1040°
Submitted by Michael-Jackson 1140d ago | review

IGN: Infamous 2 Review

Nothing exists in Infamous 2 just because, and that’s something developer Sucker Punch should be commended for. When combined with how well-executed just about everything in the game is, the overall package is one of PlayStation 3’s best and a must-play for fans of the first game. Don’t be deceived by niche subject matter like I was when the original Infamous first came out. This is a rock-solid third-person action game with an incredible story, great characters, meaty gameplay and – above all else – a string that effectively ties everything together. (inFamous 2, PS3) 9/10

Attached Video
Alternative Sources
« 1 2 3 »
user9422077  +   1140d ago
Well done, Sucker Punch and IGN.

Sucker Punch for creating an amazing sequel.

Well done to IGN for not giving the 50 millionth 8.5 score.
#1 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(129) | Disagree(16) | Report | Reply
DarkCharizard_  +   1140d ago
Right up there with
Crysis 2, The Witcher 2, Total War: Shogun 2, Patapon 3, Dissidia 012 Final Fantasy & Pokemon Black/White.
#1.1 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(72) | Report | Reply
Abash  +   1140d ago
20 hours to beat on one playthrough!
ksense  +   1140d ago
if you want a good score from IGN the game needs to have a good single player campaign and it has to be long. Multiplayer is secondary to them. this is what I have noticed but for some reason COD seems to be the exception.
malamdra   1140d ago | Trolling | show
thugbob  +   1140d ago | Well said
This is how you make a sequel!!!!

"Infamous 2 plays nearly identically to how the original played, and that's a good thing."

"Nothing exists in Infamous 2 just because, and that’s something developer Sucker Punch should be commended for."

I wasn't going to get this game on day one, but now I am because developers like Sucker Punch DESERVE it.

If only Killzone 3 was a worthy successor to Killzone 2 like Infamous 2 is for Infamous 1. Hopefully Guerrilla Games learned their lesson.

Infamous 2 another worthy PS3 exclusive.
GrieverSoul  +   1140d ago
Im surprised for the 8.5 on graphics. The game looks great! I know 8.5 ia good score but graphics and physics seem to me a bit over the top to just earn a 8.5.

My 2 cents
MoveTheGlow  +   1140d ago
@Ksense - Multiplayer? In Infamous 2? While that sounds okay, with electric/fire/ice dudes jumping everywhere and all, Infamous 2 is a single-player game. So, yeah, I'm looking for reviewers to treat it as a single-player game. The user-generated content stuff is awesome, but that isn't really multiplayer, it's shared creativity.

You're not going to see a restaurant losing a star in a review because there just wasn't enough snowboarding. You didn't see reviewers marking down Final Fantasy 6 because it didn't have Multitap functionality. You're not going to see Infamous treated like Call of Duty. Did you even read the article?
#1.1.6 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(5) | Report
MoveTheGlow  +   1140d ago
@GrieverSoul - Yes, definitely, when compared to other PS3 games graphics-wise, it's looking like this one's up in the top tier; of course, that's because Sucker Punch has had time to improve on their past work, on an engine they originally built from the ground up. Colin didn't have anything that would bring the score down, which seems odd, but he said it looks "great," which would typically mean something in the above average range, or the 8's.

I know reviews have seen a ton of grade inflation over the past 10 years or so, with IGN leading that move in the past, but it looks like Colin (not IGN, just this guy, as Clank explains below) is following the actual scoring guidelines at the moment. He might be scoring graphical fidelity overall, compared to any system, including high-end PC's, but I'm not sure that's the case either.
#1.1.7 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
ksense  +   1140d ago
@movetheglow

chill out bro. I was not asking for multiplayer in Infamous. Did you even read my comment? I was talking about IGN reviews in general. Just take an example of Killzone 3. The game got docked points only because it had a weak story. The majority of gamers look at killzone as a multiplayer game so shouldn't the reviewer give it more importance than judging the game just for its single player experience but that is not the case with IGN. Homefront had a decent campaign but it was short and so it got a really low score.

All I am saying is that IGN gives more importance to the single player experience no matter what.
darthv72  +   1140d ago
good score but......
it is from "au.ps3.ign.com". Not like that version of IGN carries any weight.

