Approvals 12/10 ▼
PaPa-Slam (4) - 4542d ago Cancel
bigshel (2) - 4542d ago Cancel
OllieBoy (3) - 4542d ago Cancel
batdump (1) - 4542d ago Cancel
ssb3173 (2) - 4542d ago Cancel
270°

IGN: PS3 Five Years Later - The Good and the Bad

PS3 Five Years Later - The Good and the Bad

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Bad Editing
Use this for the description. "IGN's PlayStation Team breaks down their highest highs and their lowest lows in the PlayStation 3's first five years"
Criminal4542d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Add/remove tag
Remove one of the PS3 tag.
tiffac0084542d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4542d ago
DonaldBeck4542d ago

the highest point for me was when i plugged it in

the lowest part for me is when my 40 gb died 4 years later.

no worries, i got my 160 gb now.

darthv724542d ago

on the high point. Thankfully i havent had a low point yet. Unless you call paying twice for angry birds a low point. Damn rovio/chillingo!

FACTUAL evidence4542d ago

to me, the bad part of the ps3 is that we still don't have basic communication functions on psn......voice messaging is one.

Persistantthug4541d ago

Have you looked at your XMB and noticed that VOICE, VIDEO, and TEXT chat has been available for years?

How many times have you used it, out of curiosity?

darthv724541d ago

with a buddy of mine using phones and he had the PS eye on his ps3 and i used the live vision cam on mine.

Yup i used the xbox cam on my PS3. It is after all, a usb web cam.

dendenmooshi4542d ago (Edited 4542d ago )

Low point for me was the slow start of the PS3. And really, this was because of the high price and the games. I didn't have a problem with the games, it's just that none of them hit close to home for me. It all seemed like games were still trying to define "next-gen." Luckily, the PS3 had Blu-ray, which was a great advancement 5 years ago.

This small disinterest would continue for a while, but I still bought games because I knew the potential of the console. Which leads me to the all time high... Uncharted 2. It's kind of a short game, but the experience was worth more than the price tag. This was the "It" game for PS3. At least for me. It set the mark, it raised standards. It was what FF13 tried but failed miserably to be. A perfect narrative on an aspiring console. No other game can come close to it, and I'm proud to say that. I still frequently say that if you have a ps3, you MUST get uncharted 2.

5 years of PS3 have been good. I'm looking forward to the next 5.

GribbleGrunger4542d ago

funny how, on the eve of the PS3s fifth birthday, we had a lot of articles about how the 360 changed the industry and now, when the PS3s birthday is upon us, we have articles like this telling us the good and the 'BAD'.

OllieBoy4542d ago

That's the western media for you.

PS3 is the best selling console in the world, but you wouldn't know it because only the NPD matters here.

darthv724542d ago

the wii is the best selling current gen console. So neither one wins (ms/sony).

And it isnt just western media. It is subjective media in general. It has been some time sine there has been a good objective report of how things are. Good AND bad.

4542d ago
kikizoo4542d ago (Edited 4542d ago )

Only biased people can't see obvious bias. ;)

and yes, it's the best selling "current-gen" console in the world (wii is not in the same league, like ds or iphone), and the best hardware with more and best exclusives, motion controler, etc

by the way "move a mistake" : LOL, it's the best best motion controler, only biased people are searching dumb "bad" like this.

darthv724542d ago

you should point out that you are referring to "HD" console. My comment was more to the general point of current gen. It does not matter (to you maybe) what its technical qualifications are.

It has been released withing the same time frame as the 360 and ps3 and like it or not they are all after the same thing. The all mighty consumer $$$. For that, the wii is the current best selling console.

You can try and dispute those facts by changing how you classify things but they are what they are. No offense.

Boody-Bandit4542d ago (Edited 4542d ago )

Uh no DK286K it obvious bias. It has been proven hundreds of times over. You would have to be blind or plain ignorant not to see it. The western media nit picks Sony to death and has since this gen started.

On topic
The only down side for me with the PS3 is I was really hoping for more advanced PSN integrations, especially more voice options. But next gen will be here before you know it.

Where Sony just kills it is their in house studios. Far and away I had the most fun this generation with some of their exclusive titles like Uncharted, Infamous, LBP, Resistance, Heavy Rain, etc. The Uncharted series being my favorite of the bunch.

