Is the graphical divide between PS3 and Xbox 360 games becoming less and less? Take a look for yourself.
It looks exactly the same I really prefer 2k sports than EA
i agree. the main thing is that the game looks so much better than 2k7 does
This game rocks, I bought this game on release day for ps3 and im so happy its totally identical.
indeed but you think with a console costing more it would be better if not superior then the cheaper console...and people argue why xbox or ps3 is better when they really have no leg too stand on. your only going too buy a console for the exclusives.....and in my eyes the only exclusive I want is god of war 3. amp i belived like so many that ps3 would be far superior in graphics..framerate..everythin g...from the release of the ps3 no one can tell me they expected horrible ports from multiplayer games also....yet people defend their consoles with their last breath. I am a fan of the xbox but having suffered 3 RROD with 2 consoles i cant defend it like most people. But i do see your point about the ps3 being one year old...I just cant justify peoples ideas on here thinking EVERYGAME on the ps3 is far superior..and vice versa for xbox as well.
more expensive console, yes. PS3 is a more expensive console. I know your a big 360 fan, and i respect your opinion. I agree that a console exclusive is a big selling point also. If these 2 look the same, with less than 1 year out for the PS3, do you think that means anything or not?That seemed to be the crux of the video. Snuk, Thank You.Im an old gamer, its nice to hear somebody that isnt a slave to the fanboys! Have a great time gaming! Peace.
The graphics are similar, so that means that for an incremental $50, you get a free xbox360 without the $100 - $500 console lifetime internet fees and that you won't have to join the red-ring-of-death-group. Coupled with the free xbox360, you get a PS3, PS2, PS1, and PSN console. And you'll be able to watch bluray movies and dvd movies, all in one quiet machine that's so high quality that it's almost indestructable. Not bad for only $50 more than an xbox360. It seems as if, because my PS3 with these multiports and pc computer versions of xbox360 games like bioshock and halo or gears, I'm getting a lot of stuff. Why not pay $50 here instead of $50 for yearly internet fees on that hunk of junk console getting in this generation's way of higher definition graphics? For a one-time $50 fee, you get a free xbox360 without ineternet charges when you buy a PS3. However, when you choose to pay $50 a year every year on the xbox360, what else do you get? With the PS3, you participate in folding to advance human society. With the xbox360, you participate in restricting this generations graphical potential. Here's the reason why: The xbox360 got to the market first and has a larger market share. Developers want to eat these gullible,easy-to-fool harlem, ghetto customers like Snuka alive. Therefore, when they multiport these games, they'd focus on the xbox360, despite the xbox360's limitations and force the PS3 to look the same. Everybody, let's thank Microsoft and Snuka for holding back this generations graphics --> AGAIN. They got to the freeway first and because their hunk of junk car maxes out at 60mph before it starts to overheat and blowup, they're slowing everyone down again. They're blocking traffic. Get them off the fast lane. They're blocking traffic and slowing everyone down this generation. Tell them to go to the middle lane or join the Wii in the slow slane. PS3's Insomniac games, Killzone 2, Grand Turismo 5, and so on have work to do. It is a fact that xbots have or will have spent the most money by the end of this generation. 1) Add the console cost 2) Add the total internet fees of $100 - $500 by the end of the console's life 3) Add the necessary Bluray player (probably a PS3 if they like games) and/or HD-DVD player (no movies)because the xbox360 comes with neither devices 4) Add the games and movies and accessories 5) XBOTS, total up the total cost that's applicable and compare that price to the PS3. Let alone mention about the headache of RROD and a confusing lineup of consoles to choose from. FIGHT NIGHT / PS3 BRINGS FIGHT TO XBOX360: Because the xbox360 is afraid to raise its price to fight the PS3 face-to-face, the PS3 will bring the fight to the xbox360 by offering a $399 price tag to one of its SKU's. Get ready xbox360. Smoke and mirrors, Hype, and self-steam and all other medical artificial life support will sustain your console's life for only so long. Prepare to rumble for your life. You may not realize it, but the dividing line has been drawn, ladies and gentlemen. Everything to the left is the the xbox360 and xbox360 multiports. Everyting to the right will now on be the PS3. Please take a look at this link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=... Thank you.
