Side by side graphics comparison of the recently released Halo 3 screenshots and the CGI trailer that was released a while back. At least based on the images, the game holds up quite well in comparison.
differnet angles diffent backgrounds this is a waste of ur life comparing screen shots and CGI trailers why dont you wait till the game is out then compare it to Halo2! Hit disagree if ur a total Halo Fanatic! Few more days and we will all know the truth
Halo 3 is a first person shooter, if you're looking at Master Chief then it's not a real gameplay footage.
The game actually plays in 3rd person if you pick up certain weapons.
The camera in Halo 3 is detachable... so you can go into 3rd person view and take pics.
Go away. Nobody cares about your opinion.
Look at the current third / fourth gen games like Halo3 and Ninja Gaiden 2, and you can see that the xbox360 has maxed out graphically. They look pretty similar or even worse than first gen titles from the PS3 such as Motorstorm and Ninja Gaiden Sigma that's a remake port made by a branched off bunch of unimportant kids inexeperienced with the PS3. With an important title like Halo3, you'd think Microsoft would make a giant graphicall leap. But they couldn't. Grand Turimso 5 is only the beginning for the PS3, and you can tell that no xbox360 game ever will graphically compare. It'll only get better and better, wheras the XBOX360 has had two to three years already and there has been no sign of a graphical breakthrough at all. Grand Turismo 5 is a graphical breakthrough as Motostorm. I'd argue that the xbox360 cannot do Motostorm with all it's dust and mud and particle effects and lighting and physics. xbox360 is a 60mph car. PS3 is a 200-600 mph Lamborghinni beast. Microsoft plays dirty and changes laws and rules so that all cars faster than it must run at near 60mph so that it would be "fair" to them. They also place sneaky roadblocks and other dirty tricks along the way. But that is bad for ALL gamers. Because graphics will be capped off at 60mph instead of 600mph for this gen unless the PS3 finds a way to counter the bad people... Microsoft has committed the crime of knowingly releasing faulty hardware to the public. Microsoft has committed the crime of restricting all graphics power to their maximum level, which is pretty low. Micrsofot and xbots have committed the crime of unethical business practices as you see in this room and through bribed media and secret handshakes. All gamers suffer because of the xbox360 because all graphics are being capped off at 60mph when it should be 600mph or more this generation. We'll have to wait and see if the PS3 can outmanuever the unethical practices of their competition. You only resort to dirty tricks if you feel you cannot win fair and square. I do not believe that this gen should be capped off at 60mph with the xbox360. ALL GAMERS SHOULD REBEL AGAINST THIS, EVEN THE XBOTS.
This is a waste of time! Its obvious Halo 3 does not live up to the CGI just like all other games!
Secret stop spamming every Xbox360 thread with your shat.
They can't beat our trailers! That's so lame.. they should compare our trailers with theirs. Ours always win. SECRET U ARE WRONG! Xbox is a product by the USA, so like US automobiles.. xbox doesn't deliver. Playstation is made in Japan, so it rules! Just don't use your US cars analogy for the mighty Playstation 3! It just doesn't sound right.
If you take into consideration that most american car companies have their cars manufactured in Mexico to reduce labor costs and that Japanese car companies have their cars manufactured in the US for the same reason, your analogy is kind of flawed. IMO all games shouldn't use cgi cutscenes at all. They've reached the point where they can make the gameplay look good enough to do whatever they need to for the cutscenes in a game. The Metal Gear Solid series is a prime example. Every cutscene you see in those games are real time in engine. More games should follow in suit in this practice to get rid of these stupid CGI vs. Gameplay comparisons. Come this monday I won't care if the gameplay lives up to the CGI. I'll be too busy mowing down tards and noobs to care about petty things like this.
it seems that Bungie was telling the truth the CGI trailer was using game assets (ie 3D models). With the screen shots they use I can't tell the difference.
I agree with you. There is a little difference.
The spartan armor is a simple model so comparing it to CGI and ingame would yield little difference. I think the reason it looks the way it does was because it brought good performance on the regular xbox. What I really care about is how it plays.
4 days left.
Yeah they do look almost alike. Can't wait!!!
