Cynamite presents a graphic comparison between the ps3 and xbox 360 version of Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood. Jump and check the shot by shot comparison.
Who cares ? Not me.
you can enjoy both the same, your point google translate crappy website?
PS3 version with the exclusive content for me.
True, the point of the game is to enjoy it. this always end up the same way: Fanboy war.
Who cares? the Ps3 fans on the site should care since all they talk about is graphics.
until its ANOTHER multiplatform game that performs and looks worse on their system of choice. they have the most double standards of any fanboy group. exclusive dlc is now ok with this same group that cried, bitched, and screamed when ms was doing it more often, now its a good thing, go figure.
@ LilMissGoddess lol u got 9 disagrees but no explanation as to why you were wrong.
Apparently I am being summoned to explain my disagree. He said that there was a fanboy group worse than others. IMO all fanboys are massive annoying hypocrites, that constantly bicker over some proper noun against a group that likes a different proper noun. Pretty damn annoying if you ask me, no matter if they defend my plastic devices of choice.
get back in the kitchen
Terror_B and LilMissGoddess are exactly right. Multiplatform graphics never matter (you know since they're almost always better on the 360). The people who comment on this website are great. Sony will get praised for doing the exact same things that MS is condemned for. This is why I'm glad that Sony isn't at the top of the industry anymore. Not because I have anything against the hard working people at Sony who put out great products, but because the fanboys are indeed the worst, and Microsoft's success drives them nuts.
Indoor scenes look better for their 360 shots. Outdoor scenes look better for their PS3 shots. But any difference could be eliminated by adjusting the TV settings. These comparisons are meaningless.
Is it true PS3 version is getting some additional content?
Yes, it's already on the PSN if that's what you're talking about. Not to mention it's free.
Thank you man. Sounds nice. [email protected] bellow. U mad?
and you know what's funny raz? i don't see a bunch of xbox fanboys crying over it like YOU and ya sony brigade did when it was this way for the 360 and ms. funny how that works huh? whats even funnier is the sony camp on here brag about how they are "more mature" than the "xbots" lmfao. i didn't know being a hypocrite equalled maturity. i have both consoles and i have for well over a yr now. i'll get this game for my ps3 because i like its controller for this type of game slightly more. nothing else. i beat ac2 on the ps3 after i owned it for my 360 because of the controller, and because it was the only game that i ever had that got "corrupt saved data". so i completed it on ps3, but i got to tell ya, the screen tearing was an awful bitch in the ps3 version of that, and also the frame rate would drop, and the game would freeze for a second at times. performance, in my opinion is a lot more to me than extra content. im hoping like hell that this game doesn't perfom as bad as ac2 did on the ps3. the extra content to me is just that EXTRA. edit- of course 2 disagrees form the sony fanboy camp on n4g, and not ONE response with any kind of "rebuttle" all i said was TRUE, but keep on being hypocrites and lying to yourselves and others on here about some multiplats for the ps3. i got the trophies to prove my statement, and i am glad i don't live in delusion land like most of you.
dude WTH, he was just doin a question, this wall of text u just wrote shows how ridiculous and butt-hurt you r cuz of it,
You don't own a PS3. Don't pretend you do. You just own a 360 and want to bash on the PS3. If you think you are so mature than why are you getting into this whole 360vsPS3 stuff?? Why are you trying to convince the "fanboys" that you are right? If you would be mature enough you wouldn't gave a damn about the whole story. Also if you must know 360 owners gave a lot of crap to PS3 owners when the PS3 was released and a year and a half after that as well. But fanboys will be fanboys and fight a war that only exists on the internet. As for graphics, I think everyone likes nice graphics no matter what platform but a true gamer is more concerned with gameplay not with pixel counting. Also it has been proven that the PS3 is capable of more than the 360 with games such as Uncharted 1 and 2, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo 5. Why are we keep on talking about 360power vs PS3power?? it's the devs who program a game for the 360 first and than port it to the PS3, no wonder it will look worst on the PS3. I thought everyone knew that by now. Some developers are not talented enough or don't have the resources to completely utilize the PS3. If they wanted to do that they would have needed much more time and money.
WOW! I love my PS3 and 360. And to be quite honest, there isnt much difference between both versions!