I just needed to let you in on a little advice...GET A LIFE. I am glad the PS3 is receiving a $400 dollar SKU; I can sell my PS2 and afford one. Everyone has preference in terms of what console they like to game on and the basis usually isn't about graphics. Multiconsole games really have only a few features that make you choose one or the other. Most people choose the version that suites their taste for control and online functionality. The Playstation controller is hands down my favorite when it comes to fighting games...however I will always choose the 360 controller when it comes to sports and FPS. I also prefer the online capabilities of LIVE. It is frustrating and sad to see so many people obsess over crap like price, graphics, console preference, etc. Try playing more games and liking them because they are good and not because your fanboy blind to one console or another.
it's nice to see someone who can disagree with someone and speak on their reasons why. This site needs more gamers like you. Fanboys aren't gamers because their are blind by their loyalties. I posted a video review of Halo 3 from AOTS: Feedback the Loop, and in that video review, they had their seasoned Sony Fanboy. He went out and bought a 360 and played his friends copy of Halo 3, and admitted on national TV that the game was great, fun to play, innovative and that it rocked his expectations (even though the were very low to begin with.) I hope more gamers start letting these fanboys know that it's not cool to flame. Secret always comes on these posts and gives these long drawn out fanboy rants about his preferred console and how much it is better than the others, and no one really wants to hear him, so kudos to you for letting him know why you disagreed.
"Everyone has preference in terms of what console they like to game on and the basis usually isn't about graphics. Multiconsole games really have only a few features that make you choose one or the other. Most people choose the version that suites their taste for control and online functionality. The Playstation controller is hands down my favorite when it comes to fighting games...however I will always choose the 360 controller when it comes to sports and FPS. I also prefer the online capabilities of LIVE. Thats how I feel.
I notice how every time I see a comparison video the PS3 looks like someone turned down the contrast or up on the brightness. My games never look that light when I play them, so I don't know who is doing this but they might as well do it on the 360 because the PS3 has caught up in gfx and is only going to start surpassing now.
It was never that big to begin with, it's always fanboys that made a huge deal of it, or game sites that wanted hits. Good game, but 2K needs to update their graphics engine. MLB and NHL did it, now it's basketballs turn. I'm sure it relates to the extra time needed for the PS3 version last year, so maybe next year will reflect more changes.
These are really never good to use for comparison. If you are loking at a HD version then yes. I think the reason why people make a big difference about graphic comparison is becuase the Sony has always boasted that they have the most powerful machine, yet this has not been visible by any game currently on the market. Now, even though the 360 devs have had a more time to get used to the hardware. Even though it seems that comparing the same game mkes since it, sometimes you should judge on what generation the game falls in. For instance Gears of War had the best graphics to date when it was released (many tink it still does) and this was the 360's first true 2nd gen game (some consider it the 3rd, so thats arguable). So another way to judge graphics would be to compare a game for the PS3 that is release between October and November, this would be about as long as it took MS to produce a game with eye piercing graphics. Which the PS3 is capable and has or will produce. I remember last gen when many people said it was about game play nd not graphics, now all of the sudden its about graphics. Innovtive gameplay and gadgets for your system and games is next gen also, not just grpahics. So does the 360 or PS3 have the best graphics? We cold debate all on this, but remember the most compelling thing about a video game is gameplay with storyline and graphics being in with good mixture. Some games are good at inccorperating all thre aspects, but it would be good if all games on all systems did this all the time. Hell, then you would never have to worry about wasting $50 or $60 bucks.
I agree with you for the most part but how can gears be a 3 gen game when it released 1 year after the 360 launched. And this was the first title that epic released on to the 360. I think the whole gen thing is a little stupid. What matters is what games there are right now and its starting to look better and better for both systems.
I saud some people consider it a 3rd gen game not me, I yhink it is a 2nd gen game. Even though GOW was Eics forst game on te 360 all the other games and devs improved the dev tools which made it easier to program and exploit the system. So this is what puts games in diffrent gen. You did it yourself with " What matters is what games there are right now and its starting to look better and better for both systems". Eac system is getting deeper into exploiting the system. Some peole think the 360 is maxed, but it is not. Both still have a lot to offer.
Who cares just enjoy the game on YOUR system. But yes they are the same.
