IGN: How Does Battlefield 3 on PS3 Measure up to PC?

The question on everyone's mind since the first footage of Battlefield 3 released in February is, "where's the console version?" DICE's follow-up to last year's Battlefield: Bad Company 2 and 2005's Battlefield 2 has looked great on PC even in its early, pre-alpha state, but we've never seen it running on console up close – until now.

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Emilio_Estevez2222d ago

Stupid article. Pre-alpha and mising destruction and textures.

Kalowest2222d ago

Still looks better than MW3.

theonlylolking2222d ago

Obviously, MW3(60fps) while BF3(console) is 30fps.
Pretty much any 30fps game will look better than a 60fps game. Just like how Shift 2(graphically) looks better than Forza 3 but that is only because Forza 3 aims for 60fps while shift 2 aims for 30fps.

Compare apples to apples not apples to bacon.

Greywulf2222d ago Show
M-Easy2222d ago

Bubble for smartness Kalowest.

Inside_out2222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )

The PC version according to all the leaked footage and even EA-Dices recently damage control trailers shows a game with a lot of problems and being 12 weeks out from launch...I don't expect it to get much better...what a mess and this footage is no doubt running on...
EA-Dices recommended specs...

Recommended specs, no minimum announced.

-OS: Windows 7 or Vista
-CPU: Quadcore @ 2.0 or faster
-Ram: 4 gb
-HD: 7.25 gb free disk space
-Video: 512 mb or greater
-Direct 10 or 11 compatible card with the latest drives ( AMD 11.5 or later Nvidia 275.35 or later
-Sound: Direct 10 or 11 compatible card
-Internet: Broadband connection

...SOoooo...if it's a mess with those specs, then how is it going to look on a less powerful system with a fraction of those requirements...O_o

kaveti66162222d ago Show
TripleAAARating2222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )

I don't see any problem with Greywulf's comment... he simply stated facts and telling from your response he's a thorn in your side cause he states facts that degrade your platform of choice... really pathetic on your part to have to ask why he's still alive, why are YOU here feeling the need to belittle him.

baodeus2222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )


Yeah 20% of GT5 looks better than forza 3, while the other 80% look worst than forza 3, especially at 1280x1080 with no AA, w/ mix of 16 high res/low res vehicles on a track w/ pixelated particles/effects/shadow/,flat ten low resolution environment/ xy trees/ 2d spectator and grass, and 80% of vehicles have no interior. You can still look at it but would you greywult? why not show them greywulf, you know what they look like right? No wonder they don't have interior view for those 80% of vehicles.

So what are u getting at Greywulf? You sure don't want to mention that part do ya. I know, i play the game, you can't lie like that man.

Anon19742222d ago Show
NanoSoldier2222d ago

Greywulf you're still a Fanboy

paintsville2221d ago

Greywolf is just trying to stir up the crap. The fact remains that PC will have the dominant version of BF3 when compared to either console. My interest will be how the PS3 stacks up to 360. Given past experience with MW and BF it should be interesting.

Ducky2221d ago (Edited 2221d ago )

... how did GreyWulf get a 'well said'? O.o

LolKing's point is that a 60fps games will look worse than a 30fps games, and used Forza as an example of a game that doesn't look that great.
Wulf replies with GT5 looking better than Forza3... which doesn't add anything to the discussion.

Maybe if Wulf had said that GT5 looks better than Shift2, which he didn't, rather, he made a typical response that shows up whenever GT or Forza are made.

vandal GAB2221d ago

@ Greywulf

Wrong GT5 tries to run at 60fps anymore than 4 cars on screen and it's a mess.

hamburger1232221d ago (Edited 2221d ago )

smh @ peoples talking about forza and GT5 and shit

SixShotCop2221d ago


Kaveti6616 belittled Greywulf because he's a douchebag. It's really as simple as that. Why are you defending him? Is he your boyfriend? Oh wait.. he's a PS3 fanboy! I understand.

To be honest, i absolutely hate the dude. IMO he needs a freakin beatdown.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 2221d ago

Im tired of this stupid articles...We all know PC games look better cuz its obviously more powerfull.

This article is just asking for hits.

DaTruth2221d ago

Ask and you shall receive!

lMHl2222d ago

Read a dam artical once you finsh the video dam ps3 fanboys.

EDD2132222d ago

Hate to brake it to you but consoles don't haven nearly as much features compared to PC versions, just look at Crysis 2 that includes destruction

lMHl2222d ago

@EDD213 Im buying it on pc so i dont know what your trying to break to me I use my xbox360 controller on my PC for games

RankFTW2221d ago

If you use your 360 controller to play BF3 on PC then you are going to get owned, alot.

TekoIie2221d ago


I've used a 360 controller for loads of games on PC, gears being the main one. I played BC2 with it as well, didnt get owned much at all and i know i would get my ass wooped a ton more if i used the mouse and keyboard because its something im not used to.

When i see video games i always think "ok lets pick up the controller and play". keyboard and mouse have never really worked for me because of that and its only RTS's that i use them for...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2221d ago
shovelface882222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )

I love how they say "...PCs max of 60[fps]," which is total bullshit. IGN doesn't do their research.

Organization XII2222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )

I totally was like wtf when I first read that. I mean come on, a gaming site like ign doesnt know that PC games doesn't have limitations whatsoever on frame rates? That's a big load of ignorant BS. I have a feeling IGN doesnt pay their journalists well that's why they spew nonsense in their articles - or they are just plain dumb. I'll go with the latter one.

frostypants2221d ago

The whole article is fail. It's inconsistent with the every other critic who's seen the PS3 version and said it looked pretty damn good.

RugbyGod2221d ago

How is it stupid? He played it. I'm sure he knows how to spell "Missing", who's stupid?

Emilio_Estevez2221d ago (Edited 2221d ago )

Still them, of course I know how to spell missing, it was a typo obviously. He's comparing when it's not finished and to the version that will obviously be better. And I never said he was stupid, the article/comparison is.

Heartnet2221d ago

If thats what there showing off then thats what we compare em by..

Dont say stupid article when thats all we can compare at this moment in time...

and if they think pre alpha is good enough to show off to the public then we have the right to judge and criticize

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2221d ago
firemassacre2222d ago (Edited 2222d ago )


pc version will obviously be way better than the console versions NO QUESTION.

2222d ago Replies(4)
solar2222d ago

you could definitely tell the difference in lighting. other than that it kinda looks like a slightly prettier BC2. :/

frostypants2221d ago

I'd actually be ok with that...but the textures and animation both look better than BFBC2's.

hiredhelp2222d ago

Of course.
can you imagin a console housing a 9-12" long video card.

hmm note to self create a console system with a external graphics card."

Heartnet2221d ago

no question... wow such a blind fanboy....

What if EA focus more on the console version and release console exclusive maps and guns and add new modes to console version..

mods and the like are blocked so..

but ITLL LoOK So MUch BeTtERZ... no it wont..