PSB: We have some Singleplayer gameplay footage from Killzone 3, Guerilla's upcoming shooter and it's simply awesome.
can't wait to get my hands on this
cant wail to play kz3. i have been playing the beta on botzone ever night for the last few weeks. i am ready lol.
I don't know about you but I found it didn't stick to it's original Killzone feel. Like sure the story and characters are but just the gameplay feels more COD then it does Killzone. Then again it's probably good since the PS3 COD is a disgrace.
Last video I'm gonna watch now.
and i have to agree with andrewryan. game felt like COD. i also didn't find it to be visually impressive. it was VERY visually busy...but visually busy =/= good (unless you're a fanboy apparently).
"visually busy =/= good (unless you're a fanboy apparently)." you do know that opinion = stupid, right?
kz3 does not play like CoD. STOP IT. it plays like kz3 period.
Raiinstorm81: Crysis. And that shit came out 3 (soon 4) years ago.
PC ftw! :)
Crysis does not. Cant you PC gamers admit that crysis has been beat? The only reason a PS3 cant run it is because of the big world it would have to render in real time @ those ultra high graphics. GG says killzone 3 has huge SP story mode level maps and the PS3 can run it but the maps are nowhere near crysis's size BUT killzone 3 has better graphics.
Na Crysis is still yet to be beaten. KZ3 is nice but it's still no Crysis.
can't ps3 fanboys admit they are blinded by their fanboyism? of course not...so how hypocritical is it for you to expect anyone else to do what you can't possibly accomplish. and yes, crysis still beats it...by far. and crysis doesn't cut corners either. every console shooter has to cut corners to achieve visuals that are even close (eg. heavy post processing, things in the distance aren't actually there, non-destructibility, limited color pallet, etc..) and it's not just crysis either. farcry 2 and bad company 2 both look better on PC than any console game as well. if you're a console only gamer, you're playin in the wrong generation. sorry to be the one to break this to you. oh what's the point...n4g has long since stopped being a site for a gamers and is just a place for people that will only EVER admit a game is bad if it's on a system other than ps3.
Spydiggity : you claim that ps3 fanboys are blinded by fanboyism and yet you make a fanboy statement. bravo, good for you. can't we just admit that both will be good and play games? no, that's too much to ask, right? only on n4g do we have these stupid fights. i'm getting both. i win.
Crysis 2 on consoles prove how weak the Crytek team is. All they can do is rely on high spec PC's. They can't optimize as good as Naughty Dog or Guerrilla Games.
Thereaperson I know I used to Benin love with kz2 but now I realize all those muddy textures and bad animations made it really look rather bad
You have my avatar! D:<
Now he has your nose! GET HIM!
Actually you have my avatar. You know the one I haven't changed since I joined in 2007
Why do you people nit-pick games? Games are meant to be fun, yet you PC/360 fanboys insist trolling the shit out of Ps3 exclusives. WHY? God forbid we be excited about games. Nitpicking games you will never play because you don't even own a Ps3... WTF is wrong with you people?!?!?! Killzone 3 is gonna be epic, and judging anything from a 10 minute youtube video is RETARDED!!! Go play Halo or Crysis, or something...
Shame about the audio in this vid
This is probably a flashback because Rico is still bald and their suits are similar to KZ2.
Or.....gasp. This part is right after KZ2.
Yeah, there is also a possibility that this is one of the "earliest" parts of the game.
its right after the secound game, as u can see the games telling u wat to do through totourials, like gurrella says, the killzone 3 starts right where killzone 2 left off
im sure its early in the game because there is kinda of a tutorial goin on either way tho i cant wait to play.
Brings FPS to another Level. I'm ready!
another level of generic.
you again ... come on man let us enjoy games.
I want you to enjoy your games, it just looks like more of the same that is all. Im sure the multi will be good, but the campaign looks average. Just seems really overhyped.
It is like I am watching any other military FPS being played. All the hype is exclusivity. Its incredibly bland looking. The gameplay is really mindless. All you have to do is walk forward and shoot, no tactics necessary.
Another generics and dumbs comments from 2 desperated fanboys multi account without games that can compete with best games of this gen, like kz2/3. Downplaying the best things, games, hardware, Help them probably to enjoy more inferiors gzmes znd hardware, but stop trying to lie to others, most of the real gamers know the truth.
