A Toronto firm named McPhadden Samac Tuovi has filed a proposed class action against Sony “for the breach of privacy.” The lawsuit claims damages in excess of $1 billion, which, if won, would see Sony paying the costs of credit monitoring services and fraud insurance coverage for two years.
I think that's they crucial bit of this. They won't win especially for that ungodly sum of money
Info was stolen! Bank accounts were accessed! Sony has even said they still aren't sure what was accessed!
This isn't the end though, as I see more lawsuits coming because everyone is looking to sue for anything!
I am pissed at Sony for not protecting my information well, and I am pissed at the hackers for taking that information. But I can't do anything about it so instead of doing something about it I am playing games because nothing can be done.
@anyone laughing about the suit ammount. you have to remember this is a "class action" suit, which means it applies to anyone and everyone who was effected by the leak, not just an individual person looking for a quick buck. there are 77m accounts on psn. at $1b that only works out to about $13 per person. It may sound like alot, but in this type of case, with so many people effected, it is possible for them to win.
"it applies to anyone and everyone who was effected by the leak"
Well not exactly, this would only apply for Canadiens since laws almost always are specific to each country, except of course some international laws formed by mutal treaties.
Also some Class Action Lawsuits require anyone affected to "join" the lawsuit/case by signing a petition or some type of legal document to receive any money that might be due upon a verdict in their favor.
"When was the last time you saw a phonebook showing peoples credit card information?"
News flash!
The credit card info from PSN was encrypted. Only 900/25,000+ cards from a SOE hack were leaked, and the lawsuit isn't about THAT attack.
There is already one guy online claiming to have had over $12k taken from his bank account and has shown photo evidence of the withdrawl from his bank statement, If that can be proven then i think its a little more severe than you make it out to be. Hopefully sony will be able to gather all the info as to what was actually taken and we will find out soon. but for now there isn't really any way for us to know for sure.
According to Sony only 900 of those cards were active.
http://n4g.com/news/756120/...
Covering the losses of 900 people will be far less than 1 billion dollars.
And issues of fraud are constant there are bound to be people who will see fraud on their accounts in this time and it have nothing to do with the PSN breach. One or two people claiming to have been victims of fraud does not make Sony liable for their loss. There are many ways that people can get your information, some guy with a bank statement of a withdrawal does not mean the card information didn't come from somewhere else.
I have my card number stolen a few months back and I never received any notice that any company I do business with had gotten breached. So you never really know.
Holy f*cking hell :D Pure moronism.
Sony not only apologizes, but compensates all PSN members AND develops a much stronger security system for their network (which should answer her issue)
That's basic information that you can get anywhere.
She suffered no damages. So what the hell?
Sony admitted that to date, their still not 100% sure what was compromised. So did you read somewhere on the Interwebz that only basic info was taken or just come to that conclusion all by yourself? I think you should probably take your own advice, because for everyone that has their own credit information on PSN and not mom and dads, it sucks and can cause problems far down the road.
Sony can't be held accountable for a hack. And all they need to do is show their security measures and this case will be thrown out. The credit card information on PSN was encrypted, there aren't 101m PSN users, and information such as names, addresses, and phone numbers are all public domain and readily available at your finger tips.
Of any possible cards that did have info taken from them, they all came from SOE which is a separate division and thus would have to be part of an entirely different lawsuit, which again would be thrown out once the security measures were shown.
I really can't believe how many people actually refuse to read and still believe that credit card numbers were stolen and fraud is rampant all due to PSN being hacked. All the official information should show you that this issue is not as large as the media and the haters have blown it up to be.
Sory but you are wrong. Data wasn't encrypted it was plain text !
Also they stored credit card info on their servers.
In this era firms are using only checkums and because of that people can't steal your information and that is why you password will be resseted after you forgot it.
All above is like being a CEO of Bank and not locking your safe.
As of stealing information about us. Even if you have Facebook profile it doesn't nulify your right to protect your information.
Also you fail to grasp a bigger picture in therms of information brokering.
There are a lot of firms who sell your information. even if it is information about 40 mln of us it's a looooooooottt of money to them.
Sony is binded by LAW to protect your information if they want to store it.
if not i expect you to shutup immediately and cease all discussion on the matter
If you're talking about info such as addresses and phone numbers, again that's public domain. Plus, have you ever heard of SSL? It transfers plain text information over a secure connection and it's something EVERY online service that deals with such information uses. So sorry, you're completely wrong and spreading misinformation.
