200°
Submitted by mathsman 1293d ago | review

In-depth Review: Battlefield 3 - Electronic Theatre

Of course, launching at the tail end of the year, and practically going head-to-head with Activision’s industry leading franchise, Battlefield 3 has to pack plenty of content to compete. Name alone might be enough for some, but there are plenty of gamers new to the franchise that may find migrating away from Call of Duty a bigger challenge. That Battlefield 3’s single-player campaign is relegated to the second disc is indicative of DICE’s intentions for Battlefield 3. The series built its fanbase based on the multiplayer aspect of the videogames, and were it not for Battlefield: Bad Company’s insistence on characterisation it’s highly unlikely that there would be any campaign to speak of even today. (Battlefield 3, PC, PS3, Xbox 360) 68/100

math  +   1294d ago
Times must be tough.
Hufandpuf  +   1293d ago
Single player was the second disc, but it seems that's what all the reviewers played first.
Grimhammer00  +   1293d ago
Great looking, great sounding....fairly average gameplay. Vehicles are the stars of the show. Destruction is dialed back significantly on consoles.

Exploitable boosting is rampant but thankfully Dice is banning these cheaters.
Panthers  +   1293d ago
I would hardly call the gameplay average, at least online. I havent had this much fun in a shooter in a long time. But thats just one mans opinion.
cyborg6971  +   1293d ago
If you think Bf has average gameplay,cod must be sub par. And what makes you say the destruction is dialed back just on the console? This is the same engine for pc and the console was lead platform.
Kaneda  +   1293d ago
gameplay is fine..

but SP campaign mode was pretty disappointing. Nothing special. I thought Medal of Honor SP was better.

MP was fun!
iLL_Ranger  +   1293d ago
I wish reviewers would rate the single player and multi player separately (for all games). That would probably give a more accurate review of the drastically different game play a user will experience. ...But I guess and overall score is pretty useful as well.

-iLL
Avernus  +   1293d ago
Really? A 68/100...wow. Tbh I wouldn't review BF3's SP together with the MP.

MP is just wicked, and addictive. SP wasn't bad though, but shorter than I expected. Reviews are opinions now.
slampunk  +   1293d ago
Another struggling website searching for hits by giving a crappy score to a game that deserves more than a 68....

SP is not bad, multiplayer is awesome if you know how to play....give it a couple of patches and some further DLC and this game will be a MP masterpiece....
trenso1  +   1293d ago
i dont feel this was a honest review. just for hits and i felt like he was leaning towards mw3 the while time since he mentioned the game way to often. plus it seems like he only played the game on the 360 as well
ssb3173  +   1286d ago
This is a decent game, online could be better but overall its acctually pretty good

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

MegaCraft - Super Mario Sunshine Part 1

3m ago - Matt, Josh, and Trevor check out Isle Delfino in this incredible Mario Sunshine remake! | Culture

Oculus Releases Mobile SDK 0.6.0

3m ago - Last month saw virtual reality (VR) specialist Oculus VR release the Beta version of its 0.6.0.0... | Android
Ad

Splatoon (Wii U) Review

Now - Ken sprays paint (I mean ink) everywhere in the name of reviews. | Promoted post
20°

Is Allowing The Public At E3 A Good Or Bad Thing?

12m ago - With E3 making the news with their plans to allow between 4000-500 members of the public to their... | Culture
40°

GameFly Launches Game Streaming Service

16m ago - Could GameFly Streaming be the Netflix of videogames? | Industry
20°

Top 10 Mad Scientists in Video Games

25m ago - When you start experimenting with zombies, forgotten gods and killer robots, you've gotta be a l... | PS2