Top
150°

MW3 vs BF3

Abed Abla from GIGAlb writes "Okay, so Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 are coming out this year. Both games are FPS giants that changed the genre and improved it, each one in its own way. The Call Of Duty series took the more arcadey one-man-army road while the Battlefield series took the realistic squad based approach. Now what everyone is probably wondering is: Which one is better?"

The story is too old to be commented.
thugbob2313d ago

Exactly, not even going to click the link.

Ababi7772313d ago

If you take the time and read the article you'd realize it's not trying to get easy hits..

thugbob2313d ago

Ok I'll take your word for it and actually read it.
Most BF vs MW articles are usually biased nonsense so don't blame me for passing this one off as another one of those initially.

consolez_FTW2313d ago (Edited 2313d ago )

@ Ababi777

I think thugbob was just judging from the title alone. Well, then again in the summary of this article it ask which is better and neither game has been released yet...Though my vote is on BF3.

firemassacre2313d ago

call of duty get its ass handed to it all of the time compared to battlefield, no competition. battlefield kills call of duty, drinks its milk, steals its car and takes its girlfriend.

HOORAH!!

EmperorDalek2313d ago (Edited 2313d ago )

N4G? more like N4BFG.

GoldPS32313d ago

MW3 vs BF3 articles are getting very annoying now. Wait til the games come out 1st then compare them.

KingPin2313d ago

why would gaming "journalists" wanna do that? they now judge games off a BETA which isn't even anything near final code. they write full reviews off betas. they compare multiplayer betas to that of full games. i think waiting for a complete game to roll out before comparing it would mean that they weren't the first to rate it and so their review will fall in the endless abyss of other reviews on the internet.

Gaming journalism in this day and age for the most part sucks balls!!

DeforMAKulizer2313d ago

There wasn't any Beta comparison in the article. He isn't even comparing the games as graphics or which is better, he is stating that there should not be any comparison cause each is in a different state and entity of its own.

Ababi7772313d ago

the only reason I wrote MW3 vs BF3 as a title is to lure all the people who usually like to compare and bash games that didn't get released yet and if you read the article you'd realize that it's trying to do exactly the opposite of what the title suggests..

Hicken2313d ago

Well, this is actually refreshing. He doesn't at all try to prove that one game is better than another, but instead asks why there's even the need to prove such a thing in the first place.

DeforMAKulizer2313d ago (Edited 2313d ago )

Exactly, and that is what i fully believe in as well...

Hicken2313d ago

I mostly agree. I have my issues with the CoD franchise having become stagnant, but not so much with the core gameplay, even as I prefer BF.

Chocoboh2313d ago

unknown site posting rediculous articles asking for easy hits

DeforMAKulizer2313d ago

Did you read the article at all?

A very valid and non biased argument... Don't bash if you didn't take some time to read it...

Ababi7772313d ago

the only reason I wrote MW3 vs BF3 as a title is to lure all the people who usually like to compare and bash games that didn't get released yet. If you read the article you'd realize that it's trying to do exactly the opposite of what the title suggests..

Show all comments (20)