Gamersmint writes : Bethesda has released three new awesome looking screens for their upcoming game, Rage.
Agreed bro but people don't understand that the game runs at 60fps+sandbox and on console at 720p and it looks that good!
Can we use a word besides stunning. To the main point. This game looks great, for some reason whenever I see it I think Fallout meets Borderlands with better graphics, and since both of those games were great, that is definitely not a bad thing to be.
The lighting sells it. It's pretty awesome. Even though the textures are slightly flat-ish, it's the color and lighting which are good.
Awesome pics. The power of the ce... I mean.. PC.
hmm. nice but not that "stunning" people need to stop with the hyperbole
killzone 3 a run for its money graphics wise on consoles its rage
3 or 4 games already beat KZ3. KZ3's color filtered art doesn't make it the king.
@Tinasumsum Really? care to list them? I could use a laugh right now.
plan on naming said 3-4 games?
lol It's funny reading console gamers' comments fighting over table scraps while PC will have the undisputedly superior version.
^^^ So what, PC gamins so 90s get with the times, i f-in HATE Windows 7 and HATE usin my PC in general for that reason so if you think im gonna spend MORE time gamin on my PC your MAD buddy
PC "gamins" so 90s? PC gaming paves the path for consoles who follow their breadcrumb trail behind them and salvage what they can. PC will always be superior, and who cares if you don't like using PC? He didn't ask anyone to use PC more anyway, just stated it was better. Protip: using capital letters on words with meant impact looks silly.
1)I'd like to see these 3-4 console games that look better than Killzone. 2)It doesn't matter how much more powerful a PC might be, the PC will never get a Sony exclusive game. Brag all you want about your gaming-rigs, but if you don't own a PS3 AND PC, you're not getting everything you want.
Of course PC will always be superior...they release new hardware every six weeks... I'd be pretty ticked if I had to upgrade my console every six weeks just so I could say I'm "superior". That's not superior in my book...that's desperate for attention. Since I bought my PS3, I haven't felt the need to upgrade my PC even once, and I bought my PS3 at launch.
@ Toaster Funny because I thought PC gamers received the scraps: The multiplats. PC only gamers like yourself are missing out big time on all the GOTY console exclusives, the best games this gen in general according to award boards and reviewers (and more importantly, hardcore gamers)
Yeah, who cares if you get a better version on the PC, you don't want to be stuck in the "90s". That's so insulting it makes me not want to play a better version of a game. Dur.
...but no one gives a sh*t! I don't understand why you PC fanboys are so insecure. @HornyHaggis Crytek just said that developing for consoles allowed them to have a bigger budget and helped PC development. Sounds to me like consoles are benefiting the PC and not the other way around ;) Sounds to me like a lot of you PC fans are a little envy of some console exclusives that look very good and don't seem to far behind many PC games despite "lower frames and pixel resolution". So who cares. It looks good!
Rage is this and that but Rage hasn't come out yet. to be honest Carmack is starting to be to me the kid who has a toy knowing every kid on the playground wants that toy to play with it but teases them because they dont have it yet...i feel like beating up that kid and taking that toy-_-
meh those are all PC screens which are touched up as usual looks nowhere near KZ3 or UC2 for the matter by the way x360 screens untoched looks like LOL all those screens are super BULLSHOTS even on PC
to Dumb Mexican after that comment. Your crappy shit is 720 P at 30 FPS. That is so weak it;s not even funny. LOL PS3 fanboys dellusion
There's nothing wrong with 720p and steady 30fps or even 60 like many other console games. Besides, most TVs don't go over 720 or 1080 in the first place. You PC fanboys are so insecure.
that makes no sens you guys are the ones that think your games look close to the PC, when in FACT it's not close their is a HUGE difference between 30 FPS and 60 FPS and 1080 vs 720. LOL read the comments in here it's beyond dellusional. Yeah if it looks way better than console it must be bullshots. Fucking retards!
I wasn't agreeing with the "bullshots" argument. But I still stand by what I said above. There's nothing wrong with steady 30fps. And many console games do 60fps. TVs don't go past 1080, so why bother pushing console games to go further. The differences are unnoticeable. No one's being delusional. Everyone knows PCs can achieve higher specs. It is you, the insecure PC fans who go around all the time saying how inferior consoles are and how the graphics suck in comparison to the almighty PC.
for a game which still has sometime before release
These look impressive but they are still far from the best I've seen.
just out of curiosity what is the best you've seen?
1080p would be nice for starters.
My guess that it starts with either a K or a U, both end in a 3
@Munky: Or in a 2. Either would be true :)
They're not even close to rage. Rage's detail and texture resolution is unmatched. Rage's gigapixel texture technology produces the most crisp detail high rez textures ever! They are sharp from a mile away and still sharp zoomed in from a inch away.
^^^^oh boy another doubter screaming a multiplat is going to look better than a PS3 exclusive, werent you here yesterday when Crysis 2 got marked off the list of contenders?
