330°

How Sony lost its way

Despite its iconic brand, Sony Corp. remains out of step with the rest of the global technology world and its talent for crowd-pleasing innovation has largely evaporated.

A hacking scandal in April that exposed more than 100 million accounts on its online gaming network to possible data theft not only hurt its image but threatens an online strategy meant to unite a disparate corporation and could upset a carefully crafted succession plan for when chief executive Howard Stringer steps down.

Read Full Story >>
ottawacitizen.com
rabidpancakeburglar4719d ago

Stopped reading after, "A hacking scandal in April that exposed more than 100 million accounts on its online gaming network" as they clearly have no clue about it. How do they get over a 100 million from the actual figure of 77 million?

Nitrowolf24719d ago (Edited 4719d ago )

The added the other accounts from Sony Entertainment Online
77 Million was PSN accounts, idk how many were from other games (Subscription, Quiricty)

Max_Dissatisfaction4719d ago

I dunno why you have disagrees, what you said is 100% true. It was 24 million SOE accounts

tehpees34717d ago

its just another article twisting what is said to get hits. how many is this now?

Istanbull4717d ago

Its may 25th, 10 days after we're back online and we still getting some leftovers of these corrupted journalists who were late to the Sony-bashing party.

Joni-Ice4719d ago

WAIT A MINUTE....Sony lost their way? Since when? I thought the world didn't end Sat.

IPUMPMYGUN4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

How many times is loner and uneducated journalists going to keep this up? I know you pressed the disagree button, Loner lol.

DaReapa4717d ago

While in submission, this article had several reports (over 10 I know). For the life of me, I have no idea how this got through. Goes to show you about the moderation on this site - or lack thereof.

krauley4717d ago

Gaming journalism is pure garbage just as is most news stations on tv. All news stories/articles look to get a negitive slant out of any information.And imo it wont change because that negitivity is what draws peoples attention over anything positive.

As a side thought, I would like to see this site change the way you disagree to someone by making them have to sign in to click that disagree and then have a link to who did disagree.

GSpartan7774717d ago

Look who uploaded the article. It should say enough.

metsgaming4717d ago

this article shows the failure of the mods. Either they missed it or they purposely let it through. Neither is a good place to be. It was pending for a long time too i doubt they missed it. They still have chance they can still pull it.

kneon4717d ago

I don't see any reason why it should have been rejected. There are far far worse articles approved every day.

Most of the issues discussed are real, though they are also mostly out of date. It used to be nearly impossible for different Sony divisions to work together. That's not at all unusual in a company of that size. But that is no longer the case at Sony, things have improved a lot.

Also I know that they have hired some brilliant engineers lately, the PS4 is going to be awesome.

DaReapa4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

@ metsb
You're right. And what's worse than that, it sat for as long as it did with about 11 or 12 negative reports (maybe more) versus about 4 or so approvals - and STILL made it through. I too was starting to believe that it was let through purposely. The flamebait nonsense throughout this entire site is sickening.

Apone4717d ago

anyways... useless article.

BLACKBOIJONES4717d ago

Booooooring....Give me someting new.

kikizoo4717d ago

"ottawacitizen"

just lol it.

blackmagic4717d ago

Ottawa is the capital city of Canada and the Ottawa Citizen is the biggest news publication out of Ottawa.

Bell Boy4717d ago

didn't even bother reading once I noticed Loner submitted yet another of his famous Sony knocking articles

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4717d ago
Nes_Daze4719d ago (Edited 4719d ago )

So in a nutshell, poor management led to Sony losing their way? Exactly how are they losing their way? They offer amazing gaming products. Yeah they're not on top, they messed up at first but I'm pretty sure they have learned from their ways. So they don't completely dominate the mp3 market, or the gaming industry,so what? that's competition, and it will fluctuate and in the end consumers will be the ones rewarded. I don't see anybody poking fingers at other companies for their mistakes.

Max_Dissatisfaction4719d ago

They used to be the market leader in tv makers, they are now number 4 or 5, they used to be the number one portable music player maker (walkman) and now they don't even register. They used to be the number 1 video game console maker in terms of marketshare, this is no longer the case.
They have reported loss after loss each fiscal year since 2008(?).
I'd say they maybe just kinda lost their way.

Nes_Daze4719d ago

Like I said. it's competition, they've lost their way but I wouldn't make an article for every company that loses their way, holy crap we would have loads of them. I think they are learning from their mistakes, as for the gaming industry, they miscalculated and underestimated casual gaming. But hell, at least they didn't bend over to shovelware.

-Alpha4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Yeah it's competition, and they used to be the top dogs. Now they aren't. That's just the point of the article.

I don't get why people are making a big deal out of this as if it's wrong to do a piece comparing Sony yesterday to Sony today

Soldierone4717d ago

-How many other companies have abandoned the MP3 market? Even MS themselves are struggling hardcore with the Zune according to sales numbers.

