Submitted by batbatz 1550d ago | rumor

Rumor: new maximum graphics for Crysis 2 PC

Did Crytech deliberately gimp the PC version of Crysis 2 , by withholding the rumored maximum extreme setting from the PC version? (Crysis 2, PC)

Update Typo Crytech should be Crytek

Hard to tell
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 18
Masterchef2007  +   1550d ago
LOL this is just 2 funny. Do people really expect Crytek to add an extra detail setting via a patch? I can understand DX11 but the extra detail setting should have been available from the start. Looks like PC owners are just ticked that the game doesnt look as good as they were expecting it 2. From what i have seen it looks much better on the PC than the 360 and PS3 versions so i dont know what the fuss is all about.
RedDead  +   1550d ago
The fuss is that Crysis 1 looks better. Why does a sequel with newer and way more powerful hardware to work on look worse than the first one? Even though it was promised the Pc version wouldn't take a hit due to consoles?

Look I don't care personally but I can see where they're coming from.
Masterchef2007  +   1550d ago
Theres some parts of Crysis 1 that look worse than the second. Like for example the character models were horrid in the first one. I mean seriously the game looks and plays great on the PC so they should be happy for that.
theonlylolking  +   1550d ago
The mods in crysis 1 look better than crysis 2 but the actual game crysis 1 does not look better.
nickjkl  +   1550d ago
wait are we saying it looks worse as in

like omg it looks horribley worse than the first one or are we talking

like console fanboy of recent multiplat games of hahaha your missing a shadow right here so my gme is better
#1.1.3 (Edited 1550d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
B1663r  +   1550d ago
Well the main thing from dx11 is displacement maps. If there were no displacement maps generated while the game was being created there really is no reason to use dx11.

Also from the Kotaku video yesterday, the game is already almost photorealistic...

Personally, I think C2 does look better than C1, they have chosen a better more realistic color gamut.
BlackKnight  +   1550d ago
DX11 is about tessellation, not displacement maps. Displacement maps (parrallax mapping) was in Crysis 1.

Even Splinter cell Chaos Theory on Xbox and PC used displacement maps.
distorted_reality  +   1550d ago
I think PC owners are mainly annoyed at the lack of configuration options when the game was released, well that's partly why i'm annoyed in any case. The DX11 implementation is a minor annoyance personally.

I think the game looks ok, but not as good as I was expecting, not as big a leap as Crysis was, and not as impressive as say Metro is right now. When going through some of the interior parts of the game, especially the sewers and subways, it looks like there have been definite shortcuts made.

There's huge room for improvement in my books. I'm not playing the game any more until certain issues get resolved (although to be fair not all the problems are things that Crytek can fix, like the flickering crossfire issue).
CrzyFooL  +   1550d ago
paintsville  +   1550d ago
This game would've looked much better if Crytek hadn't of had to dumb it down to fit in a certain console's tiny 256 meg of video RAM. Yeah, yeah it's got 512 meg TOTAL but only 256 for video. If they'd been solely developing for PC and a certain console that has an advanced UNIFIED RAM architecture it'd been much better. But when you have to program for the lowest common denominator (256 video RAM) it's tough. Over all I think that Crytek pulled off a technical feat with this game but at the same time it's true that the PC and xbox could've been much better had it not been for trying not to make such a difference in the graphics on a certain 256 video ram limited console with bottle necked GPU.
#1.3.2 (Edited 1550d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report
BeastlyRig  +   1550d ago
Imagine Uncharted 2 looking better than Uncharted 3!! & stripping away new tech to use older tech in the new version!

That's what the fuss is about!

From dx 10 to dx9 is a fail!
kevnb  +   1550d ago
That would just be dx11. its not ready yet, honestly.im glad they didnt delay for dx11.
godzookie  +   1550d ago
Microsoft paid off Crytek to delay the full amazingness of the PC Crysis 2 vs xbox
sonicsidewinder  +   1550d ago
I'd rather they fixed the game first before they bother with DX11.

But in the end, it should have been there from the start.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

How Star Wars Battlefront is Similar and Not Similar to Battlefield

14m ago - SegmentNext - Our take on Star Wars Battlefront’s demo was filled with nothing but praises, yet... | PC

Show of the Week: Fallout 4 and the 4 Top Fan Theories About Vault 111

15m ago - OX writes: "Fallout 4 could be the game to command more of your time than any other this year, wi... | PC


Now - The largest video game wiki platform on the web, featuring hundreds of community-driven wiki projects. | Promoted post

Yoshi's Woolly World Is Like Every Other Nintendo Game, And That's Not A Bad Thing

1h ago - It's fun, it controls well, and the art style is absolutely beautiful. NichBoy gets all wound up... | Wii U

[FGP] Terrigon - Creepy First Person Pac-Man Set Aboard A Nostromo-Esque Spacecraft

2h ago - Terrigon is essentially first person Pac-Man, set in a deserted spacecraft with Blinky, Inky, Pin... | PC

E3 Inteviews: Fallout 4, Project Morpheus, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Star Wars Battlefront

2h ago - Good Game's Hex takes a look at Fallout 4, Project Morpheus, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Star War... | PC