Guerilla Games VS Crytek's Cryengine 3 this is an EPIC battle but only one can win and that one is Killzone 3. Both games are incredible, detailed and easily can rival one another but when you see Killzone 3 in comparison to Crysis 2 slight edge goes to Killzone 3.
In 240HZ these games are even more impressive you must see this and Killzone 3 definitely rises to the occasion and remains the best looking title released this year so far.
One Question remains if Crytek made Crysis 2 exclusively on the PS3 in terms of the console market would the verdict have come out to be different in terms of graphical power?
Check Out The Video Below
70°
10°
40°
40°
30°
Ad 
40°
but rezolution, the jaggiez, pop-ups, texturing of the game sets it behind killzone3 by quite a bit.
while in killzone3 i can go straight up to a wall or floor, aim at it, zoom in, and still feel amazed at its texturing detail. with console crysis you cant do that.
Edit, but they're both good games. what crysis lacks in also makes up for with the length and open-ness (lol if thats even a word) of the campaign.
plus the lighting in crysis2 during daytime scenery is realy good too.
but to suggest that it has better graphics than Killzone 3 is just silly
on topic: i agree with you. i mean even if GG saw they werent gonna top crysis, they could always ask other sony devs for help. no shame in that. honestly, i dont see any multiplat dev take away sonys 1st party devs crown away when it comes to graphics on consoles. i mean heck, even the Insomniac games asked sony 1st party devs for help. again, no shame in that. atleast they willing to put their pride aside and give gamers a quality title. respect to them.
"Hey guize!!!1
240hz games look siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiick!!!! "
( input lag FTW!!! )
It have a game mode wich turns off all the fancy image processing shit. and the imput lag is 21ms. which is good, I heard most tvs are between 30 and 100.
with 100 being unplayable since 100 milli seconds = 0.1 second, while mine supposedly is 0.02. its a Panasonic TX-P G20E/ES.
a PC that can run circles around the consoles is not that expensive. Hell the sandybridge intel chip can run all source engine games on the on board chip in the processor. LOL. I guess some people just don't like gaming in HD. Oh yeah and it's a PC you can actually do other things than play games.
If that's the case, then PC gaming wouldn't be expensive for him now would it?
It's funny you don't see him reporting on bf3 because he knows it'll just make him look stupid.
and you pc gamers make it sound like pc is light years ahead in terms of graphics, you guys need to chill the f out.
the ignorance is hilarious. Anti- virus is free. If you have to go to the shop to fix a Pc then you are not very smart. Burn music to USB LOL. The Ps3 browser sucks, it's speed for downloading anything sucks. So hard to click what res you want to make a game look better. Yeah no uncharted big deal. 1 game. BF3, Rage, Brink, Witcher 2 all better games in HD on Pc. Jax and dexter, Really? LOL. GT was shitty, and yeah I got get LBP for my little kiddie cousin. KZ got spanked by crysis 2, and I get the real version. No stracraft, no Diablo, no old republic. Best shooter this year BF3 with 40 more players AND IN HD. Oh and beacause I have a job and not allowence form mommy I have a Ps3 too. LOL
@ below exactly it's fukcing easy. You don't have to mess with anything. they just say that to make themselves fell better. Ps3 updates lag hard, i need no disks for almost all my games. the Ps3 menu is more covaluted than anythig on PC.
Related image(s)
Crysis 2 PC does indeed destroys every console game graphically but it's the console versions what he's talking about.
When it came out in 2007, it raped, destroyed and tore apart the fastest GPUs on the market at the time. People expected similar stuff to happen for Crysis 2, but this didn't happen. Some upgraded their rig only to be met with disappointment. Others love the game but honestly, it is not that much of a leap, if hardly any at all.
Crytek wanted to provide an experience that was equal on both the PS3, Xbox 360 and PC platforms. Some people such as PC enthusiasts might have seen this as taking a good game that was going to be so much better then 'consolising' it. Besides, going multi-platform was a good financial decision especially when you think that in 2008 Crysis was amongst one of the most pirated games.
would have a Pc too. You can take you sub HD , DLC
paying for internet gaming, raging fanboy BS ,30FPS and blow it out your ass.You guys and your mentality is the reason people like Justin Beiber are popular, can't think for yourselves,bend over to anything easy.
