1120°
Submitted by hackersdelight 1172d ago | news

Lens of Truth - Head2Head: RAGE Screenshot Comparison (PS3 & Xbox 360)

Lens of Truth writes - "Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This week we take a stroll through the mutant filled wasteland of RAGE on the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. There’s been a lot of speculation on how id Software’s latest creation would look consoles, and here’s your chance to find out." (PS3, Rage, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 3 »
Tempjf  +   1172d ago
Dang they look pretty close if you ask me. I guess performance will be the deciding factor... 3 disks or 8 gig install pick your poison
Shanks  +   1172d ago | Funny
Well rub my nipples with sandpaper and beat my wiener with nitroglycerin, somehow they look the same.
Zephol  +   1172d ago
looks the same! Xbox 360 wins!!
Korix  +   1172d ago
@Zephol
Why the hell does the 360 win if they look the same?
For me, I'd rather install 8 GB than switch between 3 discs. Depends on your harddrive in the end.
slayorofgods  +   1172d ago
The only difference I'm seeing is that they have different gamma adjustments. So really they are identical.
#1.1.3 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(6) | Report
dantesparda  +   1172d ago
@ Zephol

Woohoo! lol!
phinch  +   1172d ago
can people not see that zephol was joking....
Sitdown  +   1172d ago
@Korix
If they both look the same...why do you prefer minutes of an 8gb install over seconds of disc swapping....while keeping your space?
WrAiTh Sp3cTr3  +   1172d ago
I'm too anxious to not be able to just pop the disc in and play. Patience isn't a virtue that I have....
zeeshan  +   1172d ago
Holy sh**!!! They look the same! GREAT JOB!
Corepred4  +   1172d ago
No matter people say or think. Having to swap discs is so barbaric! Especially in an era where we have discs with bigger capacity and HDD available! Not joking, not 'trolling'. Truth.
juggulator  +   1172d ago
It's pretty crazy but they look identical. Looks like id just set the bar.
NewMonday  +   1172d ago
is this after the PS3 super texture pack?
pixelsword  +   1172d ago
@newmonday:

I really doubt it; unless the super texture pack actually means "id's a pack of liars".
ChrisW  +   1171d ago
I dunno... it seems that the Xbox version looks greener and the PS3 version looks redder.

Literally! And I don't think it's because of the color of the boarder around the pictures.
#1.1.13 (Edited 1171d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report
YangBrett   1171d ago | Spam
badboy7428  +   1172d ago
I have 1TB HDD in my PS3 I bought for 50bucks.

I have a XCM adapter to use a keyboard and Mouse/360 controller for any PS3 game.

So the PS3 Version for me.
slayorofgods  +   1172d ago
I have the exact same, only on my pc so it will be a hard choice between pc and ps3 version for me.
#1.2.1 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(10) | Report
kevnb  +   1172d ago
unless your pc is crap, get it for pc hands down. If for nothing else, there will be mods.
sikbeta  +   1172d ago
1TB? I thought the max was 750GB, I read it somewhere :P I have a 320GB with 55GB left, next time I do a change I'll go for the bigger available...

O-T

Looks the same to me, everybody wins!
Washington-Capitals  +   1172d ago
The 1TB drives on the market currently won't fit in a PS3. They're 12.5mm so are slightly too thick. PS3 needs to be 2.5" & 9.5mm.

Clearly people on this website lie for some f*#$ reason that that i really cant explain. Stupid fanboys. And all those people agreeing with him are clear blinded fanboys who think sony will brick their ps3s if they say something negative or dont blindly approve of everything pro sony.
#1.2.4 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(16) | Report
NoOoB101  +   1172d ago
@ washington-Capitols
Theres ways to get a 1tb in ur ps3 if u didn't know. You shouldn't call someone a liar before asking them how..
u can check google on how to or go to the playstation forums and plenty of members on there tell u how to get a 1tb hard drive in..but it involves breaking the hard drive caddy inside the ps3 to make it fit.
motherboop  +   1172d ago
Actually, you're all wrong! The first 9.5' 1 TB 2.5 drives have hit the shelves in early August - I have a Samsung in mine, and it works flawlessly!

http://www.amazon.com/Samsu...
Pedobear Rocks  +   1172d ago
@Washington Capitals.

LMGTFY

http://www.newegg.com/Produ...

It took me 5 seconds to see that you are wrong.

oh...Ovechkin sucks
Washington-Capitals  +   1171d ago
guess im mistaken and i apologize. But $100 with shipping is quite a bit of money, and the way people here are saying "oh yeah i have a 1TB hard drive also" seems like EVERYONE has one. Thats definitely not true.

