Dualshock Nexus: It appears that someone has leaked some very low quality videos of Battlefield 3 single player gameplay.
ps3 version looks good, but imo uncharted 3 looks better than this.
Why would you even compare a TPS up against a FPS? Makes no sense maybe if you vs it up against gears...maybe but here is not the place. Also this is the 360 version of BF3 look at the controls and stop trolling. you just had to come here and give your views on a TPS looking better than a FPS huh? It was so important somebody knew what you thought looked better.
Here is another leaked video showing 4 minutes of jet gameplay: http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Yeah and the PC version of BF3 will destroy uncharted 3... you see what i did there? LOL, dumb fanboys, Anyways, cant wait for this game.
@belal http://www.reddit.com/r/bat... "this was recorded off of a test kit. the program used to record isn't all about quality, only showing bugs to the developers to get the point across. the videos are 1:1 off the recorder."
I don't understand it when people say that the PC version will be better, at least graphically. PC's don't have a universal setting, they're all dynamic some worse then others. And it's possible that some of the worst performing PC's will fail to the consoles in graphical fidelity. I just don't understand, dumb fanboys I guess (referring to Washington-Capitals)
@Sillyace92 That's becausebu just totally overlooked 64 players on mp and bigger maps.
why can't somebody say a TPS looks better than a FPS? because its a different genre there are different standards to graphics? I'm not disagreeing with anybody here. i am just simply trying to understand why it has to be in the same genre to compare a game graphically.
I disagree with you...You can compare a TPS with a FPS if your just talking about looks. The guy said Uncharted 3 LOOKS better than this. Thats his opinion and comparison. Now if he went into more details maybe that would be different.
I could tell as soon as he crouched behind the van that this wasn't PC footage. It's good to finally see some console footage, though, so that I can make a decision on platform.
You know when I really think about it there is no problem vs the graphics against a TPS and FPS but the real problem is why would you vs an aplha or beta gameplay against each other? I mean neither game is complete to say "this" looks better than "that". If you do say that then the correct way to say this phrase would be "Wow this beta footage looks better than that beta footage." But I would rest to say any game look better than the other since at this point IT DOESNT MATTER. Both games are gonna look better at release so why even compare them now?
Uncharted 3 will look better than this, but it was kinda random to bring that up wasn't it?
seriously? You had to bring up Uncharted?
You need new eyes then...
His eyes is fine just the video is in low Res.
Don't need new eyes at all, you are ignorant if you belive that bf3 on console looks better than uncharted 3. bf3 looks great ( even though low res) but uncharted simply outshines it in graphics( console version), pc version of bf3 is hands down the best).
UC3 does look better than BF3 on consoles...No argument there... YET UC3 also is linear and lacks destruction, smaller environments, does not have the sheer amount of vehicles and most of the effects and lighting and soft shadow effects are pre baked and pre calculated unlike BF3. IMO this is comparing apples to oranges.
Pretty terrible logic. Uncharted is and exclusive while BF3 is multi-platform. All Exclusive titles look better than if it were to be mult-plat. Get lost troll.
wow sounds like a post apocalypse military shooter with epic garphics and all over the world. DO WANT!!!!!! the sound is very nice from reload to running. and a flashlight? ima use that in MP idk why but i must! can we get a singleplayer demo? thats what i want more than a multiplayer demo. idk why just do.
The videos on the Duplicate don't work though... By the time you read this comment these videos might be down too, thanks to EA. >:/
looks great. ahh i will have to finish the single player before diving into MP.
I'll be doing the opposite.
But that means that you will never play the SP...
same here bro SP first then MP!
i always play sp first to get the feel of the controls for mp. but thats me.
Gald to hear someone say that! Too many people have been saying that they don't even plan on touching the campaign because all they care about is MP! Seems like a waste of what could be a solid story and a tour of some great set pieces and action
They weren't kidding when they said 'low-quality'.
Is it just the video or do the graphics just suck? I hope the final product doesn't look that sketchy. It's prolly just the video in low quality because the graphics are looking very bad, this is running on xbox? P.S I hate people that reload even tho their mag is full, if dice wants realism they should make it so if you reload with a half full mag then you lose all the cartridges in the mag, it would make alot of sense
This is suppose to be "pre alpha" footage. So I expect thing to look a lot better. Look at the improvement from the ps3 alpha of bc2 to the final product. Much better lookin.
I have to agree with you on the graphics.I know it's pre alpha build but my god the graphics where horrible.Even if its low res video footage it still doesn't make up for how bad it is.Regardless of the graphics in this footage the game will still be a lot of fun and I'm very much looking forward to this game once release time comes near. As to your reloading even if the clip is some what full shouldn't mean anything.I'm always reloading right away just in case I'm walking into unexpected foes.It's just more of a smart idea and strategic way to play the game.
