Is Modern Warfare 3's impressive, movie-like campaign let down by an underwhelming multiplayer?

Zoë Ainscough on how the campaign in the third iteration of Activision's seminal first person shooter 'exceeds expectations', whilst multiplayer is underwhelming, glitchy and is a waste of money if you've bought the game soley as a good multiplayer FPS

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
egidem2504d ago (Edited 2504d ago )

Call of Duty let itself down, by repeatedly milking itself every year. Just because you think that your milk is good doesn't mean that everyone else will like it!

Edit: That came out so wrong on levels I can't even explain.

bumnut2504d ago

I agree......... with your edit!

aznrunner18812504d ago

ya i hate cod. but then again, its not the only milked franchise out there *COUGH COUGH* FINAL FANTASY

hennessey862504d ago

To me the real call of duty comes out every two years, Treyarcs efforts have given COD its bad name

MrBeatdown2504d ago (Edited 2504d ago )

EDIT: Nevermind. Had two MW3 articles open and replied to the wrong one.

flavorbabies2504d ago

I think you got it backwards. Campaign is more of a let down than the multiplayer.

PSX992504d ago

Both are good to me.the campaign had a certain set piece that I was surprised by.

kneon2504d ago

Does it actually make any sense this time around? I didn't even bother buying the game because the last two had completely stupid stories in the single player and the online has gotten boring.

Titanz2504d ago (Edited 2504d ago )

The only thing that bothered me about the campaign, was the ending. xd

The airplane turbulence scene, was epic.

jdfoster2504d ago

I completed the campaign in 4 hours =/ ... decent ending though. And to answer your question. No!!

AbNoRmaL__aGenT2504d ago

lol im sorry you beat me to it so it looks like a double post

Show all comments (22)
The story is too old to be commented.