Battlefield 4: Release predictions and BF3 improvements

Product-Reviews writes: It’s too early to speculate on a possible release date for Battlefield 4, but we would like to see a new game come out within two years. What improvements would you like to see in the game, compared to BF3? A lot of people would like EA DICE to put more effort into the single-player campaign as some felt that it fell flat this time around in Battlefield 3.

[tr00p3r]

If this is a next-gen title, I would just like to see more of the same from BF3, but with better graphics, like a lot better than what we see at the moment. The gameplay is fine, so it doesn't need too much work. More tanks, jeeps, jets, equipment, unlocks..gonna be epic if this is next-gen.

[Ares84HU]

In next gen I want better graphics and physics obviously. But I would love to see 64 player battles on consoles in the next Battlefield game with true destruction.

I feel that BF3 was a step back from BFBC2 in the destruction area which is really bad I think because it was one of the biggest features I really loved in the game.

[DasBunker]

i agree on the inferior destruction in BF3... hope BTK is better... i dont really like the design in at least 3 of the current maps in BF3..

[emekcrash]

Battlefield 4 is the best game I have ever played. I have high expectations for Battlefield 5.

[SJPFTW]

looks like a fail attempt to roll lol

[sublIME2s]

Wait, what? You're already playing BF4? Damn dude...

[Gamer-Z]

60fps and 64 players on consoles like what they advertised in all those videos (what a bunch of bull).

[AndrewE]

You bought into that? That's why you're the sheep consumer and they're the superior publisher.

[ufo8mycat]

As long as the maps are designed with 64 players in mind sure. Most of the BF3 maps fit 24/32 players better then it does 64, except maps like Caspian Border.

If theres one thing that needs to be done is get rid of SP. It is not needed. The time spent on SP, could of been made improving and removing bugs in BF3.

[awi5951]

Only if call of duty does HD next time lol. It never was HD really lol.

[Geralt]

My guess:
2012 -- Bad Company 3
2013 -- Battlefield 4

[sycnation]

Didn't you see the medal of honor plug/tease in the bf3 box...
MoH $3quel 2012
Bf4 2013

[0neShot]

Talking about a game that is set to release 3 (three) years from now? For all we know there might be another shooter that will overshadow both COD and BF. So, move along, there is really nothing important to talk as of this point.

[BattleTorn]

AFter years of COD withdrawl, I can't believe I ever say... "More of the same!"

I think we can expect both COD, and BF to be around for, at the very least, a couple more iterations.

BF on consoles (if current gen or not) need more players in matches (not cut-down maps, as well)

I notice quite often, while playin Rush on Xbox360, that the server is only filling up to around 8-9 players, and staying consistant.

Now of course this is temperary issue, but I've noticed it's clearly affecting some maps more than others.

[awi5951]

Never play rush conquest is the only Battlefield mode the others dont matter lol.

[GrumpyVeteran]

rofl, why would you want a new game out already in 2 years? Sigh, this generation lol. People happily played BF2 for 5+ years.

[Hufandpuf]

DICE will try to capitalize on the COD fatigue. It would be smart for them to let acti do their thing next fall, just to see how consumers react to the COD over saturation. Rest assured, we'll see BF in some form or another in 2012, they make a game a year but they are not full featured releases (heroes and play4free).

But right now it'd be best to lay low so that next year people will be saying "remember that other shooter, BF3? Yeah that was an amazing game". It's best to fade in the shadows and and return once the industry seems to be at a standstill.

As of BF4, it's too early to talk about it now, and frankly I'm content on improving the one we already have.