LilMissGoddess does infact own a PS3
@lilmiss I disagreed with you just cuz you went super-saiyan postal on everyone over an irrelevant disagree tab, right after preaching about maturity & hypocrites. lol
I recognise that account lmao.
this is why women should stick to wii and Kinect
Are you crying about other people crying. ALL fanboys need to get a life
yeah really.......who cares?
who keeps on approving these websites!? sees Google uberwhatever..........closes window
They look almost identical so the real question is would you trade free downloadable content for almost identical graphics?
i'm just happy the ps3 version is much better looking than AC2. Even ign said so (although I h8 them :P)
They both look great. They're very close too, but the xbox version looks darker in those pics. I'd say they look equally good.
you know what kind of comparisons i hate the most. The kind where they raise the contrast of the PS3 version so high that it looks terrible. Lens of Truth is a perfect example of this and they do this with every comparisons. Meanwhile this german site does it and both versions end up looking the same except for the slight texture blurring that QAA causes
Why don't you get a screen grab from your TV with the correct contrast levels? You PS3 fanboys or so stupid, with all the time you people spend bashing sites over things you can't possible understand you could have gotten a job at Toco Bell and bought yourself a real system (XBOX 360 baby). We Xbox owners automatically have every game upscaled to 1080p and no stupid Super White Full RGB settings to worry about.
stop with the bullshit already we dont need this flamebait I say play with what you got, its like me putting someone down for reading a paperback version of a novel while I assume my hardcover edition is better.
So PS3 version for me!
Does Ubisoft console lock saved game file again the PS3 version? I'm getting very tired of games that lock the saved game file to the console and stuck only able to play the same game progress on one console.
Ubi showing they don't have a clue at handling the Ps3 by giving out exclusive, feel better ps3owners, content. I cannot believe, as a staunch Sony supporter, anyone else can support this team and their games. I just can't. Every version of Assassins Creed has lacked in a big way graphically on the Ps3 when compared to the xbox 360's version. And that's another thing I'd like to bring up. My comments here will probably be considered trolling for some stupid ass reason, but news threads about graphics comparisons that show how one sided one version is over the other isn't considered trolling. Go figure. But it's all moot anyways. It's clear Ubi knows one thing and that's this game and its engine. This whole series is nothing more than a skin for Prince of Persia. It's the same damn game almost. It plays almost just like it too. It's like Ubi's own way of squeezing more and more life out of their weak engines to make a few more dollars before people catch on. I'm a proud owner of ZERO Ubi-Soft games.
maybe that reason is you have two bubbles and your reputation is correct? They've also admitted to having issues in the past and that the PS3 version was inferior but every indication is this time is much more on level with the 360 considering it was built on the PS3 as the lead platform.
@babytownfrolics You gave the most epic-positive answer ever!!! Especially the comparison with a novel hardback vs a paper back book of the same story how nothing changed just its cover. Multiplatformed games are the same regaurdless of look and gameplay its the same story thats all that matters.
is all right. the 360 version of AC2 has better frma rate and detailed visuals, but that i know because i played both. If you pick the PS3 version without playing the 360 there would be no issues whatsoever
Seriously why? WHY do the pictures got too have different brightness? 360 screens is like looking in to the soul of Bobby kotick and ps3 looks like if youve got a fucking flash grenade up your face...
I bought my copy for 360. I thought about getting it for PS3 for the content, but I've seen articles which state the 360 version is better. The best thing about owning both consoles is I can buy the best version of any game, plus I get the exclusives for both consoles. It's funny how PS3-only fanboys claimed that MS getting exclusive game content was BS, but now that PS3 has exclusive content, they're all for it.... Double standards, anyone?
unless the game is also on PC....do you also not realize by now PS3 games are getting exclusive content because graphics/performance wise they're not up to par with the 360 version? before 360 was getting the superior version AND exclusive DLC now at least its being evened out.
Yeah AC2 was not great on ps3. Brotherhood is fine, dualshock is much better for this type of game imo and you get added content and for MP like this game, the ps3 fanbase will be much better imo. just opinion.
don't tell them Sony psid for the exclusive DLC...they'll bitch and moan about it.
Got mine for the PS3... because I own a PS3. Simple as that
saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa me !!!!!!!!!!! i just bought the game but my brother took it -.-... he will finish it same day >.<...
They look pretty much exactly the same. Nothing noticable really unless you're looking for it. If I get it, I'll probably get it for PS3 just because I like trophies better than achievements.
