This sequel to Nintendo's console wargame wages a much more successful campaign on free time.
OMG! They're teh biased against Nintendo too! :O
...In order to further their points about Ratchet and Clank.
"See? We're not biased, we just have a higher standard."
I'm not saying at all that this game deserves more than an 8.5 (I own it and it's great imo), but I suspect that we'll have to have brain-jack (like on the Matrix) games in order for them to give a high grade now. :D
I wonder how long Gamespot will remain relevant? This is weird.
What is that supposed to mean? If they're not "having their fun" with it, they're not giving a good score? It's pretty arrogant to mention "higher standarts" when each time they submit a review about a popular game they trigger a riot on about every gaming forum on the Web. All this for their "higher standarts", oh that's freaking great. According to them, my whole library of games is 'average' at best!
just put halo on every title and you'll get 9.5.
Maybe that would help Ratchet and Clanks score lol.
so u do agree laugh out louder.
If it's a good game but not a Sci-Fi Shooter on Xbox360, it's going to be a 7.5. I would laugh my @ss off if Insomniac could just put a Haloesque planet in the next installment of Ratchet and Clank to have a better score with Gamespot.
I've been following this game for a while, need to check it out since on their rating scale it's a 9 or 9.5 (same as R&C, Zelda).
they say its a better game in the review but score it lower than the original
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.