In this screenshot check they compared the PS3 version to the Xbox 360 one of Two Worlds 2. As you can see on the first image, the PlayStation 3 version has more blurry textures.
Unfortunately when It comes to Two Worlds (2).. I'm more concerned about the quality of the title.. before I start worrying about the port/best platform. The first one was quite... unimpressive.
This is still flamebait.
Yes the first one wasnt the greatest thing ever, it was filled with more bugs than anything else and ran at like 20 FPS, but you know what? The core gameply was still great, I played TW2 at E3 this year and the game looks great in motion and plays very well too.
It's flamebait but one can't help but wonder what happened. I mean is PS3 seriously that hard to program for or what. 360 is the to go on multi-plats going by this trend.
ther are actually alot of people here with a 360 and a ps3, and Id assume they would prefer to know the differences in order to get the most for their 60$. but like the other guy said, we should be more worried about what kind of improvements have been made over the original for this game, not what version looks better.
A crappy port for a likely crappy sequel to a crappy game.
True ^^ however TW2 looks awesome and i have to take that the ps3 was taken at a different time in game lol since the lighting is non exsistent.. Also this game was made using like 4 different versions of the GRACE engine and they announced that it will look better on ps3 but run smoother on the xbox 360..
Wow. Two Worlds II looks terrible on PS3.
You think the 360 version looks good? You know you're a fanboy when you think one turd looks better than another.
But the ps3's turd is uglier and smellier so. . .yeah
What's wrong with the lighting on the 360 version?? Looks so rough! :-/
As i could tell only difference was the lighting and he could have been playing at a different time of day on the ps3.. And on the second image the ps3 character model looks alot better than the 360's but yeh 360 one is looking nice ^^
ugly...ugly game.Man...those textures...f.u.g.l.y.
I don't care which version looks better.
I have seen much better screens of this game earlier this year I can not believe that these are in HD screens. The PS3 version looks like SD screens not HD.
that Two Worlds 2 is possibly the dumbest title for a game ever.
I'm glad some1 other than me thinks so. Here's a bubble :)
I still think "Divine Divinity" is worse though.
...that's redundantly redundant. :D
That title was created in the Redundancy Office Of Redundancy!!!
For once a screenshot comparison that doesn't have the word 'stunning' in its title.
I honestly can't tell which I prefer. The PS3's is dull, not actually blurry, but the uniform lighting makes it look that way. And the 360's has such a high shadow bias, it makes my eyes water to look at it, like when you look out on a sunny day from the shade. From these shots, you may as well just stick to Oblivion, which came out a long time ago.
Ow Pc version it is then.
If you have a PC, you may as well just get Oblivion and a bunch of Mods.
For a huge RPG I didnt expect mind blowing Uncharted 2 level stuff here, the game looks great though and I will be buying it. been in need of a good Euro RPG.
Favorite things of fanboys to do is compare screenshots and argue about them. Seriously....who the fuck cares?? Just buy it on the system you want to play it on.
but...but one has to be better than the other! Really though I hate screenshot wars myself.
I have both 360 and ps3 and will always like to know which is better. If im going to spend 60$ on a game, im going to buy the best version possible. You say "just buy the system you want to play it on" which makes sense if you have no choice because that decision has already been made for you. But Id like to know the differences so that I can choose which system to play it on. Im guessing you have a ps3 and would not be complaining if the 360 wasnt usually the better looking version of multiplats. Single console owners can brag or bitch about comparisons all day, it wont change their version. These comparisons are for people who have a choice and want to get the most for their money.
That's is what you get when a multiplatform adept to the weakest platform and sure it's the 360 in that case. I hope the PC version will not get bumped down by the weakest platform but i don't have fait with it so i will pass this multiplatform game. Edit: I see, some people will not see the true about that, if you are stealth disagree with me give some arguments than? First, the game is gimped! Even the PC version will be gimped becouse it's also on PS3 and 360 and it must keep the same more or less. PC version is always little better than PS3/360 version, but not to much and that's is the point what i mention GIMPED!! The only what PC version will better is the 1080p resolution nothing more. I have Nvidia 480 GTX and i know this beast can much more than this silly screenshot. Second, the game looks UGLY! ----------------------------- ---------------------------- Clarence That's why i get those disagree's :) PC version can also much better than this. That's why i agee with you, but next time don't forget the PC.