Sony did protect our information, problem is that a hacker found a way around that protection using a worm to bypass firewalls. Sony can't protect against every contingency, no one can. That's the risks of having your information online. Sony followed the law by encrypting the sensitive information that could cause people to be victims of identity theft and fraud. Your address is not something that can do that, so get your panties out of a knot and use your eyes to read the REAL information and not the hate propaganda you obviously have been.
It went on to apologise and put £30 into my account as a goodwill gesture.... I feel I'm 999,999,970 short!
NO, bank accounts were NOT accessed. Not due to Sony, anyway. Obviously a handful of people out of 77,000,000 had fraudulent charges on their accounts. Out of that many people, they would have regardless of PSN. There's no evidence that is was BECAUSE of PSN.
"Sony could have prevented this but they left all account information in text format which is a huge mistake."
No they did not. CC numbers were encoded. And FYI, virtually all companies store customer info as plain text. Stop listening to bloggers who don't know what they're talking about.
I'm surprised they haven't been sued by other companies.
I'm not sure of canada's class action laws...they ARE different than here (which is why the california class action suit was immediately thrown out, as there are new laws that protect tech companies in situations like this)...So i'm not commenting on whether or not this is a legitimate suit...
But in the US at least...Sony is legally obligated to do 2 things:
1.) they have to reimburse paid subscribers for time lost, at a minimum...which is why all this 'welcome back' stuff is coming to light...They are avoiding suits and problems associated with money they have been paid for a service that was temporarily not available...
2.) they have to prove to a court (if court cases do come to this) that the malicious attack was beyond their control, and that they DID have the proper security measures required for a database of this measure...which, despite what fanboys keep throwing around, they did...
a court will see that...Sony has stated numerous times, and the chat logs of apparent hackers (that may or may not be involved with the theft we are talking about) confirmed that the credit card data table was completely encrypted...the basic information was in plain text, as well as user passwords...that IS bad, but it was also behind some fairly significant security measures in the first place, all of which would hold in court...
Sony didn't have your credit cards in plain text just sitting out in the open for anyone to grab...so STOP saying that...You can blame sony all you want, but the reality is that ANY database is vulnerable to an attack like this...and any court is going to see that...I'm not protecting Sony in any way, I didn't have a card in there in the first place for reasons like this...but people need to understand there is a large difference between what Sony legally is required to do, and what they ethically should do...people are skewing those things together...
While Sony my have done what it could have done to protect people, it still happened under there watch. Generally in a case like this the amount paid out will be lowered if the people bring the suit win, on top of that some sum will be sent to all PSN members affected.
"One other point to clarify is from this weekend’s press conference. While the passwords that were stored were not “encrypted,” they were transformed using a cryptographic hash function. There is a difference between these two types of security measures which is why we said the passwords had not been encrypted. But I want to be very clear that the passwords were not stored in our database in cleartext form. For a description of the difference between encryption and hashing, follow this link."
Source ~ http://blog.us.playstation....
just like the other one.
I think even the judge would laugh at that amount
So, what is the point of this company even existing?
You wouldn't have happened to of played Socom back in the day would you?
This woman sues Sony. Why?
Because of the loss of her personal information. Why?
Because the PSN was hacked and some information was leaked. Why?
Because some angry pissed-off hackers decided to declare war on Sony. Why?
Because Sony sent them a message by suing GeoHotz. Why?
Because he decided to be himself (arrogant) and hack the PS3 to expose some private info regarding the console, while at the same time claiming that he didn't see this as opening the floodgates of piracy. Why?
Because he was being a douche by taking other hackers' credit and claiming he did this. Why?
Because he is apparently "fighting" for freedom of information. Why?
Because he thought that it's similar to his iPhone case. Just because he bought the device, he can tinker and publish its inner findings. Why?
Mainly because he claims that by hacking this machine, he was just trying to bring back the ability to install Linux on the PS3. Why?
Because he missed this feature, and Sony had it removed. Why?
Because allegedly, maintaining this feature was costing Sony money. This could also be because of Hotz's attempt in earlier 2009 to tinker with the PS3's innards via a Linux exploit.
So we can conclude that this entire shitstorm started with him.
When will this mess end...
Are you SURE??
So let's play it by your rules.
You go back in time, where hotz released the authentication and signing keys for the PS3.
He technically violated a law, so you "somehow" prevent Sony from suing him. (I don't see how you'd stop this, but hey, suppose you do!)
So now people can finally bring back Linux to the PS3. (YAY! How exciting /s.)
At the same time, hackers and pirates GOT HOLD of these keys. They are sitting on their goldmine. Surely they are not going to sit there and say "No, we are not going to pirate these games...It's illegal!" ?