It is usually the US site that gets all the flak. I am betting they will give the usual score.
#1.1.9 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(27) | Report
despair  +   1140d ago
@darthv72

Its the same review for all regions and its done by a US reviewer...
MitchGE  +   1140d ago
Colin Moriarty from IGN (the guy who did this review) must be blind. 8.5/10 for graphics? InFamous 2 is easily a 10/10 for graphics. It's pretty much an open world Uncharted 2 graphically.
RankFTW  +   1140d ago
Can't wait to pick this baby up, sorry Duke you will have to sit in the pile for a few days :).
darthv72  +   1140d ago
@despair
thank you...i stand corrected.

Some sites that have variations around the globe review things independently of the rest.

Was a bit skeptical there for a moment.
zootang  +   1140d ago
How is it that COD will score a 10 in graphics but infamous 2 gets an 8.5? Seriously?
despair  +   1140d ago
@darthv72

NP...I made that mistake once or twice and there are usually multiple reviews for the different regions on IGN so I know why you were mistake..plus the link is to the AU site..
unicron7  +   1140d ago
@GrieverSoul

I know right. 8.5 for graphics??? Watch them give MW3 a 9 or 10 in graphics with absolutely no basis for it whatsoever. This is why reviews are mostly BS, opinion based, and don't have a leg to stand on. I'm buying the game, but definitely not by going off their review. I'll be using my own two eyes.
thereapersson  +   1140d ago
How has DarkCharizard not been reported as off-topic or trolling?
None of those games have anything to do with Infamous: 2, so there was absolutely no point in mentioning them except to stir the pot.
Colmshan1990  +   1140d ago
@thereapersson

He's just naming other games that IGN gave the same score to.
And there's some pretty fine games in that line up.
He's replying to the first comment, not trolling.
#1.1.18 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report
thereapersson  +   1140d ago
@colmshan
Again I ask, why was it necessary? What purpose does it serve?

This article is about Infamous 2, not Crysis 2, The Witcher, etc. If people want to see every other game that got the same score as Infamous 2, they can go to the IGN ratings page and look them up there.

You excusing that sort of off-topic posting is exactly what's contributing to this site's downward slope.
vickers500  +   1140d ago
"You're not going to see a restaurant losing a star in a review because there just wasn't enough snowboarding. You didn't see reviewers marking down Final Fantasy 6 because it didn't have Multitap functionality."

Lol, your metaphors are kind of crappy. A better saying would be "you're not going to see a mexican restaurant losing a star because there wasn't any chinese/american/italian food".

Multiplayer in inFamous wouldn't be as crazy and out of place as you make it sound. Provided the developers wanted their game to have multiplayer or co-op, I'm sure they would do a fantastic job of implementing it into an inFamous game, and it would feel natural.

But inFamous doesn't NEED multiplayer, although I'm very interested in seeing Sucker Punch giving it a shot at some point in the franchise. Given inFamous's universe, they could make it pretty unique and badass. But that's another dream for another day, and inFamous 2 is almost here, so I'll enjoy that.
DarkTower805  +   1140d ago
@thugbob,

"Nothing exists in Infamous 2 just because, and that’s something developer Sucker Punch should be commended for."

So does this mean that the blast shards are used this time around? I loved Infamous, but the shards are a stupid decision imo, and there were sooo many of them. I hope they are worth collecting this time around.
bozebo  +   1140d ago
@Zootang

CoD runs at 60 fps (BSP based coridoor shooter type engine). Also, if they were taking into acount it's graphics on the PC it could be boosted up a bit, but 10/10 wouldn't make sense because plenty of games look much better on PC.

Anyway, on topic:
I don't understand how other people don't find infamous repetitive, is it just me? Everying aside from the repetitiveness and the loud footsteps is great though.
#1.1.22 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(9) | Report
schlanz  +   1140d ago
Well done Sucker Punch, you mean
clank543  +   1140d ago
No. Thank you Colin Moriarity. Seriously, he is one of the only people over there that I continually trust with his in depth reviews and solid reasoning. While I don't hate IGN as much as some others, some of their reviews over the past couple years have been terrible and brief.
SSKILLZ  +   1140d ago
Hell yeah man
blusoops  +   1140d ago
Yeah totally agree! I'm glad they promoted Collin to editor recently from workin on guides. I feel he has a great understanding on gaming, good reasoning, not biased against Playstation, and is fair. Can't wait to play thus game!

