Approvals 13/3 ▼
-Mezzo- (4) - 4707d ago Cancel
SpaceSquirrel (3) - 4707d ago Cancel
knifefight (2) - 4707d ago Cancel
zeeshan810 (2) - 4707d ago Cancel
Jonmau5 (2) - 4707d ago Cancel
400°

IGN: Sony Not Rushing PlayStation 4

With Nintendo revealing its next console at E3 2011, gamers are wondering if Microsoft or Sony might accelerate the timeline for launching their next generation of consoles. Yoshida said he "[does] not feel the need to introduce a new PlayStation console" at this time.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4707d ago
MariaHelFutura4707d ago

Why would they? That sh!t cost MS Billions!!!!!!

DeadlyFire4706d ago

Nintendo said the same thing last year before E3. So just wait. E3 2012.

tplarkin74707d ago

Sony is not rushing, because their not doing anything for PS4, yet. If history is any indication, Sony will panic in 2012 and then being rushing their console.

MariaHelFutura4707d ago (Edited 4707d ago )

Agatha? Don`t you need the other two?

NateCole4707d ago

Like they panic with the PS2 and PS3?.

You x360 fans really are in Bazzario world.

blumatt4706d ago

lmao haha @ the Minority Report reference. Very well said.

I don't think Sony needs to release the PS4 until 2013 or 2014. There's so many good games coming for it and they still haven't reached that sweet pricepoint--$200. The games just keep on looking better and better year after year.

I hope the PS4 keeps the Cell architecture and just upgrades the RAM to like 4GB for those "lesser developers."

Upbeat4706d ago

lmao 23 disagress shows how much BULLSHIT your talking, anyways the ps3 can still complete for a good while yet with it having the best grapics on the console market, and even when the xbox720 comes out it will still complete for a while. That is what happens when a company take their time and do things right. Just like microsoft 8-)

Inside_out4706d ago

.
Whether they want to or not, Sony will have to keep the PS3 on the market to try and get some of the massive losses off the books...I don't think it will work. PS3 is not PS2 and history will show that when it's all said and done.

Xbox 360 has been far more profitable and been around for 6 years now. Even if they announce holiday 2012 for a new console, 360 will be 7 years old. Who is using a 7 year old pc or cell phone...EXACTLY. M$ cannot let Nintendo launch a new console first and I believe they will launch one as well and that is why Halo was removed at the last minute this September and replaced with Gears 3. Halo 4 will be a launch title Holiday 2012 with a new M$ console.

Nintendo and the wii have more consoles ( about 30 million more...O_o ) sold than either M$ or Sony and yet they want to get this new machine out as soon as possible and lock up some middleware like Unreal 4 and release their impressive library of games in HD to the public. If they go it alone, they will crush Sony and MS holiday 2012 and never look back.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4706d ago
jmare4707d ago

All Nintendo is doing is coming on line with the 360 and PS3 in terms of hardware. In a few years both Microsoft and Sony will release new hardware and then Nintendo will be behind again. Why do either of them need to rush?

Shackdaddy8364706d ago (Edited 4706d ago )

Nintendo goes off a 5 year plan while Sony and Microsoft appear to be going off a 7. If this holds true for the future, then only two years after Microsoft and Sony release a console, Nintendo will release a new one. This would actually be the contender for the next gen - Not this current console. 5 years after that and they will all release a new gen at the same time.

All Nintendo is doing is pulling an inception on us - Releasing a gen within a gen :)

ChrisGTR14707d ago

yea sony sure does take its sweet time. cough.. in game xmb... cough .. cross game chat.

lil Titan4707d ago

"Why would they?" stole the words right out my mouth

Persistantthug4707d ago

They never told the direct truth...

The reason they closed all those studios (ENSEMBLE, DIGITAL ANVIL, FASA, ACES), was because RROD cost them billions, and investors were not gonna put up with ANOTHER generation of lost proceeds.
Microsoft had to trim some fat somewhere, so they canned good studios, and now in 2011, Microsoft has no games.....basically.

Rushing helps no one in the end.

unicron74706d ago

Unless you count all the Kinect games set to come out. Wasted money that could have been used towards good 1st party software. They are more concerned with cashing in then pleasing their already established customers.

gamingdroid4706d ago (Edited 4706d ago )

I'm sad to hear that... I would have rather had technology that was immediately efficient and cost effective, then have shorter cycles.

Instead we ended up with a over priced console, that is now 5-years old that is reaching it's prime! If Sony would have a released a cheaper console without an obscure architecture, it is very likely we would have been looking at 3 new consoles this E3....

Ironically, releasing the cutting edge eventually meant holding back technology without much benefit.

pain777pas4706d ago

This generation is different from the past. Remember that a PS3 at 199 dollars is a great value. Graphics can get better but in all honesty games are good looking enough. There will be another GOW game just like the PS2 to send the system off. Wouldn't be suprised if another Infamous game came out aswell. 2 trilogies are over. Resistance and Killzone. Guerilla should move onto another IP. Sony Japan have yet to show their cards. PS3 really is looking good right now. A price drop will give the system long legs. Remember Bluray, wifi, decent online, trophies and many exclusives. No need for the PS4. MS and Nintendo can have fun while PS3 can sell a lot.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4706d ago
SpaceSquirrel4707d ago

That's good to hear. I'm still playing my ps3 like crazy

knifefight4707d ago

Good. I can wait. There are too many good-looking games for my time and budget as it is.

Take your time, guys.

a_bro4707d ago

still think they will announce it next year and launch it in 2013.

other than that, just give me some social networking features on the PS3 and I wont be a bother for the next 2 years sony.

thehitman4707d ago (Edited 4707d ago )

I dont think it will get announced until 2013 and released 2014-15. Remember the seemingly long wait from PS2-3 i think it will be 2x as long waiting for PS4 and that MS may even have a 2-3 year advantage this time possibly.

Dart894707d ago (Edited 4707d ago )

I'm not in a hurry and i'm sure Sony isn't either.

Edit:Retards who ever disagreed.

And i'm sure Sony dosen't wanna make the same mistake M$ made.

Show all comments (57)
20°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3m ago
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community20d ago
ChasterMies20d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken20d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga20d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken20d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6419d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long19d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197219d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
DivineHand12520d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91320d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer19d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91319d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit19d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
Christopher20d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6919d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit19d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher20d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken20d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197219d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2319d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218319d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder20d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts20d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community26d ago
blackblades26d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken26d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades25d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii25d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p