770°
Submitted by skyward 1154d ago | news

Crysis 2 DirectX 11 The 'First Next-Gen Game' - Crytek

NowGamer: Crytek thinks the DirectX 11 features headed to Crysis 2 make it the first, true next-gen game... (Cryengine 3, Crysis 2, Crytek, Industry, Next-Gen, PC, PS3, Tech, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
« 1 2 »
theonlylolking  +   1154d ago
Here we go again...
lelo2play  +   1154d ago
Yep... Crytek lost their chance.

'First Next-Gen Game' will probably be Skyrim or Battlefield 3.
#1.1 (Edited 1154d ago ) | Agree(27) | Disagree(53) | Report | Reply
elpibepiola   1154d ago | Spam
inveni0  +   1153d ago
Skyrim is not "next-gen". Battlefield 3? Maybe. MAYBE.
TheRealWar  +   1153d ago
Skyrim wont beat BF3 in graphics but it will still win GOTY 2011. You can bet your hairy a$$ on it!.
YourFlyness  +   1153d ago
Arma 3!
YourFlyness  +   1153d ago
Arma 3
badz149  +   1153d ago
seriously...not these lame ass big headed bunch again!
they mean..."THEIR" 1st next gen game, right?
Muffins1223  +   1153d ago
i think this update will be out in a week before those come out....also Skyrim next gen?I know it has kick ass graphics but not like battfield 3
lil Titan  +   1153d ago
TimeSplitters 4 using the CryEngine 3 DirectX 11, well at least its rumored
lastdual  +   1153d ago
I'd say The Witcher 2 is already pretty "next gen" if your rig has the muscle to max it out.
Motorola  +   1153d ago
Can we wait until we see Skyrim PC footage maxed out before making assumptions like that? BF3, PROBABLY. Anything else this year...probably not. But Skyrim has a slight chance
evrfighter  +   1153d ago
Would have loved to see witcher in dx11 glory. I would label it the pinnacle of dx9 however.

First next gen title is going to bf3 or arma 3

You can't patch in next gen. Yerli deserves this mess he stuck himself in. only a few months and crysis 2 is already off the grid. With the lineup coming out this year and next. This game's legs have been amputated.
stu888  +   1153d ago
next gen will come with PS4 and the next xbox.
Talking about next gen now is crap.

A generation is PS1 to PS2 or PS2 to PS3.

If you think BF3 and Crysis 2 DX11 are like the gap between PS2 and PS3 from games coming out on this gen of consoles, then take off your fanboy glasses.

Its like when Half Life 2 and Far Cry 1 came out. The PS2 wasn't capable of those graphics, but the PS3 shits on those graphics. The same thing will happen with BF3 and Crysis 2 DX11.

I'll take a bet with anyone who disagrees with me.
Miiikeyyy  +   1153d ago
Uncharted 3.
Kurylo3d  +   1153d ago
u do realize that consoles are incapable of doing dx11... right? I mean the next generation of consoles will be what pcs are today... or what pcs are a year ago. I mean when 360 and ps3 came out ... pcs were already 2 generations ahead in graphics card power.
#1.1.14 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(9) | Report
stu888  +   1153d ago
when talking of a generation in gaming, I am correct. end.

Only the most expensive PC owners would deny this.
History has shown that each new console since PS1 has portrayed a new generation in games and what they're capable of.

PC specs don't come into a new gen or not. They'll be some super PC somewhere that will probs be able to play PS6 games but that don't mean we're two gens ahead does it!

PC gamers stop sucking each others dicks and except you've all wasted your money on a slight graphical increase! suck em!
NukaCola  +   1153d ago
Epic was in GAMES magazine with thier new engine. I call that next gen. Next gen is developing now but until current PC/consoles can run it, it's still this gen. Plus tuntil games are built native to DX11, they aren't truly using next gen capabilities. I LoL a bit because I bet DX12 will be out before nex gen game even release
pixelsword  +   1153d ago
@ Kurylo3d:

What you are saying is traditionally true but this gen is a little different. This time it's all about digging into the console's cores and very few 1st, 2nd, or 3rd party developers have done that for, well, everyone; including the PC.

Here's what I mean:

- Rage, for example, will probably be the best looking game on every format because of the developers (people checking to see that it was actually running on the PS3 and not a high-end PC, for example) because of Id getting into the cores. Conversely, devs are also getting into the cores for the PC and not the consoles. Crytek is a good example because they couldn't even get their game in HD on any consoles, yet boasts the best looking game in gaming (Crysis).