LOL he got sniped at the end. BF3 isn't COD buddy.
yeah you think the guy seen the sniper video like millions of us have already.
in that case KZ3 looks better
on ps3 yes... on PC hell no.
why did people disagree with spektical? It's factual that BF3 and bad company 2 for that matter (pc versions) looks way better than kz3. and why do you even play games on consoles if you care about graphics?
how the fuck can people say other games look better than this on console even thoe theres no hd 1080p quality videos shown from this title as yet.that makes no sence to me.hopefully itll blow everyone away when they get it and play it in the flesh on a nice size hdtv. then people may have a legitimate opinion.
Yeah, idk why people think this is the final version lol who would release it in this state? It looks great on console but we can clearly see this version was for dev testing on NOT retail.
Can see in the second video that the 'B' Button on the Xbox360 controller is used to open the gate. It's about time this version surfaced. It's just a shame that the consoles can't hold up to the incredibly impressive PC version.
but i thought it still looked nice on the console version. can't wait
yeah man i have to get the console version. i wont be disapointed cause i will refuse to watch anymore pc footage. it would bug the shit out of me and make me feel a lil empty inside.
Don't get me wrong, I'm going to be getting the console version (PS3), and it did look nice. It's just that all the hype surrounding the visuals was created by the early showings of the PC version. As long as the game plays the same, or similarly, it'll be fantastic. I'm still playing the hell out of Bad Company 2.
Even though it's pre-alpha & a low quality recording ... there was still quite a bit of fugly in there.
Still take this over Call O' Dootie.
240p... We meet again.
240P AND console gameplay? seriously dude dont upload never again vids with that crappy quality.
"death2smoochie " Y but u failed here cause u compare an fps with a action-adventure game so next time if u wanna compare games compare them each to their own genre...BF3 VS CoD or any other fps out there,unch3 vs gears etc etc
The point I was making was in reference to another member who posted UC3 looks better than BF3. It was not I who compared the two titles. I was simply responding to post. Regardless...if you look at both games running on consoles you can see right off which game is rendering more advanced effects in real time than the other. This is why UC3 can look better. It lacks many of the dynamic game engine effects BF3 has...even on consoles. That was my point. I did not come out and compare to twio. I was responding. @Zero_cool You miss the critical point...MAG does not have destruction or a dynamic game engine. It posses visuals on par or less than COD...this is why they can have 256 players. You actually think if MAG had graphics like BF3 and had almost full destruction and real time lighting dynamic soft shadows and GI that it could run 32 players with those large maps and all those vehicles? The answer is no...and you know why? Because other than BF3, there is no game out on consoles that is doing it at 32+ players with that game engine or an engine similar to it with destruction and use of real time lighting and effects for the most part. Most other FPS games on both consoles use pre calculated effects, LDR/NO32,MLAA, FXAA and other work arounds to save resources. BF3 for consoles uses quite a bit of real time effects. With those effects you will NOT get 32 players with vehicles and destruction on one map. Look at MAG and then compare whats going on behind the scenes. It's not even close to what BF3 is rendering at any given time.
kinda ugly, but its pre alpha, so probably no need to worry. But the ps3 pre alpha gameplay looked far better and actually pretty good, but who knows, time will tell.
great footage but bad quality lol but then again id rather see something new like this than 2 not see anything at all
I don't like the graphics TBH, sony and MS should release a new hardware ASAP, cause this type of game is no longer compatible on max settings using outdated consoles LOL
Six minutes of crappy video quality.
Fan made trailer combining Battlefield music with Skyrim gameplay: http://youtu.be/EoD0RyaLtEo
Everyone seems to be focusing on the graphics. Games are more than graphics. From what I saw in those vids, the gameplay looked rather bland and boring. Nothing got my adrenalin going in the slightest, very repetitive, very linear. I know the game is primarily for the MP but come on, if you honestly think this is great innovative gameplay for a SP experience, you're drinking the kool-aid a little too much. I'm hoping this is just a few minutes of the most boring parts of the SP because if the whole SP game is like this, I played this game years ago and it doesn't grab my attention anymore. p.s. Not a COD fanboy. I'm not buying MW2.5
I can't wait for this game. I just can't decided if I'm going to get it for ps3 & 360. Maybe I'll have enough money to ge it for both if I save lol. I don't have too many friends on my 360 because I just got one like a year ago lol. I love the fact that there's no sound. Just guns and the screams of the ones who get shot lol.
Honestly, that video was terrible, there's a ton of games that look better. That's not how the game is going to actually look, so unless you post an HD video, I dont want to see shit or hear any comparisons
240p in all its glory
Well it's not a big deal if the console version is less then 64 players in multi player but maps could be bigger on the console versions but for arguments sake they could of had a 32 player count in the console version's multi player without any performance hits.Look at mag it has 256 players in online multi player with 8 player squads & i know it's graphics are in the range of call of duty but keep an open mind here & examine it from the other points of view then you'll see what im getting at in relation to battlefield 3 on console. Note:I included this video as well of a 256 player online multi player match.... Cheers Gamers & Happy Gaming!
Def the best Multiplat game eva!
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.