BEYOND!
SIX  +   1140d ago
I've been listening to Colin for a good year now and you are right. It's almost obsessive how much he loves playstation. It's just that 90% of them guys at IGN are big nerds for the console with the big X on it.
grailly  +   1140d ago
I would say that he has an interesting view on games, I woudn't trust him on everything though. He loved homefront and singularity, he's always saying how good they are. also, he hates sonic. He's especially big on settings for games, that's what makes him interested or not.
nskrishna2  +   1140d ago
I was kinda wondering why an IGN review was making sense and then I found out that it was written by Moriarity...more power to the man
movements  +   1140d ago
BOOM!
guigsy  +   1140d ago
Why are you congratulating IGN? It's their job to give out the score they deem the game is worthy of, good or bad. You can't just congratulate them for giving out a good score and criticize them for giving out a bad one, that's completely missing the point of product reviews.
RedDead  +   1140d ago
Ya, it's one of the many forms a fanboy can take...This form being the 'Hypocrite'
user9422077   1140d ago | Trolling | show
Dread   1140d ago | Trolling | show
young juice  +   1140d ago
@theboywhocyryedfanboy
while there are alot of fanboys on this site, you cant go around accusing everyone who likes the review of being a fanboy.

i dont particularly like IGN either ( because its a poorly maintained mildy biased site imo.) however i thought the written review was pretty good. but that makes me a fanboy, right? because i mostly agree with both Suarez7's comments? please... you people need to lighten up. they're just games
#1.5.4 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report
Why o why   1140d ago | Trolling | show
Coffin87  +   1140d ago
@1.5
You're completely missing the point of irony.
sikbeta  +   1140d ago
Great Score, Well done Sucker Punch for Delivering a great sequel...
frjoethesecond  +   1140d ago
@ksense

Hence MW2 getting a 9.6 instead of a perfect 10?
Obelisk92  +   1140d ago
LOL Yeah, I was actually thinking they would give it another 8.5.

Anyway, is this the first review of the game? God, that's early for IGN standards.
TBM  +   1140d ago
I don't need a review or score to tell me which game(s) im going to like or love. I platinum the first game, and well go after it again for part two.
ps3destroyer  +   1140d ago
How funny it is to watch IGN growing in the eyes of ps3 fanboys after a great score for an exclusive game of their console.
ThanatosDMC  +   1140d ago
I got $55 on it at gamestop... i just need to add a little bit more money on it to pick it up on day one. Does anybody know if there's a midnight release?
50Terabytespersec  +   1140d ago
I am skeptical about this score as IGN is known to be very biased and M$$$$ friendly lol.
But I am sure the guy doing the review must be a new hire??
This looks to be a fantastic game for Sand box lovers ..
Im sure to buy this because it is 2nd gen title from sucker punch!
gunnerforlife  +   1140d ago
thats what IGN should do more, put someone that is a fan of either that Genre or was a fan of the first game, not someone that totally hated the sequel or is not a fan of that genre, which is what they usually do and thats why their reviews r so wonky.
damnyouretall  +   1140d ago
GrieverSoul

its a open world game so i dont expect the graphics to be great. but thats still the best owg graphics to date from what ive seen. i didnt play infamous, im waiting on the free game. this looks like a must buy though. after i beat the first one that is
#1.14 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Drake_Seraphim  +   1140d ago
This game looks great!
the_best_player  +   1139d ago
Just small camera problems the game should of got 9.9 then
OllieBoy  +   1140d ago
We so excited!
Istanbull  +   1140d ago
Wow, especially after all those games they gave an 8.5, this means Infamous 2 really is THAT good!