- Another X-factor is people are still getting their head around the Cell Processor, which is proving to be one of the most curious gifts or scorned curses in gaming, depending on your point of view.

For example:

It's a curse because it's hard to program for from what I hear, but other than that, there's a huge up-wing in terms of advantages if you get into correct programming for the cell.

* There is at least one game in 1080p on the 360 and the PS3, but for the PS3, it's success for most of their games being in 1080p would be if devs use the Cell/RSX configuration plus their algorithms in a manner that would produce results like Factor 5 did four years ago with Lair. The RSX has to be used in tandem with the Cell to even start to approach getting great graphics out of the PS3, then, your algorithms have to run off the cell (through the cell) and when you do that, you can achieve 1080p and 60fps just like Factor 5 did with Lair. Yes, and I know that there are games that go way above 1080p on the PC, but for most people on the planet who game, even on the PC, they probably won't see that level for years due to pricing and the bad economy; so for now, 1080p is something all developers ought to strive for for not only the PC, but for consoles, and I think both the 360 and PS3 can do it.

* As of yet (not saying it's not possible, it just haven't happened this gen) there hasn't been a game yet on the PC or a mod for The Unreal or Source engine that has the players in a HD, FPS game that went above 128 players, and even then it runs very poorly or is stripped of graphics whereas the PS3 has a game with 256 players in it with virtually no lag almost all of the time (I'm not saying 100% no lag, because that's a lie: I got into a few that were laggy in part of the match... not the whole match, but definitely a part).

MIT has proven that the Cell is very powerful when they used it on their folding project; and even though the PS3 participants were in much smaller numbers than their PC participants, the PS3 processed much more data than the PC.

Basically, what I mean that this gen there's a lot more grey area here than meets the eye.
#1.1.17 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report
juggulator  +   1153d ago
The main feature of DX11 is tessellation which in all honesty simply automatically adds more detail to everything. It's a great feature and PC gamers are lucky to get it but alot of the same could be accomplished on consoles but it would just take more time(and likely more memory) depending on the project and who's working on it.
the_kutaragi_baka  +   1154d ago
lol funny, majority of textures in Crysis 2 are half the resolution quality of those in Crysis 1. Crytek downgraded the textures significantly in order to be on consoles.
#1.2 (Edited 1154d ago ) | Agree(26) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
fluffydelusions  +   1154d ago
They could have easily included higher res textures and DX11 for PC (like other devs) but chose not to, so really is it consoles to blame or Crytek/EA?
RevXM  +   1153d ago
Yeah like the Console version have the same textures as pc anyways... Now that is lol.

Yes blame the consoles!/s Textures and DX11 should be a Cakewalk. BF3 is doing it.
#1.2.2 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report
fatstarr  +   1153d ago
i see no problem, they are doing what they shoulda did ages ago and its not like they are charging pc gamers for this.

its basically the paint that will kill rigs of today. i cant wait to crash my comp tryn it out.

crysis on high feeling all over again.
wallis  +   1154d ago
These guys need to learn to STFU because crysis 2 is NOT as good as they think it is.

The brief time crytek were kings of graphics has passed. Battlefield 3 pretty much makes crysis 2 squeal like a pig.
CommonSense  +   1153d ago
not sure how you can say that when crysis 1 is still one of the best looking games out there.
#1.3.1 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report
andibandit  +   1153d ago
You guys are forgetting UC3
ViserysTargaryen  +   1153d ago
What about UC3? I haven't even seen any Uncharted game at native 1080p with full scene AAs yet, nevernmind the tess and all this nextgen stuff Crysis 2 and BF3 are doing.
stu888  +   1153d ago
Graphics isn't dictated by res or AA.
just saying...

And when you sit back from the TV its harder to tell than when your up close on PC.
fatstarr  +   1153d ago
my pc would crash trying to play crysis 2 with full dx11 and the high res textures at 19** X 1080. and i play everything on high.

thats how you know its next gen

I cant wait to see tributar and maxishine and other pc gamers with crazy rigs test this out on max.
PirosThe4th  +   1153d ago
lol at maxishine... he is crazy... haha crysis 2 full dx11 seems like i would run on my rig... i hope o_o
JsonHenry  +   1153d ago
Another vote for ARMA 3.
ViserysTargaryen  +   1153d ago
ARMA3 looks good but that franchise suffers from crap animations and horrid voice acting. I'll buy ARMA 3 anyways tho...its "nextgen" LOL.
MRHARDON  +   1153d ago
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

/s
#1.6 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
DARK WITNESS  +   1153d ago
It'z da kingz of every gen and runz on Directoz-109.