"it just looks like more of the same that is all. Im sure the multi will be good, but the campaign looks average." to YOU going to every KZ article and b!tching about it hoping others will react thinking it makes a difference just annoys people. no one gains with you going on about how generic YOU think it is + you don't even look like your going to buy this game, why even bother comment? you like attention? sure, I go into Blops articles and b!tch because its a serious matter that affected people beyond a subjective manner (broken game, bad service, ect) but why are you herE? what did KZ do to you? is it all the PS3 fanboys saying it looks better than crysis? is that what hurt your feelings? ignore them just give it a break you sound like you have a grudge against a game = an inanimate object the saddest grudge a person could ever have.
@LunaticBrandon Except the OPM review says exactly the opposite and that "just walking forward and shooting" will get you killed. You can fire from cover in this game for a VERY important reason: That's how you survive.
DeathMetal1474: "Whatever guy, go enjoy your lame Killzone game, because I have no friends."
To visualb - He is entitled to express his opinion, just because it's different to your's does not give you the right to make immature personal attacks! What does it say about you if you if your ego is so fragile that you can't stand anyone disagreeing with you?
Obviously you have not played it. Til then keep assuming it won't be any good and when you do get a chance to play it then it will change your mind.
@OooSheeet It's not about his 'fragile' ego, It's about a lot of us knowing what his intentions are posting that comment. He's taking part in a smear campaign against a game many of us are very excited about and want to see succeed and his declaration of poor quality in the game is baseless. Generic is a very vague descriptive word you can put on 90% of the games out there - he can't tell us why because he doesn't know how to. His reasoning isn't descriptive at all. 'campaign just looks average' - 'it just seems like more of the same' that doesn't explain why it would be called 'generic.' If it's more 'killzone' that doesn't make it like every other game on the market. If it's average, why? I'm sure there's plenty of us on here ready to explain why it's more than average. Everything he said can be said about any shooter out there. If I had to guess, I'd say his words were chosen about how he 'feels' about the game and the platform it's on, rather than what the game is actually like. People want it to fail so 'their game' can be liked more by the masses (in his case it's PC gaming and Crysis). The 'entitled to voice his opinion' argument is just a sad way of not realizing we're all marketeers in our own way. Questioning someone's intentions is fair game if they can't back up their arguments.
@DeathMetal1474 Yeah it's overhyped. I'm getting it day 1 but to say KZ2 had a great story is stretching it by far! KZ2 looked great but that was about it, the MP was a bunch of spawn camping. Shhhh don't tell the truth in here though, you'll get the disagree police after you.
@Visualb "just give it a break you sound like you have a grudge against a game = an inanimate object" You sir are very ignorant to think that a videogame is an "inanimate object". Inanimate Object; Def: Lacking the quality or ability of motion; as an inanimate object. Yes, if you think of it as just an object(Disc or Cartridge)in a physical sense it will be inanimate, but we're all looking further along. Every Videogame out there has a form of animation in it. But I agree with everything else you said. Hozi
Does this video spoil anything story wise? Don't want to watch it if it has spoilers.
I love your avatar!
i stopped watching after about 45 seconds......i don't want anything ruined either.
We all love your avatar...keep posting so we may gaze upon the hilarious angry sackboy once more
2 bubbles say this is the sp demo thats suppose to hit psn store tuesday and its a pre build like me2 demo.
there is a demo for KZ coming THIS tuesday (feb.1st)??? i haven't heard about it.
Pretty sure the multi demo is this Tuesday and the single isn't til around the 14th or something, whatever Tuesday of that week is.
The 1st is for the Multiplayer demo, then the single player demo comes out the following week for PS+ Users and the next week after that for regular users. Then the game comes out. :)
and the 14th 0r 15th for everyone else....if I am correct
not the 1st but like a week later. forgot the date
hey, are you talking about the MP beta next week? you confused me when you said SP demo - i was thinking that there was a campaign demo coming that i hadn't heard about......still excited about the MP beta next week.
yeah its a SP demo coming as well....
Its not a demo. A trophy pops up while he is playing.
Nope afraid not it is the snow level coming.
Correct. The mp demo/beta is also the Frozen Dam snow level. Great level btw
Looks alright until you start to nitpick, which I shall now do. Animation is very clunky. I often read comments on here where someone says such and such game has bad animation because there are missing animation frames. The first part of the video shows some worringly frequent animation deficiencies. Boring gunplay. I hope there is more to the game than simple gun fights such as this, because for that whole vid the combat consisted of using absolutely no tactics. It was a straight forward sit behind cover with an assault rifle battles all the way through that vid. Dumb AI. What is going on with the friendly AI? They can't seem to make they're mind up as to what they want to do. They are always just standing around (especially in the last scene), and several times doubled back running straight into the player, or otherwise getting in the way. Similarly, the enemies used absolutely no team work at all. Graphics. Technically good, but still looks horrible. The fire moves too quickly (I said I was gonna nitpick), and is generally dull. The characters look like they have no personality at all, they all look somewhat dazed and emotionless. Surprising amount of aliasing too. Static Environment. I heard we were gonna see destructibility, but apparently not. All round unimpressive, looks like the multiplayer will be where the fun is at.
