It's not a nail'd on classic. Buy it and you'll feel stitch'd up.
wow, talk about conflicting reviews from the same site lol
i remember some article stating nail'd blows motorstorm out the water...someone please link it, then email the guy how he should quit life
And then link all the xbox fanboys that jumped on that article and told us for two days how awesome this game they'd never played was. We'll just chuck this in the Pure is better than Motorstorm Prototype is better than inFamous Banjo is better than LBP bin.
Pure can be considered pretty close to motorstorm. It's an awesome game.
loooooooooooooooooooooooooool is all i can say :p
I enjoyed this game more than most people i see.
3.8/10? Were they high when playing?
Would've gotten a higher score if they were high.
really low review score, and here i thought this game would replace Pure.
WOW - Nail'd is not THAT bad. I'd say 5 at WORST
Maybe the people disagreeing really thinks it that bad.
? http://ps3.nowgamer.com/rev... So are they saying the PS3 version is better?
Probably just different reviewers. IGN and Gamespot both gave it 5.5/10 but Gameinformer, which I usually agree with, gave it 8/10. I loved Pure. Might check this out when it's cheaper. Wish there was a demo for it.
No...they are saying the ps3 version got rated higher against other ps3 games, and the xbox version got rated lower against other xbox games. Just like ign. Just like every other game site out there.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.