Screen shots of Gran Turismo 5 : Prologue and the '06 Gran Tursimo Awards Best In Show & Best Hot Rod Winner 1960 Corvette in GT5 Prologue.
crap. This looks spectacular.........I CAN'T WAIT FOR GT5 WOO :P
The 1960 Corvette look so photo-realistic
I agree, it brings back memory's of my grandfathers old '58 corvette he had. I have to say after seeing these GT5 looks better than Forza 2. I'm glad that I also have a PS3, even though it's collecting dust right now, it's good to know that I have this to look forward too.
The details on that Corvette are absolutely stunning.
gorgeous as usual!
i hear this game is upscaled? is that right as i heard the man develper dude state it 1080, also the screen are in 1080 so....?
that blog site limits the pixel amount or file size for images. all the original's were 1920x1080 screen captures.
maybe the pictures are from photo mode?
At least it is HD not 640 like Halo 3
some are sheeps but....nice put none the less.
GT5 looks like nothing else. In my eyes I cannot see anyting better in motorsports. The ps3 is doing well. More so than I and most of us thought.
Yh but the demo doesnt look like that. Hopefuly the final game will. But those pics are doctored cus the game is no where near as smooth and crisp as that.
Anyone who disagrees is in denial.
yea, I played the demo, its amazing, but yea, there are a few issues, like shadows inside the car, they're a bit pixelated and theres some screen tearing in the Demo, hopefully this gets fixed, other than that, I cant wait for this game to come out
Maybe you have your TV sharpness up too high. I noticed that when the sharpness was really high it looked like crap, but when I dropped it to the default level it looked amazing.
Y ou guys realize that the Demo is actually just a demo of a demo.
but omg, this looks like GT5 supports 8x Anti-Aliasing
8xAA, on a gaming pc thats laughable... 8...
GT5 prologue's cars look so disgustingly real,that by the time GT5 rolls out,they would have ironed out any visual problems.i've never seen videogame cars that make you want to curse:
and as some europeans say "BLOODY H-LL!"........hahahahaahh haa!!!!
that corvette just looks sick.just blaspheme to all other wantabe games clawing at the 50 million unit selling series.get the h-ll out of here with all that nonsense that those "other" games look like this game.
mag lev..........."bloody h-ll"........what the f-..........
my post was basically gonna read "how dare xturds compare forza and PGR to this, they must be on crack"....lol
thats true, I cant wait till the real GT5 releases
i cant wait for this game, please come sooner, i,really enjoyed the demo very much, hope you guys did too
This game is going to be great, I can't wait to get my hands on it. Off topic can anyone tell me how I can get the new WARHAWK patch 1.1?
just start playing warhawk, then update screen pops up. I was suprised when I updated warhawk today, the game is embedded with the PS3 menu screen (Not the XMB, but the menu screen that pops up when you press the PS button while in game) it reminds me of the Xbox 360 in game menu screen when it tells you that theres an update available for a game. It also restarts the game for you just like the Xbox 360 ingame update menu screen. I think this is a clue that we are getting In game XMB soon.
2.00 within the next 2 weeks so they say, so not long to we can see.
i had to do it and get it out there fast.hahahahahah!!!
if these were pictures of pornstars,the girls would be so fine,that you would bust a n-t just looking at them.the corvette is like "jeneveve jolie" good.
i clicked on the picture and dropped to my knees.....hahahahah!!!
i'm kidding,but man,what does polyphony smoke after hours to get those cars to look like they do?
Im not even into racing games and these pics make me excited.
Agreed. I am not into this series at all, but this and CoD4,KZ2,MGS4 is jawdropping and I don't even have a feel for them - AT ALL. Still they makes me quiver. I have to admit, I am a bit of a gfx whore. *L*
Since recently I'm a proud owner of a PS3 and after playing the demo I can only conclude that these sceenshots give a very misleading image.
Unlike in these shots, the aliasing in the demo is pretty horrible. The enviroments are very PS1-like, which they have cleverly hidden in these shots with nifty camera-angles and depth of field techniques.
That said, PD seem to be the only devs out there that can get the colour saturation and lighting spot on. I mean, if they can clean up those enviroments a bit, add some high quality motion blur and depth of field in-game (dropping to 720p @30 fps will give them some more headroom thus is a much better trade-off) they have a killer looking game that nothing out there can even remotely compete with, from a visual standpoint that is.
Gameplay wise it needs a lot of work though.
This is prologue
You really think the recent developments are lightyears ahead of the demo? I sure don't believe so.
Besides, they do the same with all the GT releases. GTHD looks far superiour in the screens released as well.