There is a bit of a difference, but not really that much, the CG trailer was a more gritty.
in the CGI master chiefs armor looks like its scratched up from battle, but in the game its shiny and new like mr. clean polished master chief
great comment with that picture! XD lmfao
I think CGI looks a lot better. But thats because it's CGI. Using models and whatnot. At least Bungie didn't claim that this was in-game footage...cough cough Killzone 2.
because you beat me to it
damn....i wanted to say that
-- At least Bungie didn't claim that this was in-game footage...cough cough Killzone 2. When did they say this? As I recall the E3 2005, was a video done by Sony to show what potentially was possible with the Playstation 3 it wasn't actually running off any graphics engine and was produced the same way most CGI videos are done.
http://www.gameklip.net/v/1... "Sony Computer Entertainment of America's Vice President, Jack Tretton, lies that E3 2005 Killzone footage was realtime and playable. A year later the truth is revealed on SpikeTV's Gamehead by a studio contacted by Sony to create the prerendered footage of Killzone for PS3." Edit: Here's another one for you http://www.gamespot.com/new... RUMOR #1: The Killzone PlayStation 3 tech demo was prerendered. "So how does Sony respond to the allegations? Far from being evasive, it met them head-on. "Yes, it is real time," a rep told GameSpot."
mentioned it was in game graphics, they just showed the video and ppl assumed or pushed the issue that it was in game. But what they did say was the game will have a similar feel like in the CGI video first shown on e3 Now going back to halo, i've been to the futureshop a few times and they were showing a video (low res though) on in game graphics and gameplay, if those are the graphics they are pretty behind gears of war.
Did you not watch the Video from sticky doja? Jack Tretton says it's real time and playable. I love games as much as the next gamer ps3 or 360 but you can't stick up for Sony's Lies. They have said more lies then any company. Face it Sony thinks by telling lies to their customers they will might sale an extra ps3 or so. I personally don't listen to Sony or MS. I just play the system and see whats good.
and look how awesome killzone 2 looks now. u xbots got Killzowned.
Bungie did claim they used the in-game engine for this trailer so...pfffffft jog on.
I do seem to remember someone telling me that the cgi video for Halo was real-time. Either way, it looks close enough that I really don't care. Same with Killzone. Luckily for me I'm going to be able to play both of these games and have fun while doing so. Too bad there's so many people out there that don't think they can enjoy one or the other just because it's not on their system...
both are un impressive, especially the in-game. Common, be honest, this game never was about good graphics...just sayin zall.
with yours. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm i wonder why. 2 people thinking the same thing. u guys are pretty pathetic. and sorry but halo 3 looks like halo 2 with a tiny upgrade in graphics. although i will say gameplay is where its at.
That really sucked.
But,last in game picture looked great.
That cgi is mixed with live action using the movie assets. the fact that the game is even remotely similar is astounding. I think many people are going to be pleasantly surprised with the end product.
i finished the game yesterday on normal difficulty, and i wouldn't advise people to play it on a bigger screen than 32" cause the graphics are just horrible, it looks like the game was made on the old Xbox and then ported to Xbox360... there isn't much difference between the beta and the final game on the visual part. I am really interested what will people say, when they see it by themselves, but i just want to warn people not even try the game on a projector, that would kill your eyes for sure... Edit: calm down XGamer, what are you 12 or what? i finished the game yesterday, you can give me some control questions if you dont believe me :D but i don't want to spoil the game for others... btw. the game took me about 6-8 hours to finish, the same as Gears. Bioshock is way better. Edit: hmm Bladestar aren't you a loyal MS shareholder?? nuff said... Edit: doublertist yep, i don't want to give away my gamertag ;)
wow! that's what I call a loyal sony fanboy... did you know yesterday I beat kill Zone 2 and I wouldnt recomend anyone playing this game.. the A.I is so bad that the enemies follow your line of fire and the bosses run like little b!tches... no but seriously... you can always give us your gamertag.. we can tell by the achivements if you are lying or not. something you can't do with the PS3.
You seriously try to hard.
i will be playing halo 3 this weekend as well on my friends chipped 360 cuz the game is all over the internet for dl right now and has been for almost a week already...
How about you tell us your gamer tag and we can look you up ourselves and see what you have played? Put up or shut up....such a great motto.
Where's your gamertag?
The outdoor graphics looks great, but would have to say the indoors is not very detailed. The AI is very good too.
I just hate little lying wannabe's. Damn you suck. Previous post, I'm going to be playing it in about 4 hrs, a few hrs. later, I just finished it in normal difficulty, lol, your pathetic. From what we've all seen, the game will look and play beautifully, so don't waste yourself.
though i'm ps-fan, I have to say Halo 3 looks great... there's little difference between those screens :)
This one is definately a console seller.. I hope they get one on the PS3 (I mean it), so I have a good excuse for getting a PS3..
Bladestar, I got a suggestion for you. go (((HOME))) and you'll see some acheivements. Halo 3 CGI doesnt even come close to the real game. not as close as Killzone 2 trailer did to the actual game.
How about you go ((HOME)) instead...oh wait thats right, you cant go ((HOME)) until 2008 now. H3 looks great...so did Killzone 2. Everyone just enjoy the games they have and the promise of whats yet to come.
It was never claimed that it would
Gameplay graphics? It only showed the screenshots of the commercial (CGI) and the in-game cut scenes.
i just wish the campaign was longer and why are you X-box Fans downplaying killzone it looks great as well and i can't wait to get my hands on it same for Halo 3. There are some great games coming out for both consoles it's a great time to be a gamer.
