180°
Submitted by ObnoxiousGamer 1089d ago | review

Battlefield 3 Multiplayer Review (ObnoxiousGamer)

ObnoxiousGamer: The multiplayer in Battlefield 3 gives a new feel to the FPS genre - but not without its faults. (Battlefield 3, PC, PS3, Xbox 360) 7.5/10

superfranky  +   1089d ago
7.5 for multiplayer? idiots
iamnsuperman  +   1089d ago
Or it is their opinion and didn't like it. Just because they disagree with you doesn't mean they are idiots. Read the review next time. They had technical problems with it (servers) but said it was fun.
#1.1 (Edited 1089d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
WolfLeBlack  +   1089d ago
Exactly, ever reviewers opinion of the game is going to be different. Just because you disagree with the score doesn't make them idiots.
kennyboy  +   1089d ago
i still dont see how anyone could think battlefield games are fun, i cant say they arent good, but fun i dont see how
Myth  +   1089d ago
"Conquest operates like a capture the flag variant"

What? No it doesn't. Take his license away.
GroundsKeeperJimbo  +   1089d ago
^That and only having a body of three paragraphs...
BeaArthur  +   1089d ago
I only had issues finding games on Tuesday.
JellyJelly  +   1089d ago
BFBC 2 had the best multiplayer I've experienced this gen. Battlefield 3 is even better. My rating goes without saying.
aksmashh  +   1089d ago
100% Agree

Battlefield 3 has improved on BC2 in almost everyway, its confusing what people were expecting..
spenn2010  +   1089d ago
LMAO a 7.5 lol with all of its features, gameplay etc. I rated his site down and WTF'd his article. It seems anyone can have a site and get articles on N4g lol. Reviews are worthless i put my house on it that he isn't good at the game and and finds COD to be better and easier.
iistuii  +   1089d ago
Have you
Read the IGN review, along with many others ?. They say that there is floating objects, bodies disappearing into the mountains,arms & legs sticking through buildings, poor AI, average single player, yet they then give it a 9. Tell me with all those problems how it gets a 9.
ObnoxiousGamer  +   1089d ago
it doesn't take skill to be unable to find matches due to server issues. The gameplay is very good, and definitely more complex then call of duty. If the servers were functional at the time of the review, the grade would've been better. If you actually read the article, nothing was slammed about gameplay. But I wouldn't expect you to read the article and see the reason for the rating.
veChuy  +   1089d ago
7.5 for the best fps multiplayers in the history of gaming. LOOL

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

The ABCs of Blood Star – Aliens, Bazookas and Clones

19m ago - Straight out of the minds of the team at Dark Screen Games comes Blood Star, a third-person isome... | PC
20°

Camp Pokémon: Quick review & off-screen footage

27m ago - The guys over at Gaming Boulevard were able to download Camp Pokémon. They share their experi... | iPhone
20°

Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog Joystick - Hardware Review | Chalgyr's Game Room

34m ago - Chalgyr's Game Room writes: I am a longtime fan of flight simulators and space-based simulator... | PC
40°

Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel! - The First Six Hours

34m ago - The jury's still out on co-op, but this latest Borderlands adventure is very entertaining (and am... | PC
Ad

Getting started in Archeage

Now - Quick overview from Curse on everything you need to get going in Archeage. | Promoted post
20°

Donkey Kong Land 2 3DS Virtual Console trailer (Europe)

39m ago - Donkey Kong Land 2 3DS Virtual Console trailer (Europe). | 3DS