This is all that matters! Bubbles for you my friend.
the ps3 looks a little bit sharper to me. this game kicks a$$
but it definitely has more going on onscreen. just look at the reflections on the court. On the PS3 you can see real time reflections of the red ticker while on the 360 it's just a static red blurb. PS3 is the better version.
just stop it, at different times there are reflections on the floor of the basketball court. The games are not perfectly synced. Why are you trying so hard to look for things that aren't there. Both games look great and are showing improvement with dev and hardware relations. So that's a plus, because that shows that the devs are starting to get a better understanding of the hardware. Cheer for that, but stop looking for things that aren't there. They both have clear reflections at different times on the basketball court. And if you don't believe me, if you look when Arenas scores on the floor on the 360 side you can see the red lettering reflections scrolling. So i guess that should shut you fanboys up.... Lame claims!
I dont know why they even do that comparison stuff to be honest. It always comes up the same.
The 360 is clearly better as you can see that the color are much more vibrant than the ps3. Looks like the ps3 is still washed out and blurry...................okay I'm just kidding, who here was getting mad? I know some of you were ready to rip me a new one. The 2 comparisons looked exactly the same. But I still call this a win for the 360 since I'm playing the exact same game for $200 less. I wonder if the framerate holds up on the ps3.
haha...i was about to hit the disagree just like I did to IDONTCARE who goes on to say not much difference, but PS3 is sharper...f*ckin BS. ANYWAYS....yeah they look the same...and i'm going with the 360 because thats what I got, although others may say for the achievemants
Well, that would be true of you were only taking about the ones that got the PS3 at $599. But not the ones that will get it at 399.00.
"since I'm playing the exact same game for $200 less" is that before or after the two years you have paid for XBL by now? Also, don't forget those peripherals. Hmmm, that sounds like about $200 to me.
"Well, that would be true of you were only taking about the ones that got the PS3 at $599. But not the ones that will get it at 399.00" Yeah talk about being a sucker. A $200 drop in less than a year. "is that before or after the two years you have paid for XBL by now? Also, don't forget those peripherals. Hmmm, that sounds like about $200 to me." I guess Sony doesn't have any peripharals either, right? I guess you can add another $60 for a controller if you want the rumble. Idiot.
well i guess you got a nice cable along your floor from the router to your xbox then right? oh yeah, and save games are out cos you got no harddrive huh? what you gonna do when you get bored of it, watch a HD-DVD.. oh forgot thats extra huh? maybe you could spend your free time trying to get your xbox back to white as after a few weeks it gets that lovely pi55 stained yellow colour, very fetching...
was actually funny and by year 4 that 200 less is almost 50 more
Playing exact the same game? Wow, your 360 controller have sensors! Oh, and you guys replying this, you are supposing this is his first 360, right? Cause if not, the 200$ thing will just turn around and you will be the ones playing the same game, saving 200$...
It seems a close call but then you look closer: - the floor mirroring lights/persons etc. looks better on the 360 - movements look more fluently on the 360 (better framerate?)
Your wrong.... They look the same, stop kidding yourself.
i think everything looks better on xbox360 if you take a xbot chillpill... right Marty? :D
actually when you look closer, and I mean really really close....you would have to agree that your an XBOT!! I play 360 too but they look the same, get over it.
Go figure you would say that!!!
PS3 version is slightly washed out and fuzzy.
theMART, Even FirstknighT disagrees with you. And he's 360 fan. Edit: And etownone. Your post cracked me up. :)
Do you remember when you wrote "360 fans do not spend all day trying to destroy the PS3 by digging up even the most silly dirt and every mondane issue." Do you even believe half the crap you type? You really make it too easy to rip on you. @Mart You're blind fanboyism is whats making it look blurry, nothing else. How many times have you violated your Xbox? I bet you put a dress on it. That's a USB port!!
The XBOXKing has spoken and as usually he can see and make sh*t out of thin air just to make PS3 look bad and cure his 10 year insomnia. Poor fella, this is what 10 year insomnia do to a person. If PS3 reign for another 5 year. I'm sure the king will pull the pin out of his head. Good catch Blitzed, my question to his statement, will simply 4 letter. "O RLY"
I'm gunna post a fake video of a PS3 v. 360 comparison, but use only the 360 version for both sides. My estimate? Marty-boy and Power of Green (funny its the same color as money) will still say that one is "slightly washed out and fuzzy."
i have to agree when people speak the truth. but they do look pretty much the same.....................NOW OFF TO SEE WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT THAT FOLKLORE REVIEW
Bubble for not giving a damn :D
PS3 version looks better. either way NBA 07 destroys this game supporting 1080p only possible on PS3.
isn't NBA the one getting the worst reviews out of the three? stay with the 1080p 60fps....its still sucks asss
I bet you don't even own a 1080p tv, and maybe not even a ps3.
so Peter Moore is doing his job?