MW3 iz da winners!!
AdvanceWarsSgt  +   1153d ago
I've never seen completely stupid comments on N4G before. Fanboy delusioned? Yes, but not completely asinine.

Congratulations stu888, your comments are the first ones I've seen that made absolutely no sense!!
skyward  +   1154d ago
Think it's going to look fantastic. Wish I had a rig to play it.
IcarusOne  +   1153d ago
Excited to see video of this.
jellybalboa  +   1154d ago
crysis 2 is a crap game
Newtype   1154d ago | Bad language | show
HeavenlySnipes  +   1154d ago
Been saying that
since the abomination of a demo they release on the PS3. Lost a bubble for listing all the problems I saw.

Thank God I downloaded it before it was taken down, I would have bought it. X^D
ShoryukenII  +   1154d ago
Lens of Truth checked and Killzone 2 had better graphics than that demo. Killzone 3 has better graphics than the final game. I hate how Crytek hyped the graphics for that game. Now a lot of people think it is the best looking shooter on consoles. Check any Crysis 2 review and you'll see how advertising can skew someone's opinion. I played the multiplayer and it is crap. I like the climbing and the high jump but the heavy reliance (sprint) on suit energy is BS. I expect the single player to be good (I haven't played it) so it would only be worth a rental. But it's sad that the first Crysis looks better than Crysis 2. These devs have no heart.
IcarusOne  +   1153d ago
Yes, but Crysis 2 is far and away a better game with better action, better set-pieces, a better story, and better characters.
Jack-Dangerously  +   1153d ago
lol
Motorola  +   1153d ago
Theres a story in Crysis 2? Thought it was an incomplete tech demo (no Dx11 till now)
IcarusOne  +   1153d ago
Sigh. I just feel sorry for you guys. That's all.
ATiElite  +   1154d ago
yeh it's not really good at all. even worse than the first one.

but i do wanna see all the eye candy in Crysis 2 DX11 so when it hits the bargain bin i'll get it.
Shepherd 214  +   1154d ago
Damn, Crysis 2 sucks? Its seriously like a 6.0 or below?

What game did i beat then? Coulda swore it was a good one. Is this one of those exaggerated high standards issues?
Jocosta  +   1154d ago
Yep, I beat it to, must have sucked really bad.
ElementX  +   1154d ago
I love Crysis 2. The Nano suit is pretty sweet. I never played Crysis 1 but compared to COD and the like, Crysis 2 is easily one of the better FPS games th is generation.
jellybalboa  +   1153d ago
crysis 2 was a shit investment
fatstarr  +   1153d ago
sorry to burst ur bubble but crysis is original a pc game not meant to satisfy console gamers.

imo crysis is 1/2 benchmark and 1/2 game.

its a playable tech demo, fun but not the best but its nice to see some one taking the initiative to put time and effort into trying to max out a game.
halocursed  +   1154d ago
Some people already have the DX 11 patch...How does it look?
Fishy Fingers  +   1154d ago
Some people got the texture patch but it cant be installed until Crytek release the official update. So I dont think anyone outside of a select few have it working.

But comparisons show a marked improvement, although the gameplay needed the work, not the visuals. I'll still be DLing :)
GamerSciz  +   1154d ago
With what we have seen of BF3, I think Crysis 2 even with DX11 has some catching up to do.
Fishy Fingers  +   1154d ago
Well Crysis 2 will have the Dx11 patch before BF3 releases. Thats the only reason that they can make such a claim.
Fishy Fingers  +   1154d ago
"next-gen" as a term doesnt really work with PCs.
no_more_trolling  +   1154d ago
when u have to upgrade ur graphics card, processor and ram

that is next gen
Fishy Fingers  +   1154d ago
Well my 'current gen' hardware will be able to run the Dx11 version without problem. Does that mean the game is 'this gen' still then?

