This articles compares the PS3 to the Xbox 360 and PC version of Crysis 2. Hint: Click on "see full-size image" to enlarge the screenshots to original size.
The big question: Did Crytek really give each platform everything they could? Hopefully...but I have doubts. It makes me sad to say it, but the more I see of Crysis 2 the more I think PS3 is getting the shaft. And that is bullshit. All this talk of every platform being the same from Crytek you would think differently. Don't get me wrong, I loved Crysis and Crysis Warhead. I was just hoping to see them do better with the consoles. Oh well, KZ 3 actually did look and play as good as everyone thought it would so I will play that. @ Wizzio Kid Ya, best platform for this one will be PC. Not a surprise, but I was still hoping for parity on both consoles.
nope only played the PS3 one out of the console demos and if that's the best the PS3 can do (which we all know it isn't) next-gen better hurry up. the PC version does look nice with the setting on Hardcore, if you want to play this game to it's best, I suggest skip the consoles
than Crysis 2 on consoles.. even LOT(xbox biased supposedly) admitted that KZ2 looks better than Crysis 2 on 360. so Crytek really has no excuse for getting beat by a two years old game on PS3.. @the picture comparison... it is kinda bad shots... you are looking at far away sceneries where you would notice the PC advantage the least...
Definitely get the PC version both the 360 and PS3 version look assed out.
From those screen shots, I think the ps3 looks closest to the pc in terms of detail, but the pic looks washed out. Saying that the 360 looks 2 dark and also looks like it has dynamic contrast up full causing it to look messy! Pc looks the best but we knew it was gonna. Still cant wait to see it on my ps3. When crytek said the 360 can do 3d because of the way they make it, I hope that doesn't mean the ps3 is gonna have shitty side by side like the 360s. Does the ps3 demo have 3d and is it reald or s-b-s?
Xbox 360 version looks beast
How can they give a HD screenshot comparison when the game isn't HD on either console? PC FTW.
PC definately wins no doubt about it but the 360 is vastly "superior" to the ps3 version. To be immediately followed by, "Crytek is stupid, crytek can't optimize, crytek is lazy, exclusives, exclusives, blah, blah, blah. After five years of the same ol' same ol' excuses from the ps3 fanboys it's starting to just sound like background noise.
Are Yu kidding me? The ps3 and PC version look alike and the 360 one has the best details...yu can tell all they did was make a 360 game then pass it down the ps3 and pc...to everyone saying the PC is best...look at it, it looks washed out just like ps3 version, however yes the PC version will have better resolution and everything than 360 version, but this is a console port...definitely can tell Edit: looking at these though, I think the 360 is waaay too dark like always, it does have the best effects, but everything is so dark, so I guess PC kind of wins, but 360 still has beat effects like the rays and things (because it was built for 360)....crytek can't do multiplatform, they ruined PC and ps3
"PC wins" The disagrees are votes towards "Captain Obvious of the Year" awards. ...and fanboys.
I knew PS3 fans were going to do this if the PS3 version turned out looking inferior. I knew that they would start bashing the game in general and saying all kinds of ridiculous things about it. They know it looks good so they feel threatened by it and go on the attack.
While PC and PS3 are very similar in brightness and contrast levels. Exhibit A: http://www.videogameszone.d... Exhibit B: http://www.videogameszone.d...
Good point. Sometimes I wonder why people associate over saturated colors and contrast with being better graphically. In photography, this would be considered a bad attribute to have. Exhibit A is a good example. The over exaggerated brightness and contrast hiding the details of the gun and posted photos on the left side of the screen. Sure, the 360 version is pretty to the untrained eye, but if the PC version represents the ideal graphics and presentation, then the PS3 comes closer than the 360.
I played on the 360 and the PS3 and can't hardly tell any differeces, on the PS3 it seems to take longer to find a match but the game looks pretty much the same on both consoles but actually either version is very far in visual quality from Killzone 3, this looks just a little better than COD and not as good as Bad Company 2 EDIT: hit detection is a big problem but that happens on both versions
Now that i think about it what you say is true. The PS3 is the one closest to the PC version. The 360 doesnt look better by being darker because the darkness hides the detail in the game. I agree with you that darker is not equal to better. Which is something many people have failed to learn.
^^that actually happens a lot between PS3 and 360 multiplatform games... colors on the 360 always seem...different...not sure of the reason...but to me its like the settings on my TV...if I switch color to the presets of 'warm', it looks like the PS3 screens...if I set it to 'cool', it looks like the 360 screens... some developers even talked about it...Rockstar was saying how the PS3 version of GTAIV has a softer color palette, because of the way it renders the game, and that they slightly preferred that to the 360's more vibrant color rendering... it is strange though that color wise, and background blurring/effect wise...the PC and PS3 look nearly identical...while the 360 version looks like the settings for screen capturing are completely changed... last night played both versions of the demo back to back console wise...360 and then PS3...This is the biggest 'blow it out of proportion as much as possible' situation i've run into in a long time...the PS3 version is perfectly fine to anyone that doesn't have a rabid agenda...the 360 version is fine too...both struggle at times, both have some pop in here or there...and NEITHER version is crowned any type of console graphics king...but both are perfectly playable in my experience...
