CVG: Ubisoft Montreal says it can "definitely" replicate the stunning Far Cry 3 experience shown running on PC at E3 on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.
Speaking to CVG in LA last week, producer Dan Hay said his development team is aiming to have the shooter looking "incredible" on PS3 and "fantastic" on Xbox 360 - but PC players will be able to "dial it to 11".
Demo for Far Cry 3 was really intriguing...lots of good games coming out this year.
Never played the 360 version, but if they are in any way the same game it couldn't suddenly get better. No amount of good graphics could have fixed Farcry 2!
You have no clue about anything to do with games.
Right ON!!!
Now as for Far Cry...It'll look great on PS3. It'll require a 5 gig install, and won't perform nearly as well as the 360 rendition. As long as you don't play this side by side with the 360 version you'll think it looks and performs great on PS3.
best.show.ever.
Except kz2 is a blurry low res textured mess and I skipped uncharted 2.
Uncharted 2, Gears of War series, Red Dead Redemption, MGS 4, Forza and GT... I could go on with great games PC gamers are missing out. So no, PC does not go above and beyond, console does...
All decent games on PC are released on console. The best console games, on average rated higher than PC exclusives (metacritic). You are wrong!
Just suck 'em. in fact fuck off and shag your USB drive or something like what you PC gamers do.
i play red dead on ps3 and few people were telling me to play it on xbox360 so after playing both versions i couldn't see the difference
these sites want hits fanboys from each side want to believe they are getting the better looking games while both will play the same
now few games push the console boundaries 3rd party wise. The next game that will do and surpass it will be RAGE 3rd party wise and gears3 and uncharted 3 1st party wise respectively
so enjoy the games and forget about the minor difference
NEVER.
really was there that big of a difference i could see some minor graphics details here and there but really that much.
i finished the game on xbox360 after i finished it on ps3 and maybe something is wrong with my eyes but i didn't see something where i said to myself one is better version than the other
i am not that kind of gamer where small things make big difference to me game ran smooth on both systems looked about the same. Gameplay wise it was about the same
but anyway that's just one gamers testing i guess
The AA and the textures are so bad on the PS3 version :(
Just look at this..remember to click Watch picture in original size.
http://n4g.com/news/526409/...
They have differences and to some look like it just a different color pallet that's it.
nothing game breaking/game ruining in any of those pics.
I don;t think i even played RDR on ps3 i think it was a 360 only game for because of MP friends
99.9% of the time if I'd not been "informed"of the tiny details differing between console versions of 360 and PS3 games I'f NEVER have known about them even having played both versions close together. I prfer my PS3 because of to things these days-I don't want to pay a Gold sub any longer and I like a DS3 better than a 360 pzd but for multiplats and performance I couldn't care less either way. You'd be just as well off with 360 playing the inferior FF13 on however many discs as you would be playing Bayonetta's supposedly broken PS3 port.
They're the two more crecent examples where I think I can see the difference without being prompted and even there i wouldn;'t say to ANYONE "hey, ou GOT to play it on the other platform, you're missing out!". Only with The Orange Box do I truly feel a PS3 version of a multi has been THAT poor it's obvious to everyone and a shoddy mes that's best avoided if you have the choice but even so, if you only have a PS3 those meta scores speak for themselves-it's still amazing and if it wasn't amazing on the system reviewers would have said so. And that's the WORST sodding port I can think of!
LoT/DF and comparison sites of every size have to find winners and losers and actively seek them out in ways we couldn't possibly do. they use programs to detect FPS and screen tear issues and so on. Speed up and slow down to check detail and even use different settings than you should if they'r struggling and they do it because they exists to do so and without a winner or loser every other release why would anyone ever go to them?
Seriously, they know there's ads to be sold in the fanboy hits they collect-by and large-and I feel for anyone who truly goes to them expecting to find out things pertinent to their own experience as they count a lot of stuff you could NEVER see even with games running side by side FFS. It's annoying to me that we don't see multiplatform titles pushing the 360 and PS3 as well or as hard as the very best exclusives do on each platform but fact is EA/Ubi whoever ants the games as close as possible as long as they reach an acceptable and saleable standard close to each other. Annoying but unavoidable with close console sales figures.