It's a silly term to use for PCs as each 'gen' has a vast range (of specs/power) and a new 'gen' is released every few months, based on 'previous gen' hardware.
#6.1.1 (Edited 1154d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(0) | Report
fatstarr  +   1153d ago
hes right.

it is next gen,

processor and ram arent the problem its your card.

if you want to play this first you need a 64bit os which 50% of the computer world doesnt have

then you need a true dx11 compatible card which happen to start at Radeon HD5550 and gtx450

a majority still have gtx 280s and 9800gtxs so yea major upgrades have to be done to play this fully.

not to mention a second card always helps and that's a 100-900$ upgrade depending on what you need.

what crytek meant was the next gen interns of gaming not hardware. leaping over the current gen by forcing devs to make real games with dx11 and all that jazz.
ct03  +   1154d ago
Yup. It's a silly thing to say.
If anything, Crysis 1 was the first "next gen" game because it's above and beyond anything the current gen consoles have put out. As is Metro 2033.
Kahvipannu  +   1154d ago
PC is, and allways will be the next-gen ^^
JasonPC360PS3Wii  +   1154d ago
My Toshiba Satellite is more powerfull than the 360 and PS3 combined, and I still have a hard time playing the first Crysis.
Ducky  +   1154d ago
... Yea, well, hopefully it looks better than Metro this time around.
StayStatic  +   1154d ago
About time :P looking forward to it.
Superted2007  +   1154d ago
"Crytek thinks the DirectX 11 features headed to Crysis 2 make it the first, true next-gen game"

Should of been included in the damn game from day one!
trancefreak  +   1153d ago
I guess we have been playing the troublesome plagued beta version from the get go.

Now this is a true release.

So many complaints in the mycrysis forums that A lot of pc gamers just gave up while the community is slipping away.

Also I have noticed undercover pr heads in the forums always trying to downplay peoples complaints incognito mode. Uber lame.
#9.1 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
death2smoochie  +   1154d ago
Technically they can be correct...in a almost comical way

This patch will be released before BF3 hits retail...That's the only thing they can claim BECAUSE WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN DEMOS OF BF3 RUNNING IN PRE-APLHA WITH FULL DX11 SUPPORT...
Now saying that, until Crysis 2 includes almost full environmental destruction in real time like BF3 and can claim that the Cryenegine 3 was built from the ground up using DX11, there claim is...well just THEIR CLAIM.
#10 (Edited 1154d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
Theonetheonly  +   1153d ago
they akready did that with crysis 1, battlefield is honestly a little behind crysis with destructability, and i would reckon that the accuracy and fidelity of the physics in the original crysis would still put frostbite 2,.0 to shame

when i say physics i mean when stuff explodes to a lot of pieces the small pieces dont fall through eachother to the ground and dissapear, all bodies interact and move realistically, even the smoke was physical in the original crysis, you could blow it out of the way with a grenade or blow it away with the exhaust of one of those flying vehicles or the helicopters.

the physics were and still are absolutely TOP NOTCH, REALTIME, and more accurate. most of the time stuff will not collide with other stuff in the same debris pile and shortly after dissapear. watch the barrel explosions or the nuke explosions on youtube for the og crysis you will prally see what i mean
Megaton  +   1154d ago
Still needs to prove its visuals are on par with the original Crysis. Right now it's still a disgrace to the name.
dirthurts  +   1153d ago
I disagree with you on that one.
Crysis 2 may not have the massive open environments, but in most ways it looks much better than the original, aside from a poor texture here and there.
The new texture pack should fix that though.
kramun  +   1154d ago
I actually really like the game, thought it was a good shooter with a decent campaign. Was it as good as the first one and Warhead? No, but it was still a decent shooter. I'll enjoy going through it for a second spin with the new DirectX 11 features, they arrived late but at least they turned up.

A lot of hate for the game but I enjoyed it.
JeffGUNZ  +   1154d ago
Why is this linked in the 360 section? This patch is only for the PC, right?
moaradin  +   1154d ago
That's Ironic because the first game looked much better and that game came out in what, 2007?
CoD511  +   1153d ago
I really don't get how people say Crysis 1 looks better. Crysis 2 looks better by a slight bit, not a huge amount as would be expected of a sequel four years later.
Gran Touring  +   1153d ago
With Crysis 1, the more you throw at it, the better it looks and the faster it runs.

Crysis 2 was very well optimized for lower-spec computers, but the engine doesn't scale up much for high-end hardware.