We we we so excited!
LiamIRL82  +   1140d ago
No need to quote Rebecca Black, that's just cruel to us!
Brian5247  +   1140d ago
Woohoo! Boooughttttt
Zir0  +   1140d ago
IGN is trusted once again woop woop
a_bro  +   1140d ago
IGN is never trusted -_-
chidori666  +   1140d ago
so, now IGN is...=/

edit: IGN they gave infamous 1 a better score. :D
#4.1.1 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(13) | Report
sikbeta  +   1140d ago
your point? don't tell me... now 9 out of 10 is not good, right?

-_____-
Dread   1140d ago | Trolling | show
LostDjinn  +   1140d ago
Read the review and then check the scores. Something doesn't add up. Nine is a good score but from what is said to how it scores there's just a bit of difference.
Graphics, sound and gameplay all get a glowing review yet they scores eights?

After all, the author doesn't mention one problem (wonky camera is a stretch).

It's still the same IGN. Make no mistake.
#4.2 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(18) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
death2smoochie  +   1140d ago
So they should have given the game a 10 then? 10+ for graphics?
Would that make IGN more credible then?
LostDjinn  +   1140d ago
I see smoochie.
Way to go with taking things to extremes.
What they need to do is give "valid" examples of what falls short?

You see any of those in this article?
I didn't think so.

Edit: I inserted the word "valid". It'll make a nice change from their usual approach.
#4.2.2 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(4) | Report
HolyOrangeCows  +   1140d ago
I'll bet you're critical of people taking it to heart that Castro said their economy doesn't work, too.
"Oh now he's a reliable source? LOLOLOL capitalist fanboys!"

When something that's not in favor of something says something positive about that thing or something NEGATIVE about their thing, it can usually be seen as pretty reliable, because they have nothing to gain.

So quit your obsession with "shifting" opinions of LOT, IGN, etc.

And just because IGN has mostly terrible writers who write feature lists as opposed to critical reviews, doesn't mean that they don't have one that can write a good review.
#4.3 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Pyscho_Mantis  +   1140d ago
look at all these fanboys above me. IGN is trusted its why so many people still look at their reviews and lately they have been getting better and a bit longer too. Its just sometimes there reviews can be utter bullshit and in those times IGN is slated. IGN changed their scale for the person who say Infamous scored better. Thye would either have given it a 9.0 or a 9.5. I kinda like the new IGN. There not as generous as before when they used to 9.0s like it was nobody's business.
HATE506  +   1140d ago
as if the same doesn't apply to 360 fanboys? pfft
gravemaker  +   1140d ago
waiting for my copy to arrive in couple of weeks
darren_poolies  +   1140d ago
Can't wait, think I may even get the Hero Edition. :)
kingdavid  +   1140d ago
Gotta wait till PSN store comes up so I can get play the first for free before I get this :(
emekcrash  +   1140d ago
The game's coming on the 7th on June, the PSN store will probably be back by then.
emekcrash  +   1140d ago
Very good score. So the only big problem is the wonky camera that appears here and there occasionally? EXCELLENT.
Petro89  +   1140d ago
After watching the video review, I'd say that their complaints about the 'wonky camera' are probably more down to their own incompetence and lack of skill, rather than an iffy camera mechanic.
emekcrash  +   1140d ago
Heh, probably.
fooltheman  +   1140d ago
think they use the same camera mechanic as in infamous 1
BeaArthur  +   1140d ago
All open world games get wonky camera angles at times. You claim lack of skill and I say you will die at least once during this game because of a camera issue.
Prcko  +   1140d ago
epic game,day 1 buy!!!
Petro89   1140d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
byeGollum  +   1140d ago
the sequel to one of my favorite games is out soon.. and im broke :(..
#11 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
sorceror171  +   1140d ago
It don't get a big gaming budget. The Hero Edition is my anniversary and Father's Day present. After I get home from work on the 7th, the big TV is *mine*!
jetlian  +   1140d ago
what
about e3? mine won't arrive till the weekend so l won't be conflicted
#11.1.1 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
divideby0  +   1140d ago
if you dont look at the score and read the review, you would think the game was a 9.5. I didnt see anything negative at all. Its a SP game which has good solid length AND user content will just extend the value.
9 is a great score, but once again, read and you will think it should be higher
kramun  +   1140d ago
You're gonna moan about 0.5%?