The PC version will run on DX11, so expect tessellation, soft particles, soft shadows, SSAO in addition to other PC stuff like much higher resolutions and better textures, etc. I also heard the PC version will support multiplayer lobbies, where 50 players can interact and form groups (think Guild Wars). But like everyone else said, none of this matters if the game is absolute crap.
The game is just fine so dont worry about the game being crap. EDIT: I played it at E3 so I do know how it plays.
The ps3 version is crappy because of the 360?? Lol so thats why ALL multiplats are better on 360? Shouldn't the 360 then be the console that always trails? I mean sure they can stunt the leading platform's performance but then shouldn't the WEAKER console have WEAKER performance? Would love to hear you explain bayonetta and the orange box which were ported by 2 different companies. Oh and Medal of Honor...ps3 was the lead and lo and behold, performs better on 360. How do you explain that huh smart guy?
All multiplats you say ALL of them maybe try not being a fanboy most multiplats have there own weakness on each system there on but then again who cares about multiplats when exclusives show what the console is made of but then you wouldnt know about that you own a 360. Another note MOH wasnt lead on the ps3 douche bag.
Please real killer. You do not own a 480GTX nor do you PC game. The only system you have is the PS3. You're the same guy who stated on this site that the RSX inside the PS3 is more powerful then the This generation of GPUS from Nvidia and AMD.
We all know the PS3 is capable of much better graphics than this. It has proven time and time again with their exclusives. Make the PS3 the lead and this wouldn't happen.
doesnt all the sudden make the developers more talented or have more developement time. The pc version will look great Im sure, but you cant expect a multiplatform dev to get the same performance out of the ps3 as a 1st party dev. who only has to work on one version of their game. Also, games like ghost busters have turned out worse on PS3 even thought ps3 was the lead platform. Simply making the ps3 the lead platform will not solve their problems.
yeh multiplats cos there soooooo important to 360 owners with no actual exclusives to play lol
i need another comparision. game look like **** in those pics. and worest in xbox360
I will pass.
I think these are pc shots from two worlds 2 forum. http://vnfiles.ign.com/twow... http://vnfiles.ign.com/twow... http://vnfiles.ign.com/twow... http://vnfiles.ign.com/twow... http://vnfiles.ign.com/twow...
as long as it dont have bad jaggies everywhere i could care less about textures
Insted of calling it a turd some people shoud start looking for the reviews that are already out and place the game on 9/10!And are not bias reviews!Check the Two worls 2 forums http://www.google.pt/url?sa...
Agreed. it has 4 reviews out and the lowest so far is 90% even if it gets lower scores I think overall it will be a much better game than the first, they have really taken the criticism they received to heart. plus after the main quest is finished you can carry on, which seems to be missing lately, any way I can't wait to start sailing and exploring all the islands, crafting new weapons etc...
oh what??, the xbox 360 version is better?...nooo really?
This has got to be Fake. There is NO WAY the PS3's version looks that bad. I don't believe it. No, I won't believe it.
Look at all the screen shots, the 3rd one makes the PS3 look better.
360 version is subhd. I think. Looks blurry. But both don't look great anyway,lol.
The top pics are ps3, not 360.
i hate overblown lighting, so ps3 looks better imo. is anyone else tired of shit always shiny!?
if you actually full screen you can see which is better... but i doubt even 10 percent of yall hit the full screen button.
No. As I can see in the first image, PS3 is packing depth of field. The textures are like-for-like. The main difference is the lighting. Dull on the PS3, and completely over-blown on the 360. Both look bad.
The game is a pile of dump unless you like playing piles of dump get something else.
Shit name. Shit graphics. Shit franchise. Its well...shit.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.