IGN - Call of Duty is nothing short of a juggernaut, and for good reason.
As I stated years ago. COD is a fast paced quick game, Battlefield is a group strike, long paced game. It is no different than comparing Red Orchestra 2 to World at War. There is no best FPS, RTS, RPG, console, PC, etc. The reason why? It is opinion based and always changing......
There is a best FPS, RTS, RPG, console, etc. To each his own. One find what he or she likes better than the rest. Some like Pepsi, some like Cola. The only reason between Sodas and Video Games is that the users of Video Games have to bitch about the product they do not like.
I bitch about Pepsi all the time. Anyway, personal list: Reason 1: No expectations Reason 2: Not gonna buy it Reason 3: Kinect support already disproved. I'm sure it'll be okaaay.
Well hopefully MW3 campaign will be much better then BF3s. Ahh i remember the hype of BF3 and people bashing MW3 and look what happen...
yes what did happen? battlefield 3s multiplayer has kicked modern warfare 3s ass already, i havent played modern warfare 3 but i have played every other 1 and we all know they are all the same. People also complainging about battlefield 3s single player are stupid, i dont know where to begin on that.
Well the thing is..COD and BF have two distinct multiplayer styles. COD is focused on fast paced run and gun with quick reactions, that some people love and BF focuses on large combat on large maps with vehicles. COD = Rambo BF = Being apart of a bigger picture ( well somtimes you can be rambo and beast on i guess lol ) BF MP has not kicked modern warfares 3 ass as some people will prefer the fast paced nature then the slow paced running across large maps and getting into the action and getting sniped from someone that is camping in a bush on a hill 1 mile away lol.. All down to personal choice friend.
lol @KiLLUMiNATi_89 i'm looking forward to it for the sole reason of playing new maps on domination mode
Yea, bf3 is all about muliplayer. To be honest, that is all I care about these days. I am so bored of playing with ai, no matter how epic the story line is. Seriously, when you pay $65 for a game, are you going to be worried about the single player that you spend 8-12 hours on or the multiplayer that you spend 200+ hours on??? As for the bf3 kicking mw3 ass in mp comment, I guess we meant in originality because in no way can you say it is just a giant mod for the last battlefield. As for cod, I have been saying that IS the case for every one cod4. So yea it might be a sweet gamestyle but after waw, mw2, and black ops, I am willing to say nothing will extremely new will be added to gameplay to mw3. I mean if you like it, then cool. Not hating. I just personally get tired of repetitiveness. Not to mention I prefer playing a game that actually makes you feel like a badass in the middle of a very believable warzone.
What do you mean look what happen? BF3 sold 5m in a week great numbers. Know one in their right mind would think that It would outsell MW3. As far as campaign goes... Its a small percent that play it. You actually think MW would sell like it does if it only a single player campaign. IMO the campaign for FPS are boring. You save the world or country from alien invaders or foreign countries that invade. If you die you repeat that part of the level over while the AI does the same thing over. The hype for BF3 was well deserve. Im enjoying every bit of it. I remember how people bashed BF3 and look what happen 5m sold and still going. MW is garbage, but thats my opinion.
HAHAHAH I bought dark souls for 20$ the day it came out and am finally at the last boss.... AND HAVE BEEN PLAYING FOR 70+ hours. Games dont have to be multiplayer to get lots of hours worth of entertainment(although dark souls can be played with others too). I am not excited for battlefeild of COD despite FPS being my favorite type of game. But it is funny to see how suddenly single player doesnt matter and its "all about the multiplayer" when battlefield 3 comes out. Yet when the last COD games have come out people on this site and the internet as a whole bash constantly about the short singleplayer. If its all about the multiplayer and SP doesnt matter than I guess COD is pretty good too right??/ Or does SP suddenly matter when COD comes out with a short one again?
" Ahh i remember the hype of BF3 and people bashing MW3 and look what happen..." What happened? We got a stellar multiplayer experience that completely eclipses Call of Duty. BF3 is head and shoulders above any Call of Duty game.
Dammmmmn ign is itching to give cod a10.
That "article" has paid advertisement written all over it...
IGN are COD fanboys.....so you know
they are also uncharted fanboys I guess too right?
Just because they give it a 10/10 score....you can't deny a good game. They always go on about COD, hype it up, make it out to be amazing yet complain about it like the rest of the COD fanboys 5 months later. It will get a 9/10 score...
http://uk.ign.com/videos/20... From 1:48 constantly play and pause until you get a clear image of the MW3 box at 1:49, what do you see? The credibilty of IGN's opinion on this game is worth shit, not thats game reviews are worth anything to me, but some do point out some things such as game breaking bugs/ glitches etc.
20million fans think it won't dissapoint.
Yeah but who cares about Justin Bieber fans... Oh no wait you were talking about MW3. - I do hope MW3 is good; I reckon I'll get it on consoles if its good but I'm not getting my hopes up.
While I am a Battlefield lover, I have to admit that some of the changes that the COD game has made, (eliminating killstreaks and moving to points is a big one) impress me with this tittle. While there are only small tweaks to the game, and minimal visual improvement I still expect the game to be great. I love Battlefield for what it is, and I enjoy COD for what it is. Both great games and both will be enjoyed.
where did you see they eliminated killstreaks?
