The PlayStation Vita Name Revisited; It Isn’t so Bad After All

PSLS writes: "Sony’s follow-up to the seven-year old veteran PlayStation Portable is upon is, and with a name like Vita it has easily caught some attention. Many consumers couldn’t stand hearing the name when it was first announced in early June. However, it wasn’t always known as the Vita, and the discovery of a new Sony handheld dates back further than many might recall. Let’s rewind a little bit."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Abash2334d ago

I don't care about the name, but I like it for being different. What matters to me is the games, features, and price. All of which the PlayStation Vita has lured me in with

NukaCola2334d ago

Name never bothered me. Plus with all it's features, games, and price, it was sold anyway. But Vita is 'life' and this little thing is going to change handheld gaming.

f7897902333d ago

I overreacted too..... BUT I STILL DON'T LIKE IT!

I'll accept it now. It just takes so long to get used to names like this. Sony better have a GOOD marketing campaign to go with this.

Peaceful_Jelly2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

my view hasn't changed one bit, Vita and Wii U are totally retarded names.

KonaBro2334d ago

with Peaceful_Jelly as a name.

MaxXAttaxX2333d ago

Vita actually MEANS SOMETHING.

-Alpha2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

People get used to the names and then they don't matter anymore.

TheOldOne2334d ago

True but I still haven't gotten used to: Wii U.

Vita is an OK name.

Chaostar2334d ago

"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet"

xtreampro_REVENGE!2334d ago

What's the point of these articles? Vita isn't the best name in the world but it'll do.

f7897902333d ago

It sets the topic for us to discuss in the comments section while never actually reading the stupid article.

Show all comments (33)
The story is too old to be commented.