Top
300°

Why Battlefield Multiplayer Is Superior To Call Of Duty

Gaming Irresponsibly's Josh writes: Okay, first off I need to preface this article with the fact that one of my most favorite FPS games ever in the history of FPS is Battlefield: Bad Company 2. There are many reasons behind this and I will probably touch on them in a bit. So yes I will be incredibly biased here but I am going to try to be fair as well.

Read Full Story >>
gamingirresponsibly.com
The story is too old to be commented.
fluffydelusions2550d ago (Edited 2550d ago )

I don't think it's necessarily correct to call it "superior" That is a very subjective term. I think it's better to say they are different but I suppose that wouldn't make for a good headline. Regardless, each franchise has their fan base that will praise one over the other. Either way, they both can coexist.

agentxk2550d ago

Kinda feel bad for all those other FPS games out there now...

mrv3212550d ago

On a technical level Battlefield games are superior.

news4geeks2550d ago

I disagree, superior can be a very objective term so long as you explain yourself via valid and sound arguments. I don't play either multiplayer so I'll leave it with you guys to battle this one out :)

Motion2550d ago (Edited 2550d ago )

If you don't play Battlefield games in multiplayer, you've never played a Battlefield game before (well, bots I guess, but that hardly counts). They haven't made a true Battlefield game with a single player campaign yet. That hardly give you room to disagree.

news4geeks2550d ago (Edited 2550d ago )

you're point being?

edit: oh ok you thought I disagreed with the title and basis of the article. I was disagreeing with superior being a subjective term from the opening comment. Also you should explain where you edited, for it can make me look like an idiot :)

edit @ below - you're first sentence is valid but not sound. You're second is valid but its soundness is up for debate. I like to think that it's inductively forceful, but just how forceful is questionable.

X-DominusRebellis-X2550d ago

It's superior because BC3 is an actual "multiplayer" game. Where people have to work as a team and not just run and gun trying to get as many kills while you fuck your team over.

Master_S2550d ago

Battlefield is SUPERIOR game.

phantomexe2550d ago

agreed and can't wait to play 3

agentxk2550d ago

I will lose so much time playing Battlefield 3, looking forward to it!

Lirky2550d ago

call of duty is : spawn,kill,spawn,kill repeatative.
battlefield is : tactical manuevuering less repeatative.

Chnswdchldrn2550d ago

battlefield is a slow paced shit shooter with a bouncha level 50 try hards and I cant walk 2 feet without getting owned in a server

COD games are way more friendly and better designed and u get more for your buck, especially with the amount of DLC they give you

COD dumps on BF, as MW3 will dump on BF3

thugbob2550d ago (Edited 2550d ago )

LMAO!!!

You hate battlefield because you aren't good at the game? Don't blame the game blame yourself.

CoD requires no skill. There is nothing tactical about CoD.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 is the second best multiplayer in my opinion. The best to me is Killzone 2 and CoD tops my worst FPS list. So CoD is superior at being worse than Battlefield.

wsoutlaw872550d ago

o you mean easier, yes cod is. Some might say noob friendly. Thats why im sick of the stupid game. its too easy to dominate for bs reasons

Motion2550d ago

"DLC they give you"

ha. haha. hahahaha omg I can't stop.

denero12550d ago

in terms of brand name mw3 does shit on bf3 but in terms of quality bf3 shits on mw3

Show all comments (37)
The story is too old to be commented.