4542d ago
DigitalRaptor4542d ago (Edited 4542d ago )

@ DK286K

You do realise that this is first gen where the Internet has been a driver of information and resources for these consoles, and where an opinion can be spread like wildfire and it will be all over the web. The anonymity of the Internet means people can say whatever they want and remain an anonymous blog writer or a journalist hiding behind a corporate logo or trademark? People are not scared to show their bias on the Internet anymore and don't care if they become a bandwagon jumper.

Past generations of gaming never truly had this. Now consider this. It's pretty damn clear that the western media shows bias for basically, which ever console is in the spotlight. It's nothing to do with dominance since where is that shown? Online play? Exclusives? What? Certainly not sales. So the dominance argument is BS to begin with.

The western media have changed into something undesirable this generation because of the Internet, marketing and influences beyond market dominance. Heck, even journalists are writing flamebait on "professional" gaming media sites. So many articles that I see these days are geared towards fanboys, and written by fanboys themselves.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4542d ago
DonaldBeck4542d ago ShowReplies(1)
darthv724542d ago

the articles were more about the original xbox and how it changed things. The "xbox brand" just turned 10 years old so yeah that makes sense as to why you would see those.

This is the birthday of the PS3. Had it been the birthday of the "playstation brand" then we would see lots of stories portraying its changes to the industry as well.

Dont perceive it out of context.

Ravenor4542d ago

The Xbox just turned 10 as a brand, why wouldn't there be articles?

Dawww it's the bias, the west doesn't like the PS3.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4542d ago
WorldGamer4542d ago

Who is that child standing in the middle of the picture there?

GamerSciz4542d ago

So their bad is that it was $600 at launch (too expensive), PS Move was a mistake (Greg Miller called it...), and that having to sync trophies is an annoying setback.

Hm...well let's see.

1. $600 for PS3 with a Blu-ray player...at that time Stand-alone blu-ray players cost upwards of $1000 at launch. So PS3 was the better buy. Plus, it plays games.

2. PS Move is a niche market and you aren't forced to buy one. Only a select few games make you use it but again it's a niche market so who cares. If you like it great, if not then don't buy it. Simple.

3. Syncing trophies...well now with PS+ my PS3 turns on at 3am every morning and syncs all of my trophies and updates any game or system update I need. So that solves that issue. If you don't have PS+ then still the time it takes to sync has gotten much faster then it was with updates.

In other words, nitpicking much?

darthv724542d ago

however, standalone players were cheaper. not by much but it was the extra abilities of the ps3 (web browser, games, hdd) that sony was trying to capitalize on during its launch.

It was the competition between hddvd and bluray that caused the prices of players to drop considerably faster while leaving the ps3 to remain pricier than other brands. Even sony themselves had a cheaper standalone unit.

Blacktric4542d ago (Edited 4542d ago )

Agreed with 2 but 1-3 cannot be excused. Ever. 600 dollars launch price was a disaster considering the launch titles and the promises they made and trophy syncing shouldn't even be there at all. Just like Xbox 360, it should be done at the background. Not to mention stuff they just started admitting like how cross game chat is not possible after people asked for it for 3 years. PS3 is a great console but just like everything else, it has its faults and there's no need to act like they're not such a big deal when they actually are to some or most...

BrutallyBlunt4542d ago (Edited 4542d ago )

@GamerSciz

The only one nitpicking is you. We don't need people to counter IGN's reasons or anyone else's. It's an opinion piece, that's it. Jesus, are we that loyal to brands where we must defend any criticisms? This is their view and they want your view.

1. The price was a HUGE issue to many. That's not nitpicking, it's reality. Did everyone who wanted to transform from playing games on the Playstation 2 to the Playstation 3 expect a whopping $600 price tage? No they did not. Did Sony offer a game platform without Bluray? No they did not.

2. Saying Move was a lowpoint also isn't nitpicking. It's part of the 5 year lifespan and is very relevant to those 5 years. It's not nitpicking.

3. Why are you defending the Trophy syncing issue? You talk about your 3 a.m. wake-up call as a counter? Seriously?

This topic is about your highest and lowest points yet you and others can't even do that. How sad. Instead once again the diehards come out to save Sony and the Playstation 3 from being mistreated.

My highs, the overall value the system represents. From free online play to Bluray support to a diverse library of exclusive content.

The lows, mainly PSN and how one can easily see that it was an afterthought. Yes it has improved but it still feels like an outside app. at times.