Ok, so now you have changed this timeline. Hackers have been invited to the PS3 hacking. It's okay now to tinker with the console and just write about any piece of code and it will run. This means that now they can put their creativity to good and of course bad use.
Methods on how to hack the PS3 would radically improve (as they did with the PSP).
Remember, you have changed the timeline. PSN doesn't get hacked. People would be secure, but there could be an even greater attack that could have been worse. Hackers would not have learned their lesson.
As bad as others think it was, Sony had to sue him. He did something that violated their terms of agreement, and they simply weren't going to take it without a fight, knowing the amount of damage his arrogance was going to cause.
I ask again,
Are you SURE??
and we can all move on sony has already said sorry and announced free stuff for fans
end of the day is they can make their service even more secure that's all i care about
gamers unite
I mean, they'll have to convince the court that Sony did something wrong or that their security was inadequate. Over the years we've seen everyone from Ebay to TD Ameritrade, from 7-11 to T.J. Maxx/Marshalls and HomeSense fall victim to hackers losing almost 200 million credit card numbers, addresses and scores of other personal information on their customers.
Hacking is a crime, just as robbing a bank. Of course we expect care to be taken with our personal information, but let's face it...if there is something worth stealing, someone will always figure out a way how. It would be nice if there was a security system that was 100% hackproof, but let's be realistic here.
In the next few months as more details come out, it'll be interesting to see if Sony's security was indeed lax, or if they're simply another corporate victim.
Its not karma, its just life. You add the points you choose to see to come to a conclusion of karma.
Yes these same sony investors on n4g were laughing at the hackers threat and posted tons of article about 1 guy sit in one store.
ANd how they supported Sony's taking geohotz to court and were still not tired of posting news about it everytime. NOw they dont want to hear about any news of the repurcussions coming out of the stolen information.
Sony is lucky to have blind loyals who even when get screwed still blindly support the corporation. Who has lied, cheated and hidden news not only about the recent events but even before ps2 was launched.
Neither Sony nor MS nor any console provider is at fault for hackers being supported by the greedy, out of line idiots only to happy to support and hide the hackers because they're cheap gits, the enemies of gaming and enjioy stealing people's work and IP for themselves to play free.
What makes me laugh about Geohot and the supposedly hacked PS3 is that they needed someone to actually let slip(or was it stolen/left in a nbar with more future iPhone designs by someone oddly working for Sony and Apple-or Snapple I guess)the front door key to the system. Without that occurrence(and a VERY non IT event) the PS3 and PSN may well have not been hacked or jailbroken even now. As it was also fairly recent I'd suggest sony did pretty well up until circumstances and greed left them in their current mess-though none of it directly THEIR fault. there's NO karma at work here and no karma at work on the 360 where stolen games(that's all piracy means)are concerned.
There's fanboy hate on every side but, thankfully, I just don't see there being the amount you seem to and definitely don't see how karma can be involved when the vast ,majority of gamers on EVERY system BUY THEIR games and would only ever feel empathy and sympathy for fellow gamers suffering at the hands of hackers by having info stolen or systems down. I didn't EVER want the 360 hacked and pirated and have NEVER had a prated game for any of my 360s OR will ever for my PS3s , PC and Wii. I don't DESDRVE it either even if a few people were idiots and celebrated before it was wise(and it's NEVER wise to support a company as you would your sports teams, is it?)and they felt their system's were safest. don't go to their level JOY-why would you want to?
http://n4g.com/news/584619/...
http://n4g.com/news/554911/...
http://n4g.com/news/219738/...
http://n4g.com/news/413174/...
http://n4g.com/news/216331/...
http://n4g.com/news/646831/...
http://n4g.com/news/250830/...
http://n4g.com/news/38179/h...
Reminds me a bit of the whole BS notion that sony loyalists only hate on 360 so much on this site because ps3 was bashed (unfairly) when it was launched, conveniently sony faithful forget all the brand taunting and iferiority claims made by both sony and their fanbase during the year before ps3 launched, "ps3 will outsell 360 in 6 months", "ps3 launch games will be so much better than 360", "360 won't be around in another 5yrs", and blah, blah, blah. yep, Karma.
$1 Billion certainly ain't, in fact ama try for 150 billion see how far I get.
Not sure of the "official" number of accounts, and obviously some people have multiples.
i am a user and they do not represent me.
they can only represent users who actually take part in the class action so anyone saying they are representing all users is just plain lying.
that's not even a real value. but lawsuit always do ridiculous stuff..try it, gazilion might work lol!