*bzzzt* YOU guys are the reason the KKK and Neo Nazis are cool again. SEIG FILE!!!
oh shut up..U Pc gamers are a bunch of geeks just like the guy in the south park episode of WOW.
Just because you game on consoles doesn't mean you don't own a PC retard. Obviously since you see alot of console gamers leaving comment on N4G right? I've been gaming on console all my life so I guess I don't know what random access memory is? You PC fanboy act like your so superior to all other gamers and don't even realize that all your doing is the same damn thing as other gamers. Pushing a button and watching what happens on screen. The only reason you PC fanboys are here is cuz your not getting any attention. Most articles on N4G are about consoles and you bunch or basement dwelling cry babies can't stand it. I respect the PC as a gaming platform why is it so hard for you guys to do the same with consoles huh?
You don't have to mess with anything. they just say that to make themselves fell better. Ps3 updates lag hard, i need no disks for almost all my games. the Ps3 menu is more covaluted than anythig on PC.
ya thats veryy true, you dont have to mess with anything on pc, if so then why get it on pc at all, in order to get the max out of your pc, you going to have to do more then mess around.
Ps3 updates lag hard, please explain more by what the in living hell that means. ps3 updates lag? maybe your getting it confused with something on pc becouse everytime i update my ps3, it doesnt lag.
so you dont have space for a few disks? i feel bad for you, if you can afford a gaming pc then a little shelf for games hsould be no problem
Really? you find the ps3 menu that hard? my 6 year old cousin just learned to read and he knew where everything was. lemme explain. Friends icon has all your friends with the option to send and recieve messages and some other option, the setting allows to change many setting on the ps3 to your liking,the picture icon has the pics that you have on you ps3 hd. the video has videos off your hd and you can download some off the psn network video store.
and finally the most complicated one, the icon with controller, this allows you to play games,demos and some other things,like check your trophies, if you need further explanation please pm ill be more glad to help you since you find it so hard.
Sticking to the point, Crysis 2 looks very good for a multiplatform game especially when you consider that it has such huge wide open and expanse environments. It's not quite an open world type, but you are given various ways to approach a given objective.
Killzone 3 on the other hand is available only on the PS3, nowhere else and as much as some people might ignore this, it is an absolutely good looking game. Period.
Now if you are talking about Crysis 2 (PC) vs Killzone 3, then that's a whole different story. Both games are good. I have Crysis 2 for the 360 while Killzone 3 is on the PS3. I don't want my 360 to miss out or be left doing nothing, so I try to balance games and make sure I enjoy both platforms as much as I can.
If Crytek made a game exclusive for any platform, especially PC, or PS3, the game would look and play much better than it does now. Being able to focus ONLY on the single platform makes working more.. well, focused.
You don't need to stress over making them as equal as possible, or be pulled down by the other platforms weaknesses, or split up your team. It's just a simple "how much can we get out of this single platform?".
I'm personally more interested in how good Crysis 2 would have looked if it was pushed on PC exclusively. But I am looking for a more optimized engine for their next game.
Although, I think it has too many graphical glitches to deserve the title.
Best graphics can't go to a game with significant pop-in and framerate drops, not to mention the grain glitch which makes it look crappy in later levels.
At times the actual game has the same blocky look as the low quality videos.
I love a great looking game, just as much as the next guy but that is only a part of a larger whole that contributes to making a great game. One that isn't even a must. The fact of the matter is most games on the PS3 and 360 look great. Some look fantastic but it isn't this wide gulf of greatness that some would have you believe.
There are some technical hiccups with CY2 but I prefer the art style better and think the game looks better overall. KZ3 looks great and it runs smoother. I say just play both and have fun.
As far as KZ3 and CY2 goes, I prefer the single player of CY2 but the MP of KZ3. That isn't saying much though as I don't think the KZ3 MP is that good. The game is good but much like most PS3 exclusives I found it overrated.
.