Anyways, i didnt want to respond to that. to the NOOB who said ovechkin sucks. Alex Ovechkin is the best player in the NHL hands down. Cindy Crosby is too pussy to play cause he has headaches. OV is still the only player in the leauge to have scored 60+ goals in a season since 1993. He has won 2 MVPs (Hart Trophy), 2 Goal scoring (Rocket Richards), Art Ross(Most points) 4 Pearson awards (Voted as the best player by his peers) in ONLY SIX SEASONS IN THE NHL. Please you know nothing about hockey, cause ovechkin DOES NOT SUCK.
Blitzed  +   1171d ago
@Washington-Capitals

I am not going to be ignorant and say OV sucks, thats just stupid. However you shouldn't be calling anyone a pussy while backing OV. I will never forget him leaving the game agianst Canada in the World Juniors. He was crying and complaining that he was being 'picked on'. Sure, he has sinced toughened up, but he has the beating the Canadian juniors gave him to thank for that.
Blitzed  +   1167d ago
@WashingtonCapitals Since you blocked me after PMing me like a true 'pussy', I'll respond here.

Sorry about the 'cursing', I didnt realize you were so sensitive. Ill try and tone it down so I don't hurt your delicate sensitivities.

I could fill you in on the credentials of my hockey knowledge, however this is the Internet, I could say anything. Im sure my opinion doesn't carry much weight with you anyways. How about the GMs of the league? Do they carry any weight? They like Crosby better too. Check it out since you like TSN polls so much.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story...

Also, It wasn't that OV was hurt, he quit. He could play, he just choose not to. He was crying because he was being 'picked on'. Those were HIS words. Oh and he was 18 idiot, not 16. Regardless, did you sulk and cry alot at 16?

Still talking about Crosby's first year in the leauge when he bitched at the refs? I'll give you that, drove me nuts too. He has since matured though, and no longer is known for that. That's probably why he has an Olympic gold medal and a cup, what does OV have again? Oh that's right, individual awards. Crosbys got those too. I guess that's all you get though when do things like steal the puck of Semin's stick; His own teammate! I bet you loved it when he pretended his stick was on fire. Lol His own teammates skated away from him!

Enough OV bashing though. I actually think he is an incredible player (like I said in my original response), just not the all round player The Kid is.

You want to bash Leaf fans now? How often do the Caps sell out? With all your superstars in the 'top 50' and you couldnt win a playoff round! You talk about the Leafs being at the bottom? How old are you, 8? How do you think the Caps picked guys like Semin, Backstrom and OV? Toiling in the basement for years!! You should really think before you type, your points of argument make you sound like a fool. Send me another PM when the Caps win a cup. Ill receive it since I dont feel the need to block you. You see, Im not a 'pussy'.
#1.2.10 (Edited 1167d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
vulcanproject  +   1172d ago
HA! Good luck seeing this in the next 24 hours if you haven't already. Their servers are poooooopy.

Cmon you cheapskates, sort it out already....
#1.3 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(33) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
TheBossMan  +   1172d ago
I think it's time for "Clock of Truth" where we pit the time it takes to load the site against the time it takes for peanut-butter to fall out of a jar hanging upside down.

EDIT: Really? It loads for you guys? Cause if not, I don't understand the disagrees.
#1.3.1 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(27) | Disagree(7) | Report
dantesparda  +   1172d ago
^^ LOL!!! god stuff, good stuff. You hear that LOT?! you are becoming a joke. Shape up!
Prophet-Gamer  +   1172d ago
IMO, the install is better, sure it'll take a while but after that you don't have worry about having to switch disks. I wish that there was an option to install all 3 disks and only need disc one to access the whole thing.
#1.4 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(23) | Disagree(10) | Report | Reply
XGamer  +   1172d ago
That should be exactly it as the disc in this case is only used as a security measure. download all 3 and play with disc 1 in the tray.

regardless, enjoy Rage my friend. it's gonna be an all night experience tonight
sikbeta  +   1172d ago
Install are better IMO because of how easy is to swap a bigger HDD in the PS3 and the back-up utility is a wonder...
WrAiTh Sp3cTr3  +   1172d ago
Uhhh...yeah...that is an option, lol.
guigsy  +   1171d ago
This could be done, whenever you install a game on the 360 the disc is only there for validation. That's why it stops spinning after a couple of seconds. I guess it's to stop people sharing discs.
cjflora  +   1171d ago
Yay! They both look exactly the same! Which can only mean they made the game for the lowest common denominator! Wait...
XGamer  +   1172d ago
Xbox 360 for the best experience
actually, remember the Xbox 360 can instal/download all 3 disc to it's Hard Drive and play seemless from it.
This will make it a greaat play through....and the ps3 has an 8 gig instal, that's going to make it play great as well.
Not sure about the PC's choices, however ALL who will be playing Rage tonight after the midnight release will be the real winners as this game is going to "KICK ASS".
2pacalypsenow  +   1172d ago
Even if you install all 3 disks on the 360 you still need to swap disks
zeddy  +   1172d ago
without doubt the slowest site on the world wide web.
Boody-Bandit  +   1172d ago
The site doesn't load at all for me.
zu4G  +   1172d ago
for me its a tie..