Of course new engines running on new PC hardware is going to look better than ones optimised for old ps3. I know you like comparing games on consoles instead of in the highest quality possible, but then you really wouldn't be comparing the games would you?
Oh let me guess...
KILLZONE 3 AND UNCHARTED 3 IS BETTUR LUUUKING!!!!! /s
Sure. These new pics prove that this is the most technically advanced game on consoles to date. Open world world FPS HD game running at 60 FPS with the best lighting, animations, textures a console has ever seen. http://www.gamersmint.com/w... Give me some of what you and your agree-ers are smoking please!
This and Brink looks amazing. Can't wait!
Carmack got back.
why are you looking at carmacks ass?
Are these taken from the console version or the PC one? Looks too good to be a console game imo.
There are better looking console games, don't see how you reached that conclusion.
Not with the scale of Rage though... when you think about the scale of the game, that's when you see you how impressive it is.
The word "scale" is too loose. Do you mean explorability? because if you do then hmm, I agree (not that it means too much, mind you) But if you did mean scale then I'm guessing you haven't played God Of War 3 ;) the scale in that game is much bigger than Rage, and it looks quite a lot better too.
@jammydude By scale I figure he meant freeroam. Not large and linear. RAGE is also able to keep a consistent 60FPS. Something which even certain linear titles can't do.
Im talking about what Eiffel said for me. By scale, I'm talking about how huge the world is and how much of the world is able to be explored and have to be rendered with high textures. Sure there is a lot going on in GOW3 but everything going on in the background does not have to have a huge amount of detail for the player will never get that close to it.
LOL! This has to be from the PC version. There are not enough jaggies to be a console version in these pics.
I hope this will be on steam!
Of course it will. Nothing gets you more pumped for this game than the Quakecon trailer. http://www.youtube.com/watc... So glad to see ID Software back with one hell of a punch to the industry.
Can't wait for PC version!
Looks...okay. I don't see what the fuss is all about. I've seen better.
No you haven't :)
Yes, I have. The only thing this has over other games in my opinion, is the megatexture tech or whatever it's called.
Looks like you guys are going to have major struggle with denial for the rest of this generation. You shouldn't have hyped PS3 as the almighty.
^^^oh boy another doubter screaming a multiplat is going to look better than a PS3 exclusive, werent you here yesterday when Crysis 2 got marked off the list of contenders?
@Tinasumsum First off, don't group me with PS3 fanboys. You may not have actually stated it, but it's what you are implying. Denial has nothing to do with it. I could give a f*** whether or not the PS3 has the best graphics or not. I think many 360 games look better, including Gears 3. I also think many PS3 games look better. Have you ever thought to take your head out of your ass, and stop assuming that everyone who has a different opinion than yours is a fanboy or in denial? On a side note: I am basing my opinion on the countless HD videos and pics (including these), that I've seen of this game. And I will continue to come to the same conclusive opinion until I am proven otherwise (perhaps playing it and seeing it in person).
Best sky that i've seen so far
Rage will be a nice warm up; but im far more interested in Doom 4 - the graphic king shall return, and there's going to be hell to pay.
Imagine Fallout 4 looking like this *drool*
Which is actually a possibility, Bethesda hopes to to use the ID Software's ID Tech 5 engine for future releases.
Can you handle the truth :D
No thanks, you can keep your low resolution textures. And that is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of cold hard facts.
>confusing opinion with fact
For some reason these people are oblivious to how muddy their textures are. Probably because they've never seen a real high-res texture. I remember posting this texture comparison between Max Payne 2 and Alan Wake on the official Alan Wake forum. Got kicked off the forum for posting it. http://img707.imageshack.us... http://img684.imageshack.us...
Here's another one. How DARE I compare a game from 2003 to Alan Wake? I'm such a troll. http://img88.imageshack.us/...
It is a FACT. The consoles simply don't have the power to push anything but low rez textures. It is a matter of math, not opinion. LOL! ct03 made my point EXACTLY. And I would go so far as to say most of them are not really 100% what we mean when we say "texture" and are clueless that textures have their own resolutions...
@ JsonHenry, CT03 (PC fanboys) Firstly, you're both idiots. Secondly, you're both wrong. " Probably because they've never seen a real high-res texture." "It is a FACT. The consoles simply don't have the power to push anything but low rez textures. It is a matter of math, not opinion." Prepare your anus http://i.imgur.com/cPrJE.jp... http://iforce.co.nz/i/bfrej... http://iforce.co.nz/i/w3iwp... That's just the beta, and far from the best textures seen on consoles (some of the ice in UC2's ice levels are absolutely fantastic)
Rage is 60fps & its FANTASTIC ! I cant imagine Doom 4 with 30fps !!! and i have a question. is Rage graphics cell shade ? look at this : http://www.gamersmint.com/w...
No, it's not cellshaded. It just has thick black lines around objects which gives it a unique look.
Are you being sarcastic? You can't be serious right now...