Do u ever consider the type of real time lighting they employed, the large scale, the amount of things that crytek have to rendered that can be interact with, the realistic and detail textures on everything within the game (i do mean up close too, seriously, do u ever try to look up close on anything in crysis 2?), the real time destruction, in game and real time movie sequences,etc... all on a Ram limited old consoles tech? What do u think?
Are u saying textures on KZ3 is better, do u mean like just on a couple of things like character models during cutscene or do you mean on everything in real time?
KZ3 (small scale, scripted gameplay (most destruction are limited to scripted rail sequences or maybe a couple of toilets?), deffered lighting, nothing is real time), a decent MLAA when it works but is very limited (possibly to the swamp level?) but not great on many other occasion.
I don't know about u, but it seems your vision are skewed, not sure about functioning (possibly need eye exam to determine that) but skewed is for sure.
Regardless, i don't think any of you guys would be able to admit anything. It is quite a pointless discussion to say the least. It been like that for years, so i wouldn't expect u guys to just suddenly be open minded.
But like many have also said, graphics is replacing gameplay, story, etc which are much more important factors for a good game than graphics. No wonder every developers are just trying to pump up the graphics, while neglecting gameplay and story.
As much as you guys criticizing CoD, halo, half life, gears, etc... for it graphics, i could say they really focus on the game play instead, hence rating, sold numbers, large fanbase, etc.... U guys on N4G are just so blind to see that.
I click the link, press play and get treated to: "YO ITS YA BOI IS DA HIP HOP GAYMA SHOW, DIS NEWZ JUSH IN... (etc, etc)".
I want to shoot him with a paintball gun. A modified paintball gun. Preferably one that shoots razorblades.
"In Crysis 2, you can see the details, easy. But in Killzone 3, they are just throwin it in your face. It looks that much more realistic in terms of the character models."
He isn't even coherent. He says in Crysis 2 you can see details easy but in KZ3 they are thrown in your face and its much more realistic in terms of character models. Not to mention Killzone 3 character models are no very realistic save for some of the ISA. Which is not even a bad thing, it is called art style. Just seems more like more fanboy raving from a guy who may game alot, but doesn't know the details in the slightest.
However, the issue here is HHG blends his taste and what he states as "fact", hence the flamebait article.
Vid with proof: http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Crytek should have upped the rez and FPS for this game even if it meant taking a hit with the GFXs because i prefer smooth gameplay (solid FPs min) over high detail but choppy framerate.
PS: Forgot to mention this but the CGI is so heavily compressed that it looks horrid and that is due to the limitations of DVD9.
More Proof: http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
PSS: I am going to throw this in, in case anyone hasnt seen it yet the comparison from Lens of Truth.
http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
Heavy Rain is debateable
Plus the framerate at times, pop-in and lack of sharpness.
It seems the games graphics go down hill afte that first raining level due to increasing glitches.
Killzone 3
-Better animations. Crysis 2 had the same standard animations throughout the entire game. Hardly any of the enemy AI would react to getting shot.
-Better AI. AI in Crysis 2 was the only thing I absolutely hated, its stupid and way dated.
-Better Story. Crysis 2 was nothing more than doing chores.
-Better visuals ON CONSOLE. He said it right at the begining of the video, it has better visuals on CONSOLES! Yes those things dedicated to games you guys seem to ignore.
Crysis 2 is a fantastic game with a few drawbacks compared to some PS3 exclusives. However this whole ignorant "My 1k dollar PC is a god and I dont appreciate console gamers at all" crap needs to stop. Im glad your PC runs games better than my PS3, you also paid nearly 3 times the money to have that. Doesnt mean my PS3 cant still have good games and make ME happy.
As for this article, I agree. Crysis 2 on consoles doesn't compete with Killzone 3. Crytek should have just kept their mouths shut, because there are better looking games on PS3 and from the looks of it Gears of War 3 will look better as well. Maybe on PC it dominates, but what do you expect.
There is no doubt PC games look better but after all Crysis 2 is still Crysis 2 on the PC. It's the same game apart from the graphics. PC gamers/fans go on about console fanboys but some of the stuff they come out with just makes them look like elitist nerds. Their all games, we are all gamers.