People say the first looks better, and it kinda does, given the right hardware.
lugia 4000  +   1153d ago
Ya want something that can be considered next gen? Crysis 1 with EQM mod.
BitbyDeath  +   1153d ago
Nextgen doesn't start until the next round of consoles are out
MyOtherHatIsUrMom   1153d ago | Spam
SuicideShaun  +   1153d ago
Finally. This should have been there at release crytek.
BeastlyRig  +   1153d ago
I love PC man!
unicron7  +   1153d ago
Still waiting for this "Killzone 3 graphics killer" on consoles that was supposed to have dropped back in March. If it was Crysis 2, I sure as hell couldn't see it. Stopped playing it after a week.
#20 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(10) | Report | Reply
Jdub895O  +   1153d ago
what is next gen anyways?I want to be blown away like in the old days
parasit3  +   1153d ago
Agreed. Since Crysis 2 and DirectX 11 are both PC and there are no next gen consoles on the market, then this is believable!
Foxton01  +   1153d ago
The Witcher 2 says hi...
vandal GAB  +   1153d ago
lol
Hicken  +   1153d ago
So, obviously I'm going to get disagrees, but I'm also going to mention what unicron and others have already said:

It's not the best-looking shooter on console, let alone game. It was supposed to look better than Killzone, and it failed at that. Killzone isn't the best looking game on console, so Crysis 2 can't possibly be visually superior.

As for it being "next-gen," that's a term that is, honestly, used to refer to consoles. PC doesn't count toward it, as PC standards change virtually on a monthly basis. In such a malleable arena, it's all but impossible to pin down what a "generation" is... which is why it's used as a console term.
Darkfiber  +   1153d ago
Graphics don`t mean a thing when the gameplay is generic and boring, the story is nonsensical and just plain atrocious at times, the NPCs and voice acting are hollow and poorly written, the level design is linear and the world is non-interactive. Oh no, this game is FARRRR from next gen.
#25 (Edited 1153d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
camargo2012  +   1153d ago
graphics enhance gameplay, multipe developers have said that lol and thats true
Kos-Mos  +   1153d ago
Played the game on pc. Next gen graphics I don`t know, but last gen gameplay and storytelling and atmosphere yes.
MasterCornholio  +   1153d ago
A little late isnt it? Wasnt the game suppose to come out with DX11 features in the first place?
Darkfiber  +   1153d ago
Probably, but the product was clearly rushed, and they wanted to downplay the fact that most Nvidia cards that people are using right now still don't have DX11, especially with that giant "NVIDIA, THE WAY IT'S MEANT TO BE PLAYED" logo in the loading screen.
Jack-Dangerously  +   1152d ago
Nope.
llMurcielagoll  +   1153d ago
No matter, still looking forward to it, going to play C2 DX 11 ready once more, that was my plan all along, play it once get to know the story, gameplay, next to enjoy DX 11.

and Yes I do play good games over and over and over doesn't matter as long as I am enjoying it to the max!
ViserysTargaryen  +   1153d ago
Maybe now all the PC gamers can stop hating Crysis 2 for it's dated graphics.
I_am_Batman  +   1153d ago
I still can't get how a current gen game can be considered next gen.next gen game will come out when the next gen begins.
dirthurts  +   1153d ago
Next gen consoles always use what pc hardware has had for a few years.
Therefore, Direct X 11 on current pc = Next gen console.
Easy as that.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Things to do in GTA V - Roller Coaster Wars

14m ago - The Achievement Hunter guys use a roller coaster as a course to race their motorcycles in Things... | Xbox 360
20°

Cloud Chamber Review | GodisaGeek

25m ago - James Bowden: "Not all of the acting is perfect, admittedly, and the audio presentation won’t be... | PC
30°

Bioshock Infinite: Burial at Sea - One Last Hurrah

47m ago - Endlessbacklog.com's Chris reviews Irrational Game's final game in Burial at Sea. | PC
30°

Actual "Moe" Games You Can Probably Buy Somewhere

1h ago - AUTOMATON's red-headed stepchild, Pontius Jones, enlightens us regarding the Japanese trend of "m... | PC
Ad

Win a Titan One from N4G and ConsoleTuner!

Now - We're giving away three Titan Ones from ConsoleTuner (original inventors of the Cronus and CronusMAX)! The Titan One device makes modded controller... | Promoted post
40°

Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare PS4 Review

1h ago - Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare is one of the most surprising shooters to launch this year. Wh... | PS4
Related content from friends