Check this gallery with comparison screenshots from Gran Turismo 5, Forza 3 and Test Drive Unlimited 2. Which game do you prefer?
Sees GT5 Vs Forza 3 and thinks fair enough but then see's test drive unlimited 2 in the comparision, what is the point in this very lame........ playing TDU2 as i speak and so far im enjoying it
First Killzone 2 now GT5 has to put up with all the comparisons? We know PS3 exclusives look the best no need to rub it in.
What you talking about KZ2 for ?
gt5 is the best looking racing game in universe .cars are really sexy and eiger and london are best looking tracks in all racing games.i dont know if this game is 1080 p or 720 p but 1080 p is really crap and i prefer 720 p and i think the reviewers played it in 1080 p and said those things about its graphics and said nfs hot pursuit is better than gt5 but i have them both and gt5 is much better than hot pursuit in 720 p .
Are you retarded? How is 720p better than 1080p?
Didn´t you know? 720P is the best, 1080P is just ugly. More detailed textures, less jaggies etc etc. Why would you want that? /s
and while there is slightley less pixelation when theres smoke and spray the graphics are alot worse. It definitley looks better in 1080p on my tv
gt5 runs at 1280p x 1080p
One of the weakest comparisons I have seen in ages and THAT says it all. Comparing GT5 to Forza 3 is bad enough, but TDU2 to GT5? That is a complete joke. There isn't enough doctoring in the world to be able to pull that feat off. TDU2 looks like an average first generation (this gen) title.
that last pics more or less defines GT5, it looks freakishly real !
ive got a pic i took on gt5 as my wallpaper on my playstation but ingame and replays dont look as good
but GT5 ingames looks better than any racers on console to date
That is because photo mode in GT5 renders at a higher resolution, much better shadow and lighting effects, better AA etc as it does not have to run 60 frames a second. Basically the high end post processing in photo mode is not actually in game because well....it cant do it and run 50+ frames a second. Many photo modes are like this. TDU2 looks good although i am playing the PC version, generally with 1080p natively and a bunch of anti aliasing its a rather pretty game as you drive around. On console much less so.
this game isnt 1080 p i think but if it is its 1080 p is really crap try 720 p then look for yourselves
It IS 1080p - 1080p is defined as 1080 vertical lines of pixels with the image progressively scanned - the fact that GT5 is not of native 1920*1080 resolution does not change that it is, natively, 1080p. People have this misconception a lot when talking about GT5. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... http://www.hdmi.org/learnin... http://www.foxtel.com.au/di... http://www.prillaman.net/ht...
Your incorrect... http://www.youtube.com/watc...
1080p is also often used as shorthand for 1920x1080 or Full HD when referring to somethings outputted resolution, as using the literal meaning of a term that allows for such variance is rather pointless, a video with a res of 1x1080 is by definition 1080p. When people say 1080p what they really mean to say is Full HD, but due to the way that TVs are marketed the terms have come to mean one in the same. It says all this in the wiki article you linked. So when people say GT5 is not in 1080p they mean that although it may be technically 1080p, it doesn't meat the industries marketed requirements for 1080p or Full HD.
we should just have a video comparing the cars in GT5, FM3, and TDRive2 with their real life counterparts. TD2 wont really fit but thats ok. Lets just compare the cars in GT5 and FM3 to the real cars. Nobody will say anything going against GT5 car models because theyre so detailed and perfectly modeled that no other game is going to be able to touch it.
No other game is going to be able to touch it? You're being a little extreme here.
Why the disagrees to Kon, when the next-gen racing games come out, they'll no doubt smoke these graphics, it's just common sense... It's inevitable.
I think the man has a point. No other developer would ever bother to render models with so many polygons hence the uber hight detail.
I think the man has a point. No other developer would ever bother to render models with so many polygons hence the uber high detail.
So the people disagreeing with me are basically saying that no other game, even next-gen ones, would have graphics like GT5.
Why do people try to rewrite history? GT5 was not the graphical powehouse you expected it to be, you should be more worried about Forza 4 and Crysis 2.
The secret of GT5's fidelity... http://www.alphaworks.ibm.c... http://www.realtimerenderin... http://www.yostuffs.com/200... http://www.blu-ray.net/
The PS3 is a powerful console but its nothing compared to technology released after 2007. 3 PS3s can do interactive ray-tracing but at something like 5FPS or less. http://www.youtube.com/watc... Here is ray-tracing done with Nvidia Cuda http://www.youtube.com/watc... MLAA is nice to have but looks no better than 4xMSAA this is because its a post process filter and not 1:1 http://media.bestofmicro.co... http://i.imgur.com/amVXr.gi... Nvidia is developing a new type of AA that is 1:1 and uses less computation power than MLAA XDR was a great technology and was aimed to be released for PCs but DDR3 got there first, XDR does have higher bandwidths but soon there will be DDR3 Quad Channel and DDR4. Also DDR5 has bandwidth of up to and over 200GB/s Blu Ray will be around for at least another 15 years but I think and most will agree when I say the next gen of console will all have Digital Download as their main selling platform, optical drives are all but dead and it would be a smarter choice to put media on flash storage. Example: USB 3.0 up to 600MB/s Theoretical Storage 2TB > SDHC up to 90MB/s Theoretical Storage 2TB Theoretical Blu Ray up to 54MB/s 12x speed Storage 128GB BDXL Blu Ray up to 9MB/s 2x speed (PS3) Storage 50GB BD-DL (PS3)
The technologies inside PS3 still meet the necessary requirements to meet the game studios needs to continue to produce better games end of story moving on...
Gran Turismo 5 is the best graphics racing game ever across every platform. The Racing/Driving Physics (Simulation Scale 1 = Worst and 10 = Best) iRacing = 10 rFactor = 9 Gran Turismo 5 = 8 Forza Motorsport 3 = 7 Dirt 2 = 6 Grid = 5 BLur = 4 Test Driver Unlimited = 3 Ridge Racer 7 = 2 Mario Kart Wii = 1 Other games depending of how the driving physics work could fall under any rank.
Anybody with half brain with some practical & logical sense can clearly see these other race sim series are currently out matched by gran turismo 5 for all aspects.That dose not mean the this won't change in the near future only time will tell but for now that's not the case.
Sony fans, I feel your pain, last gen when the Xbox was CLEARLY superior in graphics most people didnt seem to give a crap. Granted the Ps3 only has a slight edge this gen, but I feel your pain.
People. for sake of the world play GT5 before comparing it with forza and test drive before you speak. do you even know how it look with the dynamic weather and day and night transitions.
What a stupid comparison..Test drive's graphics are limited because the entire game is built to run online seamlessly with dozens of other drivers at any given time. Also given the amount of detail in the massive worlds, it's no suprise that these two simulators on closed courses have better graphics.