Wow...seriously, just wow.
one of many court battle SONY has to fight atm
an it wont be the last...
people so hungry for money.. dont blamem with gas prices soaring and in effect causin food an other goods to soar as well.....
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Lawsuits are one thing, but $1 Billion? Please for all that is holy, throw this ridiculous claim out the window with the law firm and persons filing it.
Expect to see MANY more of these type of lawsuits filed over the next few months.
77m accounts =/= 77m users
most people have multiple accounts (with Fake data) to access different stores, EU+US+JP+HK and so on...
And 10 million active CCs....do the math...
i'm talking about stupid trolls without games to play, jumping on every ridiculous articles where they can sing "ps3 is doomed"..
since 2006 the same mistake, and they always loose : games, graphics, exclusives, movies, free online, bluray, consoles and software sold, motion controler, etc not a single victory, poor sad loosers, only happy with a bad ps3 game review, or psn down (only 2 weeks in five years : free) :)
1 billion and she hasn't lost a dime? Does she eve know the various ways in order to prevent her money from being stolen? Most likely not since she's quickly angered into suing.
The more options you have the more likely to are to think logically rather than to have your emotions guide your actions.
you're doing it wrong! get in a blanket with a video cam. say the exact sentence, record it and post it online...then people might be interested :-)
Pathetic attempt, Sony took every precaution to protect information it's not like they gave it to them.
And this case can never be won simply because if they do people will get hackers to hack big companies like MS, Apple and such companies just so they can sue them and make billions off it.
Related image(s)
This isn't me saying "leave Sony alone" but we're reaching a point of ridiculousness here on how a single company is being taken to extreme lengths to account for something that they more than likely aren't negligent on. Heck, there was a massive internal leak of CC data at American Express that was extremely negligent (hey, who needs internal controls or to install HDD encryption software?) where millions of CC data was stolen and sold... and nothing happened other than finding and taking the person involved to court.
Anyway, wonder how this will end. This will definitely go towards setting some precedence on the liability of companies regardless of negligence or not if it goes to court.
A quick googles search reveals tons of lawsuits concerning breach of privacy related to CC's, just a few I found in a few minutes below, the thing is we just don't follow many CC violation cases outside of gaming, Citibank and many others went through months of congressional hearings on the matter, but again why would the avg n4g user care?
http://www.pcmag.com/articl...
http://classactionlawsuitsi...
http://www.ucan.org/money_p...
http://www.uslaw.com/lawsui...
http://www.thompsonhine.com...
I like many here believe the hackers are responsible for this whole mess, but unfortunately in the eyes of the law sony is facing a seperate basic question in this lawsuit, which is "Did they have adequate security in place to safeguard users personal info from theft? (and may also face questions about their response) Again, courts understand that anything can be "hacked" but laws are in place to ensure huge corporations take appropriate measures to at least provide a "significant" level of security, NOBODY here is privy to the details to make that determination, so we should all just stop making assumptions and wait for hopefully a favorable descision for Sony by the court.
I said "most backlash" not "any backlash".
Most of those other lawsuits occur months after the breach was even found out. This, two weeks and we're already at Australia, U.S., UK demanding answers and at least two notable lawsuits before the analysis by the government officials who are helping Sony at the moment have settled on Sony being negligent in this situation at all.
That's just how it is. Even if they find said people PSN/SOE users won't sue the hackers nor care that they were the ones who started this whole incident.
Until then this will be seen only as a Sony issue.
Plus if its in the contract then the case will be thrown out, im sick of everyone not reading LAW BINDING contracts and claiming they didnt know what they were reading, since you have to press a button called "Agree" before going to the next page.
Ignorance is no excuse to wastes the courts time and our taxpayer money.
Worst part of it is, the only info that was stolen can be easily taken from any one of these dumb social-whores facebook pages
how very true
So when an actual credit cards security specialist/security specialist, give us some real explanations here, about enough security.
Can all the arm chair security experts on n4g stfu about not having enough security. If the credit card companies themselves still get hacked and have data stolen, how can sony or ms ever make their networks hack proof.
Sony is rebuilding it's network, obviously better than before, what else do you people really need?
whats your reply to madjedi?
I'm interested to see what you have to say. Also expand on why you believe that quote to be true.
ps as im out of bubbles if youd like to continue this convo bubble me up ;)
If divided among the 24 or the 70 million psn users, plus the lawyers ...
One billion sounds about right.
Oh the irony... rrod costs MS about a billion too