too bad for id, Dark Souls and Nba 2k12 will outsell this game..
Gamer3000   1172d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
Joe Bomb  +   1172d ago
Wow! Carmack and company are gods amongst their peers! These two look nearly identical. Can't wait to see how they perform!
#3 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(23) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
SilentNegotiator  +   1172d ago
"gods amongst their peers"?

Come on now, it's great that they made both versions identical, but then both of them lack AA, and the "megatextures" are pretty blurry.

Seriously, some of the textures are an eyesore: http://www.gamesblog.it/gal...

Their peers might create a game with 60fps too, if they allowed the graphics, especially textures, to take such a hit.
#3.1 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(19) | Report | Reply
Zynga  +   1172d ago
Game looks amazing so quit being a graphic whore. Let me know when a PS3 EXCLUSIVE does 60 fps otherwise shut up and game on.
SilentNegotiator  +   1172d ago
"Game looks amazing"
Obviously you haven't looked at any of the pictures in the link I posted.

If you just looked at LOT's selective tiny screen captures (a site that wouldn't exist without publisher's ad dollars and early copies of games), then sure, it looks amazing. But if you look at raw, HD pictures such as the ones I linked to, you'd see a different tale.

And why would I want a "PS3 EXCLUSIVE" to run at 60fps if it meant such muddy textures and no AA? 30fps is very playable, and GOW3 ran at around 45fps on average with absolutely amazing graphics (no muddy textures, had amazing AA, fluid animations).

I'll take a ps3/360 game at 30fps with nice textures (and maybe AA) over a 60fps game with muddy textures. Any day.

I just think its insulting to call John a "God among his peers" when his peers have made very impressive games. Games that weren't 60fps, but some as high as 45fps with spectacular graphics and no short comings just to get a marketable framerate.
#3.1.2 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(11) | Report
dontbhatin  +   1172d ago
@ Zynga

Wipeout HD 60 fps
Warhawk 60 fps
GT5 prologue and GT5 60 fps

need i say more?
#3.1.3 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(30) | Disagree(13) | Report
NukaCola  +   1172d ago
@Zynga
Ratchet and Clank Future series
Critter Crunch
gumchewinasskikr  +   1171d ago
Zynga

Rachet and Clank, GOW 3

And even though COD is not exclusive it is 60fps.

It isnt magic bro and it's obvious that there is a trade off. Look at the textures man they are shit!
cjflora  +   1171d ago
Making the game fit the weakest link isn't exactly an accomplishment. I would have been happier if they'd spend the time required to make each one full advantage of each system. Although I do understand the why that might be more costly I would be curious to see if it made any difference in sales if a company tried it once.
Ulf  +   1172d ago
If you see it in action, there's more of a diff.
Ulf  +   1172d ago
I wonder who the disagrees are from, the PS3 fans, or the 360 fans?
dirtrider  +   1172d ago
both
popup  +   1172d ago
You have purchased the game on both platforms and compared them on the same screen? Great!

Can you explain what differences there are please? I am amazed at how good the game looks and both claim 60FPS. I could not see much tearing on the PS3 video I saw.
#4.2 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Ulf  +   1172d ago
No, I saw it at PAX.

PS3 -- Some tearing in the outdoor area. Not much, just a little, really.
360 -- Some texture pop-in. Looked slightly blurrier, implying a sub 720p framebuffer... but it was a trade show. The screen could have just been worse, or had odd settings, relative to the PS3 station right next to it.
#4.2.1 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(8) | Report
kevnb  +   1172d ago
screen settings create pop-in? I would go ps3 for this since its opengl and this is carmack, but of course the best choice is pc even if its held back by consoles.
gamingdroid  +   1172d ago
@kevnb
Carmack said that he thinks Direct3D is better than OpenGL:

"'I actually think that Direct3D is a rather better API today.'"

