is "addictive" and "enthralling". There's a mighty big difference there, and Skyrim seems like the clear GotY choice, if it had to be one or the other. Bugs or no bugs -- FUN is FUN, and that's all that matters in the end.
If anything, Gears 3 and UC3 are the "cut and paste with a better (or just new) story" games in the list -- Skyrim is a clear GotY nominee over such games.
I could say skyrim is cut and paste with more bugs and glitches dual wielding and shouts
*finishes pouring gasoline on the fire*