It's never enough for some people....
Pyscho_Mantis  +   1140d ago
there being more strict. 9.5's are now much more rare which I like. Think of it as the new 9.8.
Inzo  +   1140d ago
What! IGN finally giving a game a 9.
_Empath_   1140d ago | Immature | show | Replies(1)
GodHandDee  +   1140d ago
Electrifying!
silkrevolver  +   1140d ago
This is gonna be good...
I’m gonna have a hard time sleeping between playing inFamous 2 and keeping up with E3. Sleep deprivation, here I come!!!
user2285916   1140d ago | Spam
Rampaged Death  +   1140d ago
Can't wait to play this. From what I've seen a 9 is the right score.
GUYwhoPLAYSvideoGAME  +   1140d ago
it's cool and all that they got it up early and stuff. But they didn't talk about anything i was hoping that they would
diehardgamer1000  +   1140d ago
curious on wat modern rehash 3 will get
teedogg80  +   1140d ago
Wow! If IGN gave it a 9 then all the scores will mostly be 9's also.
BeaArthur  +   1140d ago
So this week we like IGN because they gave Infamous a great score? I'm sorry, it's just hard to keep up, one week "you can't spell ignorant without IGN" and then the next "great review!!!!!!". The gaming community is so pathetic I'm almost embarrassed to be a part of it.

On topic, can't wait to play this, Infamous still remains my second favorite PS3 exclusive behind U2. Just so everyone knows Gamestop doesn't have a demo available (at least the one near my office does). It's pretty lengthy too, got 45 minutes in and still didn't finish it.
monkey nuts  +   1140d ago
Technically you still can't spell ignorant without IGN, or O,A,R and T for that matter. XD
BeaArthur  +   1140d ago
Yes this is true, but the fact remains.
Why o why  +   1140d ago
calm down BeaArthur

IGN have been inconsistent. Think of it like agreeing with the oppositions leader. Doesnt mean we all of a sudden want to become a coalition. We can agree, we can disagree. The whole gaming industry is littered with inconsistencies and hypocrisy. If you look at the comments you can see that many who call the ignorant still do...what more do you want.
BeaArthur  +   1140d ago
You do realize that IGN isn't one person and thus opinions and "inconsistencies" will occur. The fact is that gamers are children, the websites they like or respect change weekly based on articles and reviews. This week someone will say only site X is reliable and 2 weeks later they will be talking about how retarded they are because they gave Halo or Uncharted an 8 instead of a 10.
XabiDaChosenOne  +   1140d ago
Regardless if there are different people reviewing the game they should all go by the same criteria. This is where the inconsistencies come in.
starchild  +   1140d ago
So basically, Why o why, you are essentially agreeing with BeaArthur.

You PS3 fanboys think every PS3 exclusive deserves a 9+ and you hate IGN when they don't give a PS3 game that score. Then when IGN give a PS3 exclusive a high score they are suddenly deemed to be correct again.

What this shows is that you guys are extremely biased and simply think that all PS3 exclusives should get 9s and above.
#22.2.3 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(9) | Report
fuckoffodion  +   1140d ago
Starchild, you 360 fanboy. Learn to read. IGN is still inconsistent. Read Clank's comment.

"No. Thank you Colin Moriarity. Seriously, he is one of the only people over there that I continually trust with his in depth reviews and solid reasoning. While I don't hate IGN as much as some others, some of their reviews over the past couple years have been terrible and brief."
Bloodraid  +   1140d ago
Very well said, my thoughts exactly. And of course, you have more disagrees than agrees.

Though, I am laughing at 'Why o why' and his pathetic attempt to justify it.
Why o why  +   1140d ago
Though, I am laughing at 'Why o why' and his pathetic attempt to justify it.

wow....you dont seem like the laughing type...just saying. Of course people flip flop like the weather but it will take a while for many to trust ign....silly as it sounds. Same thing happened to gamespot....many people used to distrust their reviews for varying reasons...The consensus now is that they've turned the page. Just saying that just because some people like the score doesnt mean they ALL wanna suck ign off. Yes there will be some and you/we ALL know the types but why focus on them or paint so many with the same brush (this IS n4g). So no, im not attacking ya or 'blocking ya' or even calling your words pathetic im just saying being 'disgusted to be a whatever' is a bit...u know...strong an all that and shutting down people who liked/agreed with the review is a little shortsighted even though i hear where the two of ya are coming from.

