Top
70°

"If You're Not A Fan Of Multiplayer, You're No Gamer"

If someone said this to you, how would you react? Would you be surprised? It seems multiplayer has gotten so huge that "true" gamers are forced to partake...

Read Full Story >>
psxextreme.com
The story is too old to be commented.
EYEamNUMBER12306d ago

i would think whoever said that to me is not the true gamer

im not really a big fan of mulitplayer
90% of the time for me when i go online its either
A. retards who only mess/joke around and don't do anything seriously
B. retards who take everything too seriously 1 little screw up and they blow a fuse

rabidpancakeburglar2306d ago (Edited 2306d ago )

Exactly, this a stupid article. I would much rather sit down and spend 40 hours relaxing and playing a single player game than play online and get frustrated or bored within a couple of hours.

consolez_FTW2306d ago

Yeah man, I agree with you. I play BC2 online alot since that's basically the only online game I can actually tolerate.Though once Skyrim and Deus Ex get released, I'm glad to say goodbye for online for a while....a long while.

iamnsuperman2306d ago (Edited 2306d ago )

What I tend to do is play through the single player then go on line. For me on line is second and is a feature that adds longevity to the game but is not a necessity. Some of my favourite games do not have multi player (for example GOW3)and these titles I find (generalising a lot here) have the best single player experience. This is a reason why I care less about games like BF and COD. They are really not story oriented games and the story telling is generally weak. One major reason why instead of getting BF/COD I am going to get Uncharted 3

darthv722305d ago

to me, that title implies someone who plays the good with the bad. online and offline. And doesnt give a ratz arse what others think.

Actually....back in my day that is what "hardcore" was all about. Playing anything and everything gaming related.

Times have changed and so has the perceived definition of 'core' gamer. Sad really that so many would think that you cant be considered 'core' if you enjoy simple games as well as complex ones.

EVILDEAD3602306d ago (Edited 2306d ago )

Actually the guy who criticized the author was right..

He asked him why would you be allowed to 'REVIEW' games if your not a gamer..

We all have preferences in how we game, but why would I trust a reviewer who simply has no idea how to review online game portions of games.

The author who says he played games for '27 years' literally believes if a game has a good single player then it has a good multiplayer as well. Clearly not how it works.

He then believes that you need two reviewers to review online and offline features of one game.LOL

Look this is where your reviewer gamer card really needs to be pulled. Simply play the single player campaign and review it on it's merits. Then go online and play and do the same. What's the rocket science behind that? It's exactly how every gammer will play their game. On or offline..but why wouldn't a 'veteran' gamer and reviewer know that?

It doeant mean this guy isn't a gamer..just if he's supposedly a reviewer, it sounds to me as a that he's a little out of touch with the gaming world as a whole.

Evil

Hicken2306d ago

Everything he said was supposition.

On the quality of multiplayer and singleplayer:
"the single-player and multiplayer elements of a game are often very different (although it stands to reason that if one is great, the other will be great, too)"

On two reviewers:
"I mean, we see entire development teams for big-budget projects dedicated to one or the other...might critics and game reviewing sources soon have to take a similar approach? I.e., one person to review the single-player and another to handle the multiplayer?"

And he starts off by saying he DOES play the multiplayer when necessary:
"Me: 'No, I do when I have to. Like for reviews. But no, very rarely do I do it for fun.'"

You completely twisted- or are just ignorant of- everything he said.

Inside_out2306d ago

.
Well said Evil...This Ben DUMBka clearly is a lost cause ( like Hick )and the fact that he claims to reviews games with the dehydrated walnut he has for a brain is another reason meta-critic is a mess.

" However, this got me thinking "...

...you should of been thinking BEFORE you started typing all that nonsense and calling people who disagree with you " anonymous moron " and colossal douchebag. :/

" I admit, I find it difficult to give both the attention they deserve. There are only 24 hours in the day "...

It sound to me there is a custodian job waiting for you...they will give all the time you need. Leave the reviewing to someone who CARES.

@Hick...Wow...it's no surprise a hick like you would agree with a guy like this...

" although it stands to reason that if one is great, the other will be great "...O_o...

Hick, you seem to found your calling, Review games like Brian DUMBka...you already have the " ignorant " part down. ;)

EVILDEAD3602305d ago

@ Hicken

Just because you copy and past the SAME article onto your comments means absolutely nothing.

You simply just reproved everything I said

Whose twisting words? I'll copy and paste just like you did.

the guys aked '"Wait...so you don't EVER play multiplayer?"

But what made him say it? The author suspiciously omits this part of the conversation. If someone asks you this it's because you probably said somnething to the extent that you NEVER play games online.

the author responds 'No, I do when I have to. Like for reviews. But no, very rarely do I do it for fun."

The guy THEN responds '"...who the hell even lets you REVIEW games if you're not a gamer?"

So please show us anywhere did the guy say 'If You're Not A Fan Of Multiplayer, You're No Gamer'

See that's the title of the article and THAT is twisting words.

I called it like I saw it. The point the guy (who was called a moron) made was that if your not an avid gamer, then he's far from a credible reviewer for those types of games. Which is a fair criticism.

Ask any gamer, would they want the guy who knows the insides and out of the biggest multiplayer titles. I gamer that spends hours leveling to Prestige, or to the higher levels of Halo, Gears, Killzone, or Uncharted. Knows load outs, weapon types, the hottest maps,own DLC etc.

Or do I want a guy who NEVER plays online in his free time. Does it when forced to say something about the multiplayer in a review.which means he gains a few levels and say..umm the single player is good..so it stands to reason that the multiplayer is good as well..LOL

The reviewers credibility would be thrown out of the window if people knew that those were his gaming habits.

On the second point, he called the guy a moron, but name a credible gamer who would surmise that because a game has two teams and a huge budget, that maybe we need to ask' might critics and game reviewing sources soon have to take a similar approach? I.e., one person to review the single-player and another to handle the multiplayer?"

Again..HIS words. I repeat, it doesn't matter how many people work on ANY game out there. As a gamer you simply play it and as a reviewer you simply review it on it's merit whether online or off. If you can't do that then as the guy simly said..'who would let you be a reviewer'?

But to answer the 'fake' artcle headline. No it doesn't make you any less of a gamer if you only like the campaigns. It's YOUR money and YOUR game, nobody forces you to play anything and it doesn't alter your 'gamer card' in anyway. Your preference is your preference.

Just keep this guy away from Battlefield 3, MW3, Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3 if you want a FULL review of the game as a whole.

Just my take

Evil

RedDead2306d ago (Edited 2306d ago )

I like good games. Doesn't matter what genre, multi or single player etc....if a game is good I will like it. RPG's seem to be good with me more than others, however MGS is probably my favorite series.

Completely off topic here haha

Some of my best experience this gen was Gears 1 online and Cod4 online, playing with your friends is a different expierence to playing a single payer story game. Love both anyway

KingSlayer2306d ago

Both can co-exist. Christ it's frustrating when people feel the need to draw a line in the sand. Like MP more than SP? "You're not a gamer!". Like the 360 and XBL more that the PS3 and PSN (or vice-versa)? "Troll!". Everyone has the right to their opinion, so here's mine: Let's stop being douchebags to each other. There's more fun to be had.

gypsygib2306d ago

I like MP, but it gets boring after half an hour. I can play SP all day....literally.

bwazy2306d ago

I was a real gamer before multiplayer existed. F this Shiz

Show all comments (23)
The story is too old to be commented.