NBA 2k8, not NBA LIVE 08. Peter moore not doing his job :)
Peter Moore is going for a hat trick EA will be the 3rd company in a row is finacially cripples.
maybe Peter Moore really works for Sony with the way he wrecked the dreamcast,xbox1 and soon to be 360, now he can add EA to his list. lol
If you guys see any difference then you must also be able to see the 4th Dimension. Anyway. They both look the same. I'll probably be picking up 2k8 for ps3 this time since I've started using my ps3 a lot more with Warhawk and everything. I got 2k7 for 360 last year ^_^.
they look just as bad on both. bad EA, bad.
Why is everyone saying this is EA? This is made my 2k sports(take -two)...Sigh. Oh wait...I think I spotted something...yeh you're right mart...ps3 has that one pixel there in the bottom right that's a little darker than the 360's pixel. Oh...and you can't even see the rim on the ps3 version. You have to guess where the basket is..it just cuts off...horrible. *end sarcasm*
Doesn't mean anything 2k has made it a mission to match games and they made the claim to do so. We don't know if they held back one version or got them close by taking advantage of both consoles to the best of their abilities. Games that look different on the 360 is due to devs not careing about matching the games they need to make the best they can at that given time to sell software. The game looks stellar none the less and the crowd is better than NBA live atleast dynamicly
Definitely better crowd, like you said. I do have to say though that if they pushed both systems to their full potential, they wouldn't look this close. You're not THAT stupid! The PS3 version would look WAY better than the 360 version if they actually pushed the hardware. I'm just saying dude...
The mart is right about half way through pause in the Wizzards staduim plain as day. The 360 version is less fuzzy more vibrant not as washed out and this footage isn't even HD, they did a good job though. No amount of attacking will change it.
grow up, if you judge weither to buy a game on such small difference then you shouldnt even be called a gamer! you guys are getting out of hand. if you want it buy it, regardless of what console you own. "if you stop it at 32 seconds in you can clearly see that the guy in the 27th row has a cap on and he doesnt in ____ version.... hahahaha ____ sucks!!!" pfft
The only thing I thought was that the player slamed harder on the "slam cam" on the PS3 version. LOL, but ultimately they looked the same. Good job 2k. You're reward will be customers on both sides of the console divide, and you deserve it.
I don't see much difference. But to be honest both look like crap. I think NBA live 08 looks better.
I agree they both look pretty crappy, at least after watching the hires one on gametrailes: http://www.gametrailers.com...
IMO, 2K has Live beat in player proportions, uniforms, and arenas. Live is superior in skin textures, and it's got the right idea when it comes to lighting, but they overdid it with the darkness.
ive had enough of all this comparison BS, its just done to encourage flame wars. does anyone othe than fanboys care... "oh i was gonna buy NBA 2K8 until i found out the shoe lace texture is better on _____ console..." this is such a load of crap, if you want/like the game then buy it, if you dont, well then dont. but if your put of by the smallest differences then IMO you didnt even really want it in the first place! who approves all this crap? i wanna headbutt their mum...
can i have them when you're done with it.
and as well all know comparing on a low rez vid streamed over the net is the best and only way to compare. [es]
and the game plays 100% smooth and fluid on PS3 graphics are a bit sharper on PS3 but after all, it's a great game for both systems.
and I don't think PS3 VS XBOX 360. I think more like last gen vs this gen and notice how little some of these games have progressed. NBA 2k8 is still using the same crap engine it was back on the PS2 and XBOX. Same with other games like WWE RAW VS Smachdown!. Just very crappy
Both versions seem identical to me
The game itself is awesome! I bought the 360 version over the PS3 version only because of the achievements. The graphics are amazing because of the animations. The animations in this game will blow your mind! As for the folks hyping Live 08 over NBA 2k8, I've played both and NBA 2k8 pwns Live 24/7. Peace!
Sega makes great multiplatform games on the PS3. Virtua Tennis was actually the better version on PS3 than the 360 and that came out in Febuary.
$60 for PS3 version $5 for 360 version decisions, decisions
Has reportedly saved small kittens from drowning and the 360 version only a puppy or two. I'm a cat fan so I'm going to have to go PS3 version I think. Graphically, I really wanted to notice a difference, but to my disappointment, there isn't one. Move along fanboys... buy the one on your system of choice.
Ps3 clearly is better than that other thing.. I forgot what it is already.