@BeaArthur

definitely, i understand that there will be different opinions by different members but dont send a guy that loves sports games to review a rpg.....im sure there are cases where the wrong person has been selected to do a review and despite their individuals they are still representatives of one mag/site so there should at least be some form of balance.
#22.3.1 (Edited 1140d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report
Bloodraid  +   1139d ago
@Why o why
That's far from the point BeaArthur was making. He was simply pointing out the blatant hypocrisy in the gaming community.

Whenever the reviewer (who happens to be an individual with his or her own preferences, by the way) doesn't care much for a game that a lot of people like, everyone treats him or her like shit, and says they've been paid off by Microsoft.

For example, I don't like the Killzone games, and would likely give them low scores on a review simply because they don't entertain me. However, I love the hell out of the Uncharted games, and would give them very high scores because they are extremely entertaining to me.

Point is: Reviewers are individuals, not the gaming population as a whole. They review based on what they feel, not other people. If you don't like that, then you are a sad individual.
AnonUser5555  +   1140d ago
Great review...can not wait until this game releases. Absolutely loved the original and does not look like the sequel will disappoint.
Kon  +   1140d ago
So now they aren't biased? Strange.
Silly gameAr  +   1140d ago
I expected comments like this. Thanks to you and a few of the other usual suspects for not disappointing.

Anyway, the game looked sick from the get go. Guess IGN can't hate every game that comes out.
telekeneticmantis  +   1140d ago
Are you reading the comments or just trolling blindly
As you can see if you... I don't know, read the comments. People don't agree with the review score, I don't care about a score becuz I've played overrated and underrated games too many times this gen. I personally don't how they can give gameplay 8.5 and give these sterile FPS's 9.0's when Infamous has the best 3rd person traversal, and awesome powers to boot, but that's Ign.
monkey nuts  +   1140d ago
Fps's dominate the industry unfortunately. Its easy money, or if you happen to be a website, easy hits.
Nes_Daze  +   1140d ago
Amazing score, I knew this was a worthy sequel of infamous, and a 9 from IGN for a PS3 exclusive is really really good.
telekeneticmantis  +   1140d ago
You guys can't let scores determine your purchases
That is the most controversial part of the review. What you should do is watch the content, listen and read the review for yourself. That's why this game might be my game of the year. I can't see what's "wonky" about the camera and that's basically their only complaint. So what does that add up to me? 9+ score.

This is where I give IGN the credit, it was a really good review, too bad the score had to make people scratch their heads, but that's the business for you.
Sheikh Yerbouti  +   1140d ago
Word.

The game is going to be the shiznit without a score.
LedZeppelin  +   1140d ago
i wanna see the new powers
MrDead   1140d ago | Trolling | show
Octo1  +   1140d ago
Can't wait to pick up my collectors edition.
Kee  +   1140d ago
That's up pretty early. Sucker punch must've been sure it would get good reviews. Quite rightly so. Day 1 buy.
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories

Dota 2: Who will be the Most Common Heroes at TI4?

3m ago - Mike Stubbs: "As much as I love playing Dota 2, my real obsession is with the professional scene.... | PC
10°

Destiny Multiplayer: Earth 'Rusted Lands' Developer Walkthrough -- IGN First

3m ago - IGN: "Destiny Lead Designer Lars Bakken takes you on a tour of the Crucible multiplayer map "Rust... | Xbox 360

Sunless Sea Preview: The Paddler In Darkness | GamerTell

4m ago - From the preview, "In the massively overcrowded realm of free-to-play browser games, one name con... | PC
10°

ChristCenteredGamer Quest for Infamy review

4m ago - Those who backed Quest for Infamy on their 2012 Kickstarter were able to get the digital version... | PC
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
20°

Bad Gamers: Ep 77 – Destiny Beta Code Giveaway, Pre-Order Bonuses and Two Special Guest Hosts

12m ago - On this week’s special episode, not only do Dan and Chandler discuss PSLS’ Destiny Beta code give... | Xbox 360
Related content from friends