Quantcast
70°
Submitted by 101arena 705d ago | article

Is Duke Nukem Forever 13 years too late?

After 13 years of waiting you’d think the gaming world would welcome the return of The King with open arms, but judging by the growing number of negative reviews, it seems that Duke’s latest adventure isn’t what fans of the franchise were hoping for. (Duke Nukem Forever, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)

VampiricDragon  +   705d ago
as it turns out it was 13 years to early. It needed more Development time
zero_cool  +   705d ago
Time for journalists to stop beating the poor dead horse behind barn just bury it the ground for god's sake!
#2 (Edited 705d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Young, Female Protagonists are Taking Over Video Games

8m ago - With the announcement of Quantum Break, DefaultPrime's Lucas looks deeper into the male and femal... | PC
10°

Call of Duty: Ghosts preview: rebooting a franchise | Shack News

9m ago - Shack News: "Activision deliberately crossed everyone up when it announced the next Call of Duty... | PC
20°

Xbox One x Smart Match +Game DVR = Social Gamer's

9m ago - Sony showcased share functionality when they showed the Playstation 4 in February. Microsoft has... | Xbox One
10°

Resident Evil Revelations Review | GamePlanet

9m ago - GamePlanet: "Revelations is a lesser experience on console simply because more is expected. Upsiz... | PC
Ad

Soul Sacrifice (Vita) Review

Now - Ryan takes this unique Vita title for a spin and talks to a book. Trust us, just read the review. | Promoted post
20°

Call of Duty Ghosts preview – the next generation of CoD | The Guardian

9m ago - The Guardian: "The first live footage we see is a forest. Well, this is Call of Duty – of course... | PC
Related content from friends