"Direct3D handles multi-threading better, and newer versions manage state better.'"

http://www.bit-tech.net/new...
#4.2.3 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report
WetN00dle69  +   1172d ago
HOLY CRAP CAKES BATMAN!!!
The game is basically identical!
Many props to John Carmack and Id!
cant wait to play this and Dark Souls tonight!
gravemaker   1172d ago | Trolling | show
yamzilla   1172d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
THC CELL  +   1172d ago
Both same, ps3 brightness too high . we need some new people to do this
RudeSole Devil  +   1172d ago
No one does it better bud than LOT sorry! There's always POS translate Google :(
CernaML  +   1172d ago
Actually Digital Foundry do some pretty damn good in depth analysis of multiplatform games.
Soul Train  +   1172d ago
You must be blind CELL. id Software matched the gamma before shipping the game, because they're awesome. If you can't see this get glasses.
kevnb  +   1172d ago
nobody else cares enough.
death2smoochie  +   1172d ago
Here we go again....
TheOtherTheoG  +   1172d ago
Must... resist... urge... to sing... Whitesnake....
RememberThe357  +   1172d ago
Hahahahaha
bunfighterii  +   1172d ago
come on you know you want to....

cos...

HERE I GO AGAIN ON MY OWN!

GOING DOWN THE ONLY ROAD I'VE EVER KNOWN!

LIKE A DRIFTER I WAS BORN TO WALK ALONE

hey this song might fit with the whole lone ranger post apocalypse theme?
dirtrider  +   1172d ago
good song, but that gal in that official video is bangin
guitarded77  +   1172d ago
David Coverdale would approve...

On Topic: They look the same... BIG WIN!!!

Related image(s)
girlwithturn   1172d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(2)
maniac76   1172d ago | Trolling | show
girlwithturn  +   1172d ago
In fact, a signal on ps3's hdmi goes directly, while 360-signal a lot of times processed and re-encoded. Therefore ps3's games gamma closer to the developer's idea. You also can check this in Crysis 2 platform comparison, where is pc and ps3 gammas a closer to much.
#12 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(26) | Report | Reply
RememberThe357  +   1172d ago
Anything other than your word on that. Some links perhaps?
testerg35  +   1172d ago
Why is it then that in pretty much all previous comparisons of PS3 vs 360 multiplatforms, PS3 fans would always complain and say to just modify the TV settings for the PS3 game.
DaTruth  +   1171d ago
Because 360 fans were the ones complaining the PS3 looks washed out compared to the heavier contrast of the 360 version! Thus, if you like the darker contrast better, just modify the settings!

It could have gone either way, but nobody was complaining the 360 version looks too dark! In those comparisons, the only way to make the PS3 version inferior was to say "it looks washed out"!

That doesn't mean the PS3's gamma wasn't the developers intention, it just means 360 fans were grasping at straw!
#12.2.1 (Edited 1171d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report
mynd  +   1172d ago
<sighs> No it has to do with the gamma curves.

http://filmicgames.com/arch...
MasterCornholio  +   1172d ago
Crap i cant open the site at all for some reason. Will try later.

Glad to hear that they didn't screw PS3 owners.
#13 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
MasterCornholio  +   1172d ago
I just saw the pics and both versions look pretty much the same. There is a slight difference in resolution and draw distance but its so minor that its barely noticeable.

However if i had both consoles i would choose the PS3 version due to the free online, dualshock 3 controller and single disk format.

I thought Carmack would screw up the PS3 version because he complained about Sonys console in the past. But i am happy that i am wrong.
Oldman100  +   1172d ago
If you're wondering about the blurriness in the distance in the second to last rollover of the ps3 version i'm pretty sure it's the result of depth of field. Which to me seems to give the ps3 version an advantage.
Johnny_Cojones  +   1172d ago
I kinda hate these head to head comparisons, honestly.

Counterproductive.

People shouldnt be focused on pixel counting and slight differences in lighting.

Play the games, enjoy the games, be happy.
#14 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
Johnny_Cojones  +   1172d ago
Playing games > Arguing about games.
MCas24  +   1172d ago
Well said, you sir get a bubble.
admiralthrawn87   1172d ago | Trolling | show
lookintomyeyes   1172d ago | Spam
Dlacy13g  +   1172d ago
clearly both the PS3 and 360 version look good and are on par with each other.
lookintomyeyes   1172d ago | Spam
ziggurcat  +   1172d ago
visually speaking, this is quite possibly the closest to parity between X360 and PS3 that i've ever seen.

kudos to them.
RegorL  +   1171d ago
How is that a good thing?

It like having a Ferrari and a Lamborghini handling exactly the same. Not using there respective strengths but the least common feature.