Your kidding right? in those screenshots, XBOX 360 looks the best, look how vibrant the colours are, the PS3/PC version look identical in some images. No doubt PC will look best in the final build with all specs bla de bla. But Xbox 360 verson looks freakin great!
There's 2 much color it looks messy.
WOW.. OMG dude really??? I mean.. really???? How f*in ignorant can it get. Judging from those screenshots, 360 has *BY FAR* the worst graphics, they're downright crappy!!! I mean really, what screenthots were you looking at?? Look at the screen I attached. It looks like an alpha build from a 2005 game. Just Cause 1 had better graphics. Hell, even the first GeOW had better graphics. If I were a 360 owner, I'd be kinda pissed really by the work that Crytek did. PS3 doesn't look that bad imo. Not as bad as I feared. But obviously it gets WAY closer to the PC standard than the 360 version.
I don't know for certain about that one coffin; of course the PC looks the best, but (I'm going by the first pic) the PS3 version looks blurry; whether it will look like that in the final game is unknown. The 360 version looks crisper, although being more vibrant could be just a matter of adjustment on their part (yes, professional gaming sites often do not tweak their console settings) But as far as jaggies, the PS3 and 360 version looks different ,but evens out to be almost the same to me, but the PS3 has a slight, slight, sliiiiight advantage (basically meaning, not an advantage lol). Colorwise, the PS3 version looks more like the PC version, and I know a lot of people don't tweak their PC unless they are graphics professionals or avid PC gamers, so this kinda makes me think that some settings could be better on the PC and PS3. If I were to rank them, I would honestly have to see both of them running to accurately judge, put the PS3 version in terms of still shots comes out last to me. Actually, seeing this in motion could alter my opinion: I remember how GTAIV looked better in action on the PS3 (and was quoted by several sites of being the better looking between the PS3/360 and the PS3 version looked blurry in pics, so it might change, but how I don't know.
The 360 version looks more vibrant because of the higher contrast settings, the same effect could easily be achieved on PC and PS3 with some tweeking of contrast and brightness settings. Fact is though, the PC version looks better on my PC than those pics, and the PS3 version looked worse on my TV than those pics, so these comparison images are worthless. Everyone has their monitors/TV's set up differently so comparisons are moot unless you do them yourself on your own set up. (or unless there are mega obvious differences, which in this case there are not.)
I am actually quite shocked from the results but the 360 version looks better in many areas, when compared to the PS3. The PS3 has so much blur in everything and where is the lighting? The fanboys can fight all they want. I dont play a game for it graphics. I play it for pure fun. I just find it funny of the Sony fans base a game on it while the 360 fans love to shove it in their faces when multiplats dont look as good. Funny world we live in. Oh well. I'm not buying the game. Too busy with work and life in general.
damn PS3 versions looks horrendous.
. Everybody should of known when Crytek was running around showing everyone the 360 build. Rage, Brink and anything else will be the same. I have a PS3 as well but it's pretty obvious to see if you are really looking. Stop complaining already, it's embarrassing.
i think they all look decent enough to play. If i was to nitpick I would say pc and ps3 look a little muted and the 360 has too much contrast which can be a pain in the arse when you cant see whats going on in darker scenes. I guess if you like high contrast and vibrant color its 360. If you prefer a more gritty movie style graphic then its pc/ps3. i am undecided which one I like best so no clear winner here for me.
as always xbox 360 version wins
Madness look at this pic http://translate.googleuser... http://www.videogameszone.d... The PS3 and PC shot have some sort of green tint to them probably because of where the characters stood right in the water this is going to lower quality yet the 360 shots are standing further back thus increasing quality. Whoever is posting these is trying to prove 360 is better than ps3 and pc when its no way gonna beat PC. EPIC FAIL. These are cherry picked shots and the PS3 looks like the PC and the 360 colours are completely different? Which probably means they took the 360 shots from a different source then again these are the same site that said games like FF13 looked better on 360 so it shows there credibility.
no point in putting PC in there it's obviously the winner, the real comparison is 360 and PS3, to judge if crytek really did put there all into each version... from playing the demo alone, I say nope
PC screens look terrible here, dont know if the seetings were low or the capture is bad. Consoles, both look damn ugly (slight exaggeration), especially PS3 which seems to be lacking a lot of lighting effects (HDR, god rays etc) while the 360 seems to have over compensated. After all the chest beating I expected more. Although, Crysis 2, does look far better in motion than screens shots/grabs.
its not just a question of still screen shots, PC version running on a 70-100usd gpu will obviously be much smoother then either console. Fluidity of game play > graphics.
No idea how a site can get a bad capture from ANY PC game. Install FRAPs and that is about as good as you're going to get.. and it's free.
I agree when I saw there PC pics and PS3 pics I was saying to myself"they dont look like that". The PC looks great in motion and screen shots but these are poor.