Like I said, they have the fundamental basics to look like that (lighting and colour saturation and high poly-count), but it's the nifty camera angles and depth of field techniques that hide the ugly (background) details. Not to mention the obscene amount of AA.
you know, they do upgrade the graphics over time.
to anyone who's played GT4, its clear that these images are taken from inside the photo mode in the game. just like in GT4, there's a whole lot of different settings to play around with in the photo editor, such as shutter time and those kind of things, but AA is always applied. -thats why these pics look way smoother than when you're actaully playing the game.
the photo mode does not apply any other graphical improvements than AA. so you're wrong by saying the pics are severely doctored. the graphics just improved since they released GHTD, which is expected, as its nearly a year ago the demo was out.
also, how can you say the environment is PS1 like? full sized realistic 3D mountains as the BG isnt PS1 like, especially not when considering everything's 1080p, which it should be, as a PS3 game.
gameplay wise, i dont know about GT5 prologue, but GTHD is doing fine. any Granturismo fan would agree, as this is just how the game works, and thats why it's gotten so popular.
edit: i saw your reply 13.2, and again, all they did with the GTHD screens was adding AA. i dont know about your tv, but when i play GTHD on my 1080p tv, the game looks just like the official screens, only without AA added.
2nd edit: i forgot one thing.. other than the added AA, i can agree that they upscaled the shadow resolution alot on the screens, removing alot of the wow effect when you actually play the game. -as Adropacrich2 made clear. the game does look pretty good though ^^
That's just pure nonsense.
I advice you to have a look at Forza 2 for instance. If you see what people can make that game look like with photomode in comparison to what it actually looks like in-game (which is mediocre at best imo) then you can not come to the conclusion you did.
Photomode offers several CRUCIAL graphical enhancements and camouflaging techniques to make it look like the screens above.
The enviroments in the demo of GT5 prologue are really bad, ok maybe not PS1 bad, but very poor regardless. And those are hidden in these screens by the depth of field and blur techniques.
That's why these screens look so good , because the ugly enviromental details are hidden.
It's a trick many devs use in their screens: Hide the ugly details, polish some other details and the game looks great!
Play the game on your own tv (and yes, I have an HDTV) and it's a whole different story. This happens all the time, and you have to be very naïve to think otherwise.
Also, resolution isn't everything. It's very resource intensive and not worth it imo. I'd much rather have them use those resources on enviromental fx and post-processing fx. Sony really brainwashed a lot of gamers out there with their 'high resolution campaign'. 1080p is just not worth it, not with consoles this generation anyway.
The same console thats claimed "inferior" to the other console.
If early ps3 games are looking this damn good & 60fps 1080p.
Certainly can't moan at these shots.
You still have to wonder if Poly can make a game that has absolutely no jags like these and all shots show there to be.If anything PS3 has worse jags than 360 in a lot of the games i have seen for it but they both most defintely have problems in this area.I mostly don't care but we can all clearly see no jags in these screens.
If things do really end up being completely jag free then i will be very impressed but i guess we will have to wait and see.
GT5 has mostly stunning photorealistic graphics but add jags to the mix and that wow factor soon disappears.
yeah the jaggies definately remove a big part of the wow effect. sadly, i dont think they can do much about it, as every other PS3 game with same kind of lighting effect (what's it called, dynamic lighting?) has the same low shadow resolution as GTHD. its just like AA i guess, makes alot of difference, both in image quality, and required hardware power.
I think you will have to have a 1080p TV for that to happend. The scaler in PS3 isn't that good, if I have read all ps3 things the right way.
GT 5 Prolgue demo doesnt look like that good as the pics.....its a demo of a demo...the real game GT5 will be better...imagine that.
Love to know how many polygons these beauties have as it looks to be twice the amount of PG4 maybe.
I'm in love with PG4 at the moment though and i can't imagine GT will compete with it in terms of fun - at least not in the immediate sense.
For simulation fans, GT is justifiably going to rule i imagine even if it is just a bit to clinical for it's own good.
Just because it's essentially a demo of a demo, the graphics are still only going to be as good as Poly can get out of the system at this time.It's also a little ignorant to expect something of a major difference in quality from the final game - Poly's engine is mostly close to 90% of how good it's going to be and the remaining time will be used to produce what will likely be Poly's best sim so far.
When Lost Planet was released, it had increased about 1% in terms of how much more impressive it was from the demo first shown a year before it.
GT looks to be one of the best things out there but there is simply no guarantee it will be looking much better than it already does.Factor that with jags and you still end up with a stunning showpiece for PS3 but don't make out it's going to be something far better than it currently is.
gt5 pro is a full game. Not just a demo of a demo. just want to point that out
i remember when sony showed early footage of GT 2000 and it had poor reflections and dark windows and such:
and then GT 3 came out looking like this:
and then GT 4 came out looking like this:
so,as bad as these youtube videos are,each time,polyphony has outdone themselves and tweaked the graphics to reach new heights.the demo is one thing,but the full game is about a year away.
i expect GT5 to look as best it can.hope they bring back the wet tracks.
It's even got some new-tech gas discharge headlamps and a set of large diameter wheels for that low-rider effect. Cool!
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.