We traditionally think of games as something fun, but leave that concept behind, and you open up a lot of possibilities.
Hanzala from eXputer: "I do appreciate GTA 6, Rockstar, but if I could trade it for a new L.A. Noire or a Bully game, I'd do so in a heartbeat."
How are they lost? You can get L.A. Noire on Steam, PS5, Xbox Series and Nintendo Switch and Bully is on the PS5 and Xbox Series too.
Whenever gta 6 launch we won't be getting another rockstar title for another 10 years lol but on the positive side they bou to come back n show how open world supposed to be done 🔥
There was a lot to love about Rockstar and Team Bondi's 2011 open world title.
One I never finished. I've been looking at the ps4 version off Amazon the last few months just never bit
I picked it up on sale recently, going to play it next summer. I'll get more out of it this time, first time around I treated the open world like it was GTA and goofed about, whereas now I'll play it with more respect. RDR2 has trained me well.
I also hadn't read Raymond Chandler at the time so presumably that'll add another layer of enjoyment too.
Absolutely stunning game. So underrated. Played through it again last year and it still stands up so well. Like many of rockstars games it’s actually a far better experience on PC. I didn’t enjoy it as much on console. Completed it at least 3 times on pc.
The rumours of a sequel are awesome news despite the fact I think Rockstar are now the shell of the company they once were.
GF365: "Out of the many historically accurate games out there, these are our picks for the six best games that are historically accurate. While these games aren't completely accurate, they depict the times and situations of history well. Plus, they're all a lot of fun to play, too."
Historically accurate from the past is tough to truly know and judge especially the farther you go back because history is written from the people in power and doesn’t mean it’s the truth just the narrative they wanted to tell.
I don’t care about historically accurate in most games because they are games not biographies or history books . Just make the game fun , good gameplay and such .
Ghost of Tsushima wasn’t historically accurate in many things but I loved the game . Many examples like it .
I had almost no fun playing The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, yet I still got all 60 achievements....
Is there a way to check out this Phone Story game now?
Some boring games are actually pretty good. I think over half of my games are boring.
Its funny there are a handful of games ive played this generation that i thought the geams were just meh but were fun to play. Red Faction: Armagedon is a perfect example of it. Ask people what they thought & most will just tell you its an ok game but its fun.
Games need to immerse the player that's all it needs.
Take SP focus games they immerse through setting, story, characters sometimes only one of the three or all of them at the same time.
Multiplayer focused games immerse through competition. That adrenaline rush of ten seconds left and one kill away from winning. Or the dynamics of teamwork.
Casual games like angry birds also immerse. They are played casually which means the immersion comes from the quick objectives. They may not immerse one heavily into it's world but it does immerse people well enough to both make a person put reality in the backseat and focus on something that's less stressful and be ready when that immersion needs to be broken.
Most importantly the fluidity of the gameplay is the most key aspect, since you don't want to break that immersion against your will. All in all, all games need are immersion to be good.