Rant over. Sorry but nothing annoys me like the crud sold as things the average gamer should care about or even be able to see with their own eyes by these sites. I just don't get why we visit them. If a difference is bad enough to be obvious to a gamer don't we imagine it would be picked up by the average reviewer who is way more likely to even SEE both versions than we are? A bad port is picked up on ANYWAY so sod these sites telling us who won because their C told them so when their eyes can't.
I guess MS didn't made them sign the contract that most devs have to sign that forces them to scale down the PS3 version so both will look very similar
except if they said "incredible" because they don't are usualy good with ps3.
Al i have to say is the PS3 has Uncharted 3 and after seeing all thoose fluid physics and graphics as well as KZ3's stage with water effects etc. it doesn't get any better!!!
The SPU's are being used correctly and so is the Blu-ray capacity.
Now stop saying this game is gonna be anything but a PC port.
Obviously PC has an advantage but so does PS3,
PS3 inspires hard work and creativity with its unique design , but PC's inspire a easy quick fix game engines with not too much paradigm or out of the box changes in thinking.
Im tired of FPS PC ports slap onto xbox360 and PS3 then saying all this crap about how they look so great??
BS !!
Give me something exclusive and specific!1
I paid 500 for my PS3 and it has SSD drive i want some real serious native games!!!
"So we want to make sure that if you're playing it on PS3 it looks incredible, and if you're playing on the 360 it's unbelievable.
Unbelievable > incredible...haha
Misleading and pointless header.
fantastic: conceived or appearing as if conceived by an unrestrained imagination
good would be better
before the fanboy war this is what they said
"So we want to make sure that if you're playing it on PS3 it looks incredible, and if you're playing on the 360 it's unbelievable, sounds amazing and looks fantastic," he said."
seems to be no advantage in ps3 vs 360..
I hope there will be graphics mods for this game!
so much love for pc from devs in 2011 vs being shunned in 2010..
However you're still right about the orgasmic settings.
this is what is wrong with gaming. Last gen devs were proud to pump out strong stuff on XB1 and GCN, but this time around everyone wants to be the "same".
This was the FPS I was impressed by at E3. The voice acting by the hispanic guy was awesome, and the story looked pretty intriguing.
Driving everywhere soon became a massive bore to most of us and it felt a worthless grind having to battle every outpost on the way to every mission. The weapon degrading system was pants too-I'm positive there was some equation where they made it more likely, even if you'd just got a decent looking gun, it was more likely to break if it would REALLY screw you up-and as I say regardless of the condition at a fire fights start!
I'd really loved the first game and played it to death and was looking forward to FC2 so damn much it hurt but along with FO3 it's been the biggest let down this gen for me-and another of those games tons loved and I felt I was going ,mental but the longer it went with FC2 the more I found I might be same. Ish.
Still a very good looking multi on consoles and genuinely great looking PC title for my money though-despite the flaws in gameplay which led me never to finish it. I will do one day as it does deserve that much but driving to missions gets me down after a couple.
This is what was said, "So we want to make sure that if you're playing it on PS3 it looks incredible, and if you're playing on the 360 it's unbelievable, sounds amazing and looks fantastic"
Only fantastic??? awwwe ;(
"So we want to make sure that if you're playing it on PS3 it looks incredible, and if you're playing on the 360 it's unbelievable, sounds amazing and looks fantastic," he said."
Unbelievable, sounds amazing and looks fantastic > Incredible!
Incredible = Unbelievable + Amazing + Fantastic!
http://www.bestbuy.com/site...
this shitty, bottom of the barrel laptop will run all multiplats in 1360x768 (way higher than consoles 1024x720, on average, some games are wayyy lower alan wake 940x540, call of duty 1024x600....barf)
at higher frames with better fidelity than the 360 or ps3.
Nvidia 7800 receives around 5000 points.
Troll WAY harder.
You're barking at a tree that wont even respond to you . Do you even expect people to give up their consoles because you're grumpy about them ?
far cry 1 is good, but 2 was meh!
the important thing is...i don't really care how good far cry 3 graphic, but if ubi made it with far cry 2 gameplay than i will skip it ^^
Edit: Oh, and at a resolution of 2560x1440! Beast :)
2012 will be repeated the same more games on 1 platform and less on the other he he.....and guess what there's nothing they can do about it...oh wait lots of buttonless titles to look forward to.
Sad really......
Let's face it, against the PC brunt, our hardware is taking strain...