Is the imagined conflict between Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3 worth all the hubbub? This author says no, it isn't.
I choose bulbasaur. @acronkyoung Lol I was hoping for that exact reply XD
Screw that. Always Charmander.
It's all taste. Why does one have to be better when they clearly do things differently?
It seems in this generation there always has to be a winner, whether it's a competition or not. pathetic really.
Because this is the Internet. Your not allowed to like two games in the same genre.
Do those two games really do things that differently, though? :)
Yes, I would say so. While they're both shooters, they provide a completely different experience. For example, BF3 has vehicles, larger maps and level destruction.
Even though they're both military FPS games, it's really like comparing football to soccer. They both do their thing, even if they're similar things, and some people prefer one to the other. It's not the best simile, but it's what I'm going with.
If it's nor worth caring about why is he writing an article on it?
for teh lulz
Both have their fans....plenty of room for both
I only play campaign so having said that IMO MW3 has a good story where i found BF3 kind of lacking.
Modern Combat 3: Fallen Nation on iPhone beats both of them.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.