The team give their opinion on the lack of Microsoft first party software, the Uncharted series and the number of HD remakes making it onto the market.
Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"
Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”
Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever
Nice one ☝️
This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.
No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.
Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.
Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?
Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.
Microsoft's future in the video game space is murky right now, so let's break it all down.
Not anytime soon. But they're on that path.
One thing not mentioned in the article is Microsoft's money bags. If Sega had Microsoft's money, they would have still been around as a hardware manufacturer. Xbox as a platform only survives because of the money bags. They can continue making consoles for the core and port to PC.
The multiplatform strategy is only the result of arrogance and misguided leadership that blew up in their face. They thought gamers would jump on Xbox in droves if they knew that many of their favorite games would be only on Xbox. But that's not happening at all. Sales didn't increase. They decreased. Why? Because the dumb asses thought giving away these expensively made games in a cheap service would also turn the tide.
Gamers on other platforms are willing to buy quality. They don't need to be handed nearly free games in a service that aren't even finished and sometimes average in their development. Gamers buy Nintendo games. They buy Sony games. Microsoft groomed their base to not buy games. Even the quality ones. It has always been their plan to go digital. But most gamers still like single player gaming. Still like physical releases.
Microsoft's problem has always been that they don't produce high quality games at the same output as Nintendo and Sony. Actually, they should be producing quite a lot more because they're worth over 2 TRILLION. How they don't have more is ridiculous and no excuse. Buying publishers to take away from competition only backfired. Because it still takes millions of dollars to continue to make those games from the publishers they snatched. Their only choice was to crawl back to their competitors to help sustain those developers because Nintendo and Sony platforms were the ones buying games.
Am I sorry for Microsoft? Hell no! They deserved last place for putting in the least effort. They deserved the fallout for buying up the industry and didn't make a single blip on the radar against their competitors where they now need those same gamers they took away games from to support them. Part of it may have been to cash in on their competition. But the result is the slow death of their platform. They may go 3rd party. They may keep making hardware. I don't give a shit about them to worry about it. I only give a shit about the destructive nature of their industry moves that only negatively affect gamers. They could sell and drop out of the industry and I wouldn't blink. Probably laugh. But not blink. They deserve whatever comes to them. At least Sega put in the effort when it came to games. They just had poor leadership. Microsoft has poor leadership and barely makes memorable games. That's a killer combination. And not in a good way.
Not sure about that. It's been two decades and I still think about Power Stone, Shenmue, Crazy Taxi, Jet Set Radio, Seaman and others, but I'm not sure I'll remember Xbox Series X/S games in a few years from now... Maybe I'll remember about the franchises that the Xbox brand spawned, but I don't believe that the Xbox Series lives up to the late Dreamcast or even to the Xbox name itself. I do have great memories about the 360 with Blue Dragon, Gears 2 and Lost Odyssey though
No, Dreamcast was ahead of it's time and most still have very fond memories of it that had one. It also had some good games on it even in it's short lifespan. Xbox has none of these qualities.
Microsoft has announced the Microsoft Rewards app on Xbox will be discontinued in April and has confirmed that weekly streaks will also be coming to an end.
I'm confused. Is the XBox 360 a gaming console or an avenue to watch movies and social networking? "Dashboard updates are a form of exclusives? Halo, Gears and Fable spring to mind for exclusives? Exclusive DLC is a good move." <--That's the problem, most gamers I know want more than just an a exclusive or two per year and quite frankly I am a little tired of being nickel and dimed to death by DLC.
If I want social networking
(Facebook, Twitter, Skype) that is why I have tablets, smart phones, laptops and PCs. If I want to watch a movie I have DirecTV, DVDs and BluRay players. If I want to watch ESPN, again I have DirecTV.
The XBox 360 is suppose to be a gaming console. MS can market it any way they choose and the media can spin it till we all puke. I mean nobody knows marketing better than MS, BUT to us, the gamers? We want games! Everything else can be had better on other hardware.
This is what it has come down too, seriously?
All this crap about early on about Sony not having games or exclusives and it was more a movie player than a gaming device. My how the tables have turned and the spinning is completely out of control.
Its almost like we are starting to hear that "gaming" is no longer important in the gaming industry.
All of their panelists failed to mention Microsoft has created/acquired five gaming studios in the last few months..
I am totally happy with my "No Game" X360.
Seems the only people that complain about the "lack" of games on the 360 are people that don't own one. Go figure.
Currently playing Skyrim, Gears 3, BF3, and Forza 4. Sucks to be me I guess.
@PhantomTommy
Yes I'm fine with my Uncharted 4, and God of War 4, and my MGS 5, because I know there are other titles like Ratchet and Clank, Killzone, Demon Souls, Twisted Metal, Sorcery, Resistance, White Knight Crohnicles, Gran Turismo, WarHawk/StarkHawk, Infamous then I know there are games that dare to do things different like David Cage's Heavy Rain, then there's new ip's like The Last of Us, and The Last Guardian, David Cages next project, Ni No Kuni and big hitters like Final Fantasy Versus XIII over the horizon...
I'm not trying to troll because that usually leads us nowhere. I'm just saying on paper the ps3 has way more exclusives than the 360.