These comparisons really need to die and be buried for good.
PS3 OWNS the competition in the Graphics department. Who gives a damn which multiplat game looks better. If the Xbox version looks better, then the developers were lazy for the PS3. Why do they always compare Multiplat Games? It's a FACT the PS3 has better graphics. The title for this should be as follows: Were the developers of "said game" LAZY on the PS3 side once again???
lol, yeah blame the lazy developers! Guess youll have to step in and show them how to develop for the system. Since it seems like you yourself know how to develop video games.
In his defense, I know that Honda engineers design better cars than Chevy engineers, even though I don't know how to design a car myself.
UGH. Enough with the german websites with their stupid screenshot comparisons.
first off get off your high horse. it isn't a fact ps3 has better graphics, the only fact about that statement is that sony has talented first party devs, that they FUND and support with the developement of their games. ms does not. lazy devs huh? never heard that one before...... shakes head, ya know it has a lot to do with time, money, and resources right? lazyiness has nothing to do with it. these guys have dead lines to meet too. ya know, you say that but i could say sony was stupid in designing the ps3 with its "foreign" architecture, which doesn't allow for easy, efficient, coding. love my ps3, not a ps3 fanboy like you and the others, but saying the same comment that YOU guys have been posting for 4 damn yrs on here is gotten past the point of getting old. the flip side is it has been 4 yrs and well the devs should know better, but i still stand where i say it is more of time, resources, and money. i believe 4 yrs is plenty of time, really longer than that for devs to get a handle on something, but the same tiring excuses from guys like you just suck. you may need a better understanding of how the world works. as long as it is an improvement over ac2, then thats really all that should matter. grow up, and when you develope a game on ps3, then i'll listen to your fanboy excuses, and the bashing of REAL devs a little more ok?
lol u seem to be trying to get a point across cause u posted 3 comments CMON! troll
If you'd actually read LilMissGoddess' comment, you'd find that it actually makes valid points. You may or may not disagree with it because of your opinion, but he/she is not trolling.
Troll or not he is trying to hard. Really he posted like 3 essay post and no one is not even going to care for it or even read it. Just another fool who is complaining and he is being disagreed on because he is being a bich. Seriously is n4g not politics or the world. That's why I disagree with him or her, because you take this site to seriously like your post about.
Dev's are lazy and many still don't understand the PS3. And Black Ops (while still fun) is prof of that!
I'm picking up the 360 version being as I've brought all of them on my 360.
I'm far from a fanboy. I own both systems, and I always do my research before I buy. I just leaned 360 this time due to my friends, crossgame chat, and live. Other than that, they look identical. Who knows how accurate their TV settings are? I know the PS3 is powerful. Just look at GOW 3. It's that the 360 uses PC arcitecture, and its easier to code for. Other than exclusives, and FF13 lol, I've been leaning xbox. Although, I spend a fair amount of time in Home too. LOL. BTW who cares? It looks basically the same.
lol @ sony for paying for this DLC
version will look leagues beyond both consoles making their minor differences negligble.
Really? Looks like a bit higher resolution and some mildly better textures to me. Leagues better? Hardly. Go back 10 years if you want to see when PCs TRULY beat down consoles. These days you're just splitting hairs.
Look at 360 fans complaining about dlc. Ms gets bash because they pay cash amount of money just for a dlc, that will also come out on the ps3 later. And all that money could have been into a new ip or exclusive. Sony on the other hand been pushing out new ips like crazy this gen. I also love how this fanboy war is turning out. Ps3 fanboy brags exclusive While 360 fanboy brags multi. Funny
My version looks the best, :) This articles are crap..
I set my Super White to "No" and Full RGB to limited and the image still looks washed out. What did I do wrong Sony? Should I play through composite video because thats the cable it came with? I mean I have such a super powerful cell system with all the HD sheetings in the world, but the system comes with composite cable. Why would Sony suggested we play with composite cables? Does the PS3 upscale to 1080p with these composite cables. Just Asking.
Everyone knows that AC is the good series to play on all formats so why bother to compare them? It's good enough for all of Us to enjoy? Then what does the graphics have to do with Me or You playing it? Only the case where You have both PS3 and 360 makes sense to compare for the better experience...
...the 360 version is better visually. However, the PS3 version has extra content. IMO, neither are worth my money.