XMNR: Thanks to a patch appearing in the cases for Battlefield 3, we know that a new Medal of Honor game is on the way. Electronic Arts and Danger Close began teasing the game even further on Tuesday.
Yep, unlike some other people, I actually quite enjoyed Medal of Honor. Sure, it had its technical issues, but the story and gameplay seemed very authentic and realistic. Color my interest piqued for this game. I just hope there's more multiplayer maps on the next one. The online was fun, just limited in map choice.
I agree, I like that they for a more realistic, historical, honor point. Not the Michael bay effect, so while it had it's issues call me curious. I wonder how they'll 'honor' the troops next.
Medal Of Honor's singleplayer was short but amazing. The only "bad" part of the game in my opinion was multiplayer but I'm sure they'll make a proper fully featured multiplayer this time. Can't wait to hear more about this.
What about Bad Company 3?
Probably 2013. EA seems to be alternating the MoH and BF franchises on a yearly basis like Activision alternates Treyarch and Infinity Ward COD games.
This, and people say only Acti milks games lol. Btw, I don't mind milked franchises a long as the games are good. But hopefully people quit bashing COD.
Look to bad company 1 and compare it to battlefield 3. Now compare cod 4 with black ops(and soon mw3) See why some people are pissed off?? With the profit they gain they can deliver much much more but they chose the lazy way.
BF and MoH will alternate so 2012 is MoH2; then BFBC3 in 2013; MoH3 in 2014; and BF4 in 2015 and so on. Essentially three franchises that are really just the same game underneath.
I think I would prefer BFBC3 to MOH coming out sooner...but I guess that means BFBC3 would be on next-gen then?
yeah i wonder if they shouldnt just fuse BFBC and MOH as one single franchise in the end ?
So now EA will do the MoH one year then BF the next? Not to mention BF:BC series. Nobody else thinks this is milking the same way a lot accuse Activision doings with CoD?
No because thats 3 different games, similar but different.
So MoH is a modern fps shooter, so is BF:BC and BF. The same way CoD:MW, CoD:BO and just plain CoD is... how are the EA games any different? Just seems to me that EA is taking the Activision route except painting their sky canvas a different color.
Yeah, that's not quite the same thing as CoD every year. They (MoH, BC series, BF series) are at least 3 different games with different worlds/stories. Not apples to apples, buddy.
i liked the last moh , it was good albeit short. Hopefully this one will be a little longer and have a few more multiplayer maps
I think they should of let Danger Close should handle both the single player and multiplayer. You could tell Dice half assed the multiplayer.
Yeah, I was wishing DC did multi because the SP felt weighted and the multi felt too light.
Hopefully the AI is smarter in the sequal than it was in the prequal
maybe they will go back to how medal of honor should be and not have dice screw it up. all they did was copy/paste there formula into it were u playin moh or bf?
I think if they let Danger Close use Frostbite 2.0 but DC develops whole product, with their own campaign, maps, etc, it could be a pretty cool FPS.
I say to EA: Forget about Medal of Honor! Just merge them with DICE and have them put their 2 cents on Battlefield games. MOH in my opinion has lost its flavor, unless they totally rebuild the series, I see no huge following for the game honestly. BF3 is awesome, impressed. 360 version installed and HD texture pack. Thankyou DICE, Awesome, great job... I love you!
WHOOO YEAH! AMERICA! Bring on the clostophobic 4x4 maps!
EA: Activision 2.0.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.