They are still there, it is just on a point system. So you get the streaks for kills and for actually doing objectives like capturing flags and what not. As much as distaste I have for this game after the last few installments, I will say this is a great idea for people to be "team" players in game modes outside of team deathmatch.
0 Reasons why I don't give a f**k.
lovely you cared enough to comment that you dont give a f**k
So clearly you DO give a f**k, because you commented
lol, I'm bored. 8 weeks off work cause I nearly cut my thumb off and can't play any games at the mo. Well, can just manage with keyboard and mouse, it's been a long time...
I love CoD and idc what the haters say, I am buying Modern Warfare 3. The multiplayer is completely addicting and I love playing it. and also fyi to people I am also buying Battlefield 3.
Fair play. Don't let people on the internet ruin a game you enjoy.
Someone is starting to justify giving out a perfect 10 for this Game i see......
I'm glad I watched those 2 hours of IGN playing through the game because that at least brought back some interest but Spec Ops has 2 players only which is a joke. Should be 3 at least...Hell, Zombies even had 4 players. Really wish they would change that.
I tell you what, im already dissapointed they are brining back the nuke (now calling it M.O.A.B) when you get 25 gun kills, Really IW?!
25 gun kills without dying is really hard though and would take up the time of most game-modes. I reckon if you get 25 gun kills in a row on CoD you should get a reward...
lol IGN those are pathetic reasons.... and this is coming from someone who absolutely loved mw and mw2....mw3 however looks utter crap. 1. Spec ops was fun yes...survival mode cool...not something that makes a game. 2. Kill confirmed one of the lamest modes I have see...im sorry but just look at it...people will camp near ares where loads of people wil die. 3. Elite hahahahaha.....reminds of those MLG crap haha seriously have we forgotten what gaming is about....making a career out of gaming is pretty pathetic in real world terms....hint its for fun. 4. The refined engine.....what bullshit...ooks exactly the same as mw2, sounds the same, particle effectslook the same, textures look the same and even the HUD looks the same. 5.STORY--- you have got to be kidding me....COD's stroy is utter shit...anyone who thins its a clever story needs to be educated...everyone plays it for the MP. Im sorry but this article reeks of PR crap like someone told IGn to write this. I swear if this game gets over a 9 I can finally understand why people say IGN are cod fanboys.
You write like you have madcow in your brain. And if not then you're simply an idiot.
As far as FPS games go, I love COD story. Ive only played COD4 and Black Ops, but I liked the story in each. And this one looks cool.
So if it gets an 8.9 its all good though right? That .1 will make all the difference. You do realize an 8.9 is still a damn good score right? Ah shucks your out of bubbles so you can't reply...haha.
Yea, like MW2 didn't dissapoint at all. Hmmmm let's take MW2, which was full of overpowered killstreaks, perks etc. Add more kill streaks, points freaks, etc. Now you get a care package for tripping on a rock. Yea this won't be like MW2 at all, nah. Then again it's IGN, they practically work for Activision. Refined engine LOL, who the eff they kidding ?! I watched a trailer where the guy threw a grenade and it as the same damn animation since COD 4 ! Let's get real here kids, every COD made by Infinty Ward since COD 4 is just an expansion pack.
I'll let you know that lame argument 'same old COD' that COD haters have been using for ages is now associated with someone who is 'stupid', 'hypocrite', 'moron', 'idiot' and 'pathetic loser' like yourself.
I think it describes Call O Dootie perfectly well, since the godamn engine has been in use practically for ages and you can tell Bobby No Dick from Activision that I called it Call O' Dootie tonight while he's making sweet love you douchbag, and remember I heard he like to cuddle afterwards.
Why can't they put zombies in this game that would be awesome because imo spec ops isn't that great with only two people if it was 4 or even 6 that would be pretty cool
That would be awesome! :D imma just wait for the next black ops so i can enjoy sum zombies.
looks like someone bribed IGN.
1. Spec-Ops was SUPPOSE to be an awesome installment to the COD series in MW2. I don't believe gamers will give two shits about it now, even with survival. 2.Kill Confirmed just looks retarded to be honest. 3.COD: Elite... Wait isn't that a con? 4.Refined engine??? Bitch please. 5.I've been a fair fan of the MW campaign, but how is it ending a good thing? IGN is just a bunch of fucking COD loving idiots. As long as COD still has some milk left in its tits Activision will keep milking and IGN will be there to sip each drop. Fucktards.
To be honest I think it would be a better comparison between warhawk and bf3 then COD to bf3. Yes i know warhawk is not a fps, but I feel they are more in the same category when it comes to MP play style. Now which game is better (warhawk or bf3) I will not comment on because these are my favorite online experinces this gen.:)
Isn't warhawk a flying spaceship game or something? vaguely remember playing sum game like that aaages when the ps3 was due to release.
Even though i see battlefield 3 as a dissapointment, I am not going to buy mw3. I do not want to support this type of game development. I was a fan of cod up until black ops but now you have to start doing something different. I feel like this is just mw2.
I don't see BF3 MP as a disappointment in any way, shape, or form. It is outstanding and undeniably technically superior in terms of graphics and gameplay, at least on the PC.
Im playing it on PC, It just does not feel like that big of a step up from the previous games and even in some parts a step down. But this is just my opinion. I still play and like it, I just expected more.
IGN gives mw3 10/10.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.