Sorry double post.
Halo 3 is a first person shooter. More like it's comparing a game cutscene to that commercial.
you can see Master Chief if you are equipped with a mountable machine/plasma gun or flamethrower, then the camera will switch over the shoulder.
lol where have you been. You do know that halo 3 has detacble camera and saved film to take it from any angle?
The saved film feature is in campaign and multiplayer so they just go back in 3rd person and take screenshots, why would their be a cutscene with him shooting the ground.
Not to mention the video editor which allows for many camera angles. Even if they were cut scene shots, Halo uses the game engine for its cut scenes, so everything always looks the same. Some people...
Do you now how long Halo 3 is? if so tell me. WTF is #1 talking about. 4 more days.
what im saying is this Screen Shots vs CGI will never show the whole picture, pun not intended! Even if you think it looks the same it still isnt the same thing. When i played HS i didnt find the gameplay to match the CGI, not even close! It looked good but it wasnt perfect like cutscenes or TV spots u see for all video games..... U ask how long Halo is? I would say 200hours! For me thats about a years worth of playing online i think. I will know for sure when i put down warhawk when socom4 or some other shooter catches my eye. No person can say Halo is short just like no one can say warhawk is short. Its endless
Damnit bladestar stop acting stupid and punch yourself in the face
I want to see the game in action. There should be all sorts of vidoes of the game at it's best. If you go by that, Super Smash Bros Melee looks awesome when you pause it. Can't wait till the release of this baby. It's got a lot to prove if it's gonna be the only game people will want to play the rest of this year.
Some peoples desparation to put this game down is ridiculous. We've been told you can move the camera around while in gameplay. This means that is pure 100% gameplay. Now to me those pics look almost identical, there's no way around it. So instead of being jealous, people should go and pick this game up.
If you think those pictures look the same, you're a retard. One looks like a game, the other looks like a movie. The game part looks impressive enough, but they have to prove to me that's how the game looks and plays all the time. Not just when you pause and get a close up of Master Chief. And don't tell me what to do with my money, f*ggot.
Your comment is completely uncalled for. You know CHANN is right. You are acting like a ignorant idiot over a game that you should really be getting ready to play for the fun of it. How can you people call your selves gamers and act like this? People like you are the reason I do not own a PS3. I just do not want anything to do with your type of stupidity. If i buy a PS3 is just feels like I am saying that you guys actions/lies/FUD/SPAM/B.S. are valid. You fanboys are killing the PS3 Now.
Funny Thammer, u implied that u do not own a ps3 simply because of the attitudes of ps3 fanboys. However, u fail to realize that 360 fanboys and ps3 fanboys are the same as they both bash each other to oblivion. Your failure to see so indicate that you favor the 360 over the ps3. Just like Bladestar, you never see him bashing 360 fanboys, since he is one himself.
PS3/Sony fans go all out to make fools of them self. If the 360 was such trash you would not even care. Butt... the drop dead truth is the 360 scares the [email protected] out of you because you see all your lies for the past two year come back to bite you. Ha HA suckers eat it. Halo 3 is bigger than the PS3. WOW a game that is bigger than a whole console. You guys are now reaping what you sew. If you were as smart as you try to act you would just stay out of the comments threads. You starting to make total fools of your selves.
How anyone can boast the visuals of Halo 3 considering the level at which many AAA games are at now. Comparing the CGI trailer, which were Hollywood standards, with cut-scenes or gameplay is laughable and simply pathetic.
For all those that were comparing the BETA Halo 3 saying it looks like HALO 2.5 what do you say now? Oh wait nothing because you are all looking stupid and have run away... Those images are a nice comparison I am amazed how awesome the ingame is! Oh and lastly...The game is only around 6.14gb and still hasn't used up the whole space.
Are you the same Supersaiyan that left a review of Heavenly Sword a month ago, on the play.com website, based on the 5minute demo on the PlayStation network? EDIT: I guess you disagreed meaning it's not the same Supersaiyan. I was hoping it wasn't. That would have been a new low of fanboyism though if it were true but I'm glad it weren't you.
There isn't a huge difference between the master chief models, but look at the backgrounds. The trees and dirt. The textures. I'm sure halo graphics will satisfy 99% of gamers out there.
Looks like they pretty much hit the target's center, it's a little off center but it's still accurate. These graphics. content and Bungie's near flawless gameplay make a mighty giant that's stepping on and crushing everything on the market right now.
You halo fanboys make it seem like that it's graphics are the best on the system. Which we all know isnt. Gameplay wise, the hype over this crap isnt even worth it. Gears of War is better than that piece of $hit halo and all u xbots need to swallow that and admit it.
you need to stop attempting to justify your purchase...and go back to the PS3 section and wait for some news : )