Now what, I'm nitpicking too?

Ravenor4542d ago

You're a monster. Poor PS3, wont you spare it's plastic heart?

Seriously though, IGN's lows aren't terribly offensive or unfounded. The Price was way to high, the Move doesn't make for a instantly better play experience in any way, and I never had an issue with manually syncing my trophies but wouldn't have complained about some AUTOMATIC INSTANT syncs.

Wintersun6164541d ago

My highest point was when I plugged it in and got myself a sweet slice of that MGS4 pie. Nothing gaming related has come even close since then.

200°

Shawn Layden Hammers Down The Importance Of Preserving Games

Former PlayStation US bigwig Shawn Layden has weighed in on the subject of video game preservation during a chat with Lan Parties, stating that more should be done by the big players in the industry to help preserve games.

Preservation is important. I’m hoping that more people in the industry, certainly the big players, begin to realize that there’s an obligation and responsibility. This isn’t throw-away stuff we’re making. This is stuff that should be around for a long time because future generations will enjoy it in the same way that we have and it’s criminal that we’re not doing more to protect it.

Sony in particular has come under attack for its poor attitude towards game preservation, having originally announced plans to shutter the PSP, PS Vita, and PS3 stores back in March 2021. This was met with widespread backlash, resulting in the format holder confirming the Vita and PS3 stores would remain open.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community180d ago
isarai181d ago

Bring him back! Or put Shuhei in charge

Obscure_Observer181d ago

"Bring him back! Or put Shuhei in charge"

I would rather have Jack as Playstation CEO and Shu as President/Head of Playstation Studios.

But Layden is definitely better than Ryan

Eonjay180d ago

Wouldn't your rather the government pass a law banning PlayStation and requiring all citizens to purchase 15 Xboxes and GP subs?

Obscure_Observer180d ago (Edited 180d ago )

@Eonjay

"Wouldn't your rather the government pass a law banning PlayStation and requiring all citizens to purchase 15 Xboxes and GP subs?"

No.

I don´t want Playstation to disappear. Actually, I want Playstation to be quite successful and maintain its leadership on the market so MS could´t never get back to their cocky ways and f* with Xbox gamers ever again.

If you read my comment history, You´ll be able to confirm by yourself that I´d been actually encouraging your PS pals hurt by MS latest acquisitions to boycott Xbox games and support Sony instead.

So I´ve been noticing that only Jin Sakai, jznrpg and Apocalypse Shadow will actually walk the talk and boycott MS unlike some hypocrites talking sh*t about monopoly and consolidation, while giving their money to MS anyway.

Botton line, though, without Playstation as competition, Xbox gamers are doomed! Period!

shinoff2183181d ago

Meanwhile Nintendo shuts down what 3ds, and wii. You hear that

Fking crickets

-Foxtrot180d ago

Well yeah, it’s Nintendo, people don’t mind when they do something shitty

DarXyde179d ago

It's not that they don't mind. People just know what to expect from Nintendo. They're ridiculous in many ways. Charging for a terrible counterintuitive online service? Cracking down in emulation when they don't do enough for their own game preservation? Charging a premium for the tech they've got?

People mind, but they are perhaps willing to treat their bad behavior with less weight because they do deliver with games. It's functionally an abusive relationship with good sex.

Bizarre analogy, but I think it's true.

ModsDoBetter180d ago (Edited 180d ago )

Whilst the compang does the bare minimum with backwards compatibility?

EvertonFC180d ago

Preservation of games isn't just BC, so many gamers don't actually know what the full meaning of preservation even means.

ModsDoBetter180d ago

That's true, but the main focus from a consumer standpoint is allowing gamers to continue to play their older titles.

Preserving the history through backwards compatibility and ease of access, which Sony don't do a great job at...YET.

The ps catalogue is continually expanded and love being able to play older titles I enjoyed on PS3 like Tekken 6, so at least they're moving in the right direction on that front, albeit very slowly.

ModsDoBetter180d ago

Learn grammar is a bit rich coming from you who can't differentiate between your and you're. English clown 😂

blacktiger180d ago ShowReplies(2)
180d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic180d ago

Does this mean we can have a lot more "Playstation Classics"? I don't feel like we're getting enough for what was promised, at least they added a few games this month.

shinoff2183180d ago

True. I've been waiting for some of those old school rpgs from the ps1 ps2 Era, where f is legend of legaia Sony

FinalFantasyFanatic179d ago

Oh yes! Give me Legaia! I don't have my original PS1 copy any more (idk even know what happened to it). There's so many games I missed the first time around, I would love the opportunity to play them.

