Top
140°

Why the IGN critic of Dynasty Warriors: Gundam 3 should lose his job | Otaku Gaming

The lack of respect for a series that is so wildly popular is an embarrassment on games journalism. One of the basic rules of being a critic is understanding the target audience of what you’re reviewing, and IGN’s critics keep proving they manage to fail at journalism 101. Tripe like the Gundam 3 review is downright irresponsible.

Read Full Story >>
otakugaming.com
The story is too old to be commented.
john22719d ago

I understand this is an opinion piece... but come on. Attacking another site for their score?

MattS2719d ago

Or attacking bad journalism. If you read the piece you'll also notice that the score isn't what's being criticised. The review is.

pixelsword2719d ago

I'd rather they stick to reading the titles; the comments are funnier that way.

Gray-Fox-Type02719d ago (Edited 2719d ago )

what crap is this? Dynasty warrior games can not believe they are still going, horrible games buttom bashing games hording down 500 AI less models that just stand there.

Dynasty Warrior games have always sucked.

Reefskye2719d ago (Edited 2719d ago )

Just because you don't like them doesnt mean others dont, if they where that bad they would of stopped making them but obviously people are still buying.

Baka-akaB2719d ago

Nothing surprising they dont even play some of the games , and just copy paste their already crappy older reviews and previews

evrfighter2719d ago (Edited 2719d ago )

What's wrong with copy pasting reviews if the game is just a copy paste.

Respect the gaming industry and earn a respectable review.

I'm suprised you morons are crying about it. Theses kinds of reviews only push the dev and publisher to try harder next time. The only ones that stand to gain anything out of these kinds of reviews is us.

Goodfella2719d ago ShowReplies(2)
Troll-without-Bridge2719d ago

Dont get me started on IGN, the whole place should be disbanded and cease to exist.

Goodfella2719d ago ShowReplies(3)
Show all comments (52)
The story is too old to be commented.