-Sony is right there with Samsung in terms of quality. LG and vizio and other cheap brands will obviously sell more than the quality brands because they are cheaper.

-Introducing Blu-ray, 3D and other technology and spending money to get it into other companies hands and mainstream market isn't cheap.

baker_boi4717d ago

They didn't "lose their way". Sony was doing good in walkmans until Apple made the iPod.

Now how are they supposed to undo the iPod? there is no cure for consumer choice.

They were doing good in TV's until other companies started makin just as good ones but for a lower price.

They could probably be more competitive in pricing but, that wont do much in the long run because most families aren't buying more than maybe one or two tvs.

Again they lost to consumer choice.

Now as Far as console Market Share, only two companies have ever had the Majority, Nintendo and of course, Sony.

They were only number 1 during the PS2 era when everybody and their granny had a PS2/DVD player.

With the PS1 I guess you could say they had a pretty big share towards its ending years.

But now a Nintendo console has it again. And one could argu their current standing in console "Market Share" is the most irrelevant figure to date. Do you know why?

The Wii console doesn't act as a pillar to support the industry. And the same goes for the PSP. Even though it has a slighty large amount of consumer units it doesn't make much of an impact in the industry as a whole.

If your product cant sell product, what use is it?

I'm gettin long winded, but I think you get the point. The number of hardware units only matters when you are continuing the make a profit just off of having that device in people's homes.

Not just dumping it off on a consumer and it fading forever. The Wii has double the share of the PS3 and 360, yet the PS3 and 360 are the pillars holding up the industry.

Sort of changes the definition of what that number means on "Market Share".

-Alpha4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

@Soldier

I really don't see why people are intent on bringing other companies like MS into an article that simply outlined Sony's position in the market.

All these points on Sony doing 3D, etc. isn't the point of the article, nor does it disprove the simple fact that Sony has changed from the top company to slipping a few spots.

It's not necessarily a negative article either-- just one that describes Sony's history. I'm pretty sure that it's agreeable that Sony has lost their holding. Does anybody seriously deny that they used to be much more successful as a business and a much bigger leader in the industry?

Am I the only one who enjoyed the article for what it was?

Soldierone4717d ago

@Alpha Because markets have changed. Apple is a computer company that foresaw the imapact of MP3 players and phones. They advertised the hell out of the market and won over a majority of consumers. You are saying Sony is falling out of place because they no longer hold that top position there...Yet companies like MS making top quality MP3 players can't even keep up.

If Sony is falling out of place than their technology wouldn't be up to par. Yet it is, and in most areas its better. A leading company for any industry is a company that can innovate and bring new ideas for consumers.

The only logic in this entire argument is "Sony can't win with sales" Who friggin cares? Sony is doing fine, just because they don't brainwash us with advertising and win in sales doesn't mean they are failing. If Sony was jumping ship on PlayStation, MP3 players, Computers, TV's, and shutting down several division then maybe youd have a case but they are not.

Apple is considered a leader yet its computer sales have yet to match Microsoft's, Android has a bigger market share over the entire phone market, yet Iphone is considered the leader. According to this article it shouldn't be that way....

-Alpha4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

What argument on sales? And why does nobody care?

It's a tech article regarding the corporation. I've yet to see anybody demonstrate how their primary outlining is wrong-- that Sony have fallen from what they used to be.

And no, powerful tech =/= Company success. That assumes many things about the companies profits, consumer relations, etc.

I am just agreeing with the general notion that Sony used to hold the top position and no longer does. Isn't this a fact? That's all the article is outlining-- your reason that Apple marketed and won over consumers just outlines the point that Sony lost its dominance in that market-- which is exactly what the article is trying to inform readers.

I don't get why people are always so defensive and get off topic with about how well Sony is doing now with 3D or Blu Ray-- that is not the point of the article.

I linked it below, but I'll do it here too: "MS is a dying consumer brand" manages to get the exact opposite reaction on N4G http://n4g.com/news/634707/...

It's pretty annoying because it seems to be that people can openly criticize MS without hesitation, yet claim that Sony is being attacked. Seems more like to me that people just take Sony criticism more to mind and heart. It's a big case of selective memory-- people don't care when MS gets criticized, but when it's Sony, suddenly they are solely targeted and defended in a manner that gets off topic

baker_boi4717d ago

@ Alpha-

I already did so.

The article is implying that Sony "Lost their way".

The phrase itself implies wrong doing on the individual's(SONY's part) without looking at the rest of the market and explaining that aspect.

Once again, it's hard to fight against consumer choice. What tactic do you use to gain consumers when they just choose a comparable item over your product?

And the article seems a bit redudant doesn't it?

Why do we need to now SONY isn't selling as many MP3 players and TV's as they used to? If it actually had a significant impact on the company that would be one thing, but it doesn't.

people are still buying the Sony Products just at a much slower rate than 10 years ago.

You forget their are cheaper alternatives and the Economy is shambles, people are trying to save money.

