Resistance 3 - Multiplayer Beta Gameplay: Trainyard

Make the trains run on time--or not at all--in this gameplay.

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
BeOneWithTheGun2537d ago

Got my code the other day. They did a really nice job on the MP, however, for me, I am just a sucker for Rainbow 6 style team work. I love the guns and upgrades, level design and graphics but it's totally a one man army set up. Even the mode where you have to capture the beacons is well thought out but no one works together. I miss R6 Vegas.

That said, props to Insomniac. I really look forward to the SP. And the next Ratchet and Clank. PS3 exclusives are simply coming out of the woodwork and that is a great thing.

Ju2536d ago

Well, that game is called R3 not R6 for a reason.

BiggCMan2536d ago

@Ju, That comment made no sense. It's called R3 because it's the third game in the Resistance series.

Ducky2536d ago (Edited 2536d ago )

^ It's a play on words (sort of).

R3 = Resistance 3
R6 = Rainbow 6

Ju2535d ago (Edited 2535d ago )

Heya, yep, people with brains. Like that :)

I have a hard time to see how R3 is related to R6 at all. Well, some people made the connection. Creativity at work, I suppose.

SAE2536d ago

i agree :) , i love rainboy six vegas 1 , it's really fun , i enjoyed it more then resistance 2 and the beta but not more then resistance 1 ..

trainsinrdr2537d ago

I guess its mediocre and it reminds me of crysis 2's mp.

InNomeDiDio2536d ago

Crysis 2 has better Graphics than Re3. But everything else is better on Re3. But I like how the game looks though.

blackburn102536d ago

Take a breath from trolling for a second okay. You will hyperventilate if you don't.

Jason1432536d ago

They screwed us on theplayer count. Bring back the big mp epic battles. Wont buy this one :(

BiggCMan2536d ago

That's a stupid reason not to buy a game. The high player count didn't work so well in 2 anyways. You would ALWAYS have a lopsided match, and the levels weren't big enough for 60 people. If you were a fan of Resistance, you would be buying it for the story alone, and not think of multiplayer as a top priority.

vickers5002536d ago


I'm a BIG fan of Resistance, and I'm buying it for the multiplayer alone. I'm sure single player will be great too, and I will play it, but multiplayer is my top priority when it comes to Resistance. Resistance is also my favorite shooter too.

So no, you don't have to want the story to be a Resistance fan.

ABizzel12536d ago (Edited 2536d ago )

I miss the larger battles as well, 60 was way too much, 40 was ok, but they could have at least done 16 vs. 16, 12 vs. 12, or even 8 vs. 8. I think 4 vs. 4 is to small for competitive multiplayer, it's fine for co-op but it feels bare for multiplayer.

But that's not going to stop me from buying the game.

EeJLP-2536d ago (Edited 2536d ago )

Agreed that 60 was too much, 40 was OK, but basically the end limit of non-'cluster fk' in that direction. They should have had 16v16, 12v12, yes.. but a quick correction. It is 8v8 max, not 4v4 max.

ABizzel12536d ago

Oh well 8 vs 8 is fine, I misinterpreted what they were saying in the interviews. They kept saying 8 players so I was thinking 4 vs 4. So yeah 8 vs 8 is ok, I still think they should have went with 16 vs. 16 or 12 vs. 12 (12 would be perfect).

I liked some of the larger maps. I think Warhawk has the best maps system, because they have huge maps for jet-play and vehicles, but you can also change the map to smaller locations for ground based combat only. That's the route Resistance should take, if you want to play more intimate matches then choose a smaller version of the map, or else you have play the larger maps for that full on war feel.

BeastlyRig2536d ago (Edited 2536d ago )

looks ok like most shooters. I guess the alien guns will make it stand out.

Show all comments (18)