No you can't go faster than X km/h (mph)
No you are not allowed to accelerate more than Y m/s^2
No you must not take corners that tight

I want to know why this should be considered good.
DaTruth  +   1171d ago
In a perfect world both cars would use their respective strengths and the race would be even. But what usually ends up happening is one ends up using all its strengths and the other ends up using none of its strengths!

So it's just nice to not see that Lamborghini disappear into the distance when you know under the right circumstances your Ferrari could have done much better!

Sadly, this is the most we can hope for!
#19.1.1 (Edited 1171d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
ziggurcat  +   1171d ago
what do you mean, "how is that a good thing"?

the PS3 has a history of getting the short end of the performance and visuals stick when it comes to multiplatform titles, mostly due to dev laziness and their unwillingness to learn how to properly optimize their game or the system.

the fact that both versions are more or less equal (at least visually) means that the devs *did their job*. i means that they spent as much time making sure that their game ran at its best no matter what system you own.

if the PS3 is capable of doing everything that the Xbox 360 can do (and vice versa), why would you not expect the exact same product for either system?
RegorL  +   1171d ago
@DaTruth @ziggurcat So you are saying that

it is better that Xbox gets a worse game than it could have got?

And/Or that

it is better that the PS3 got a worse game that it could have got?

Because
both got the same?

I earlier got the impression that it was PS3 that was the lead platform. If PS3 really is superior - as you imply - then iD has removed features to come down to Xbox level... (MS rule in effect?)
Holeran  +   1172d ago
They both look identical other than the brightness level and the pic on the second page where LOT says that 360 has a slightly sharper draw image. Its a bit more than slight in that pic to me.
aGameDeveloper  +   1172d ago
In that pic it looks like it was snapped when there was a bit more fog or smoke in the view, or perhaps when there was some lingering player damage or something.
RAmar101  +   1172d ago
Pants!

Alan wake beats the shit outta rage...
2pacalypsenow  +   1172d ago
Alan wake was sub HD and it was a linear game... Soooo..... ??
bunfighterii  +   1172d ago
360 to me looks ever so slightly sharper in some shots, but the difference is absolutely miniscule.

EDIT: I've just realised that's the difference in gamma that people are talking about, it gives the appearance of not being as sharp just slightly in some screens. When adjusted I guess they'd be the same.
#22 (Edited 1172d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(11) | Report | Reply
SageHonor  +   1172d ago
I never can tell the difference between these comparisons aside from some res textures, lightings and shadows....
bunfighterii  +   1172d ago
And to everyone who says crappy graphics you must all be blind
Zephol  +   1172d ago
rage on consoles looks so good!!
Zephol  +   1172d ago
Rage pc version rocks!!!!!! 60 fps on console! John Carmack is a genius!!
qwertyz  +   1172d ago
pc verison is a generation ahead but the console version still looks AMAZING best looking visuals on consoles and it runs at 60fps!!. johh carmack is a programming god
CGI-Quality  +   1172d ago
I wouldn't call it the best looking game on consoles, at least not based on this article's shots, but definitely a great looking game!
BattleTorn  +   1172d ago
60FPS!!!!!

as a console-only gamer, I'm in for a treat!
Kran  +   1172d ago
I got the PC version for the mere fact it was cheaper. ;P

I honestly don't know how the visual will play out on the PC, so we'll see. :)
PhunnyJesta  +   1171d ago
isnt rage on pc 59.99 though?

http://www.gamestop.com/pc/...

and every other retailer has it listed as 60 bucks
stonecold3  +   1172d ago
i might get this game later
SP3333D-O  +   1172d ago
I would like to see PC vs console comparison.
2pacalypsenow  +   1172d ago
No point everyone knows Pc looks better so its useless do do a pc /360/ps3 comparison
Kran  +   1171d ago
I dont see how. I'd personally just like to see how better or worse the PC version may be.

It's only fair.
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

The Best Video Games of 2014

7m ago - This was a troubled year in video games. The difficulty started in March, when some of the organi... | Culture
40°

Square Enix Christmas Sale Launched

19m ago - MWEB GameZone Writes, "The best of Square Enix goes on sale" | PC
20°

Kalimba review [SideQuesting]

21m ago - Sam Dixon of SideQuesting writes: "Kalimba is a mirror image of a platform puzzler, but its re... | Xbox One
Ad

Far Cry 4 (XB1) Review

Now - Ken finds his inner tiger in Kyrat. | Promoted post
20°

Quick Look: Guilty Gear Xrd -SIGN-

34m ago - Watch extended gameplay footage from Guilty Gear Xrd -SIGN- featuring the Giant Bomb crew. | PS3