Yui_Suzumiya179d ago

The boom of Playstation Classics seems to have fizzled out last gen. Now it's mostly remakes or remasters.

MrBaskerville180d ago

Sony is in a position where they could do a lot, with their premium games. They have all the systems in place to do something cool on the psp, ps2 and psx front, but they don't really want to, it seems.

Show all comments (22)
160°

The 15 Most Tedious Things Players Have Done in Video Games

When something wonderful becomes something so mind-numbingly routine.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2770d ago
TheCommentator2770d ago (Edited 2770d ago )

Planet scanning in Mass Effect 3 really sucked.

Alexander1Nevermind2770d ago

In reference to farming bosses, I gotta say I loved farming bosses in the Borderlands Series for better loot. I hope they get crackin on 3 now that Battleborn has been deemed a failure.

ILikeGamesYeah2770d ago

Clicking through an agonising, poorly written clickbait article

2770d ago Replies(1)
Zarock2770d ago (Edited 2770d ago )

Forgot to mention the RNG Bullshit which Is World of Warcraft. People got their second legendaries on their alts while others whom spent more time playing didn't get crap.

100°

New Doctor Who: The Eternity Clock PS3 Trailer

A new trailer for BBC Worldwide Digital Entertainment and Supermassive Game’ upcoming Doctor Who: The Eternity Clock has just been released. The brand new trailer reveles that the game will in fact be a 2D platformer and players will be able to play as The Doctor and River Song.

Read Full Story >>
capsulecomputers.com.au
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4475d ago
Godmars2904475d ago

Kind of disappointing that the game's "only" a 2D platformer.

DrFUD4475d ago

I'm thrilled it's a platformer because they can't screw that up.
I was afraid it was gonna be a point and click adventure game and those suck.

This looks like Shadow Comlpex and that would be totally cool.

Larry L4475d ago

I was personally hoping for an "adventure" game, along the lines of the new Sam&Max games, or even the X-Files PS1 game (if anyone remembers that). I think that would work for a Dr. Who game.

Or even better IMO would be a Dr. Who game made in what I call "the new generation of adventure games" which I think there are only 2 examples of so far......Heavy Rain and Jurrasic Park. A Dr Who game done like Heavy Rain would be INCREDIBLE.

Regardless of what I wish it were, I'll probably buy this game just because of the fact that I've been a Dr. Who fan basically since I was born (in the Tom Baker days), and have never played any kind of Dr. Who game, when I've been a gamer for the same amount of time.
I love Dr.s 1-5 and 9 and 10. Matt Smith isn't a bad Dr either, but after Tennant who was right there with Tom Baker, any actor wasn't going to be as good. But there has been some good stories in the Smith days, so I do like 11 as well.

But that's my problem with the game. If you asked 1000 Dr Who fans who their fav Doctor is, the vast majority wouldn't say Matt Smith. So I'm REALLY hoping this developer is smart enough to want to appeal to ALL Dr. Who fans and have unlockable Doctor skins, preferably for every single Doctor. But at the very least a Tennant, T.Baker and Hartnell skin to choose from. Besides, isn't this upcoming season supposedly going to be Smith's last? I thought I read that months ago. So they really shouldn't stick us with just the Matt SMith Doctor to use.

masterabbott4474d ago

Oh well its better than nothing i suppose

Cajun Chicken4475d ago

Actually doesn't half look bad. Doctor Who is a tricky thing to convert into videogames due to the Doctor's pacifism, I never once thought of a 2D platformer.

PirateThom4475d ago

I always pictured it as a Mass Effect style game where you travel to different planets solving puzzels and righting wrongs.

Also, the current Doctor would be fatally wounded in the opening scenes and regenerate into your created character.

The pacificism is always going to be an issue with a video game version, but the idea of avoiding combat platforming adventure seems alright...

MysticStrummer4475d ago

I'd rather see a Torchwood (Dr Who spin-off) game, but I'd bet the sexual orientation of the characters would be mostly or completely ignored in a videogame.

groupama34475d ago

is there a vita release planned?

groupama34475d ago

I was on mobile when I posted, so watching the video wasn't an option..

Show all comments (14)