And here's an article on a Video Game website telling me Sony is selling a few hundred thousand TVs instead of a million(just hypothetically).

We can augment that figure by shoving the PSP in their if you like, which is an all around media-player. And all of a sudden SONY has sold a lot of damn MP3 players and Tiny TV's...But who cares?

And as far as those Microsoft articles go, I don't read them. I didn't even click on the link this time.

I don't worry about how many Windows OS copies MS isn't selling, because they still selling even if not at number one(we know what it is though). The fact that Microsoft isn't number one in the MP3 player market also does not matter because they are still selling Zunes.

The only time the sales of the individual products these companies make matters, is when that product is anchor of the company and it's making incredible profit or is creating incredible losses.

If SONY not selling TV's started to affect the company as a whole, then yes, right me an article telling me they are the number TV makers anymore.

This could effect the Playstation Brand. THAT concerns me.

Back when I was growing up we didn't have a SINGLE SONY product in our home, do you know why?

They were too expensive! I remember when my brother was in Highschool and he got a sony walkman. He took it everywhere with him until he dropped it and broke it. That's 50 bucks down the drain.

lower-Middle to Lower class working families can't be apart of buying luxury products like Flat Screen TVs and PS3's iPhones, and iPod touch, etc. etc.

Though, some of these products are made available through other means at a cheaper price(not bootlegging) these two classes will general not be apart of SONY's main consumer group.

And guess what? America has had a BOOM of lower-Middle to Lower class people in the last 20 years.

I in fact see more of not only SONY's more luxurious items falling on the sales charts, but every other electronics company that sales at premium prices.

You can't fight consumer choice with a corporation. Unless you brainwashing or are the only choice, when you get over picked you just do.

It doesn't mean you, "Lost your way". It means you lost your sales.

If you have a lucrative business and you Crack smoke it to hell, you "Lost your way." When lose it due to debt or a market stagnate product, you lost your sales.

Messing up your business vs Consumer choice. This article implies SONY somehow shot themselves in the foot in someway.

I got one more bubble if you need a better explanation Alpha...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4717d ago
-Alpha4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

@Gloomy

"I don't see anybody poking fingers at other companies for their mistakes."

Well are you looking? Others may very well be poking fingers at other companies-- only reason this is on N4G is because Sony is gaming-related, so it's not like you will see articles on Apple, Toyata, etc. on this website. It's not just Sony, it's just where you are reading your media.

Point of the article was to outline how the company as a whole used to be a lot bigger. I don't know if it belongs on N4G, but it's a good informative read so I don't see why people are bashing it

barb_wire4717d ago

Well IMO.. Sony do more than consoles and games - you know that right?, So, why no Microsoft articles?.. xbox division still loses money - sure they the lead in NA for consoles but worldwide they don't.

Windows 7 phones are a disaster sales wise.. as was the Kin, if it wasn't for Kinect add-on and MS monopoly on OS on new PC's.. I'd hate to think where MS would be. But, we don't see those types of articles like that about MS here on n4g - same goes for Nintendo.. yet, Sony gets bashed all the time.

-Alpha4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

@Barb

Curious sidenote: Do you have a link showing MS is losing money on the Xbox division? Because I'm pretty certain that they are profiting off of Xbox.

Why would be see MS articles on N4G regarding Windows 7 phones? Or the Kin?

You can google MS-related criticisms and you will find it. Guaranteed. Have you ever looked?

As for MS and N4G Criticism, I just did a simple search and found "MS is a dying consumer brand" It has some resemblance to this article:

http://n4g.com/news/634707/...

Notice the first comment's attitude? Unlike the ones I see on most Sony-related articles, this one criticizes MS, yet everybody is able to have a critical discussion so openly.

Why is it different with Sony?

news4geeks4717d ago

-alpha, you are trying to rationalise with the irrational. They simply cannot comprehend. Deluded by brand favouritism and loyalties. You'll get the disagrees but no successful counter-argument.

Boon Tarkas4717d ago

"I don't see anybody poking fingers at other companies for their mistakes."

Try reading Newsweek, or Forbes or the Journal.

SkyCrawler4719d ago (Edited 4719d ago )

Loner's trying too hard again. Srsly dude...Did Sony steal your lolli?

4717d ago
Otheros004719d ago

Loner, again? I know your trying to make newbs think your neutral when you submitted pro sony articles but the people that have been here long know better. We know you love submitting Sony Is Te Doomz articles and hate Sony for everything, even if it has nothing to do with sony.

zeal0us4718d ago

what does this guy got against sony lol.

Show all comments (85)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies19d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken19d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga19d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken19d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6419d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long19d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197219d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
DivineHand12519d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91319d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer19d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91318d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit18d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
Christopher19d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6918d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit18d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher19d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken19d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197219d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2319d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218319d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder19d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts19d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades25d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken25d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades25d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii25d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit27d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

27d ago
Profchaos27d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9527d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia27d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)