I fotgot you live in a world where fire moves slow.
Wait. . . People actually live on Helghan? I thought it was all fake! I WANT TO LIVE ON HELGHAN!!!!
I agree with pretty much everything you said, you PS3 fanboys need to stop lying to yourselves and you need to stop praising the faults in every PS3 exclusive.
They don't praise the faults, they praise what's good.
im sorry the game has its faults but like any gamer that calls himself a gamer im waiting until I PLAY THE GAME TO JUDGE until then, what I see is in the air. it looks good, and none of what he pointed out could ever be judged by watching a bad quality 10 min video on youtube man some people here call themselves gamers and jump the gun to say "beh this game is this n that" without ever even playing it, as if they know what they talk about, but its ALL made up you sound like you THINK you know what you are talking about, but you don't its sad =( stop it
Stop lying to yourself because you can't play games woth that kind of quality, f troll...and please, even if yiur unsecure fanboy mind prefer that kind of ugly video, search for real hd video, then you will stop writting bullcrzps and stzrt crying...
I'm writting 'bullcrzps'? Read your comment back to yourself and see how many spelling error's you can find. Why can't I play games 'woth' that kind of quality? As I've said I own a PS3, and yes I will still likely buy this game day 1 (the MP looks good and not much else new out recently that interests me). So yeah why can't I play games with that sort of quality? I can tell you as a matter of fact that I can play games with much higher quality than that, as I also I own a powerful PC (good enough to max Metro 2033 @1920x1080). I doubt I will find a single real HD video of Killzone 3 anywhere, as I doesn't render in real HD (1080p). Looking through your comment history in over 90% of the comments you feel the need to defend the PS3 or its 'solo' games, attack rival software/hardware, or call someone a fanboy. My favourite part is that you really believe that PC games generally have worse graphics than PS3 'solos'. You state DCUO as an example, yet the graphics on PC are still better if only marginally so (not surprising seeing as its made by SOE). Look at games like Medal of Honor, Mafia 2, GTA4, AvP and Metro 2033 to name just a few if you want to see just how much better PC is capable of over PS3.
well since its all subjective. I disagree, none of your points actually make objective sense, its all so subjective, I'll guess you are annoyed some people stated this would be better than crysis *looks at avatar* sorry man, its not KZ3's fault, its PS3's fanboys faults.
So to be a gamer you have to buy every game and buy every console according to your logic? I'm a not a stupid person who waists money, and I would never want to label myself a gamer. Being labelled a gamer is a disgrace.
None of my points make objective sense? Really? If you watch that video it is clear as anything that there are a lot of missing animation transitions (you only need to watch the first 2 minutes to see about 10 examples of this). That is not subjective! They are clearly missing and my point is therefore objective and fact based. Also, I was of the opinion that Guerilla said destruction would be featured quite prominently, upon further research I've found they never really stated how in depth it would be. But still, I expected something, maybe blowing out a wall to use as cover? Seemingly not though. The rest of my points could be seen as subjective I suppose, but I feel that if you really look at the video without bias (obviously some bias will be present in your mind, its impossible not to have any) then you must see that the combat had no depth to it at all. The enemies were always in one spot, they never surrounded the player, never flanked, never pressed forward, never retreated. They just sat behind their cover waiting to be shot. It was like shooting fish in a barrel for the whole 10 minutes of the video. You are right on one thing, it does annoy me that people state that this WILL/WOULD be better than Crysis 2. They are in no position to say that unless they have played a substantial amount of both games camplaign and multiplayer. KZ3 and C1 both were rated 91, so you can't just go on past showing and say X game will deffinetly be better than the other. However, if people merely say that they feel Killzone 3 will be better than Crysis 2, then thats OK because it's alright to have tentitive opinions, but it's not OK to have unfounded 'knowledge' as it seems, that one game will certainly be better than the other!
can magically turn Killzone 3 into a bad game. Unfortunately, Killzone 3 is a great Triple A game. And no amount of trolling will change that.